切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (03) : 151 -157. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.006

所属专题: 文献

髋关节

3D导航下微创空心螺钉内固定治疗中老年Tilt骨盆骨折的疗效观察
刘曦明1,(), 陈龙1, 汪国栋1, 童飞飞1, 陈家1, 李智1, 黄明1, 蔡贤华1   
  1. 1. 430070 广州军区武汉总医院骨科,湖北省骨创伤救治临床医学研究中心
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-15 出版日期:2018-06-05
  • 通信作者: 刘曦明
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省卫计委一般项目(WJ2018H0064); 湖北省技术创新重大项目(2017ACA099)

The clinical efficacy of 3D image-guided minimally invasive screw fixation in the treatment of Tilt pelvic fracture in middle-aged and elderly patients

Ximing Liu1,(), Long Chen1, Guodong Wang1, Feifei Tong1, Jia Chen1, Zhi Li1, Ming Huang1, Xianhua Cai1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Clinical Medical Research Center of Bone Trauma Treatment in Hubei Province, Wuhan General Hospital of Guangzhou Military, Wuhan 430060, China
  • Received:2017-03-15 Published:2018-06-05
  • Corresponding author: Ximing Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Ximing, Email:
引用本文:

刘曦明, 陈龙, 汪国栋, 童飞飞, 陈家, 李智, 黄明, 蔡贤华. 3D导航下微创空心螺钉内固定治疗中老年Tilt骨盆骨折的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2018, 04(03): 151-157.

Ximing Liu, Long Chen, Guodong Wang, Feifei Tong, Jia Chen, Zhi Li, Ming Huang, Xianhua Cai. The clinical efficacy of 3D image-guided minimally invasive screw fixation in the treatment of Tilt pelvic fracture in middle-aged and elderly patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2018, 04(03): 151-157.

目的

探讨3D导航下微创空心螺钉内固定治疗中老年Tilt骨盆骨折的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2015年6月至2017年1月解放军武汉总医院骨科应用3D导航技术微创(经皮或小切口)空心螺钉内固定治疗的35例中老年Tilt骨盆骨折患者资料,男性15例(42.9%),女性20例(57.1%);年龄45~73岁,平均(57±4)岁。骨盆骨折按Tile分型:B2.1型23例,B2.2型9例,B3型3例。其中,单侧耻骨支骨折32例,双侧耻骨支骨折3例;骶骨骨折:DenisⅠ区23例,DenisⅡ区12例。记录手术切口、置钉时间、置钉出血量,根据骨折复位质量、末次随访Majeed骨盆骨折功能评分及术后并发症等评定临床疗效。

结果

所有患者术后均获得随访,随访时间3~12个月,平均(6.9±1.9)个月;手术切口长约1~4 cm,平均(2.7±1.5)cm;每枚螺钉置入耗时20~38 min,平均(29.4±1.7)min;置入每枚螺钉的出血量较少,无法计算。骨盆前环复位质量根据Matta标准评定,优27例,良4例,可4例,优良率88.6%。骨盆后环复位质量根据Matta标准评定,优27例,良5例,可3例,优良率91.4%。末次随访根据Majeed骨盆骨折功能评分,优23例,良6例,可6例,优良率82.9%。术后所有患者均未出现长期疼痛、伤口感染、神经血管损伤、异位骨化、血栓形成等并发症。

结论

3D导航下微创空心螺钉内固定治疗中老年Tilt骨盆骨折精准安全、创伤小、并发症少,是一种可选择的较为理想的内固定方法。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of 3D image-guided minimally invasive screw internal fixation in the treatment of Tilt pelvic fracture in middle-aged and elderly (45-74years) patients.

Methods

A retrospective analysis including 35 middle-aged and elderly patients with Tilt pelvic fracture treated with the minimally invasive screw internal fixation was done from June 2015 to January 2017. Fifteen males (42.9%) and 20 females (57.1%). The age range was 45 to 73 years with an average of (56.4±3.7) years. According to the Tile classification: 23 cases was B2.1 type, 9 cases was B2.2 type and 3 B3 type. The posterior pelvic ring injuries had 23 DenisⅠtype, and 12 DenisⅡtype. The operative incision, blood loss during insert screw, time of operation, reduction quality, Majeed pelvic fractures function scores at the last follow-up and postoperative complications were recorded to evaluate its clinical effect.

Results

All patients had follow-up for an average of (6.9±1.9) months, range from 3 to 12 months. Length of incision was (2.7±1.5) cm, range from 1 to 4 cm. The time of each screw insertion was (29.4±1.7) min, range from 20 to38 min. Blood loss for screw insertion was too small to count. The quality of anterior pelvic ring fractures reduction were evaluated according to Matta standardization, 27 cases were excellent, 4 cases were good and 4 moderate, rate of excellent to good reduction was 88.6%. The quality of posterior pelvic ring fractures reduction were 27 excellent, 5 good and 3 moderate, the excellent to good rate of reduction was 91.4 %. The Majeed standardization showed 23 cases were excellent, 6 cases were good and 6 cases were moderate, the excellent to good rate of healing was 82.9%. There were no pain, wound infection, nerve injury, heterotopic ossification, thrombosis complications occurred.

Conclusion

The 3D image-guided minimally invasive screw internal fixation is a precise, safe, less trauma and low complications for middle-aged and elderly patients with Tilt pelvic fractures, it is a possible ideal method for clinics.

图9~17 男性,63岁,Tilt骨盆骨折患者行3D导航下后环经皮骶髂螺钉内固定联合前环经皮逆行耻骨钉内固定术。图9~11 术前X线片及CT示左侧骶骨骨折(Denis I区),左侧耻骨支高位骨折,移位明显;图12~13 术中3D导航设备监测下置钉图像;图14 术后第2天复查影像学资料;图15~17 术后3个月复查X线片、CT三维重建及功能照,骨折愈合良好,功能评分优
1
Tile M. Acute Pelvic Fractures: I. Causation and Classification [J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 1996, 4(3): 143-151.
2
袁欣华, 庞清江, 吴乃庆, 等. 切开复位内固定治疗骨盆桶柄样Tilt骨折[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2007, 22(1): 4-6.
3
陈龙, 刘曦明. Tilt骨盆骨折研究进展[J]. 国际骨科学杂志, 2016, 37(5): 274-277.
4
Kim JJ, Jung CY, Eastman JG, et al. Measurement of optimal insertion angle for iliosacral screw fixation using Three-Dimensional computed tomography scans [J]. Clin Orthop Surg, 2016, 8(2): 133-139.
5
Matta JM, Tornetta P. Internal fixation of unstable pelvic ring injuries [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1996 (329): 129-140.
6
O'brien DP, Luchette FA, Pereira SJ, et al. Pelvic fracture in the elderly is associated with increased mortality [J]. Surgery, 2002, 132(4): 710-714; discussion 714-5.
7
Amiot LP, Lang K, Putzier M, et al. Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2000, 25(5): 606-614.
8
王鉴顺, 蔡乐益, 郭晓山, 等. 3D打印技术辅助下空心螺钉微创内固定治疗不稳定型骨盆骨折[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2017, 19(3): 240-244.
9
Fracture and dislocation compendium. Orthopaedic trauma Association committee for coding and classification [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 1996, 10(S1): 1-154.
10
王小阵, 孟乘飞, 刘曦明, 等. 3D导航技术经皮骶髂关节螺钉固定治疗骶髂关节复合体损伤[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2016, 18(11): 921-926.
11
Matta JM. Indications for anterior fixation of pelvic fractures [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1996 (329): 88-96.
12
Majeed SA. Grading the outcome of pelvic fractures [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1989, 71(2): 304-306.
13
Halawi MJ. Pelvic ring injuries: Emergency assessment and management [J]. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 2015, 6(4): 252-258.
14
杨光, 李佳, 于沂阳, 等. 2003年至2012年河北医科大学第三医院成人骨盆骨折的流行病学研究[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2016, 18(7): 607-611.
15
Pohlemann T, Tosounidis G, Bircher M, et al. The German multicentre pelvis registry: a template for an European expert network? [J]. Injury, 2007, 38(4): 416-423.
16
Mizukami S, Abe Y, Tsujimoto R, et al. Accuracy of spinal curvature assessed by a computer-assisted device and anthropometric indicators in discriminating vertebral fractures among individuals with back pain [J]. Osteoporos Int, 2014, 25(6): 1727-1734.
17
Lau TW, Leung F. Occult posterior pelvic ring fractures in elderly patients with osteoporotic pubic rami fractures [J]. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2010, 18(2): 153-157.
18
胥少汀, 葛宝丰, 徐印坎, 等. 实用骨科学[M]. 第4版. 北京: 人民军医出版社, 2012: 708.
19
李宁. 老年人骨盆骨折的治疗[J]. 国际骨科学杂志, 2016, 37(6): 347-349, 353.
20
Calafi LA, Routt ML. Anterior pelvic external fixation: is there an optimal placement for the supra-acetabular pin? [J]. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), 2013, 42(12): E125-E127.
21
Matityahu A, Elson J, Morshed S, et al. Survivorship and severe complications are worse for octogenarians and elderly patients with pelvis fractures as compared to adults: data from the National trauma data bank [J]. J Osteoporos, 2012: 475739.
22
陈龙, 汪国栋, 刘曦明. 3D导航下微创空心螺钉内固定治疗Tilt骨盆骨折[J]. 华南国防医学杂志, 2017, 31(7): 23-26.
23
Eastman JG, Krieg JC, Routt ML. Early failure of symphysis pubis plating [J]. Injury, 2016, 47(8): 1707-1712.
24
Acklin YP, Zderic I, Buschbaum J, et al. Biomechanical comparison of plate and screw fixation in anterior pelvic ring fractures with low bone mineral density [J]. Injury, 2016, 47(7): 1456-1460.
25
陈龙. 微创内固定治疗骨盆前环骨折的研究进展[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2017, 25(6): 527-529.
26
Zwingmann J, Konrad G, Mehlhorn AT, et al. Percutaneous iliosacral screw insertion: malpositioning and revision rate of screws with regards to application technique (navigated vs. Conventional) [J]. J Trauma, 2010, 69(6): 1501-1506.
27
Barsoum WK, Helfand R, Krebs V, et al. Managing perioperative risk in the hip fracture patient [J]. Cleve Clin J Med, 2006, 73(Suppl 1): S46-S50.
[1] 曹雨欣, 毛卓君, 梁嘉赫, 伊江浦, 张泽凯, 马文帅, 陈云涛, 李晓倩, 张宇新, 曹铁生, 袁丽君. 3D打印心脏模型在模拟左心耳封堵术临床教学中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 602-607.
[2] 郭杰坤, 王楹, 杨轩, 晏欢欣, 钟豪. Ilizarov 骨搬移技术在急诊一期修复GustiloⅢB 型胫骨长段开放粉碎性骨折的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 507-510.
[3] 张宗明, 董家鸿, 何小东, 王秋生, 徐智, 刘立民, 张翀. 老年胆道外科热点问题的争议与思考[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 754-762.
[4] 李宜璐, 曹永丽, 杨阳, 王思远, 张远耀, 杨维维, 王信琛, 陈俊, 魏东. 腹腔镜盆底修复联合PPH 术治疗直肠内脱垂的手术疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 394-401.
[5] 于同, 矫健航, 姜炜博, 王中汉, 王洋, 伍旭辉, 吴敏飞. 体位复位与椎板切除减压内固定术治疗胸腰段爆裂性骨折的对比性研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 331-339.
[6] 黄韬, 杨晓华, 薛天森, 肖睿. 改良“蛋壳”技术治疗老年OVCF及对脊柱矢状面平衡参数、预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 340-348.
[7] 谭明明, 战世强, 侯宏涛, 曾翔硕. 经皮微创椎弓根螺钉内固定术对骨质疏松脊柱压缩性骨折患者临床研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 349-354.
[8] 王贝贝, 崔振义, 王静, 王晗妍, 吕红芝, 李秀婷. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后贫血预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 355-362.
[9] 张峻, 赵建民, 姚晓克, 吉浩宇, 越瑞祥. 增加CT对桡骨远端骨折分型的可靠性及可重复性评价[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 264-272.
[10] 房桂彬, 肖进, 傅光涛, 郑秋坚. 老年髋部骨折患者术后1年行走能力的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 273-280.
[11] 张于, 程亮亮, 王峰, 赵德伟. 2枚与3枚空心钉治疗无移位股骨颈骨折的疗效对比[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 281-286.
[12] 茹江英, 廖启宇, 温国洪, 潘思华, 刘栋, 张皓琛, 牛云飞. 直接前方入路和后外侧入路半髋关节置换治疗老年痴呆股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 287-293.
[13] 单良, 刘怡, 于涛, 徐丽. 老年股骨颈骨折术后患者心理弹性现状及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 294-300.
[14] 李新宇, 梁建锋. 3D打印导板辅助颅内血肿穿刺引流手术[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 382-384.
[15] 喻蓉, 周伟力, 雷青, 陈松, 陈立, 刘峰, 丁州, 阳宏奇, 王康, 王大鹏. 改良的内外侧环抱锁定钢板在复杂胫骨平台骨折治疗中的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 764-770.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?