切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (04) : 209 -217. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2023.04.003

股骨骨折

两种髓内钉固定A3.1粗隆间骨折的有限元分析:增强型PFNA与InterTan
张乾龙, 王继荣, 宋晨辉, 刘修信, 任政, 刘宇哲, 阿里木江·玉素甫, 覃祺, 冉建()   
  1. 450000 郑州,河南大学附属郑州市骨科医院关节外科
    841000 库尔勒,解放军陆军第951医院骨科
    830054 乌鲁木齐,新疆医科大学;830002 乌鲁木齐,新疆医科大学第六附属医院创伤骨科
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-09 出版日期:2023-08-05
  • 通信作者: 冉建
  • 基金资助:
    新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金资助项目(2021D01C454)

Finite Element Analysis of Two Kinds of Intramedullary Nails Fixing A3.1 Intertrochanteric Fracture: Enhanced PFNA and Intertan

Qianlong Zhang, Jirong Wang, Chenhui Song, Xiuxin Liu, Zheng Ren, Yuzhe Liu, Yusufu Alimujiang, Qi Qin, Jian Ran()   

  1. Department of Joint Surgery, Zhengzhou Orthopedic Hospital Affiliated to Henan University, Zhengzhou 450000, China
    Department of Orthopedics, The 951st Hospital of the PLA Army, Korla 841000, China
    Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, China; Department of Trauma Orthopedics, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830002, China
  • Received:2023-03-09 Published:2023-08-05
  • Corresponding author: Jian Ran
引用本文:

张乾龙, 王继荣, 宋晨辉, 刘修信, 任政, 刘宇哲, 阿里木江·玉素甫, 覃祺, 冉建. 两种髓内钉固定A3.1粗隆间骨折的有限元分析:增强型PFNA与InterTan[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 209-217.

Qianlong Zhang, Jirong Wang, Chenhui Song, Xiuxin Liu, Zheng Ren, Yuzhe Liu, Yusufu Alimujiang, Qi Qin, Jian Ran. Finite Element Analysis of Two Kinds of Intramedullary Nails Fixing A3.1 Intertrochanteric Fracture: Enhanced PFNA and Intertan[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2023, 09(04): 209-217.

目的

模拟增强型PFNA和联合加压交锁髓内钉Intertan治疗骨质疏松老年反粗隆间骨折的生物力学性能并比较其优劣。

方法

采用有限元分析法分别建立增强型PFNA和Intertan固定股骨粗隆间骨折(AO分型31~A3.1型)模型,比较2种模型内植物与股骨的总应力分布、应力峰值及位移。

结果

两组内固定等效应力均主要分布与主钉内侧,增强型PFNA组最大等效应力位于主钉与远端螺钉交界处,为192.76 Mpa,Intertan组最大等效应力位于联合交锁钉与拉力螺钉交界处,为395.87;(2)增强型PFNA组与Intertan组均发生了不同程度的位移,最大位置均位于股骨头,并逐渐向远端见效,两股骨头处的位移峰值分别为:增强型PFNA组:4.562 mm,Intertan组:4.68 mm。

结论

两组内固定物的最大等效应力均位于髓内钉上,并远大于股骨上承担的应力,说明在两组内固定对于股骨粗隆间骨折均是有效的,在术后早期内固定物承担最大的应力,缓解了股骨上的应力,有利于骨折愈合,但增强型PFNA组的最大等效应力较小,相对Intertan组更加稳定,减少了出现内固定失效的风险。使用增强型PFNA固定时,股骨承担的应力更小,能起到更好的支撑作用。因此增强型PFNA是老年骨质疏松性反粗隆间骨折的更佳选择。

Objective

To simulate the biomechanical properties of enhanced PFNA and compression interlocking intramedullary nail Intertan in the treatment of elderly anti-trochanteric fractures with osteoporosis.

Methods

Three-dimensional finite element method was used to establish the model of enhanced PFNA and Intertan fixation for intertrochanteric fracture (AO classification 3.1). The total stress distribution, peak stress and displacement of the two models were compared.

Results

The equivalent stress of internal fixation in both groups was mainly distributed on the medial side of the main screw. The maximum equivalent stress in the enhanced PFNA group was located at the junction of the main screw and the distal screw, which was 192.76 Mpa, while the maximum equivalent stress in the Intertan group was located at the junction of the oblique screw and the lag screw, which was 395.87; (2) Both the enhanced PFNA group and the Intertan group had different degrees of displacement. The maximum position was located in the femoral head and gradually took effect to the distal end. The peak displacement of the two femoral heads was 4.562 mm in the enhanced PFNA group and 4.68 mm in the Intertan group.

Conclusions

The maximum equivalent stress of the internal fixation in both groups is located on the intramedullary nail, and is far greater than the stress borne on the femur, which indicates that the internal fixation in both groups is effective for the intertrochanteric fracture of the femur. In the early postoperative period, the internal fixation bears the maximum stress, relieves the stress on the femur, and is conducive to fracture healing. However, the maximum equivalent stress in the enhanced PFNA group is smaller, which is more stable than that in the Intertan group, The risk of internal fixation failure is reduced. When using enhanced PFNA fixation, the femur bears less stress and can play a better supporting role. Therefore, enhanced PFNA is a better choice for senile osteoporotic intertrochanteric fracture.

图2 抑制除股骨以外的其他骨,保留股骨示意图
图6 反股骨粗隆间骨折示意图
图17~19 Intertan装配后示意图。图17 正位;图18 侧位;图19 轴位
表1 模型材料属性
图37~38 骨水泥与拉力螺钉应力分布及应力峰值云图。图37 增强型PFNA组;图38 Intertan组
表2 模型单元节点数
图41~42 两种不同内固定类型等效应力、位移柱状图
1
Parker M, Johansen A. Hip fracture [J]. BMJ, 2006, 333(7557): 27-30.
2
Law GW, Wong YR, Gardner A, et al. Intramedullary nailing confers an increased risk of medial migration compared to dynamic hip screw fixation in unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures [J]. Injury, 2021, 52(11): 3440-3445.
3
Ze Zhang, Yudian Qiu, Yawen Zhang, et al. Global Trends in Intertrochanteric Hip Fracture Research From 2001 to 2020: A Bibliometric and Visualized Study [J]. Front Surg, 2021, 8(12): 756614.
4
Chang SM, Hou ZY, Hu SJ, et al. Intertrochanteric femur fracture treatment in Asia: what we know and what the world can learn [J]. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 2020, 51(2): 189-205.
5
朱燕宾,陈伟,叶丹丹, 等. 股骨近端N三角理论及股骨近端仿生髓内钉(PFNB)的设计理念 [J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2021, 07(5): 257-259.
6
Ftouh S, Morga A, Swift C, et al. Management of hip fracture in adults: summary of Nice guidance [J]. BMJ, 2011, 342: d3304.
7
Niu E, Yang A, Harris AH, et al. Which fixation device is preferred for surgical treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in the United States?a survey of orthopaedic surgeons [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2015, 473(11): 3647-3655.
8
Palm H. Hip Fracture: The Choice of Surgery [M]//FALASCHI P, MARSH D. Orthogeriatrics: The Management of Older Patients with Fragility Fractures. Cham (CH). 2021: 125-141.
9
Smith L, Albersheim M, Blaschke BL, et al. Trend and economic implications of implant selection in the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures: a review of the American board of orthopaedic surgery database from 2007 to 2017 [J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2021, 29(18): 789-795.
10
Roberts KC, Brox WT, Jevsevar DS, et al. Management of hip fractures in the elderly [J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2015, 23(2): 131-137.
11
钱玉,史航,朱爱祥, 等. 普通型与骨水泥强化型股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的对比研究 [J]. 东南大学学报:医学版, 2021, 40(2): 189-194.
12
田智勇,陈洪强,戴科晶, 等. 股骨近端防旋髓内钉骨水泥增强固定治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的疗效分析 [J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2021, 23(6): 539-542.
13
黄培镇,陈心敏,郑利钦, 等. 骨水泥增强股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗高龄不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的有限元分析 [J]. 天津医药, 2020, 48(5): 385-390,后插2.
14
Schuetze K, Ehinger S, Eickhoff A, et al. Cement augmentation of the proximal femur nail antirotation: is it safe? [J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2021, 141(5): 803-811.
15
Serrano R, Blair JA, Watson DT, et al. Cephalomedullary nail fixation of intertrochanteric femur fractures:are two proximal screws better than one? [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2017, 31(11): 577-582.
16
Liu W, Liu J, Ji GR. Comparison of clinical outcomes with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus InterTAN nail for intertrochanteric femoral fractures: a meta-analysis [J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2020, 15(1): 500.
17
Geller JA, Saifi C, Morrison TA, et al. Tip-apex distance of intramedullary devices as a predictor of cut-out failure in the treatment of peritrochanteric elderly hip fractures [J]. Int Orthop, 2010, 34(5): 719-722.
18
Wang J, Ma JX, Lu B, et al. Comparative finite element analysis of three implants fixing stable and unstable subtrochanteric femoral fractures: Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA), Proximal Femoral Locking Plate (PFLP), and Reverse Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS) [J]. Orthop Trauma Surg Rese, 2020, 106(1): 95-101.
19
陈健,马剑雄,卢斌, 等. 解剖髓内钉ZNN、髓内钉Gamma3和联合加压交锁髓内钉InterTan置入内固定治疗老年反转子间骨折的生物力学特点 [J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2021, 25(27): 4271-4276.
20
Dhanopia A, Bhargava M. Finite element analysis of human fractured femur bone implantation with PMMA thermoplastic prosthetic plate [J]. Procedia Engineering, 2017, 173: 1658-1665.
21
陈心敏,李文标,熊凯凯, 等. 钉道强化股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗老年A3.3型股骨转子间骨折:最佳骨水泥量有限元分析 [J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2021, 25(9): 1404-1409.
22
Sermon A, Zderic I, Khatchadourian R, et al. Bone cement augmentation of femoral nail head elements increases their cut-out resistance in poor bone quality- A biomechanical study [J]. J Biomech, 2021, 118(110301.
23
Christian Kammerlander, Daniel Pfeufer, Leonard Adolf Lisitano, et al. Inability of older adult patients with hip fracture to maintain postoperative Weight-Bearing restrictions [J]. J Bone Joint Surg, 2018, 100(11): 936-941.
24
Pastor T, Zderic I, Gehweiler D, et al. Biomechanical analysis of recently released cephalomedullary nails for trochanteric femoral fracture fixation in a human cadaveric model [J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2022, 142(12): 3787-3796.
25
杨路德,殷勇,吴晓波, 等. 动力髋螺钉及InterTan治疗老年人股骨转子间骨折临床疗效对比 [J]. 中国临床医学, 2017, 24(06): 987-990.
26
丛波,张仲文,韩龙, 等. 外固定支架与Intertan髓内钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的疗效分析 [J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2016, 24(22): 2058-2061.
27
Eceviz E, Cevik HB. The V-effect in fixation of intertrochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nails [J]. Orthop Trauma Surg Res, 2021, 107(3): 102863.
28
Onggo JR, Nambiar M, Onggo JD, et al. Integrated dual lag screws versus single lag screw cephalomedullary nail constructs: a meta-analysis and systematic review [J]. Hip Int, 2022, 32(4): 550-557.
[1] 李焕玺, 何淳诺, 田志敏, 周胜虎, 吴昊越, 张浩强. 全膝关节置换术后股骨远端假体周围骨折治疗现状[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 630-637.
[2] 曾敬, 吴冬冬, 邵明, 范震波, 王治国, 刘培谊, 兰海峰. 高龄髋部骨折患者不同手术时机的围手术期疗效评估[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 445-449.
[3] 徐志刚, 曹涛, 何亭, 李博奥, 魏婧韬, 张栋梁, 官浩, 杨薛康. 采用抗生素骨水泥治疗糖尿病患者心脏术后胸骨骨髓炎的临床效果观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 498-502.
[4] 郭杰坤, 王楹, 杨轩, 晏欢欣, 钟豪. Ilizarov 骨搬移技术在急诊一期修复GustiloⅢB 型胫骨长段开放粉碎性骨折的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 507-510.
[5] 于同, 矫健航, 姜炜博, 王中汉, 王洋, 伍旭辉, 吴敏飞. 体位复位与椎板切除减压内固定术治疗胸腰段爆裂性骨折的对比性研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 331-339.
[6] 黄韬, 杨晓华, 薛天森, 肖睿. 改良“蛋壳”技术治疗老年OVCF及对脊柱矢状面平衡参数、预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 340-348.
[7] 谭明明, 战世强, 侯宏涛, 曾翔硕. 经皮微创椎弓根螺钉内固定术对骨质疏松脊柱压缩性骨折患者临床研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 349-354.
[8] 王贝贝, 崔振义, 王静, 王晗妍, 吕红芝, 李秀婷. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后贫血预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 355-362.
[9] 张峻, 赵建民, 姚晓克, 吉浩宇, 越瑞祥. 增加CT对桡骨远端骨折分型的可靠性及可重复性评价[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 264-272.
[10] 房桂彬, 肖进, 傅光涛, 郑秋坚. 老年髋部骨折患者术后1年行走能力的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 273-280.
[11] 张于, 程亮亮, 王峰, 赵德伟. 2枚与3枚空心钉治疗无移位股骨颈骨折的疗效对比[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 281-286.
[12] 茹江英, 廖启宇, 温国洪, 潘思华, 刘栋, 张皓琛, 牛云飞. 直接前方入路和后外侧入路半髋关节置换治疗老年痴呆股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 287-293.
[13] 单良, 刘怡, 于涛, 徐丽. 老年股骨颈骨折术后患者心理弹性现状及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 294-300.
[14] 周锐, 罗飞. 骨质疏松椎体骨折的分型进展[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 315-320.
[15] 喻蓉, 周伟力, 雷青, 陈松, 陈立, 刘峰, 丁州, 阳宏奇, 王康, 王大鹏. 改良的内外侧环抱锁定钢板在复杂胫骨平台骨折治疗中的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 764-770.
阅读次数
全文


摘要