切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (04) : 193 -200. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2026.04.001

脊柱疾患

脊柱内镜下单侧入路双侧椎管减压及椎间盘切除术(Endo-ULBDD)治疗的技术要点及早期疗效观察
许德荣, 葛洪涛, 韩星, 吴增杰, 王天瑞, 苏鲲鹏, 刘文韬, 刘明智, 周传利†()   
  1. 266075 青岛大学附属医院脊柱外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-30 出版日期:2026-08-05
  • 通信作者: 周传利
  • 基金资助:
    青岛市博士后基金(QDBSH20230201026); 泰山学者青年专家项目(tsqn202408390)

Technical points and early efficacy of spinal endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression and discectomy (Endo-ULBDD)

Derong Xu, Hongtao Ge, Xing Han, Zengjie Wu, Tianrui Wang, Kunpeng Su, Wentao Liu, Mingzhi Liu, Chuanli Zhou†()   

  1. Department of Spine Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China
  • Received:2023-10-30 Published:2026-08-05
  • Corresponding author: Chuanli Zhou
引用本文:

许德荣, 葛洪涛, 韩星, 吴增杰, 王天瑞, 苏鲲鹏, 刘文韬, 刘明智, 周传利. 脊柱内镜下单侧入路双侧椎管减压及椎间盘切除术(Endo-ULBDD)治疗的技术要点及早期疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2026, 12(04): 193-200.

Derong Xu, Hongtao Ge, Xing Han, Zengjie Wu, Tianrui Wang, Kunpeng Su, Wentao Liu, Mingzhi Liu, Chuanli Zhou. Technical points and early efficacy of spinal endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression and discectomy (Endo-ULBDD)[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2026, 12(04): 193-200.

目的

探究脊柱内镜下单侧入路双侧椎管减压及椎间盘切除术(Endo-ULBDD)治疗合并有中央型腰椎间盘突出的腰椎管狭窄症患者的手术技巧,评估其360°椎管减压的临床疗效、实用性及安全性。

方法

回顾性分析2020年10月至2023年3月于青岛大学附属医院应用Endo-ULBDD技术治疗的中央型椎管狭窄合并椎间盘突出的腰椎退变患者的临床及影像学资料。共纳入62例患者,男35例,女27例,年龄56~79岁,平均(67.47±9.23)岁;椎间盘突出MSU分级均为3级,术前硬膜囊截面积(61.50±18.67)mm2;随访6~24个月,平均(14.8±5.1)个月。统计全部患者术前与术后次日、1个月、3个月及末次随访时的腰、腿痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI);测量手术前后的硬脊膜囊截面积,并计算改善率;记录手术时间,术后下地时间和出院时间。对比分析手术减压前后临床评分结果。末次随访时采用改良MacNab评分标准评定疗效。

结果

所有患者均顺利完成手术,平均手术时间(106.67±16.43)min,术后各时间节点腰、腿痛VAS评分及ODI均较术前获得显著改善(P<0.05),术后硬脊膜囊截面积改善率为(545.6±79.72)%,根据改良MacNab疗效评定标准,优良率为93.5%。3例患者反映术后神经根支配区麻木,症状均在术后3个月内消退。无硬膜撕裂或神经根损伤等严重并发症发生,随访期内无复发病例。

结论

Endo-ULBDD技术对合并有中央型椎间盘突出的腰椎管狭窄症患者能够实现360°减压及椎间盘切除,早期随访临床效果确切,安全性高。

Objective

To explore the surgical techniques of spinal endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression and discectomy (Endo-ULBDD), and evaluate the clinical efficacy, practicability and safety of 360° spinal canal decompression for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis combined with central lumbar disc herniation.

Methods

The clinical and imaging data of patients with degenerative lumbar disease who received Endo-ULBDD at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from October 2020 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 62 patients were enrolled, including 35 males and 27 females, aged 56-79 years with an average age of (67.47±9.23) years. All patients had grade 3 disc herniation according to MSU classification, and the preoperative dural sac cross-sectional area was (61.50±18.67) mm2. The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 24 months, with an average of (14.8±5.1) months. The visual analogue scale (VAS) for low back and leg pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were recorded before surgery, on the next day after surgery, at 1 month, 3 months and the final follow-up. The cross-sectional area of dural sac was measured preoperatively and postoperatively to calculate the improvement rate. Operation duration, time to get out of bed after surgery and hospital stay were recorded. The clinical scores before and after decompression were compared and analyzed, and modified MacNab criteria were adopted to assess clinical efficacy at the last follow-up.

Results

All patients completed the operation successfully, with a mean operative time of (106.67±16.43) min. The VAS scores of low back and leg pain as well as ODI were significantly improved at all postoperative time points compared with preoperative values (P<0.05). The improvement rate of postoperative dural sac cross-sectional area was (545.6±79.72)%, and the excellent and good rate was 93.5% based on modified MacNab criteria. Three patients developed numbness in the innervation area of nerve roots after operation, and all symptoms subsided within 3 months. No severe complications such as dural tear or nerve root injury occurred, and no recurrent cases were observed during the follow-up period.

Conclusion

Endo-ULBDD can achieve complete 360° spinal canal decompression and discectomy for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis combined with central lumbar disc herniation, with definite early clinical efficacy and high safety.

表1 腰椎管狭窄症患者随访资料[±s,M(QR)]
表2 腰椎管狭窄症患者临床及影像资料特征
图1~9 患者72岁,女性,诉双大腿小腿后侧疼痛麻木2年,小便困难。诊断为L4/5腰椎间盘突出并腰椎椎管狭窄症。行脊柱内镜下单侧入路双侧椎管减压及椎间盘切除术。术后影像示突出的椎间盘被完全清除,症状缓解满意。图1~5 术前;图6~8 术后;图9 截面积测量对比
图10~18 典型病例二,患者66岁,男性诉腰疼伴双大腿后侧小腿后侧足底足趾疼痛麻木40年,加重3个月。诊断为L4/5腰椎间盘突出并腰椎椎管狭窄症。行脊柱内镜下单侧入路双侧椎管减压及椎间盘切除术。术后影像示突出的椎间盘 被完全清除,症状缓解满意。图10~14 术前;图15~17 术后;图18 截面积测量对比
1
Chiang PL, Chen YY, Chen KT, et al. Comparison between lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression and other decompression approaches for lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review [J]. World Neurosurg, 2022, 168: 369-380.
2
Meng S, Xu D, Han S, et al. Fully endoscopic 360 decompression for central lumbar spinal stenosis combined with disc herniation: technical note and preliminary outcomes of 39 cases [J]. J Pain Res, 2022: 2867-2878.
3
Young S, Veerapen R, O'Laoire SA. Relief of lumbar canal stenosis using multilevel subarticular fenestrations as an alternative to wide laminectomy: preliminary report [J]. Neurosurgery, 1988, 23(5): 628-633.
4
Asgarzadie F, Khoo LT. Minimally invasive operative management for lumbar spinal stenosis: overview of early and long-term outcomes [J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2007, 38(3): 387-399.
5
Guiot BH, Khoo LT, Fessler RG. A minimally invasive technique for decompression of the lumbar spine [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2002, 27(4): 432-438.
6
Ruetten S, Komp M, Godolias G. An extreme lateral access for the surgery of lumbar disc herniations inside the spinal canal using the full-endoscopic uniportal transforaminal approach-technique and prospective results of 463 patients [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2005, 30(22): 2570-2578.
7
Zhang Hanshuo DY, Jiang Qiang, Lu Zhengcao, et al. Biomechanical stability and finite element analysis of endoscopic LOVE decompression technique and endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression technique for lumbar spinal stenosis [J]. Chin J Tissue Eng Res, 2023, 27(13): 1981-1986.
8
Kuo CC, Merchant M, Kardile MP, et al. In Degenerative spondylolisthesis, unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression leads to less reoperations at 5 years when compared to posterior decompression with instrumented fusion: a propensity-matched retrospective analysis [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2019, 44(21): 1530-1537.
9
Mishra S, Regmi S, Garg K. Effect of lumbar discectomy or lumbar decompression on axial back pain-Results of a meta-analysis [J]. World Neurosurgery, 2023.
10
Oertel MF, Ryang YM, Korinth MC, et al. Long-term results of microsurgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis by unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression [J]. Neurosurg, 2006, 59(6): 1264-1269.
11
Phan K, Mobbs RJ. Minimally invasive versus open laminectomy for lumbar stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2016, 41(2): E91-e100.
12
Zhao XB, Ma HJ, Geng B, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic unilateral laminotomy and bilateral decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis [J]. Orthop Surg, 2021, 13(2): 641-650.
13
Yoshikane K, Kikuchi K, Okazaki K. Lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis provides comparable clinical outcomes in patients with and without degenerative spondylolisthesis [J]. World Neurosurg, 2021, 150: e361-e371.
14
Kim J, Jung B, Arbatti N, et al. Surgical experience of unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) of ossified ligamentum flavum in the thoracic spine [J]. Minim Invas Neurosurg, 2009, 52(02): 74-78.
15
Park JH, Hyun S-J, Roh SW, et al. A comparison of unilateral laminectomy with bilateral decompression and fusion surgery in the treatment of grade I lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis [J]. Acta Neurochir, 2012, 154: 1205-1212.
16
Nagashima Y, Nishimura Y, Ishii M, et al. Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression and balloon kyphoplasty to decompress lumber canal stenosis aggravated by osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A technical note [J]. Surg Neurol Int, 2022, 13: 538.
17
Masuda S, Fujibayashi S, Takemoto M, et al. Incidence and clinical features of postoperative symptomatic hematoma after spine surgery: a multicenter study of 45 patients [J]. Spine Surg Relat Res, 2020, 4(2): 130-134.
18
汪文龙,刘正,吴四军等.单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术学习曲线与术后不良事件研究[J].中国修复重建外科杂志, 2022, 36(10): 1221-1228.
19
Lin A, Meng S, Wang C, et al. Severe symptomatic epidural hematoma following percutaneous endoscopic unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression (Endo-ULBD)-series report and management strategies [J]. Orthop Surg, 2023, 15(9): 2342-2353.
20
张为,李昊儒,丁文元等.椎间孔镜技术在脊柱外科的应用进展[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2017, 3(06): 377-80.
21
张鹏,刘丰平,刘杨等.微创镜下减压治疗退行性腰椎椎管狭窄症的临床研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2021, 7(02): 85-92.
22
佟智慧,曲景文,葛茂锁等.经皮内镜椎间孔入路手术治疗老年腰椎间盘突出症的临床分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2019, 5(06): 332-336.
[1] 谭海宁, 于凌佳, 谢学虎, 刘宁, 张国强, 李想, 杨雍, 祝斌. 单通道全脊柱内镜治疗腰椎管狭窄症的隐性失血及危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 233-238.
[2] 谭海宁, 于凌佳, 谢学虎, 刘宁, 张国强, 李想, 杨雍, 祝斌. 局麻单通道全脊柱内镜单侧入路双侧减压技术临床应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 165-170.
[3] 戴伟川, 郭协力, 方仲宁, 蔡文华, 洪天生, 田夏阳. 显微镜下周围神经松解术治疗腰椎间盘突出症术后残余神经症状的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 84-90.
[4] 李鹏, 赵成亮, 曾祥瑞, 王斐, 杨菲. PELD术中选择单侧入路三根减压治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效与安全性的前瞻性随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2025, 11(06): 351-358.
[5] 吴天宇, 刘子璇, 杨浦鑫, 贾思明, 丁凯, 程晓东, 李泳龙, 陈伟, 吕红芝, 张奇. 腰椎间盘突出症保守治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 379-384.
[6] 邵佳申, 张志武, 孟海, 杨雍, 费琦. 单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效和学习曲线研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 202-208.
[7] 高放, 李锋, 方忠. 斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术联合脊柱内镜减压治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床疗效研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 10-18.
[8] 李松风, 李锡勇, 白晓辉, 王云鹭, 韩鹏飞, 李红倬. 单侧双通道内镜与通道显微内镜治疗腰椎管狭窄症的meta分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 172-181.
[9] 赵俊华, 杨政伟, 刘阳, 郑银福, 刘建. 规范的术后康复训练对PELD术预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 157-165.
[10] 戴伟川, 郭协力, 陈英贤, 齐震, 蔡文华. 经椎旁入路显微镜下微通道腰椎间盘突出切除术[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(04): 252-256.
[11] 曾少良, 包权, 赵金义, 于泽霏, 王崇, 邢健. PROSET序列诊断腰椎间盘突出症责任病灶的价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(02): 88-93.
[12] 张志强, 杨建东, 范新宇, 黄吉军, 蔡俊, 冯新民, 闫明. Endo-LOVE技术治疗重度脱垂型腰椎间盘突出症的效果分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 62-65.
[13] 肖士鹏, 常中飞, 李士春. 超声药物透入联合针灸治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 54-57.
[14] 朱李梅, 张经纬, 陈佳楠, 安林. 老年腰椎管狭窄症患者围术期应用人促红细胞生成素联合蔗糖铁的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 24-27.
[15] 彭如辉, 周德春, 吴庆鸣, 杨忠. 经皮经椎间孔脊柱内镜技术治疗老年退变性腰椎管狭窄症疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2021, 08(04): 14-17.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?