切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (05) : 302 -307. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.05.009

所属专题: 骨科学 总编推荐 老年骨科流行病学 文献

老年骨科流行病学

2010年至2011年中国东部和西部地区成人股骨转子间骨折流行病学对比分析
刘磊1, 王宝泉2, 孙然1, 杨宗酉1, 孙家元1, 陈伟1, 王海立1, 殷兵1, 刘松1, 李石伦1, 杨光1, 张英泽1,()   
  1. 1. 050051 石家庄,河北医科大学第三医院关节外科,河北省骨科研究所,河北省骨科生物力学重点实验室
    2. 053500 衡水,景县人民医院
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-31 出版日期:2018-10-05
  • 通信作者: 张英泽
  • 基金资助:
    河北省医学科学重点研究课题(20170660)

Epidemiological comparison of adult femoral intertrochanteric fractures between the east and west areas in China from 2010 through 2011

Lei Liu1, Baoquan Wang2, Ran Sun1, Zongyou Yang1, Jiayuan Sun1, Wei Chen1, Haili Wang1, Bing Yin1, Song Liu1, Shilun Li1, Guang Yang1, Yingze Zhang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Joint Surgery, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Biomechanics of Hebei Province, Orthopaedic Research Institution of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050051, China
    2. Jingxian People's Hospital, Hengshui 053500, China
  • Received:2018-05-31 Published:2018-10-05
  • Corresponding author: Yingze Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Yingze, Email:
引用本文:

刘磊, 王宝泉, 孙然, 杨宗酉, 孙家元, 陈伟, 王海立, 殷兵, 刘松, 李石伦, 杨光, 张英泽. 2010年至2011年中国东部和西部地区成人股骨转子间骨折流行病学对比分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2018, 04(05): 302-307.

Lei Liu, Baoquan Wang, Ran Sun, Zongyou Yang, Jiayuan Sun, Wei Chen, Haili Wang, Bing Yin, Song Liu, Shilun Li, Guang Yang, Yingze Zhang. Epidemiological comparison of adult femoral intertrochanteric fractures between the east and west areas in China from 2010 through 2011[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2018, 04(05): 302-307.

目的

对比分析我国东部和西部地区成人股骨转子间骨折的流行病学特征。

方法

回顾性分析2010年1月至2011年12月我国东部35所医院和西部28所医院诊治的成人股骨转子间骨折患者资料,记录患者的性别、年龄、骨折AO分型和Evans分型等数据。将东部35所医院诊治的患者资料定为A组,西部28所医院诊治的患者资料定为B组,对比分析两组患者的一般资料。

结果

共收集9 233例成人股骨转子间骨折,男女比为1.04∶1;骨折高发年龄段为71~80岁(28.71%);根据AO分型,31-A1型骨折2 464例(26.69%),31-A2型骨折5 251例(56.87%),31-A3型骨折1 518例(16.44%);根据Evans分型,稳定性骨折4 169例(45.15%),不稳定性骨折5 064例(54.85%)。A组6 856例,男女比为0.99∶1;B组2 377例,男女比为1.19∶1;两组患者性别构成比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=14.582,P<0.01)。A组患者中位年龄(74岁)大于B组(70岁),差异有统计学意义(Z=9.755,P<0.01)。两组骨折高发年龄段均为71~80岁,构成比分别为29.89%和25.33%。根据AO分型,两组患者骨折高发类型均为31-A2型,构成比分别为57.28%和55.70%;根据Evans分型,均以不稳定性骨折多见。两组患者年龄段分布和骨折Evans分型分布比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),骨折AO分型分布比较差异无统计学意义。

结论

成人股骨转子间骨折高发年龄为71~80岁,男性多于女性,高发类型为31-A2型,多见于不稳定性骨折。东部地区女性患者比例、中位年龄和稳定性骨折构成比高于西部地区,31-A3型骨折构成比低于西部地区。

Objective

To compare the epidemiological characteristics of adult femoral intertrochanteric fractures between the east and west areas in China from 2010 to 2011.

Methods

The data of adult femoral intertrochanteric fractures treated between January 2010 and December 2011 at 35 east hospitals and 28 west ones were analyzed retrospectively. The patients' gender, age, type of AO and Evans classification were documented. Data from the 35 east hospitals were classified as group A while data from the 28 west ones as group B. Comparisons were made between the 2 groups to find out the general epidemiological characteristics.

Results

A total of 9,233 adults femoral intertrochanteric fractures were collected. The total male/female ratio was 1.04∶1. The fractures predominate age range was 71 to 80 years (28.71%). According to AO classification, there were 2,464 cases (26.69%) of type 31-A1, 5,251 ones (56.87%) of type 31-A2 and 1,518 ones (16.44%) of type 31-A3. According to Evans classification, there were 4,169 cases (45.15%) of stable fractures and 5,064 ones (54.85%) of unstable fractures. The male/ female ratio was 0.99∶1 in group A of 6, 856 patients and 1.19∶1 in group B of 2, 377 patients, showing a significant difference between two groups (χ2=14.582, P<0.01). The median age of group A (74 years) which was significantly older than group B (70 years) (Z=9.755, P<0.01). The fractures predominate age range was 71 to 80 years in both groups, accounting for 29.89% and 25.33% respectively. According to AO classification, the high-risk type was 31-A2 in both groups, accounting for 57.28% and 55.70% respectively. According to Evans classification, the prevailing type were unstable fractures in both groups. The differences in age distribution and Evans type distribution were statistically significant between the 2 groups (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in AO type distribution between the 2 groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

The peak age of adult femoral intertrochanteric fractures was from 71 to 80 years, the high-risk type was 31-A2 and unstable fractures were more common. There were more male patients than female ones. The proportion of female, median age and proportion of stable fractures in the east area were higher than those in the west area, while the proportion of 31-A3 type was lower.

表1 9 233例成人转子间骨折的年龄段分布[例(%)]
表2 A组和B组成人转子间骨折患者年龄段分布的比较[例(%)]
表3 A组和B组成人转子间骨折AO分型分布的比较[例(%)]
表4 A组和B组成人转子间骨折Evans分型分布的比较[例(%)]
[1]
张英泽.临床创伤骨折流行病学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社, 2009: 155-159.
[2]
Zhang YZ. Clinical epidemiology of orthopedic trauma [M]. New York: Thieme, 2012: 158-165.
[3]
Moayyeri A, Soltani A, Larijani B, et al. Epidemiology of hip fracture in Iran: results from the Iranian Multicenter Study on Accidental Injuries [J]. Osteoporos Int, 2006, 17(8): 1252-1257.
[4]
Balasegaram S, Majeed A, Fitz-Clarence H. Trends in hospital admissions for fractures of the hip and femur in England, 1989-1990 to 1997-1998 [J]. J Public Health Med, 2001, 23(1): 11-17.
[5]
Icks A, Haastert B, Wildner M, et al. Trend of hip fracture incidence in Germany 1995-2004: a population-based study [J]. Osteoporos Int, 2008, 19(8): 1139-1145.
[6]
Lau EM, Lee JK, Suriwongpaisal P, et al. The incidence of hip fracture in four Asian countries: the Asian Osteoporosis Study (AOS) [J]. Osteoporos Int, 2001, 12(3): 239-243.
[7]
Yan L, Zhou B, Prentice A, et al. Epidemiological study of hip fracture in Shenyang, People's Republic of China [J]. Bone, 1999, 24(2): 151-155.
[8]
Arakaki H, Owan I, Kudoh H, et al. Epidemiology of hip fractures in Okinawa, Japan [J]. J Bone Miner Metab, 2011, 29(3): 309-314.
[9]
Abrahamsen B, Heitmann BL, Eiken PA. Season of birth and the risk of hip fracture in Danish men and women aged 65+ [J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2012, 3: 2.
[10]
Laursen JO. Femoral fractures close to the hip--an epidemiological study in the county of Southern Jutland [J]. Ugeskr Laeger, 1994, 156(8): 1107, 1110-1.
[11]
Marks R. Hip fracture epidemiological trends, outcomes, and risk factors, 1970-2009 [J]. Int J Gen Med, 2010, 3: 1-17.
[12]
张飞,陈伟,张晓琳,等.成人股骨转子间骨折的临床特点及其变化:单中心3201例分析[J].中华外科杂志, 2014, 52(9): 697-701.
[13]
曾波,熊鸿燕,许建中,等.髋部骨折患者448例流行病学分布特征[J].中华创伤杂志, 2011, 27(1): 56-59.
[14]
Löfman O, Berglund K, Larsson L, et al. Changes in hip fracture epidemiology: redistribution between ages, genders and fracture types [J]. Osteoporos Int, 2002, 13(1): 18-25.
[15]
Hernández JL, Olmos JM, Alonso MA, et al. Trend in hip fracture epidemiology over a 14-year period in a Spanish population [J]. Osteoporos Int, 2006, 17(3): 464-470.
[16]
Cordey J, Schneider M, Bühler M. The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal femur [J]. Injury, 2000, 31, Supplement 3 (00): 56-93.
[17]
Suzuki T, Kim H, Yoshida H, et al. Randomized controlled trial of exercise intervention for the prevention of falls in community-dwelling elderly Japanese women [J]. J Bone Miner Metab, 2004, 22(6): 602-611.
[18]
Krege JH, Siminoski K, Adachi JD, et al. A simple method for determining the probability a new vertebral fracture is present in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis [J]. Osteoporos Int, 2006, 17(3): 379-386.
[19]
Van Staa TP, Dennison EM, Leufkens HG, et al. Epidemiology of fractures in England and Wales [J]. Bone, 2001, 29(6): 517-522.
[1] 韩珊珊, 徐琰, 陈卿, 杨钰坪, 明佳, 周妮娅, 李雪, 刘科. 近日节律紊乱与乳腺癌的关系[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 102-106.
[2] 中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组, 广东省医学会骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病分会, 广东省佛山市顺德区第三人民医院. 中国髋部脆性骨折术后抗骨质疏松药物临床干预指南(2023年版)[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 751-764.
[3] 刘丹丹, 宋鸣, 李霞, 徐夏君. 老年髋部骨折术后便秘的影响因素及其列线图预测模型[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 607-612.
[4] 王波, 许珂, 刘林, 张斌飞, 庄岩, 许鹏. 全髋关节置换术在老年髋臼骨折中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 385-390.
[5] 王晓伟, 王晔来, 徐宇航, 征华勇, 张建政, 刘智, 孙天胜. 老年髋部骨折后血钠紊乱与死亡风险的相关研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 186-194.
[6] 刘丽, 贾小慧, 刘艳, 沈晓佳, 周谦, 张海洋, 向丽佳, 温晓滨, 周元琳, 许婉婷, 杨磊, 李磊, 王林, 唐义蓉. 2017—2022年成都市儿童流行性感冒流行特征及儿童早期预警评分对病情严重程度的预测[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 235-241.
[7] 张雯, 徐宏燕, 张彦春, 刘凯波. 2017—2021年北京市先天性心脏病流行病学资料分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 61-68.
[8] 匡芸芸, 张悦, 张其梦, 张玉梅. 延续管理对老年COPD髋部骨折术后患者肺功能恢复的临床分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 251-253.
[9] 张海森, 叶金宝, 高鹏飞. 胆囊息肉流行病学调查及其进展影响因素分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 91-95.
[10] 李俸鑫, 许建文, 陈如玉, 李常秋, 王继羚, 谭秀伟, 卜海峰, 王海霖, 苏义基. 2015至2020年广西医科大学第一附属医院老年脊髓损伤的特征分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 45-50.
[11] 王伊帆, 陈燕, 彭劲民, 杜斌, 翁利. 中国脓毒症流行病学的研究进展[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 89-94.
[12] 李达, 张大涯, 陈润祥, 张晓冬, 黄士美, 陈晨, 曾凡, 陈世锔, 白飞虎. 海南省东方市幽门螺杆菌感染现状的调查与相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 858-864.
[13] 韩珂, 王祥耀, 茹楠, 牛晓彤, 向京元, 王妍, 高飞, 柴宁莉, 令狐恩强. 肥胖成人慢性腹泻患病率的系统评价和Meta分析[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 115-120.
[14] 陈升鑫, 翟亚奇, 卜保国, 陈德鑫, 吴浪, 方开萱, 刘文静, 李明阳, 令狐恩强. 自身免疫性胰腺炎临床特征分析[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 46-51.
[15] 章楠, 盛雪立, 邵俊, 方诗园, 王芳, 朱娴, 周斌捷. 院前恢复自主循环的院外心脏骤停患者流行病学研究[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2022, 08(06): 326-330.
阅读次数
全文


摘要