切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (05) : 277 -283. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2021.05.005

髋部骨折

PFNA与DHS治疗Seinsheimer V型股骨粗隆下骨折合并肌少症的疗效比较
侯传勇1, 刘新晖1, 殷建1,†()   
  1. 1. 211100　南京，南京医科大学附属江宁医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-13 出版日期:2021-10-05
  • 通信作者: 殷建
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省自然科学基金(SBK2019022658); 南京医科大学康达学院科研发展基金(KD2019KYJJZD021); 南京市卫健委科技发展资金(YKK19130)

Comparative study of PFNA and DHS for the treatment of Seinsheimer V-type of femoral subtrochanteric fracture with sarcopenia

Chuanyong Hou1, Xinhui Liu1, Jian Yin1,†()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211100, China
  • Received:2021-01-13 Published:2021-10-05
  • Corresponding author: Jian Yin
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

侯传勇, 刘新晖, 殷建. PFNA与DHS治疗Seinsheimer V型股骨粗隆下骨折合并肌少症的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2021, 07(05): 277-283.

Chuanyong Hou, Xinhui Liu, Jian Yin. Comparative study of PFNA and DHS for the treatment of Seinsheimer V-type of femoral subtrochanteric fracture with sarcopenia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2021, 07(05): 277-283.

目的

比较股骨近端髓内钉（PFNA）与动力髋螺钉（DHS）治疗Seinsheimer V型股骨粗隆下骨折合并肌少症手术的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2016年1月至2018年12月南京医科大学附属江宁医院骨科收治手术的Seinsheimer V型股骨粗隆下骨折合并肌少症患者52例。根据握力及骨骼肌指数（SMI）诊断肌少症。根据手术方式的不同分为PFNA组（28例）和DHS组（24例）。比较两组患者年龄、性别、受伤至手术时间、SMI值、切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量、透视次数，围手术期输血量、下肢完全负重时间、术后3个月和末次随访时的疼痛视觉模拟评分（VAS）和髋关节Harris功能评分，以及术后并发症情况。

结果

所有患者均获得随访。两组患者年龄、性别、受伤至手术时间和SMI之间差异无统计学意义（t=0.054，P=0.957；χ2=0.018，P=0.894；t=0.044，P=0.965；t=-1.298，P=0.200）。PFNA组手术切口长度、出血量和输血量少于DHS组，术中透视次数多于DHS组，差异具有统计学意义（t=-13.016，P=0.000；t=-5.305，P=0.000；t=-2.505，P=0.016；t=9.293，P=0.000），两组手术时间差异无统计学意义（t=0.432，P=0.668）。PFNA组完全负重时间较早、术后3个月VAS评分较低，而Harris评分较高，差异具有统计学意义（t=-3.874，P=0.000；z=-2.009，P=0.045；t=7.139，P=0.000），但末次随访时两组VAS评分和Harris评分差异无统计学意义（z=-1.166，P=0.243；t=0.733，P=0.468）。PFNA组1例发生内固定松动，并发症的发生率为3.57%，DHS组2例发生伤口感染，5例发生内固定松动，并发症的发生率为29.17%，差异具有统计学意义（χ2=4.686，P=0.030）。

结论

PFNA和DHS均是治疗Seinsheimer V型股骨粗隆下骨折合并肌少症的有效方法，但PFNA手术切口短，出血量少，恢复较快，并发症发生率较低，可优先选择。

关键词: 髋骨折, 肌少症, 髓内钉, 动力髋螺钉
Objective

Comparison of the efficacy of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) in the treatment of seinsheimer v-type of subtrochanteric fracture with sarcopenia.

Methods

From January 2016 to December 2018, 52 patients with seinsheimer V-type subtrochanteric fracture complicated with sarcopenia were retrospectively analyzed. Sarcopenia was diagnosed by grip strength and skeletal muscle index (SMI). They were divided into PFNA group (28 cases) and DHS group (24 cases). The age, gender, injury to operation time, SMI value, incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy times, perioperative blood transfusion, lower limb full weight-bearing time, visual analogue scale (VAS) and Harris score at 3 months and the last follow-up were compared between the two groups, as well as the complications.

Results

All patients were followed up. There was no significant difference in age, gender, injury to operation time and SMI between the two groups (t=0.054, P=0.957, χ2=0.018, P=0.894, t=0.044, P=0.965, t=-1.298, P=0.200). The incision length, blood loss and blood transfusion in PFNA group were less than those in DHS group, and the number of fluoroscopy in operation was more than that in DHS group (t=-13.016, P=0.000, t=-5.305, P=0.000, t=-2.505, P=0.016, t=9.293, P=0.000). There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups (t=0.432, P=0.668). In PFNA group, the time of complete weight-bearing was earlier, the VAS score was lower 3 months after operation, but the Harris score was higher, the difference was statistically significant (t=-3.874, P=0.000; z=-2.009, P=0.045; t=7.139, P=0.000), but there was no significant difference in VAS score and Harris score between the two groups at the last follow-up (z=-1.166, P=0.243; t=0.733, P=0.468). In PFNA group, 1 case had internal fixation loosening, and the incidence of complications was 3.57%. In DHS group, 2 cases had wound infection, and 5 cases had internal fixation loosening, and the incidence of complications was 29.17%. The difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.686, P=0.030).

Conclusions

PFNA and DHS are both effective methods in the treatment of seinsheimer V type subtrochanteric fracture with sarcopenia, but PFNA has shorter incision, less blood loss, faster recovery and lower incidence of complications, which can be preferred.

Key words: Hip fractures, Sarcopenia, PFNA, DHS
图4~6 女性，72岁，诊断为股骨粗隆下骨折合并肌少症，行DHS手术。图4　术前X线正位片；图5　术后第二天复查X线正位片；图6　末次随访时复查X线正位片
表1 两组股骨粗隆下骨折患者一般情况比较
组别 例数 年龄（岁，±s） 性别（例，男/女） 受伤至手术时间（d，±s） SMI（cm2/m2，±s）
PFNA组 28 65±8 18/10 3.4±1.6 28±6
DSH组 24 65±10 15/9 3.4±1.3 31±7
统计值   0.054 0.018 0.044 -1.298
P值   0.957 0.894 0.965 0.200
表2 两组股骨粗隆下骨折患者手术相关指标的比较（±s）
组别 切口长度（cm） 出血量（ml） 输血量（ml） 透视次数（次） 手术时间（min）
PFNA组 6.5±0.9 172±118 214±224 19.1±6.5 93±37
DSH组 11.0±1.5 418±200 375±238 6.8±2.4 88±44
统计值 -13.016 -5.305 -2.505 9.293 0.432
P值 <0.01 <0.01 0.016 <0.01 0.668
表3 两组股骨粗隆下骨折患者骨折愈合情况及髋关节功能比较
组别 负重时间（月） 术后3个月VAS（分） 末次随访时VAS（分） 统计值 P值
PFNA组 14.7±2.2 1.00（0.25，3.00） 0.00（0.00，1.00） -4.091 <0.01
DSH组 18.2±3.9 2.00（1.00，4.00） 0.50（0.00，1.00） -4.146 <0.01
统计值 -3.874 -2.009 -1.166    
P值 <0.01 0.045 0.243    
组别 术后3个月Harris（分） 末次随访时Harris（分） 统计值 P值 并发症(例)（%）
PFNA组 79.8±4.4 87.8±3.2 -29.933 <0.01 1(3.57%)
DSH组 72.9±2.5 87.0±4.4 -30.744 <0.01 7（29.17%）
统计值 7.139 0.733     4.686
P值 <0.01 0.468     0.030
1
Trafton PG. Subtrochanteric-intertrochanteric femoral fractures[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 1987, 18(1): 59-71.
2
Medda S, Reeves RA, Pilson H, et al. Subtrochanteric femur fractures[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2004, 35(4): 473-483.
3
Derogatis MJ, Kanakamedala AC, Egol KA. Management of subtrochanteric femoral fracture nonunions[J]. JBJS Rev, 2020, 8(6): e1900143.
4
Seinsheimer F. Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1978, 60(3): 300-306.
5
Giannoudis PV. Surgical priorities in damage control in polytrauma[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2003, 85(4): 478-483.
6
Xie H, Xie L, Wang J, et al. Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation for the treatment of subtrochanteric fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Surg, 2019, 63: 43-57.
7
Kuzyk PR, Bhandari M, Mckee MD, et al. Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation for subtrochanteric femur fractures[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2009, 23(6): 465-470.
8
Saini P, Kumar R, Shekhawat V, et al. Biological fixation of comminuted subtrochanteric fractures with proximal femur locking compression plate[J]. Injury, 2013, 44(2): 226-231.
9
Laubscher C, Burger M, Conradie M, et al. Prevalence of Sarcopenia in Older South African Patients Following Surgery for Fragility Fractures of the Hip[J]. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil, 2020, 11: 2151459320971560.
10
姜珊，康琳，刘晓红. 2019亚洲肌少症诊断及治疗共识解读[J]. 中华老年医学杂志，2020，39(04)：373-376.
11
Nemec U, Heidinger B, Sokas C, et al. Diagnosing sarcopenia on thoracic computed tomography: quantitative assessment of skeletal muscle mass in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement[J]. Acad Radiol, 2017, 24(9): 1154-1161.
12
Accreditata XP, Cipollaro L, Aicale R, et al. Single- versus double-integrated screws in intramedullary nailing systems for surgical management of extracapsular hip fractures in the elderly: a systematic review[J]. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents, 2019, 33(2 Suppl. 1): 175-182.
13
Prasarn ML, Ahn J, Helfet DL, et al. Bisphosphonate-associated femur fractures have high complication rates with operative fixation[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2012, 470(8): 2295-2301.
14
De Vries JS, Kloen P, Borens O, et al. Treatment of subtrochanteric nonunions[J]. Injury, 2006, 37(2): 203-211.
15
曲磊，李计东，李博，等. 双反牵引复位结合PFNA治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的初步临床应用[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志，2020，6(2)：94-98.
16
赵清斌，肖伟，阿布都艾尼·热吾提，等. 空心螺钉捆绑带结合半髋关节置换治疗高龄粗隆间骨折的近期疗效[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志，2020 (2)：88-93.
17
喻鑫罡，郭彦杰，高悠水，等. 多轴锁定钢板倒置与髓内钉治疗老年股骨粗隆下骨折的疗效分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志，2017，5(3)：20-24.
18
Paloma BB, Sagrario MA, José CJA, et al. Peripheral IL-6 Levels but not Sarcopenia Are Predictive of 1-Year Mortality After Hip Fracture in Older Patients[J]. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2020, 75(10): 130-137.
19
Laubscher CV, Burger MC, Conradie MM, et al. Prevalence of Sarcopenia in Older South African Patients Following Surgery for Fragility Fractures of the Hip[J]. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil, 2020, 26(11): 2151459320971560.
20
侯传勇，刘新晖，张海龙，等. 肌少症对老年患者髋部骨折术后远近期死亡率的影响[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志，2020，06(3)：136-141.
21
贡歌，万文辉，王斌，等. 肌少症对老年股骨颈骨折患者手术疗效的影响. 中华老年医学杂志，2019，38(2)：191-195.
22
Colón C, Molina-Vicenty IL, Frontera-Rodríguez M, et al. Muscle and bone mass loss in the elderly population:advances in diagnosis and treatment[J]. J Biomed (Syd), 2018, 3: 40-49.
23
Bahia MT, Hecke MB, Mercuri E. Image-based anatomical Reconstruction and pharmaco-mediated bone remodeling model applied to a femur with subtrochanteric fracture: A subject-specific finite element study[J]. Med Eng Phys, 2019, 69: 58-71.
24
Parker MJ, Bowers TR, Pryor GA. Sliding hip screw versus theTargon PF nail in the treatment of trochanteric fractures of the hip[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol, 2012, 94(3): 391-397.
25
Xu BY, Yan S, Low LL, et al. Predictors of poor functional outcomes and mortality in patients with hip fracture: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019, 20(1):568
26
Choi H, Yoo J I. Sarcopenia and Hip-Structure-Analysis Variables in Korean Elderly Population[J]. Journal of Clinical Densitometry[J]. Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 2020, 23(3): 482-489.
27
Girgis CM. Integrated therapies for osteoporosis and sarcopenia: from signaling pathways to clinical trials[J]. Calcif Tissue Int, 2015, 96(3): 243-255.
28
Testa G, Vescio A, Zuccalà D, et al. Diagnosis, treatment and prevention of sarcopenia in hip fractured patients: where we are and where we are going: a systematic review[J]. J Clin Med, 2020, 9(9): 2997.
29
Avola M, Testa G, Mangano S, et al. Clinical Medicine Rehabilitation Strategies for Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures in Sarcopenia: A Narrative Review[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2020, 9(10): 3115.
30
Odvina CV, Zerwekh JE, Rao DS, et al. Severely suppressed bone turnover: a potential complication of alendronate therapy[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2005, 90(3): 1294-1301.
[1] 曾敬, 吴冬冬, 邵明, 范震波, 王治国, 刘培谊, 兰海峰. 高龄髋部骨折患者不同手术时机的围手术期疗效评估[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 445-449.
[2] 杜雪清, 冯周莲, 钟佩珍, 潘杏玲. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者应用护士主导的共管模式[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 421-426.
[3] 沈建成, 阮安民, 刘壮. 两种关节评分联用评价两种手术治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 329-336.
[4] 欧梁, 齐麒, 胡伟伟, 卢敏, 黄彦昌, 黄维琛, 匡建军. 股骨颈动力交叉钉系统与其它内固定治疗股骨颈骨折对比[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 92-105.
[5] 中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组, 广东省医学会骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病分会, 广东省佛山市顺德区第三人民医院. 中国髋部脆性骨折术后抗骨质疏松药物临床干预指南(2023年版)[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 751-764.
[6] 刘丹丹, 宋鸣, 李霞, 徐夏君. 老年髋部骨折术后便秘的影响因素及其列线图预测模型[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 607-612.
[7] 奚玲, 仝瀚文, 缪骥, 毛永欢, 沈晓菲, 杜峻峰, 刘晔. 基于肌少症构建的造口旁疝危险因素预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 48-51.
[8] 徐艳, 江秀娟, 王超, 江圆满. 股直肌剪切波弹性成像对COPD并发肌少症的诊断意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 454-457.
[9] 王宁, 刘彦哲, 吴紫莺, 曾超, 雷光华, 沙婷婷, 王伊伦. 基于孟德尔随机化研究探讨肠道菌群与肌少症表型的因果关联[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 333-342.
[10] 奚培培, 周加军. 慢性肾脏病患者肌少症机制和诊治的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 491-495.
[11] 王家圆, 王晓东. 消化系统恶性肿瘤相关肌少症的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 823-827.
[12] 曹娟, 朱亚, 吴玉泉, 胡旭钢, 董芳, 洪逸莲, 桂莹. 改良Morse跌倒评估量表对老年住院患者跌倒风险的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2024, 11(02): 1-4.
[13] 曹婧然, 董福强, 张立剑, 刘长乐, 张煜坤, 陈康寅. 老年冠心病患者的营养风险、肌少症和衰弱筛查分析[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2024, 11(02): 5-9.
[14] 管惠兰, 张靖梅, 解艳红. 社区老年人对肌少症知识知晓率的调查分析[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2024, 11(02): 36-43.
[15] 王超珺, 董志勇, 赵宛鄂, 胡嵩浩, 刘昭晖. 肌少症对肥胖患者袖状胃切除术后效果的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 283-287.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号