切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (06) : 333 -338. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2021.06.003

股骨骨折

新型股骨颈内固定系统与3枚空心钉加内侧钢板固定青壮年Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的有限元分析
杜兵1, 马腾2, 路遥2, 张聪明2, 许毅博2, 黄强1, 姬帅2, 李明2, 任程2, 王谦2, 张堃2(), 李忠2,()   
  1. 1. 716000 延安大学医学院;710054 西安交通大学医学院附属红会医院
    2. 710054 西安交通大学医学院附属红会医院
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-29 出版日期:2021-12-05
  • 通信作者: 张堃, 李忠

Finite Element Analysis of the new femoral neck internal fixationsystem and three hollow screws plus medial plate fixation for Pauwels III femoral neck fractures in young adults

Bing Du1, Teng Ma2, Yao Lu2, Congming Zhang2, Qiang Huang2, Shuai Ji1, Ming Li2, Cheng Ren2, Qian Wang2, Kun Zhang2, Zhong Li2,()   

  1. 1. Medical College of Yan'an University, Yan'an 716000, China; Honghui Hospital Affiliated to Medicine College of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710054, China
    2. Honghui Hospital Affiliated to Medicine College of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710054, China
  • Received:2021-07-29 Published:2021-12-05
  • Corresponding author: Zhong Li
引用本文:

杜兵, 马腾, 路遥, 张聪明, 许毅博, 黄强, 姬帅, 李明, 任程, 王谦, 张堃, 李忠. 新型股骨颈内固定系统与3枚空心钉加内侧钢板固定青壮年Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的有限元分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2021, 07(06): 333-338.

Bing Du, Teng Ma, Yao Lu, Congming Zhang, Qiang Huang, Shuai Ji, Ming Li, Cheng Ren, Qian Wang, Kun Zhang, Zhong Li. Finite Element Analysis of the new femoral neck internal fixationsystem and three hollow screws plus medial plate fixation for Pauwels III femoral neck fractures in young adults[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2021, 07(06): 333-338.

目的

采用有限元分析方法比较新型股骨颈内固定系统(FNS)与3枚空心螺钉加内侧钢板固定青壮年Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的生物力学特性。

方法

收集一例Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折住院患者(男,35岁)的健侧股骨CT扫描数据,将该股骨CT数据通过数字医学软件建立股骨的三维模型。按照60°骨折线角度对股骨颈进行简化分割,模拟出Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折,在Solidworks2017软件中按照临床上相应的内固定尺寸和手术方案置入模拟的内固定模型于股骨模型中,分为FNS置入和3枚空心钉加内侧钢板置入两种模型,最后使用ANSYS软件进行划分网格、材料赋值和数据计算等步骤,FNS与3枚空心钉加内侧钢板固定后的生物力学稳定性有何差异。

结果

实验分为2组:a.FNS组,b.空心钉加内侧钢板组。股骨头侧应力峰值分别为:a:126.74Mpa,b:180.11Mpa。内固定应力峰值分别为:a:143.17Mpa,b:214.68MPa。股骨头处位移峰值分别为:a:10.726mm,b:11.278mm。内固定位移峰值分别为:a:10.164mm,b:11.004mm。

结论

FNS对骨折端固定的力学稳定性优于3枚空心钉加内侧钢板,是青壮年不稳定型股骨颈骨折值得优先考虑的手术固定方式。

Objective

In this study, finite element analysis method was used to compare the biomechanical characteristics of femoral neck system (FNS) and three hollow screws combined with medial plate fixation of Pauwels type Ⅲfemoral neck fracture, so as to provide reference for the selection of clinical surgical options.

Methods

The CT scanning data of the healthy femur of a hospitalized patient with Pauwels III femoral neck fracture (male, 35 years old) were collected, and the CT data of the femur were used to establish the three-dimensional model of the femur by digital medical software. The femoral neck was simplified and segmented according to the angle of 60° fracture line, and the Pauwels III femoral neck fracture was simulated. In Solidworks 2017 software, the simulated internal fixation model was placed in the femoral model according to the corresponding clinical internal fixation size and surgical scheme, and it was divided into two models, FNS placement and three hollow nails plus medial plate placement. Finally, ANSYS software was used meshing, material assignment and data calculation. What was the difference in biomechanical stability between FNS and three hollow nails plus medial plate fixation.

Results

The peak stress of femoral head were, a: 126.74 Mpa, b: 180.11 Mpa. The peak stress of internal fixation were, a: 143.17 MPa, b: 214.68 MPa. The peak displacement of femoral head were, a: 10.726 mm, b: 11.278 mm. The peak displacement of internal fixation were, a: 10.164 mm, b: 11.004 mm.

Conclusions

FNS for the fixation of the fracture end is better than that of the hollow nail and the medial plate, and the femoral neck system has the advantages of small incision and short timeconsuming in the operation process, which is a preferred surgical fixation method for femoral neck fractures.

表1 有限元模型的节点数及单元数
图1 模型分组:股骨颈系统组(a);3枚空心钉加内侧钢板组(b)
表2 模型材料参数
图2~3 两组模型股骨头侧应力分布云图
图8~9 两组模型内固定位移分布云图
1
Okcu G, Özkayın N, Erkan S, et al. Should full threaded compression screws be used in adult femoral neck fractures? [J]. Injury, 2015, 46 Suppl 2: S24-S28.
2
Windolf M, Braunstein V, Dutoit C, et al. Is a helical shaped implant a superior alternative to the Dynamic Hip Screw for unstable femoral neck fractures? A biomechanical investigation [J]. Clin Biomech(Bristol, Avon), 2009, 24(1): 59-64.
3
Knobe M, Altgassen S, Maier KJ, et al. Screw-blade fixation systems in Pauwels three femoral neck fractures: a biomechanical evaluation[J]. Int Orthop, 2018, 42(2): 409-418.
4
Shen M, Wang C, Chen H, et al. An update on the Pauwels classification [J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2016, 11(1): 161.
5
Ye Y, Chen K, Tian K, et al. Medial buttress plate augmentation of cannulated screw fixation in vertically unstable femoral neck fractures: Surgical technique and preliminary results [J]. Injury, 2017, 48(10): 2189-2193.
6
Lichstein PM, Kleimeyer JP, Githens M, et al. Does the Watson-Jones or modified Smith-Petersen approach provide superior exposure for femoral neck fracture fixation? [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2018, 476(7): 1468-1476.
7
Sitthiseripratip K, Van OH, Vander Sloten J, et al. Finite element study of trochanteric gamma nail for trochanteric fracture [J]. Med Eng Phys, 2003, 25(2): 99-106.
8
Sowmianarayanan S, Chandrasekaran A, Kumar RK. Finite element analysis of a subtrochanteric fractured femur with dynamic hip screw, dynamic condylar screw, and proximal femur nail implants--a comparative study [J]. Proc Inst Mech Eng H, 2008, 222(1): 117-127.
9
Li J, Wang M, Zhou J, et al. Finite element analysis of different screw constructs in the treatment of unstable femoral neck fractures[J]. Injury, 2020, 51(4): 995-1003.
10
Freitas A, Bontempo R L, Azevedo F, et al. New fixation method for Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture: a finite element analysis of sliding hip screw, L-shaped, and L-shaped with medial plate[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol,2021,31(6):1069-1075..
11
Roerdink WH, Aalsma AM, Nijenbanning G, et al. The dynamic locking blade plate,a new implant for intracapsular hip fractures: biomechanical comparison with the sliding hip screw and Twin Hook[J]. Injury, 2008, 40(3): 283-287.
12
Samsami S, Saberi S, Sadighi S, et al. Comparison of three fixation methods for femoral neck fracture in young adults: experimental and numerical investigations [J]. J Med Biol Eng, 2015, 35(5): 566-579.
13
Li J, Wang M, Li L, et al. Finite element analysis of different configurations of fully threaded cannulated screw in the treatment of unstable femoral neck fractures [J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2018, 13(1): 272.
14
Li J, Yin P, Zhang L, et al. Medial anatomical buttress plate in treating displaced femoral neck fracture a finite element analysis [J]. Injury, 2019, 50(11): 1895-1900.
15
Siavashi B, Aalirezaei A, Moosavi M, et al. A comparative study between multiple cannulated screws and dynamic hip screw for fixation of femoral neck fracture in adults [J]. Int Orthop, 2015, 39(10): 2069-2071.
16
Damany DS, Parker MJ, Chojnowski A. Complications after intracapsular hip fractures in young adults. A meta-analysis of 18 published studies involving 564 fractures [J]. Injury, 2005, 36(1): 131-141.
17
Slobogean GP, Sprague SA, Scott T, et al. Complications following young femoral neck fractures [J]. Injury, 2015, 46(3): 484-491.
18
Liporace F, Gaines R, Collinge C, et al. Results of internal fixation of Pauwels type- 3 vertical femoral neck fractures [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol, 2008, 90A(8): 1654-1659.
19
Tianye L, Peng Y, Jingli X, et al. Finite element analysis of different internal fixation methods for the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture [J]. Biomed Pharmacother, 2019, 112: 108658.
20
Mir H, Collinge C. Application of a medial buttress plate May prevent many treatment failures seen after fixation of vertical femoral neck fractures in young adults [J]. Med Hypotheses, 2015, 84(5): 429-433.
21
Samsami S, Augat P, Rouhi G. Stability of femoral neck fracture fixation: A finite element analysis [J]. Proc Inst Mech Eng H, 2019, 233(9): 892-900.
22
Stoffel K, Zderic I, Gras F, et al. Biomechanical Evaluation of the Femoral Neck System in Unstable Pauwels III Femoral Neck Fractures: A Comparison with the Dynamic Hip Screw and Cannulated Screws [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2017, 31(3): 131-137.
[1] 孟繁宇, 周新社, 赵志, 裴立家, 刘犇. 侧位直接前方入路髋关节置换治疗偏瘫肢体股骨颈骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 865-870.
[2] 郭璐琦, 赵雅琦, 李霁欣, 周兰, 林金鹏, 张子砚, 李俊杰, 王少白. 免荷矫形器对膝骨关节炎的生物力学影响的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 560-565.
[3] 吴聪, 刘伦, 贾全忠. 老年股骨颈骨折初次全髋关节置换近期疗效影响因素[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 283-287.
[4] 莫亮, 熊贤梅, 马超, 刘予豪, 陈镇秋, 何伟, 周驰. 股骨颈骨折内固定术后因素与股骨头坏死关系的分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 735-744.
[5] 周晓强, 孙超, 李志强, 徐人杰, 佘远时, 张向鑫, 陈广祥, 虞宵. 动力抗旋交叉钉治疗不稳定股骨颈骨折的早期疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 670-676.
[6] 张起尧, 刘子文. 复杂腹壁疝的解剖和生物力学基础[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 674-676.
[7] 宗宇宁, 薛海鹏, 韩天宇, 张昊, 王帅, 马翔宇, 纪振钢, 周大鹏. 解剖状骨水泥占位器在治疗内侧柱缺失型肱骨近端骨折中的实用性的有限元分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 242-251.
[8] 潘超, 张博, 韩磊, 刘俊阳, 崔鹏, 闫兵山, 田旭, 刘林涛, 东靖明. 肩锁关节脱位治疗的研究进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 186-191.
[9] 崔梦凡, 贺瑞, 李晓娜, 陈维毅, 宋耀文. 角膜生物力学评估参数的应用进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 236-240.
[10] 刘佳, 贺瑞, 李晓娜. 断层扫描生物力学指数应用于屈光手术术前早期圆锥角膜筛查的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(06): 341-346.
[11] 张子砚, 曾红, 许苑晶, 郭璐琦, 王金武, 王少白, 任富超, 缪伟强, 戴尅戎, 王茹. 膝关节生物力学标志物预测膝关节炎研究进展[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 315-320.
[12] 宋晓亮, 郝海虎, 刘渊, 李浩江, 雷晓晶, 邵新中, 李卿源. 股骨重建钉治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效观察[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 201-208.
[13] 金宇杰, 虞宵, 周晓强, 李志强, 徐人杰, 张向鑫, 陈广祥. 动力交叉钉系统治疗股骨颈骨折其内固定位置与临床疗效的相关性研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 193-200.
[14] 张乾龙, 王继荣, 宋晨辉, 刘修信, 任政, 刘宇哲, 阿里木江·玉素甫, 覃祺, 冉建. 两种髓内钉固定A3.1粗隆间骨折的有限元分析:增强型PFNA与InterTan[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 209-217.
[15] 刘璇, 胡正霞, 王晓东, 兰海, 李开南. SuperPATH微创全髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的学习曲线研究与临床应用价值分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 73-80.
阅读次数
全文


摘要