颈基底型股骨转子间骨折楔效应的影像学研究及治疗分析

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2021.05.004

目的

探讨股骨近端防旋髓内钉（PFNA）治疗颈基底型股骨转子间骨折时楔效应的影像学特点及处理措施。

方法

回顾性分析了我院2013年至2018年手术治疗的386例股骨转子间骨折病例，选取采用PFNA治疗的颈基底型股骨转子间骨折病例。依据术后髋关节影像学资料，统计出现楔效应的发生率，测量患者双侧颈干角和股骨头中心到股骨外侧皮质的距离。该组病例中出现楔效应的患髋作为试验组，健髋作为自身对照组，分析楔效应组骨折影像学特点和对PFNA固定复位质量的影响。

结果

共有39例PFNA治疗的颈基底型股骨转子间骨折病例，男13例，女26例，平均年龄（72±5）岁。其中有21例术后出现楔效应而纳入研究，男10例，女11例，平均年龄（74±6）岁。术后影像测量发现，楔效应组股骨颈干角平均为（129.4±3.7）°，小于自身对照组（P<0.05）；楔效应组股骨头到股骨外侧皮质距离平均为（63.2±6.8）mm，高于自身对照组（P<0.05）；楔效应组后外侧骨折块的解剖影像学特点可分为4个亚型。术后随访发现，楔效应组患者治疗1年后的Harris评分明显低于未发生楔效应的PFNA治疗的颈基底型股骨转子间骨折组（P<0.05）。

结论

揭示了PFNA治疗颈基底型股骨转子间骨折时存在的楔效应的影像学特点及形成原因，正确认识楔效应有助于提高髓内固定转子间骨折的复位质量，减少内置物相关并发症。

关键词: 髓内钉, 内固定, 髋骨折

Objective

To investigate the imaging characteristics and treatment of the wedge effect of basicervical intertrochanteric fracture with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA).

Methods

In this study, 386 cases of intertrochanteric fracture treated by surgery from 2013 to 2018 were analyzed retrospectively, including 39 cases of basicervical intertrochanteric fracture treated by PFNA. According to the imaging data of the hip joint after surgery, the wedge effect was seen in some cases. Distances from the bilateral neck-shaft angle and the femoral head to the lateral femoral cortex were measured, respectively. The affected side was treated as the wedge effect group and the healthy side was seen as the control group. Then the imaging characteristics of fractures in the wedge effect group and the efficacy of PFNA were analyzed.

Results

There were 39 cases (13 males and 26 females) of basicervical intertrochanteric fracture treated with PFNA, with an average age of (72±5). The wedge effect was found in 21 cases, including 10 males and 11 females, with an average age of (74±6). The average femoral neck-shaft angle in the wedge effect group was (129.4±3.7)°, which was significantly smaller than that in the control group (P<0.05). The average distance from the femoral head to the lateral cortex in the wedge effect group was (63.2±6.8) mm, which was also significantly longer than that in the control group (P<0.05). The features of radiographic anatomy for posterior-lateral fractures in the wedge effect group can be divided into 4 subtypes. One year after surgery, the Harris Hip Score in the wedge effect group was significantly less than that in the PFNA group without wedge effect (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The imaging characteristics and the cause of wedge effect in the treatment of basicervical intertrochanteric fracture with PFNA are identified. Developed a better understanding of the wedge effect, that will help to improve the restoration of intertrochanteric fractures with intramedullary fixation and reduce the complications associated with implants.

Key words: Intramedullary nailing, Internal fracture fixation, Hip fractures

图1~3 女，65岁，颈基底型股骨转子间骨折。图1~2　PFNA术后髋关节正位片显示楔效应；图3　股骨转子间骨折楔效应影像学测量方法，线段B代表从股骨头的中心点（C）到股骨干外侧（A）的距离

图4~11 颈基底型股骨转子间骨折后外侧骨折块（PLF）的解剖影像学特点分型。图4~5 I型指头颈部骨块和股骨干骨骨块伴有体积较小的PLF；图6~7 Ⅱ型指中等大小PLF合并头颈部骨块和股骨干骨块，此型次要骨折线更加居中，位于完整的小转子外侧缘；图8~9 Ⅲ型指PLF与小转子相连共同构成"香蕉"样骨块；图10~11 Ⅳ型指小转子出现骨折时，出现了4个骨折块，即头颈部骨折块、股骨干骨折块，PLF和小转子骨折块

表1 股骨转子间骨折楔效应影像学特点（±s）

组别	颈干角（°）	股骨头中心到股骨外侧皮质的距离（mm）
楔效应组	129±4	63±7
自身对照组	136±8	56±8
t值	3.477	3.076
P值	0.008	0.026

表1 股骨转子间骨折楔效应影像学特点（±s）

组别	颈干角（°）	股骨头中心到股骨外侧皮质的距离（mm）
楔效应组	129±4	63±7
自身对照组	136±8	56±8
t值	3.477	3.076
P值	0.008	0.026

图17 可避免钉-骨撞击时发生近端骨折段的旋转，还可以在复位骨折后预先紧贴前方皮质深部置入一枚3.5 mm克氏针稳定骨折断端，在扩髓时将髓腔锉压向内侧挤压充分磨削头颈骨折段外上方的皮质，避免插入PFNA主钉时发生钉-骨撞击产生楔效应

1	张保中，邱贵兴. 高龄股骨转子间骨折的手术治疗[J]. 中华创伤杂志，2005，21(8)：582-584.
2	Saarenpää I, Partanen J, Jalovaara P. Basicervical fracture--a rare type of hip fractur-e[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2002, 122(2): 69-72.
3	张铁超，张志山，周方，等. 颈基底型股骨粗隆部骨折的诊断及治疗[J]. 北京大学学报：医学版，2017，49(2)：246-251.
4	邵佳申，刘勃，李佳，等. 2010至2011年河北省老年股骨转子间骨折的流行病学特征分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志，2018，4(6)：352-355.
5	Jolly A, Bansal R, More AR, et al. Comparison of complications and functional re-sults of unstable intertrochanteric fractures of femur treated with proximal femur nail-s and cemented hemiarthroplasty[J]. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 2019, 10(2): 296-301.
6	Han L, Liu JJ, Hu YG, et al. Controlled study on Gamma nail and proximal femoral locking plate for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures with broken lateral wall[J]. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1): 11114.
7	Kwak DK, Kim WH, Lee SJ, et al. Biomechanical comparison of three different intramedullary nails for fixation of unstable basicervical intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur: experimental studies[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2018: 7618079.
8	Hu SJ, Yu GR, Zhang SM. Surgical treatment of basicervical intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with cephalomeduallary hip nails[J]. Orthop Surg, 2013, 5(2): 124-129.
9	唐佩福，姚琦，黄鹏，等. 股骨近端髓内钉-螺旋刀片治疗高龄骨质疏松性股骨转子间骨折[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志，2007，9(7)：622-624.
10	Blair B, Koval KJ, Kummer F, et al. Basicervical fractures of the proximal femur. A biomechanical study of 3 internal fixation techniques[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1994 (36): 256-263.
11	张宇，秦晓东，许艺荠，等. 老年股骨转子间骨折术后1年死亡率及危险因素分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志，2018，4(5)：277-281.
12	Singh NK, Sharma V, Trikha V, et al. Is PFNA-II a better implant for stable intertr-ochanteric fractures in elderly population?A prospective randomized study[J]. Clin O-rthop Trauma, 2019, 10(Suppl 1): S71-S76.
13	O'malley MJ, Kang KK, Azer E, et al. Wedge effect following intramedullary hip screw fixation of intertrochanteric proximal femur fracture[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2015, 135(10): 1343-1347.
14	Massoud EI. Fixation of basicervical and related fractures[J]. Int Orthop, 2010, 34(4): 577-582.
15	张英泽. 老年股骨颈骨折诊治中的重要问题[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志，2015 (1)：6-8.
16	Johnson J, Deren M, Chambers A, et al. Biomechanical analysis of fixation devices for basicervical femoral neck fractures[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2019, 27(1): e41-e48.
17	Kaplan K, Miyamoto R, Levine BR, et al. Surgical management of hip fractures: an evidence-based review of the literature. II: intertrochanteric fractures[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2008, 16(11): 665-673.
18	Su BW, Heyworth BE, Protopsaltis TS, et al. Basicervical versus intertrochanteric fractures: an analysis of radiographic and functional outcomes[J]. Orthopedics, 2006, 29(10): 919-925.
19	Jones HW, Johnston P, Parker M. Are short femoral nails superior to the sliding hi-p screw?A meta-analysis of 24 studies involving 3,279 fractures[J]. Int Orthop, 2006, 30(2): 69-78.
20	Parker MJ, Handoll HH. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails v-ersus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2008 (3): CD000093.
21	Hak DJ, Bilat C. Avoiding varus malreduction during cephalomedullary nailing of i-ntertrochanteric hip fractures[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2011, 131(5): 709-710.
22	Butler BA, Selley RS, Summers HD, et al. Preventing wedge deformities when treating intertrochanteric femur fractures with intramedullary devices: a technical tip[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2018, 32(3): e112-e116.
23	张殿英，郁凯，杨剑，等. \"杠杆-支点平衡\"理论——对股骨转子间骨折治疗的新认识[J]. 中华创伤杂志，2020，36(7)：647-651.

[1]	曾敬, 吴冬冬, 邵明, 范震波, 王治国, 刘培谊, 兰海峰. 高龄髋部骨折患者不同手术时机的围手术期疗效评估[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 445-449.
[2]	沈建成, 阮安民, 刘壮. 两种关节评分联用评价两种手术治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 329-336.
[3]	杜雪清, 冯周莲, 钟佩珍, 潘杏玲. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者应用护士主导的共管模式[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 421-426.
[4]	向锋, 张锡平, 陈侠甫, 戴涛, 李艳军, 文捷. 矩形钢丝环扎联合8字钢丝张力带与传统克氏针钢丝张力带对治疗髌骨横形骨折的早中期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(03): 251-254.
[5]	王晓梅, 刘宇, 董金磊, 刘凡孝, 王成龙, 李连欣. 单一前方入路内固定对肱骨近端骨折合并肱骨头后脱位的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 319-325.
[6]	赵静磊, 陈晓婷, 夏莹, 黄维佳, 周菊, 刘芳. 锁骨骨折切开复位内固定术后患者肩关节功能恢复的风险因素研究[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 216-222.
[7]	王曦, 关鹏飞. 双钢板内固定治疗肱骨远1/3骨折的有限元分析及基于肘关节功能和肘关节活动度评估疗效[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 230-237.
[8]	冷昆鹏, 孟钰童, 单磊, 刘洋, 周君琳. 不同手术入路治疗肱骨远端冠状面骨折的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 127-134.
[9]	谭明明, 战世强, 侯宏涛, 曾翔硕. 经皮微创椎弓根螺钉内固定术对骨质疏松脊柱压缩性骨折患者临床研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 349-354.
[10]	于同, 矫健航, 姜炜博, 王中汉, 王洋, 伍旭辉, 吴敏飞. 体位复位与椎板切除减压内固定术治疗胸腰段爆裂性骨折的对比性研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 331-339.
[11]	李欣, 雷孝勇, 康大为. 手术与功能支具对闭合性移位肱骨干骨折患者功能结局的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 215-221.
[12]	郭昆, 杨晓峰, 李传明. 双切口双钢板内固定治疗SchatzkerⅣ型以上复杂胫骨平台骨折的安全性及中远期预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 159-164.
[13]	郑益钒, 曾令祺, 高志鹏, 吴忻, 吴靖, 陈俊泽. 骨质疏松性骶髂关节复合体损伤诊疗的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 184-188.
[14]	冉仁国, 罗政, 廖鑫, 张付民. 低频脉冲电磁场对骨质疏松性胸腰椎骨折内固定术后康复的促进作用[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 39-45.
[15]	喻蓉, 周伟力, 雷青, 陈松, 陈立, 刘峰, 丁州, 阳宏奇, 王康, 王大鹏. 改良的内外侧环抱锁定钢板在复杂胫骨平台骨折治疗中的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 764-770.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Radiological and therapeutic study of the wedge effect of basicervical femoral trochanter fractures

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Radiological and therapeutic study of the wedge effect of basicervical femoral trochanter fractures