切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (03) : 147 -151. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2022.03.004

脊柱专题

IVIM-DWI-MRI对强直性脊柱炎骶髂关节病变活动性的评估价值
张勇刚1, 贺翠琴1,(), 张欢2   
  1. 1. 430100 武汉市协和江北医院/蔡甸区人民医院放射科
    2. 435000 鄂东医疗集团黄石市中医医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-15 出版日期:2022-06-05
  • 通信作者: 贺翠琴
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省卫建委2019年度第三批联合基金(WJ2019 H486)

The value of IVIM-DWI-MRI in the evaluation of sacroiliac joint activity in ankylosing spondylitis

Yonggang Zhang1, Cuiqin He1,(), Huan Zhang2   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology in Wuhan Xiehe Jiangbei hospital/Caidian District People's Hospital
    2. Department of Orthopaedics in Huangshi traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Edong medical group
  • Received:2021-03-15 Published:2022-06-05
  • Corresponding author: Cuiqin He
引用本文:

张勇刚, 贺翠琴, 张欢. IVIM-DWI-MRI对强直性脊柱炎骶髂关节病变活动性的评估价值[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(03): 147-151.

Yonggang Zhang, Cuiqin He, Huan Zhang. The value of IVIM-DWI-MRI in the evaluation of sacroiliac joint activity in ankylosing spondylitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2022, 08(03): 147-151.

目的

探讨体素内不相干运动扩散加权成像(IVIM-DWI)-磁共振成像(MRI)对强直性脊柱炎(AS)骶髂关节病变活动性的评估价值。

方法

选取2018年3月至2021年3月本院AS患者128例作为AS组,男68例、女60例,平均年龄(31±9)岁,依据巴氏AS疾病活动指数(BASDAI)分为活动组(n=42)和稳定组(n=86),同期选取体检健康人员50例作为健康组,采用IVIM-DWI-MRI检测纯水分子扩散系数(D)、灌注相关伪扩散系数(D*)、灌注分数(f),比较各组D、D*、f,分析IVIM-DWI-MRI对AS骶髂关节病变活动性的评估价值。

结果

AS组D、D*、f高于健康组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);活动组D、D*、f高于稳定组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);ROC曲线显示,在评估AS骶髂关节病变活动性的敏感度、特异度、曲线下面积中,D为76.19%、79.07%、0.817,D*为66.67%、72.09%、0.765,f为71.43%、74.42%、0.803,D、D*、f联合时为95.24%、93.02%、0.905,D、D*、f联合高于单独D、D*、f,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

IVIM-DWI-MRI中D、D*、f等指标与AS骶髂关节病变活动性变化有关,可作为评估指标,且D、D*、f联合时的评估价值更高。

Objective

To discuss the value of incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of sacroiliac joint activity in ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Methods

The 128 patients with AS in our hospital from March 2018 to March 2021 were selected as the AS group, which were divided into active group (n=42) and stable group (n=86) according to the Basdai disease activity index (BASDAI), and the 50 healthy persons were selected as the healthy group during the same period. The pure water molecular diffusion coefficient (D), perfusion-related pseudo diffusion coefficient (D*) and perfusion-related fraction (F) were detected by IVIM-DWI-MRI, and the D, D* and F of the each groups were compared, the evaluation value of IVIM-DWI-MRI on the sacroiliac joint disease activity of AS were analyzed.

Results

The D, D* and F in AS group were higher than those in healthy group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The D, D* and F in the activity group were higher than those in the stable group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The ROC curve shows that, in the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve for assessing the sacroiliac joint activity of AS, the D were 76.19%, 79.07% and 0.817; the D* were 66.67%, 72.09%, 0.765; the F were 71.43%, 74.42% and 0.803; The combined values of D, D* and F were 95.24%, 93.02% and 0.905, the combined values of D, D* and F were higher than those of D, D* and F alone, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusions

The D, D*, F and other indexes in IVIM-DWI-MRI are related to the changes of the sacroiliac joint lesion activity, which can be used AS evaluation indexes, and the combined evaluation value of D, D*, F is higher.

表1 两组强直性脊柱炎骶髂关节病变患者的D、D*、f比较(±s
表2 两组强直性脊柱炎骶髂关节病变患者的一般资料比较
图5~8 活动期AS骶髂关节病变的MRI。图5 轴面T2WI,示关节面下骨髓水肿呈高信号;图6~8 IVIM-DWI的D、D*、f,示D=0.78×10-3 mm2/s,D*=7.61×10-3 mm2/s,f=14.37%
表3 两组强直性脊柱炎骶髂关节病变患者的D、D*、f比较(±s
图9 IVIM-DWI-MRI评估AS骶髂关节病变活动性的ROC曲线
1
宋飞鹏,胥毅,王越,等. CT能谱成像在早期强直性脊柱炎骶髂关节骨髓水肿及活动性诊断中价值[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2020, 34(11): 1157-1160.
2
卢军丽,包超恩,赵建,等.老年腓骨近端骨肉瘤影像诊断与鉴别诊断[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2018, 4(3): 175-179.
3
Ozturk EC, Yagci I. The structural, functional and electrophysiological assessment of paraspinal musculature of patients with ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthropathy [J]. Rheumatol Int, 2021, 41(3): 595-603.
4
中华医学会风湿病学分会.强直性脊柱炎诊断及治疗指南[J].中华风湿病学杂志, 2010, 14(8): 557-559.
5
Soulard J, Vaillant J, Agier CT, et al. Gait characteristics in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review [J]. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 2021, 39(1): 173-186.
6
左后东,张小明,敬宗林,等.扩散峰度成像在评价强直性脊柱炎骶髂关节病变炎性活动中的价值[J].磁共振成像, 2018, 9(6): 427-432.
7
Komsalova LY, Martínez SM, Jiménez J. Predictive values of inflammatory back pain, positive HLA B27 antigen and acute and chronic magnetic resonance changes in early diagnosis of Spondyloarthritis. A study of 133 patients [J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(12): e0244184.
8
Yang H, Jiang L, Li J, et al. Quantitative DCE-MRI: an efficient diagnostic technique for evaluating early micro-environment permeability changes in ankylosing spondylitis [J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2020, 21(1): 774.
9
Li S, Du CZ, Mao SH, et al. Both structural damage and inflammation of the lumbar spine contribute to the sagittal imbalance in ankylosing spondylitis patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis [J]. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2021, 11(1): 362-370.
10
Wang D, Yin H, Liu W, et al. Comparative analysis of the diagnostic values of T2 mapping and diffusion-weighted imaging for sacroiliitis in ankylosing spondylitis [J]. Skeletal Radiol, 2020, 49(10): 1597-1606.
11
Kleinrensink NJ, Foppen W, Ten Katen I, et al. Comparison of the heel enthesitis MRI scoring system (HEMRIS) with clinical enthesitis and local metabolic activity on PET-CT [J]. RMD Open, 2020, 6(3): e001424.
12
钟志伟,马洁琳,王勇,等.骨促结缔组织增生性纤维瘤的影像诊断与鉴别诊断[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2020, 6(3): 165-170.
13
汤长华,杨惠林,张晓慧,等.采用MRI结合DR片定位规范数字化PKP/PVP术快速康复治疗老年胸腰骶椎骨折[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2020, 6(2): 68-73.
14
Song R, Lee S, Lee SH. Progressive sacroiliitis due to accessory sacroiliac joint mimicking ankylosing spondylitis: A case report [J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2019, 98(16): e15324.
15
Braun J, Baraliakos X, Buehring B, et al. [Differential diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis-axSpA mimics] [J]. Z Rheumatol, 2019, 78(1): 31-42.
16
Pedersen SJ, Weber U, Said-Nahal R, et al. Structural progression rate decreases over time on serial radiography and magnetic resonance imaging of sacroiliac joints and spine in a five-year follow-up study of patients with ankylosing spondylitis treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitor [J]. Scand J Rheumatol, 2019, 48(3): 185-197.
17
Kanda N, Takeda K, Hatakeyama S, et al. Ankylosing spondylitis presenting with enthesitis at an uncommon site and fever of unknown origin [J]. BMJ Case Rep, 2019, 12(8): e230113.
18
胡振彬,张晓东,范惟,等.体素内不相干运动扩散加权成像与脂肪定量技术评估强直性脊柱炎活动性的对比研究[J].临床放射学杂志, 2020, 39(7): 1373-1378.
19
李效亭,王佳佳,宋校娟,等.磁共振评估关节微循环灌注及脂肪含量对早期活动性中轴型脊柱关节炎患者骶髂关节病变的诊断价值[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2021, 35(12): 1280-1284.
20
杨陈,郭达,刘艳,等.体素内不相干运动扩散加权成像诊断强直性脊柱炎活动性骶髂关节炎的价值[J].放射学实践, 2018, 33(10): 1057-1062.
[1] 丁建民, 秦正义, 张翔, 周燕, 周洪雨, 王彦冬, 经翔. 超声造影与普美显磁共振成像对具有高危因素的≤3 cm肝结节进行LI-RADS分类诊断的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 930-938.
[2] 张莲莲, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳. 颈部血管超声在粥样硬化斑块易损性评估中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 816-821.
[3] 刘冰茹, 刘皓希, 陈莹, 赖世伟, 陈蓉. 疑似乳腺癌的韧带样纤维瘤病一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 314-317.
[4] 叶艳娜, 叶瑞婷, 陈艳玲, 彭雯, 刘乐, 肖文秋, 黄辉, 李明深, 钟慕仪, 叶娴. 基于影像学表现和临床病理特征预测良性与交界性乳腺叶状肿瘤复发的列线图模型[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 229-237.
[5] 方心俞, 黄昌瑜, 胡洪新, 林溢铭, 陈旸, 张楠心, 张文明. 膝关节软骨下不全骨折的治疗选择与疗效分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 583-587.
[6] 董晓燕, 赵琪, 唐军, 张莉, 杨晓燕, 李姣. 奥密克戎变异株感染所致新型冠状病毒感染疾病新生儿的临床特征分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 595-603.
[7] 韩宇, 张武, 李安琪, 陈文颖, 谢斯栋. MRI肝脏影像报告和数据系统对非肝硬化乙肝患者肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 669-673.
[8] 雷漫诗, 邓锶锶, 汪昕蓉, 黄锦彬, 向青, 熊安妮, 孟占鳌. 人工智能辅助压缩感知技术在上腹部T2WI压脂序列中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 551-556.
[9] 钟广俊, 刘春华, 朱万森, 徐晓雷, 王兆军. MRI联合不同扫描序列在胃癌术前分期诊断及化疗效果和预后的评估[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 378-382.
[10] 吴钰娴, 冯亚园, 霍雷, 贾宁阳, 张娟. 原发性肝脏淋巴瘤的影像学诊断价值研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 349-353.
[11] 冯海涛, 徐涛, 刘文阳, 孙晨, 曹尚超. 三维动脉自旋标记联合动态对比增强MRI对脑胶质瘤术后复发及放射性脑坏死诊断的研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 262-265.
[12] 王志文, 郑雪梅, 张庆坤, 王海江. 自发性低颅压综合征75例临床分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 398-401.
[13] 岳永飞, 朱利平, 王晓艳. 磁共振成像技术在预测胎盘植入性疾病患者剖宫产术中出血量的研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 167-172.
[14] 徐长贺, 尚海龙, 于乐林, 王一超, 赵世伟, 沈慧, 叶娟, 杜红娣, 王莺, 沈海林. 反复发作的糖尿病纹状体病的影像学特征并文献复习[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 165-168.
[15] 赵暾, 徐霁华, 何有娣, 鲁明. 误诊为脑梗死且险些溶栓的急性自发微量脑出血一例[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 369-372.
阅读次数
全文


摘要