切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (03) : 151 -157. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.006

所属专题: 文献

髋关节

3D导航下微创空心螺钉内固定治疗中老年Tilt骨盆骨折的疗效观察
刘曦明1,(), 陈龙1, 汪国栋1, 童飞飞1, 陈家1, 李智1, 黄明1, 蔡贤华1   
  1. 1. 430070 广州军区武汉总医院骨科,湖北省骨创伤救治临床医学研究中心
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-15 出版日期:2018-06-05
  • 通信作者: 刘曦明
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省卫计委一般项目(WJ2018H0064); 湖北省技术创新重大项目(2017ACA099)

The clinical efficacy of 3D image-guided minimally invasive screw fixation in the treatment of Tilt pelvic fracture in middle-aged and elderly patients

Ximing Liu1,(), Long Chen1, Guodong Wang1, Feifei Tong1, Jia Chen1, Zhi Li1, Ming Huang1, Xianhua Cai1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Clinical Medical Research Center of Bone Trauma Treatment in Hubei Province, Wuhan General Hospital of Guangzhou Military, Wuhan 430060, China
  • Received:2017-03-15 Published:2018-06-05
  • Corresponding author: Ximing Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Ximing, Email:
引用本文:

刘曦明, 陈龙, 汪国栋, 童飞飞, 陈家, 李智, 黄明, 蔡贤华. 3D导航下微创空心螺钉内固定治疗中老年Tilt骨盆骨折的疗效观察[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2018, 04(03): 151-157.

Ximing Liu, Long Chen, Guodong Wang, Feifei Tong, Jia Chen, Zhi Li, Ming Huang, Xianhua Cai. The clinical efficacy of 3D image-guided minimally invasive screw fixation in the treatment of Tilt pelvic fracture in middle-aged and elderly patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2018, 04(03): 151-157.

目的

探讨3D导航下微创空心螺钉内固定治疗中老年Tilt骨盆骨折的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2015年6月至2017年1月解放军武汉总医院骨科应用3D导航技术微创(经皮或小切口)空心螺钉内固定治疗的35例中老年Tilt骨盆骨折患者资料,男性15例(42.9%),女性20例(57.1%);年龄45~73岁,平均(57±4)岁。骨盆骨折按Tile分型:B2.1型23例,B2.2型9例,B3型3例。其中,单侧耻骨支骨折32例,双侧耻骨支骨折3例;骶骨骨折:DenisⅠ区23例,DenisⅡ区12例。记录手术切口、置钉时间、置钉出血量,根据骨折复位质量、末次随访Majeed骨盆骨折功能评分及术后并发症等评定临床疗效。

结果

所有患者术后均获得随访,随访时间3~12个月,平均(6.9±1.9)个月;手术切口长约1~4 cm,平均(2.7±1.5)cm;每枚螺钉置入耗时20~38 min,平均(29.4±1.7)min;置入每枚螺钉的出血量较少,无法计算。骨盆前环复位质量根据Matta标准评定,优27例,良4例,可4例,优良率88.6%。骨盆后环复位质量根据Matta标准评定,优27例,良5例,可3例,优良率91.4%。末次随访根据Majeed骨盆骨折功能评分,优23例,良6例,可6例,优良率82.9%。术后所有患者均未出现长期疼痛、伤口感染、神经血管损伤、异位骨化、血栓形成等并发症。

结论

3D导航下微创空心螺钉内固定治疗中老年Tilt骨盆骨折精准安全、创伤小、并发症少,是一种可选择的较为理想的内固定方法。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of 3D image-guided minimally invasive screw internal fixation in the treatment of Tilt pelvic fracture in middle-aged and elderly (45-74years) patients.

Methods

A retrospective analysis including 35 middle-aged and elderly patients with Tilt pelvic fracture treated with the minimally invasive screw internal fixation was done from June 2015 to January 2017. Fifteen males (42.9%) and 20 females (57.1%). The age range was 45 to 73 years with an average of (56.4±3.7) years. According to the Tile classification: 23 cases was B2.1 type, 9 cases was B2.2 type and 3 B3 type. The posterior pelvic ring injuries had 23 DenisⅠtype, and 12 DenisⅡtype. The operative incision, blood loss during insert screw, time of operation, reduction quality, Majeed pelvic fractures function scores at the last follow-up and postoperative complications were recorded to evaluate its clinical effect.

Results

All patients had follow-up for an average of (6.9±1.9) months, range from 3 to 12 months. Length of incision was (2.7±1.5) cm, range from 1 to 4 cm. The time of each screw insertion was (29.4±1.7) min, range from 20 to38 min. Blood loss for screw insertion was too small to count. The quality of anterior pelvic ring fractures reduction were evaluated according to Matta standardization, 27 cases were excellent, 4 cases were good and 4 moderate, rate of excellent to good reduction was 88.6%. The quality of posterior pelvic ring fractures reduction were 27 excellent, 5 good and 3 moderate, the excellent to good rate of reduction was 91.4 %. The Majeed standardization showed 23 cases were excellent, 6 cases were good and 6 cases were moderate, the excellent to good rate of healing was 82.9%. There were no pain, wound infection, nerve injury, heterotopic ossification, thrombosis complications occurred.

Conclusion

The 3D image-guided minimally invasive screw internal fixation is a precise, safe, less trauma and low complications for middle-aged and elderly patients with Tilt pelvic fractures, it is a possible ideal method for clinics.

图9~17 男性,63岁,Tilt骨盆骨折患者行3D导航下后环经皮骶髂螺钉内固定联合前环经皮逆行耻骨钉内固定术。图9~11 术前X线片及CT示左侧骶骨骨折(Denis I区),左侧耻骨支高位骨折,移位明显;图12~13 术中3D导航设备监测下置钉图像;图14 术后第2天复查影像学资料;图15~17 术后3个月复查X线片、CT三维重建及功能照,骨折愈合良好,功能评分优
1
Tile M. Acute Pelvic Fractures: I. Causation and Classification [J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 1996, 4(3): 143-151.
2
袁欣华, 庞清江, 吴乃庆, 等. 切开复位内固定治疗骨盆桶柄样Tilt骨折[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2007, 22(1): 4-6.
3
陈龙, 刘曦明. Tilt骨盆骨折研究进展[J]. 国际骨科学杂志, 2016, 37(5): 274-277.
4
Kim JJ, Jung CY, Eastman JG, et al. Measurement of optimal insertion angle for iliosacral screw fixation using Three-Dimensional computed tomography scans [J]. Clin Orthop Surg, 2016, 8(2): 133-139.
5
Matta JM, Tornetta P. Internal fixation of unstable pelvic ring injuries [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1996 (329): 129-140.
6
O'brien DP, Luchette FA, Pereira SJ, et al. Pelvic fracture in the elderly is associated with increased mortality [J]. Surgery, 2002, 132(4): 710-714; discussion 714-5.
7
Amiot LP, Lang K, Putzier M, et al. Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2000, 25(5): 606-614.
8
王鉴顺, 蔡乐益, 郭晓山, 等. 3D打印技术辅助下空心螺钉微创内固定治疗不稳定型骨盆骨折[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2017, 19(3): 240-244.
9
Fracture and dislocation compendium. Orthopaedic trauma Association committee for coding and classification [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 1996, 10(S1): 1-154.
10
王小阵, 孟乘飞, 刘曦明, 等. 3D导航技术经皮骶髂关节螺钉固定治疗骶髂关节复合体损伤[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2016, 18(11): 921-926.
11
Matta JM. Indications for anterior fixation of pelvic fractures [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1996 (329): 88-96.
12
Majeed SA. Grading the outcome of pelvic fractures [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1989, 71(2): 304-306.
13
Halawi MJ. Pelvic ring injuries: Emergency assessment and management [J]. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 2015, 6(4): 252-258.
14
杨光, 李佳, 于沂阳, 等. 2003年至2012年河北医科大学第三医院成人骨盆骨折的流行病学研究[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2016, 18(7): 607-611.
15
Pohlemann T, Tosounidis G, Bircher M, et al. The German multicentre pelvis registry: a template for an European expert network? [J]. Injury, 2007, 38(4): 416-423.
16
Mizukami S, Abe Y, Tsujimoto R, et al. Accuracy of spinal curvature assessed by a computer-assisted device and anthropometric indicators in discriminating vertebral fractures among individuals with back pain [J]. Osteoporos Int, 2014, 25(6): 1727-1734.
17
Lau TW, Leung F. Occult posterior pelvic ring fractures in elderly patients with osteoporotic pubic rami fractures [J]. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2010, 18(2): 153-157.
18
胥少汀, 葛宝丰, 徐印坎, 等. 实用骨科学[M]. 第4版. 北京: 人民军医出版社, 2012: 708.
19
李宁. 老年人骨盆骨折的治疗[J]. 国际骨科学杂志, 2016, 37(6): 347-349, 353.
20
Calafi LA, Routt ML. Anterior pelvic external fixation: is there an optimal placement for the supra-acetabular pin? [J]. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), 2013, 42(12): E125-E127.
21
Matityahu A, Elson J, Morshed S, et al. Survivorship and severe complications are worse for octogenarians and elderly patients with pelvis fractures as compared to adults: data from the National trauma data bank [J]. J Osteoporos, 2012: 475739.
22
陈龙, 汪国栋, 刘曦明. 3D导航下微创空心螺钉内固定治疗Tilt骨盆骨折[J]. 华南国防医学杂志, 2017, 31(7): 23-26.
23
Eastman JG, Krieg JC, Routt ML. Early failure of symphysis pubis plating [J]. Injury, 2016, 47(8): 1707-1712.
24
Acklin YP, Zderic I, Buschbaum J, et al. Biomechanical comparison of plate and screw fixation in anterior pelvic ring fractures with low bone mineral density [J]. Injury, 2016, 47(7): 1456-1460.
25
陈龙. 微创内固定治疗骨盆前环骨折的研究进展[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2017, 25(6): 527-529.
26
Zwingmann J, Konrad G, Mehlhorn AT, et al. Percutaneous iliosacral screw insertion: malpositioning and revision rate of screws with regards to application technique (navigated vs. Conventional) [J]. J Trauma, 2010, 69(6): 1501-1506.
27
Barsoum WK, Helfand R, Krebs V, et al. Managing perioperative risk in the hip fracture patient [J]. Cleve Clin J Med, 2006, 73(Suppl 1): S46-S50.
[1] 中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组, 广东省医学会骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病分会, 广东省佛山市顺德区第三人民医院. 中国髋部脆性骨折术后抗骨质疏松药物临床干预指南(2023年版)[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 751-764.
[2] 刘瀚忠, 黄生辉, 万俊明, 李家春, 舒涛. 髌上入路和髌旁外侧入路髓内钉治疗胫骨骨折疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 795-801.
[3] 董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[4] 孟繁宇, 周新社, 赵志, 裴立家, 刘犇. 侧位直接前方入路髋关节置换治疗偏瘫肢体股骨颈骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 865-870.
[5] 刘丹丹, 宋鸣, 李霞, 徐夏君. 老年髋部骨折术后便秘的影响因素及其列线图预测模型[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 607-612.
[6] 夏效泳, 王立超, 朱治国, 丛云海, 史宗新. 深度塌陷性胫骨平台骨折的形态特点和治疗策略[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 625-632.
[7] 陈志超, 张志伟, 蒋勰, 顾祖超, 蒋菁芸, 许婷婷. 带线锚钉结合缝线捆扎固定髌骨下极粉碎性骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 732-735.
[8] 周春林, 韩元龙, 丁飞, 吴玮杰. 踝关节骨折内固定术后形态变化及功能影响因素[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 736-740.
[9] 伊喆, 王志新, 陈伟, 齐伟亚, 方杰, 石海飞, 赵夏, 赵喆, 竺枫, 盛伟, 陈焱, 张宇昊, 朱瑾, 殷耀斌, 杨勇, 陈山林, 刘波. 机器人辅助无移位急性舟骨骨折经皮内固定的诊疗与手术操作规范[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 464-468.
[10] 刘竹影, 周年苟, 李泳祺, 周丽斌. 空心环钻联合手术导板用于自体牙移植牙槽窝备洞[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 418-423.
[11] 钟文文, 李科, 刘碧好, 蔡炳, 脱颖, 叶雷, 马波, 瞿虎, 汪中扬, 王德娟, 邱剑光. 不同比例聚乳酸/丝素蛋白复合支架在兔尿道缺损修复中的疗效[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 516-522.
[12] 丁晨梦, 胡雪慧, 闫沛, 程乔. 髋部骨折术后患者居家康复体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 365-372.
[13] 金浪, 石洁, 黄正, 贾永伟, 张建坡, 魏礼成, 金昊雷. 3D打印数字技术辅助改良交叉PVP对重度骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折脊柱-骨盆矢状面平衡状态的影响[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 263-268.
[14] 傅佰圣, 李庆虎, 王大伟, 陶扶林, 王永会. 扩髓清创联合单边外固定架治疗长骨骨折髓内钉术后慢性感染的研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 289-294.
[15] 杨鹏, 刘冲. PFNA治疗老年股骨转子间骨折后隐匿性失血及其危险因素的横断面研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 301-306.
阅读次数
全文


摘要