切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (02) : 65 -73. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2022.02.001

髋部骨折

股骨颈动力交叉钉与空心拉力钉对Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折治疗稳定性的有限元分析
陈纪宝, 鞠玉亮, 管士伟, 杨家凤, 周峰, 张晋, 刘炜, 盈梅()   
  1. 271000,泰安市第一人民医院骨科
    271000 泰安市,山东第一医科大学第二附属医院消化科
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-21 出版日期:2022-04-05
  • 通信作者: 盈梅

Finite element analysis of the effect of the FNS and CCS on the stability of Pauwels Ⅲ femoral neck fracture

Jibao Chen, Yuliang Ju, Shiwei Guan, Jiafeng Yang, Feng Zhou, Jin Zhang, Wei Liu, Mei Ying()   

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, The NO 1 Hospital of Tai'an, Tai'an 271000, China
    Department of Digestive, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Tai'an 271000, China
  • Received:2021-12-21 Published:2022-04-05
  • Corresponding author: Mei Ying
引用本文:

陈纪宝, 鞠玉亮, 管士伟, 杨家凤, 周峰, 张晋, 刘炜, 盈梅. 股骨颈动力交叉钉与空心拉力钉对Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折治疗稳定性的有限元分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(02): 65-73.

Jibao Chen, Yuliang Ju, Shiwei Guan, Jiafeng Yang, Feng Zhou, Jin Zhang, Wei Liu, Mei Ying. Finite element analysis of the effect of the FNS and CCS on the stability of Pauwels Ⅲ femoral neck fracture[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2022, 08(02): 65-73.

目的

采用三维有限元方法分析股骨颈动力交叉钉系统(FNS)与空心拉力螺钉对Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折治疗稳定型的影响。

方法

选择1名25岁健康男性志愿者,既往身体健康,X线检查未见髋关节发育异常,行髋关节CT薄层扫描,收集其股骨中上段影像学数据,并将其导入到医学三维重建软件Mimics 19.0中,得到原始股骨三维模型;并在Geomagic Wrap 2017软件中进行逆向优化,同时构建股骨皮质骨与松质骨结构;后导入至Solidworks 2017软件中建立Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折三维模型;同时使用Solidworks2017软件,按照临床中内固定尺寸建立FNS模型及空心拉力螺钉模型,同时建立其与PauwelsⅢ型股骨颈骨折的组合模型,从而建立股骨颈骨折4种治疗模型(模型1:FNS主钉临床标准点位植入模型;模型2:FNS主钉偏斜于标准点植入模型;模型3: 3枚倒三角平行空心拉力螺钉植入模型;模型4: 2枚平行空心拉力螺钉植入模型);最后在ANSYS17.0软件中进行网格划分、施加载荷和数据计算,分析各模型股骨与内固定的应力分布、应力峰值、最大位移及下肢外旋应力下位移情况,每个三维有限元模型在相应区域范围内均匀采点20个,记录每个位点的相应数值。

结果

(1) 4种内固定模型在不同压力下股骨颈骨折远近端应力值模型1最大,但骨折端应力差值最小,其次为模型3;(2) 4种内固定模型在不同压力下股骨近端应力模型1最小;(3) 4种内固定模型中的模型1与模型2内固定应力明显较其余两种高;(4) 4种内固定模型中不同压力股骨颈轴线(X轴)位移及水平(Z轴)位移随压力增加位移大,模型1最小,其次为模型3;(5) 4种内固定模型中的股骨颈矢状位(Y轴)位移模型3最小,其次为模型1;(6) 4种模型在下肢外旋应力下,股骨颈矢状位(Y轴)位移模型1与3较其余两种小。

结论

FNS标准植入治疗股骨颈骨折表现出优秀的支撑、抗内翻、抗旋转及抗外旋应力作用,3枚倒三角平行空心拉力螺钉同样表现出优秀的支撑、抗内翻、抗旋转及抗外旋应力作用,其支撑及抗内翻应力作用较股骨颈动力交叉钉系统略差。同时发现,不合理的股骨颈动力交叉钉植入位置,对其治疗股骨颈骨折稳定性影响较大,能明显降低其抗旋转及抗外旋能力。

Objective

Three dimensional finite element method was used to analyze the effect of FNS and CCS on the stability of Pauwels Ⅲ femoral neck fracture.

Methods

A 25-year-old healthy male volunteer who X-ray examination showed no abnormal hip development was selected to undergo Hip CT thin layer scan and collect the imaging data of the middle and upper segment of femur, then his data were imported into the medical 3D reconstruction software Mimics 19.0 to obtain the original 3D model of femur and performed in Geomagic Wrap 2017 software to simultaneously construct the cortical bone and cancellous bone structure of the femur. Then it was imported into Solidworks 2017 software to establish the three dimensional model of Pauwels Ⅲ femoral neck fracture. At the same time, using the Solidworks 2017 software to establish the FNS model and the hollow lag screw model according to the clinical internal fixation size, and the combination model with Pauwels Ⅲ type femoral neck fracture was established, so as to establish four treatment models for femoral neck fracture (model 1: clinical standard spot implantation model of FNS nail. Model 2: FNS main nail implantation model deviated from the standard point; Model 3: Three inverted triangle parallel hollow lag screw implantation model. Model 4:2 parallel hollow lag screw implantation model). Finally, ANSYS17.0 software was used to perform mesh division, load application and data calculation. Stress distribution, stress peak value, maximum displacement and displacement under external rotational stress of femur and internal fixation of each model were analyzed. 20 points were uniformly selected in each three dimensional finite element model within the corresponding region, and corresponding values of each site were recorded.

Results

(1) In the 4 models under different pressures, the stress value of proximal and distal end of femoral neck fracture was the largest in Model 1, but the stress difference of fracture end was the smallest, followed by Model 3. (2) In the 4 models, the proximal femur stress of model 1 was the smallest under different pressures of different internal fixation models. (3) In the 4 models,the internal fixation stress of model 1 and Model 2 is obviously higher than that of the other two models. (4) In the 4 models, the axial (X-axis) and horizontal (z-axis) displacements of femoral neck under different pressures in different internal fixation models were larger with the increase of pressure, and the model 1 was the smallest, followed by Model 3. (5) In the 4 models, femoral neck sagittal (Y-axis) displacement model 3 was the smallest, followed by model 1. (6) In the 4 models, under the external rotational stress of lower limbs, the sagittal (Y-axis) displacement of femoral neck model 1 and 3 were smaller than the other two models.

Conclusion

Standard implant therapy of femoral neck fracture with FNS showed excellent support, varus resistance, resistance to rotation and extorsion stress resistance, three nabla parallel hollow tension screw also showed a good support, varus resistance, resistance to rotation and extorsion stress resistance, in its support and resistance to stress the femoral neck slightly less power cross nail system. At the same time, it was found that the improper placement of FNS had a great influence on the stability of the treatment of femoral neck fracture, and significantly reduced the anti-rotation and anti-external rotation ability of the screw.

图1~5 FNS模型及4种内固定装置模型结构示意图 图1 FNS模型 图2 FNS主钉临床标准点位植入模型 图3 FNS主钉偏斜于标准点植入模型 图4 3枚倒三角平行空心拉力螺钉植入模型 图5 2枚平行空心拉力螺钉植入模型
表1 建立模型的有限元材料参数
图10 以股骨颈轴向为中心新建坐标系
图14 股骨近端应力
表2 4种模型在不同压力下股骨受力情况(MPa)
图18 空心钉应力-1
图27 外旋应力下Y轴线位移
表3 4种模型在不同压力下股骨X轴位移情况(m e-4
表4 4种模型在不同压力下股骨Y轴位移情况(m e-4
表5 4种模型在不同压力下股骨Z轴位移情况(m e-4
表6 4种模型在外旋应力下股骨Y轴位移情况(m e-4
1
Florschutz AV, Langford JR, Haidukewych GJ, et al. Femoral neck fractures: current management [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2015, 29(3): 121-129.
2
Ly Thuan V 1, Swiontkowski Marc F. Management of femoral neck fractures in young adults [J]. Indian J Orthop, 2008, 42(1): 3-12.
3
Yang JJ, Lin LC, Chao KH, et al. Risk factors for nonunion in patients with intracapsular femoral neck fractures treated with three cannulated screws placed in either a triangle or an inverted triangle configuration [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2013, 95(1): 61-69.
4
Hawks MA, Kim H, Strauss JE, et al. Does a trochanteric lag screw improve fixation of vertically oriented femoral neck fractures? A biomechanical analysis in cadaveric bone [J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2013, 28(8): 886-891.
5
Aminian A, Gao F, Fedoriw WW, et al. Vertically oriented femoral neck fractures: mechanical analysis of four fixation techniques [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2007, 21(8): 544-548.
6
Stoffel K, Zderic I, Gras F, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the femoral neck system in unstable Pauwels III femoral neck fractures: a comparison with the dynamic hipscrew and cannulated screws [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2017, 31(3): 131e7.
7
Zhou L, Lin J, Huang A, et al. Modified cannulated screw fixation in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures: A biomechanical study [J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2020, 74: 103-110.
8
Li J, Yin P, Zhang L, et al. Medial anatomical buttress plate in treating displaced femoral neck fracture a finite element analysis [J]. Injury, 2019, 50(11): 1895-1900.
9
Sensoz E, Ozkal FM, Acar V, et al. Finite element analysis of theimpact of screw insertion distal to the trochanter minor on the riskof iatrogenic subtrochanteric fracture [J]. Proc Inst Mech Eng H, 2018, 232(8): 807-818.
10
李佳,刘勃,刘松,等.中国中西部地区2010至2011年60岁以上股骨颈骨折流行病学对比[J/CD].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2018, 4(1): 38-42.
11
董天华,李石伦,于沂阳,等.中国南方和北方地区2010-2011年60岁以上人群股骨颈骨折流行病学对比[J/CD].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2017, 3(5): 310-313.
12
毕郑刚,王旭明.再谈老年股骨颈骨折的手术治疗策略[J].中华外科杂志, 2019, 57(11): 804-806.
13
Zhao D, Qiu X, Wang B, et al. Epiphyseal arterial network and inferior retinacular artery Seem critical to femoral head perfusion in adults with femoral neck fractures [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2017, 475(8): 2011-2023.
14
Mei J, Liu S, Jia G, et al. Finite element analysis of the effect of cannulated screw placement and drilling frequency on femoral neck fracture fixation [J]. Injury, 2014, 45(12): 2045-2050.
15
张迪峰,余霄,庞清江.股骨颈骨折空心钉内固定有限元分析的研究进展[J].中国骨科临床与基础研究杂志, 2018, 10(4): 247-251.
16
邱旭升,戚晓阳,陈一心,等.空心加压螺钉治疗老年无移位型股骨颈骨折的长期随访研究[J/CD].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2019, 5(1): 9-12.
17
吴建国,尹律平,蔡玉钦.应用空心螺钉治疗老年股骨颈骨折的疗效[J/CD].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2019, 5(4): 196-200.
18
Panteli M, Rodham P, Giannoudis PV. Biomechanical rationale for implant choices in femoral neck fracture fixation in the non-elderly [J]. Injury, 2015, 46(3): 445-452.
19
Luttrell K, Beltran M, Collinge CA. Preoperative decision making in the treatment of high-angle"vertical"femoral neck fractures in young adult patients:an expert opinion survey of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association'smembership [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2014, 28(9): e221-e225.
20
杨亚军,马涛,张小钰,等.股骨颈动力交叉钉系统治疗股骨颈骨折近期疗效[J].中国修复重建外科杂志, 2021, 35(5): 539-543.
21
Hu H, Cheng J, Feng M, et al. Clinical outcome of femoral neck system versus cannulated compression screws for fixation of femoral neck fracture in younger patients [J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2021, 16(1): 370.
22
Nibe Y, Matsumura T, Takahashi T, et al. A comparison between the femoral neck system and other implants for elderly patients with femoral neck fracture: A preliminary report of a newly developed implant [J]. J Orthop Sci, 2021: S0949-2658(21)00153.
[1] 孟繁宇, 周新社, 赵志, 裴立家, 刘犇. 侧位直接前方入路髋关节置换治疗偏瘫肢体股骨颈骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 865-870.
[2] 郭璐琦, 赵雅琦, 李霁欣, 周兰, 林金鹏, 张子砚, 李俊杰, 王少白. 免荷矫形器对膝骨关节炎的生物力学影响的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 560-565.
[3] 吴聪, 刘伦, 贾全忠. 老年股骨颈骨折初次全髋关节置换近期疗效影响因素[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 283-287.
[4] 莫亮, 熊贤梅, 马超, 刘予豪, 陈镇秋, 何伟, 周驰. 股骨颈骨折内固定术后因素与股骨头坏死关系的分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 735-744.
[5] 周晓强, 孙超, 李志强, 徐人杰, 佘远时, 张向鑫, 陈广祥, 虞宵. 动力抗旋交叉钉治疗不稳定股骨颈骨折的早期疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 670-676.
[6] 张起尧, 刘子文. 复杂腹壁疝的解剖和生物力学基础[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 674-676.
[7] 宗宇宁, 薛海鹏, 韩天宇, 张昊, 王帅, 马翔宇, 纪振钢, 周大鹏. 解剖状骨水泥占位器在治疗内侧柱缺失型肱骨近端骨折中的实用性的有限元分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 242-251.
[8] 潘超, 张博, 韩磊, 刘俊阳, 崔鹏, 闫兵山, 田旭, 刘林涛, 东靖明. 肩锁关节脱位治疗的研究进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 186-191.
[9] 崔梦凡, 贺瑞, 李晓娜, 陈维毅, 宋耀文. 角膜生物力学评估参数的应用进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 236-240.
[10] 刘佳, 贺瑞, 李晓娜. 断层扫描生物力学指数应用于屈光手术术前早期圆锥角膜筛查的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(06): 341-346.
[11] 张子砚, 曾红, 许苑晶, 郭璐琦, 王金武, 王少白, 任富超, 缪伟强, 戴尅戎, 王茹. 膝关节生物力学标志物预测膝关节炎研究进展[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 315-320.
[12] 宋晓亮, 郝海虎, 刘渊, 李浩江, 雷晓晶, 邵新中, 李卿源. 股骨重建钉治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效观察[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 201-208.
[13] 金宇杰, 虞宵, 周晓强, 李志强, 徐人杰, 张向鑫, 陈广祥. 动力交叉钉系统治疗股骨颈骨折其内固定位置与临床疗效的相关性研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 193-200.
[14] 刘璇, 胡正霞, 王晓东, 兰海, 李开南. SuperPATH微创全髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的学习曲线研究与临床应用价值分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 73-80.
[15] 覃仁镭, 罗显德. 加速康复外科理念在老年股骨颈骨折治疗过程中应用效果的meta分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 313-320.
阅读次数
全文


摘要