切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (02) : 93 -98. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2021.02.005

所属专题： 文献；

脊柱专题

聚焦解决模式对脊髓损伤伴截瘫患者残障接受度影响的研究
臧苑彤1, 张丽天1, 杨美英1, 赵小娟1, 李莉1,†()   
  1. 1. 010030　呼和浩特市，内蒙古医科大学第二附属医院
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-18 出版日期:2021-04-05
  • 通信作者: 李莉
  • 基金资助:
    内蒙古自治区卫生和计划生育委员会科研计划项目(201703119); 内蒙古医科大学科技百万工程项目(YKD2018KJBW（LH）050)

A study on the effect of solution focused approach on the acceptance of disability in patients with spinal cord injury with paraplegia

Yuantong Zang1, Litian Zhang1, Meiying Yang1, Xiaojuan Zhao1, Li Li1,†()   

  1. 1. Department of Rehabilitation, The First Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010030, China
  • Received:2019-10-18 Published:2021-04-05
  • Corresponding author: Li Li
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

臧苑彤, 张丽天, 杨美英, 赵小娟, 李莉. 聚焦解决模式对脊髓损伤伴截瘫患者残障接受度影响的研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2021, 07(02): 93-98.

Yuantong Zang, Litian Zhang, Meiying Yang, Xiaojuan Zhao, Li Li. A study on the effect of solution focused approach on the acceptance of disability in patients with spinal cord injury with paraplegia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2021, 07(02): 93-98.

目的

探讨聚焦解决模式对脊髓损伤伴截瘫患者残障接受度的影响，以提高脊髓损伤伴截瘫患者的残障接受度。

方法

将64例脊髓损伤伴截瘫患者按随机数字表法分为2组各32例，对照组给予常规护理，试验组在对照组基础上实施聚焦解决模式干预，采用残障接受度量表、自我感受负担量表和医院焦虑抑郁量表分别在干预前和干预3个月后对患者进行调查，评价两组患者的残障接受度、自我感受负担和焦虑抑郁情况。

结果

干预3个月后，试验组残障接受度量表中扩大维度、服从维度、控制维度、转变维度及总分均明显高于对照组（均P<0.05）,试验组自我感受负担得分和焦虑抑郁总分均明显低于对照组（t=5.263，P<0.05；t=3.613，P<0.05）干预前，上述各指标两组间比较均无统计学差异（P>0.05）。干预3个月后，试验组残障接受度总分明显高于干预前（Z=-3.946，P<0.05），对照组干预前后差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。

结论

聚焦解决模式能够提高脊髓损伤伴截瘫患者的残障接受度，减轻患者的自我感受负担和焦虑抑郁水平。

关键词: 心理疗法, 脊髓损伤, 残障
Objective

To explore the effect of solution focused approach on the acceptance of disability in patients with spinal cord injury combined with paraplegia, to improve the patient's acceptance of disability.

Methods

Totally 64 patients with spinal cord injury combined with paraplegia were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group with 32 cases in each group. The experimental group received the solution focused approach on the basis of routine nursing, while the control group patient only received routine nursing. Acceptance of disability scale, Self-feeling burden scale and hospital anxiety and depression scale were used to evaluate the intervention effect at different time.

Results

After 3 months of intervention, the dimensions of expansion, obedience, control, transformation and total scores of disability Acceptance Scale in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group (all P<0.05). The self-feeling burden score and the total anxiety and depression score of the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group (t=5.263, P<0.05; t=3.613, P<0.05). Before intervention, there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P>0.05). After 3 months of intervention, the total score of disability acceptance in the experimental group was significantly higher than that before intervention (Z=-3.946, P<0.05), while the difference before and after intervention in the control group was no statistically significant (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Solution Focused Approach can improve the acceptance of disability and reduce the patient's self-feeling burden and anxiety and depression levels in patients with spinal cord injury combined with paraplegia.

Key words: Psychotherapy, Spinal cord injuries, Disabled persons
表1 两组脊髓损伤伴截瘫患者患者一般资料比较
组别 例数 性别（例） 年龄（岁，±s） 文化程度（例） 婚姻状况（例） 医疗支付方式（例）
男 女 初中以下 高中以上 未婚 已婚 自费 医保
对照组 32 27 5 37±11 10 22 7 25 14 18
干预组 32 25 7 34±11 8 24 9 23 19 13
统计值   χ2=0.410 t=0.941 χ2=0.309 χ2=0.333 χ2=1.564
P值   0.522 0.350 0.578 0.564 0.211
表2 两组脊髓损伤伴截瘫患者干预前后残障接受度得分比较（分，±s）
组别 例数 扩大维度 t值 P值 服从维度 t值 P值 控制维度 t值 P值
干预前 干预后 干预前 干预后 干预前 干预后
对照组 32 46±13 51±15 -1.532 0.131 13±6 16±6 -2.014 0.051 43±19 45±19 -0.420 0.676
试验组 32 45±16 59±12 -3.821 0.000 13±6 20±6 -4.440 0.000 42±17 57±21 -3.066 0.003
t值   0.253 -2.159     0.302 -2.233     0.229 -2.348    
P值   0.801 0.035     0.764 0.029     0.819 0.022    
组别 例数 转变维度 t值 P值 总分 t值 P值
干预前 干预后 干预前 干预后
对照组 32 41±19 42±14 -0.302 0.764 144±31 155±29 -1.502 0.138
试验组 32 41±18 54±16 -3.104 0.003 141±33 189±32 -5.879 0.000
t值 - -0.014 -3.215     0.288 -4.435    
P值 - 0.989 0.002     0.774 0.000    
表3 两组脊髓损伤伴截瘫患者干预前后残障接受度总分比较[例（%）]
组别 例数 干预前 干预后 χ2值 P值
低接受度 中接受度 高接受度 低接受度 中接受度 高接受度
对照组 32 10（31.2） 22（68.8） 0 8（25） 24（75） 0 0.309 0.578
试验组 32 14（43.8） 17（53.1） 1（3.1） 1（3.1） 25（78.1） 6（18.8） 12.539 0.000
χ2值     1.067     4.655      
P值     0.302     0.031      
表4 两组脊髓损伤伴截瘫患者干预前后自我感受负担得分比较（分，±s）
组别 例数 干预前 干预后 t值 P值
对照组 32 35±5 32±4 0.145 0.052
试验组 32 34±5 28±4 2.321 0.001
t值 - 1.569 5.263    
P值 - 0.051 0.001    
表5 两组脊髓损伤伴截瘫患者干预前后焦虑抑郁得分比较（分，±s）
组别 例数 干预前 干预后 t值 P值
对照组 32 8.4±2.1 6.7±2.1 1.201 0.063
试验组 32 8.3±3.0 3.9±4.2 3.423 0.001
t值 - 1.235 3.613    
P值 - 0.072 0.001    
1
Bond C, Woods K, Humphrey N, et al. Practitioner review: The effectiveness of solution focused brief therapy with children and families: A systematic and critical evaluation of the literature from 1990-2010 [J]. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 2013, 54(7): 707-723.
2
Shuttlewood E.a, Nash J. A solution-focused approach to diabetes-related distress [J]. Journal of Diabetes Nursing, 2016, 20(3): 102-107.
3
Sophia T, Nicole E, Lynn Z, et al. Helping Spouses Cope with Partners Coming Out: A Solution-Focused Approach [J]. Am J Fam Ther, 2008, 36(1): 30-47.
4
Nurcan Akgül Gündoğdu, Handan Zincir, Nuran Güler. Solution Focused Approach and Usage on Nursing [J]. JCBPR, 2016, 5(3): 145-152.
5
World Health Organization, International classification of functioning [M]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001.
6
Dziura J. Psychological well-being, acceptance of disability and perceived social support in US military veterans with acquired hearing loss [D]. Washington, D. C, Gallaudet University, 2017.
7
陈令红，李薇，胡铭.聚焦解决模式在缓解脊髓损伤合并截瘫患者负性情绪中的应用及效果评价[J].中华护理杂志, 2016, 51(11): 1297-1301.
8
linkowski D. A scale to measure acceptance of disability [J]. Rehabil Couns Bull, 1971, 14(4): 236-244.
9
Chao HL, Tsai TY, Livneh H, et al. Patients with colorectal cancer: relationship between demographic and disease characteristics and acceptance of disability [J]. J Adv Nurs, 2010, 66(10): 2278-2286.
10
Natalie Cousineau, Ian McDowell, Steve Hot, et al. Measuring Chronic Patients'Feelings of Being a Burden to their Caregivers: Development and Preliminary Validation of a Scale [J]. Medical Care, 2003, 41(1).
11
武燕燕，姜亚芳.癌症患者自我感受负担的调查与分析[J].护理管理杂志, 2010, 10(06): 405-407.
12
Zigmond A. S., Snaith R. P.. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [J]. Acta Psychiatr Scand, 1983, 67(6): 361-370.
13
施红梅.脊髓损伤患者情绪状态与活动和参与功能研究[J].中国康复理论与实践, 2017, 23(8): 946-949.
14
McDonald SD, Mickens MN, Goldberg-Looney LD, et al. Mental disorder prevalence among U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs outpatients with spinal cord injuries [J]. J Spinal Cord Med, 2018, 41(6): 691-702.
15
Fann JR, Bombardier CH, Richards JS, et al, Venlafaxine extended-release for depression following spinal cord injury: a randomized clinical trial [J]. JAMA Psychiatry, 2015, 72(3): 247-58.
16
Zhang X, Liu Y, Deng X, et al. The Correlation Between Quality of Life and Acceptability of Disability in Patients With Facial Burn Scars [J]. Front Bioeng Biotech, 2019, 14(7): 329.
17
侯艳.脊髓损伤神经源性膀胱临床评估及治疗的研究进展[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2019, 5(4): 238-244.
18
王玉明，宫慧明，孙青,等.慢性脊髓损伤患者与闲暇时间身体活动[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2018, 4(6): 378-381.
19
朱晓东，徐锡明，董立薇,等.脊髓损伤后神经源性异位骨化的危险因素分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2015, (1): 28-33.
20
Kreier F, Genco ŞM, Boreel M, et al. An individual, community-based treatment for obese children and their families: the solution-focused approach [J]. Obes Facts, 2013, 6(5): 424-32.
21
Greenwood Deborah A, Ross Tami A, Reifsnider Elizabeth. Applying a Solution-Focused Approach to Life With Diabetes: Insights Gleaned via Twitter [J]. Diabetes Educ, 2020, XX(X): 1-10.
22
O′connell B, Solution-Focused therapy [M]. London: Sage, 1998: 2-3.
23
Carter B. Kicking Eeyore into touch: 'living-strong', 'nursing-strong' and being appreciative and solution-focused [J]. Contemp Nurse, 2007, 23(2): 181-188.
24
Hall O. Trent, McGrath Ryan P, Peterson Mark D, et al. The Burden of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in the United States: Disability-Adjusted Life Years [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehab, 2019, 100(1): 95-100.
25
Omer S, Golden E, Priebe S. Exploring the Mechanisms of a Patient-Centred Assessment with a Solution Focused Approach (DIALOG+) in the Community Treatment of Patients with Psychosis: A Process Evaluation within a Cluster-Ran domised Controlled Trial [J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(2): e0148415.
[1] 王燚, 谌晓安, 张福兰, 谭慧, 周县委, 徐涛. 运动想象训练对全膝关节置换术患者干预效果的分析[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 441-449.
[2] 吴杰, 周志强, 符菁, 李喜功, 张钦. 吸入性氢气对大鼠脊髓损伤后自噬及神经功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 363-371.
[3] 曹叙勇, 刘耀升. 脊柱转移瘤手术并发症研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(05): 435-439.
[4] 袁丹, 钟潇, 王明松, 贾康. 脊髓损伤神经源性膀胱患者间歇导尿期间尿路感染病原菌分布及影响因素[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 229-236.
[5] 王楠楠, 刘文红, 孙立, 王婧. 脊髓损伤并发腹股沟嵌顿疝29例围手术期护理体会[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 473-476.
[6] 景水力, 王娟, 刘晔, 周亨, 熊威, 叶青松. 间充质干细胞在脊髓损伤中的应用及研究进展[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 113-121.
[7] 薛文, 刘卓, 贾卫华, 张小义, 刘进, 王爱国, 冯志刚, 杨鑫, 田祺, 段虎斌. 大鼠脊髓损伤后降钙素基因相关肽及神经元钙超载的变化及相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 198-205.
[8] 李景德, 张保艳, 卢培刚, 李博. 法舒地尔对大鼠急性脊髓损伤后神经细胞凋亡和BCL-2蛋白表达水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 65-70.
[9] 陈业煌, 陈恺钦, 薛亮, 吴箭午, 黄预备, 魏梁锋, 曾炳香, 王守森. 改良大鼠挫伤型脊髓损伤模型的制备与评估[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 325-332.
[10] 郭莉丽, 高谋, 徐如祥. 脊髓损伤的治疗新进展[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 321-324.
[11] 姚尧, 杨新明, 杜雅坤, 朱宁, 阴彦林, 贾永利, 张瑛, 张培楠, 田野, 陈丽星. 雷公藤甲素与甲泼尼龙调节细胞自噬和凋亡促进脊髓损伤修复的比较研究[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(03): 132-140.
[12] 隋曌, 彭凤, 余凯, 严小虎, 李英, 钟琳, 刘晓银. 吸附NT-3的3D打印胶原蛋白/壳聚糖支架改善脊髓损伤后的运动功能[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(06): 331-338.
[13] 于同, 矫健航, 姜炜博, 王中汉, 王洋, 伍旭辉, 吴敏飞. 体位复位与椎板切除减压内固定术治疗胸腰段爆裂性骨折的对比性研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 331-339.
[14] 李俸鑫, 许建文, 陈如玉, 李常秋, 王继羚, 谭秀伟, 卜海峰, 王海霖, 苏义基. 2015至2020年广西医科大学第一附属医院老年脊髓损伤的特征分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 45-50.
[15] 左安俊, 欧振飞, 王天瑞, 丁磊, 李天予, 于腾波. 二甲胺四环素对小胶质细胞激活状态影响的研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(03): 152-158.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号