| 1 |
Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C. The operation of the century: total hip replacement [J]. Lancet, 2007, 370(9597): 1508-1519.
|
| 2 |
Tsiridis E, Pavlou G, Venkatesh R, et al. Periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip arthroplasty: current concepts in their management [J]. Hip Int, 2009, 19(2): 75-86.
|
| 3 |
Della Rocca GJ, Leung KS, Pape HC. Periprostethicfracures:epidomiolgy and future projections [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2011 (25): s66-70.
|
| 4 |
MoretaJ, Aguirre U, Saez de Ugarte O, et al.Functional and radiological outcome of periprostethic femoral fracuresafterhip arthroplasty [J]. Injury, 2015, 46:292-298.
|
| 5 |
Dennis MG, Simon JA, Kummer FJ, et al. Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures occurring at the tip of the stem: a biomechanical study of 5 techniques [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2000, 15(4): 523-528.
|
| 6 |
Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030 [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2007, 89(4): 780-785.
|
| 7 |
Moore RE, Baldwin K, Austin MS, et al. A systematic review of open reduction and internal fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures with or without allograft strut, cerclage, and locked plates [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2014, 29(5): 872-876.
|
| 8 |
Sheth NP, Brown NM, Moric M, et al. Operative treatment of early Peri-Prosthetic femur fractures following primary total hip arthroplasty [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2013, 28(2): 286-291.
|
| 9 |
Singh JA, Jensen MR, Harmnsen SW, et al. Are gender, comorbidity, and obesity risk factors for postoperative periprosthetic fractures after primary total hip arthroplasty? [J]. J Arthroplasty 2013, 28(1):126-131.
|
| 10 |
Duncan CP, Masri B. Fractures of the femur after hip replacement [J]. Instr Course Lect, 1995,44: 293-304.
|
| 11 |
Giaretta S,Momoli A,Porcelli G, et al. Diagnosis andmanagement of periprosthetic femoral fractures after Hip arthroplasty[J]. Injury, 2019, 50Suppl 2: 29-33. .
|
| 12 |
Lindahl H, Malchau H, Herberts P, et al. Periprosthetic femoral fracturesclassification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2005, 20(7):857-865.
|
| 13 |
Lindahl H, Garellick G, Regner H, et al. Three hundred and twenty-one periprosthetic femoral fractures [J]. J Bone Joint SurgAm, 2006, 88A(6): 1215-1222.
|
| 14 |
Zdero R, Walker R, Waddell JP, et al. Biomechanical evaluation periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2008, 90(5):1068-1077.
|
| 15 |
Demos HA, Briones MS, White PH, et al. A biomechanical comparison of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation in normal and osteoporotic cadaveric bone [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2012, 27(5): 783-788.
|
| 16 |
Fulkerson E, Koval K, Preston CF, et al. Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures associated with cemented femoral stems [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2006, 20(2): 89-93.
|
| 17 |
Tower SS, Beals RK. Fractures of the femur after hip replacement: the Oregon experience [J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 1999, 30(2):235-247.
|
| 18 |
Kubiak EN, Haller JM, Kemper DD, et al. Does the lateral plate need to overlap the stem to mitigate stress concentration when treating Vancouver C periprosthetic supracondylar femur fracture? [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2015, 30(1): 104-108.
|
| 19 |
Chakravarthy J, Bansal R, Cooper J. Locking plate osteosynthesis for Vancouver Type B1 and Type C periprosthetic fractures of femur: a report on 12 patients [J]. Injury, 2007, 38(6): 725-733.
|
| 20 |
Fulkerson E, Tejwani N, Stuchin S, et al. Management of periprosthetic femur fractures with a first Generation locking plate [J]. Injury, 2007, 38(8): 965-972.
|
| 21 |
Chakravarthy J, Bansal R, Cooper J. Locking plate osteosynthesis for Vancouver type B1 and type C periprosthetic fractures of femur:a report on 12 patients[J]. Injury, 2007, 38(6):725-733.
|
| 22 |
Howell JR, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, et al. Cable plates and onlay allografts in periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip replacement: laboratory and clinical observations [J]. Instr Course Lect, 2004, 53: 99-110.
|
| 23 |
Mamczak CN, Gardner MJ, Bolhofner B, et al. Interprosthetic femoral fractures [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2010, 24(12): 740-744.
|
| 24 |
Walcher MG, Giesinger K, Du Sart R, et al. Plate positioning in periprosthetic or interprosthetic femur fractures with stable Implants-A biomechanical study [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2016, 31(12): 2894-2899.
|
| 25 |
Khalafi A, Curtiss S, Hazelwood S, et al. The effect of plate rotation on the stiffness of femoral LISS: a mechanical study [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2006, 20(8): 542-546.
|
| 26 |
Jaakkola JI, Douglas WL, Moore T, et al. Supracondylar femur fracture fixation Mechanical comparison of the 95°condylar side plate and screw versus 95°angled blade plate [J]. Acta OrthopScand, 2002, 73(1): 72-76.
|
| 27 |
Weiser L, Korecki MA, Sellenschloh K, et al. The role of inter-prosthetic distance,cortical thickness and bone mineral density in the development of interprosthetic fractures of the femur: a biomechanical cadaver study[J]. Bone Joint J, 2014, 96-b(10):1378.
|
| 28 |
Iesaka K, Kummer FJ, Di Cesare PE. Stress risers between two ipsilateral intramedullary stems: a finite-element and biomechanical analysis [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2005, 20(3): 386-391.
|
| 29 |
Soenen M, Baracchi M, De Corte R, et al. Stemmed TKA in a femur with a total hip arthroplasty: is there a safe distance between the stem tips? [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2013, 28(8): 1437-1445.
|
| 30 |
Harris T, Ruth J, Szivek J, et al. The effect of implant overlap on the mechanical properties of the femur [J]. J Trauma, 2003, 54(5):930-935.
|
| 31 |
Kubiak EN, Fulkerson E, Strauss E, et al. The evolution of locked plates [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006, 88 Suppl4:189-200.
|
| 32 |
Egol KA, Kubiak EN, Fulkerson E, et al. Biomechanics of locked plates and screws [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2004, 18(8): 488-493.
|