切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (05) : 291 -297. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2021.05.007

脊柱

经皮伤椎置钉与否对胸腰椎骨折疗效的影响
高金伟1,()   
  1. 1. 030006 太原,武警山西省总队医院骨科二病区
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-29 出版日期:2021-10-05
  • 通信作者: 高金伟
  • 基金资助:
    军队医学杰出中青年人才科研基金项目(16J019)

Therapeutic influence of using intermediate screws or not in percutaneous pedicular screws fixation for thoracolumbar fracture

Jinwei Gao1,()   

  1. 1. The Second Department of Orthopedics, Armed Police Corps Hospital of Shanxi province, Taiyuan 030006, China
  • Received:2020-09-29 Published:2021-10-05
  • Corresponding author: Jinwei Gao
引用本文:

高金伟. 经皮伤椎置钉与否对胸腰椎骨折疗效的影响[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2021, 07(05): 291-297.

Jinwei Gao. Therapeutic influence of using intermediate screws or not in percutaneous pedicular screws fixation for thoracolumbar fracture[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2021, 07(05): 291-297.

目的

探讨经皮微创入路椎弓根钉短节段复位内固定治疗无需减压的胸腰椎骨折中伤椎置钉对疗效的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2016年3月至2019年6月期间我科共收治无需减压的胸腰椎压缩骨折患者58例,采用跨伤椎置钉短节段复位固定32例(伤椎未置钉组),其中男24例,女8例,平均年龄(45±10)岁。采用经伤椎置钉短节段复位内固定26例(伤椎置钉组),其中男20例,女6例,平均年龄(44±10)岁;对两组病例的切口长度、术中失血量、术中透视次数、手术时间、住院费用、手术前、后疼痛视觉模拟量表评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)及影像学参数、术后并发症情况进行对比分析。

结果

所有入组病例均获得随访12~18个月,平均随访时间(15.6±1.7)个月。伤椎未置钉组与伤椎置钉组比较,手术切口更小,住院费用更低(P<0.05);但术中出血量、X线投照次数、手术时间方面对比,无统计学差异(P>0.05);两组间术前、术后随访时疼痛VAS评分、Oswestry disability index score,ODI)评分方面对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但两组内比较,手术后均较术前明显降低(P<0.05);两组间在术后3天、1年随访时伤椎前缘高度压缩比、后凸cobb角、方面对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但两组内比较,手术后均较手术前改善明显(P<0.05)。两组间在术后1年椎体前缘高度矫正率、Cobb角矫正率方面对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组病例均未发生术中置钉导致神经损伤,术后感染、内固定物松动、断裂等并发症。

结论

采用经皮微创入路椎弓根钉短节段复位内固定治疗无需减压的胸腰椎骨折,临床疗效满意,术中伤椎置钉与否对疗效无显著影响。但伤椎未置钉组与伤椎置钉组比较,手术切口更小,住院费用更低。

Objective

To investigate the effect of short-segment reduction and internal fixation with percutaneous minimally invasive pedicle screw for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures without decompression.

Methods

From March 2016 to June 2019, 58 patients with thoracolumbar compression fractures who did not need decompression were treated in our department retrospectively. A total of 32 cases were fixed by short-segment reduction and fixation with cross-injury vertebrae (uninjured vertebrae group). 26 cases were fixed by short-segment reduction and fixation with injury vertebrae (injured vertebrae group), including 24 males and 8 females, with an average age of (45±10) years. Twenty-six cases of short-segment reduction and internal fixation (traumatic vertebral screw placement group) were used, including 20 males and 6 females, with an average age of (44±10) years. The length of the incision, intraoperative, the blood loss, the number of intraoperative fluoroscopy, operation time, hospitalization expenses, VAS (Visual Analogue Scale Score for Pain) scores before and after the operation, imaging parameters, and postoperative complications were compared and analyzed.

Results

All the enrolled cases were followed up for 12-18 months, with an average follow-up time of 15.6±1.7 months. Compared with the injured vertebra without nail placement group, the surgical incision was smaller and the hospitalization cost was lower (P<0.05), but there was no statistical difference in intraoperative blood loss, X-ray exposure times, and operation time (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in pain VAS score and ODI score between the two groups before operation and during postoperative follow-up (P>0.05), but the comparison between the two groups was significantly lower after operation than before operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the compression ratio of the anterior edge of the injured vertebrae and the cobb's angle of the kyphosis at the 3 days and 1 year follow-up between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the pre-operation, all improved significantly afterwards (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the correction rate of anterior vertebral body height and the correction rate of Cobb angle at 1 year after operation (P>0.05). There were no complications such as intraoperative nail placement resulting in nerve damage, postoperative infection, loosening of internal fixation, or rupture in both groups.

Conclusions

The short-segment reduction and internal fixation of the percutaneous minimally invasive pedicle screw for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures without decompression has a satisfactory clinical effect. Whether the injured vertebrae is inserted or not has no significant effect on the effect. However, compared with the injured vertebrae without nail placement group, the surgical incision was smaller and the hospitalization cost was lower.

表1 两组胸腰椎骨折患者一般资料比较
图1~5 伤椎未置钉组,男性,35岁,车祸伤致腰1椎体压缩性骨折。伤后18 h行后路经皮微创跨伤椎置钉短节段复位内固定术。图1 术前侧位X光片示腰1椎体前缘压缩高度比55.6%,Cobb角19°;图2 术前伤椎CT三维图像;图3 经皮置钉复位术后侧位片提示椎体前缘压缩高度比恢复至94.1%,Cobb角5°;图4 术后皮肤小切口缝合后大体像;图5 术后1年随访侧位片示椎体前缘压缩高度比92.9%,Cobb角5°
图6~10 伤椎置钉组,男性,42岁,高处坠落伤致腰1椎体压缩性骨折,伤后8 h行后路经皮微创经伤椎置钉短节段复位内固定术。图6 术前侧位X光片示腰1椎体前缘压缩高度比55%,Cobb角25°;图7 经皮置钉复位术后侧位片提示椎体前缘压缩高度比恢复至95%,Cobb角5°;图8 术后皮肤小切口缝合后大体像;图9 术后1年随访侧位片示椎体前缘压缩高度比91%和Cobb角6°;图10 术后18个月随访复查侧位X光片示椎体前缘压缩高度比90.9%和Cobb角6°
表2 伤椎未置钉组与伤椎置钉组手术操作相关指标比较(±s
表3 伤椎未置钉组与伤椎置钉组疗效评价指标分析比较(±s
表4 伤椎未置钉组与伤椎置钉组术后伤椎前缘压缩高度比、后凸cobb角、术后1年矫正率比较(±s
1
周先虎,冯世庆. 胸腰段骨折的分型与治疗进展[J]. 脊柱外科杂志201210(2):125-128.
2
Mclain RF. The biomechanics of long versus short fixation for thoracolumbar spine fractures[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2006, 31(11 Suppl): S70-S79; discussion S104.
3
伍红桦,施建国,屈波,等. 经伤椎椎弓根螺钉加强内固定+植骨治疗胸腰段椎体骨折[J]. 中华创伤杂志201329(12):1190-1194.
4
Farrokhi MR, Razmkon A, Maghami Z, et al. Inclusion of the fracture level in short segment fixation of thoracolumbar fractures[J]. Eur Spine J, 2010, 19(10): 1651-1656.
5
Gelb D, Ludwig S, Karp JE, et al. Successful treatment of thoracolumbar fractures with short-segment pedicle instrumentation[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2010, 23(5): 293-301.
6
陈艺,白波,孙辉,等. 短节段椎弓根钉固定术的生物力学研究[J]. 中华创伤杂志201026(1):39-43.
7
Heintel TM, Berglehner A, Meffert R. Accuracy of percutaneous pedicle screws for thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: a prospective trial[J]. Eur Spine J, 2013, 22(3): 495-502.
8
Yang WE, Ng ZX, Koh KM, et al. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar burst fracture: a Singapore experience[J]. Singapore Med J, 2012, 53(9): 577-581.
9
王洪伟,周跃,李长青,等. 经伤椎与跨伤椎万向钉置钉固定脊柱骨折的生物力学对比研究[J]. 中华创伤杂志201026(12):1105-1108.
10
邢泽军,马迅,马建平. 伤椎置钉与否对导航引导下经皮椎弓根螺钉短节段固定治疗胸腰椎压缩骨折疗效的影响[J]. 中华创伤杂志201834(5):388-394.
11
廖陈龙,杨敏,钟文翔,等. 疼痛分布在糖尿病性周围神经病变减压术的作用[J]. 中国微侵袭神经外科杂志201520(12):545-548.
12
吴超,谭伦,林旭. X线片上胸腰椎相邻节段矢状曲度的测量及临床应用[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志200917(15):1167-1169.
13
Fairbank J, Couper J, Davies J, et a1. The Oswestry low back Pain questionnaire[J]. Physiotherapy, 1980, 66(8): 27l-273.
14
Assaker R. Minimal access spinal technologies: state-of-the-art, indications, and techniques[J]. Joint Bone Spine, 2004, 71(6): 459-469.
15
Palmisani M, Gasbarrini A, Brodano GB, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous fixation in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures[J]. European Spine Journal, 2009, 18: S71-S74.
16
Ni WF, Huang YX, Chi YL, et al. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for neurologic intact thoracolumbar burst fractures[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2010, 23(8): 530-537.
17
昌震,郝定均,胡雄科,等. 新型与常规经皮椎弓根钉内固定治疗无神经损伤胸腰椎骨折的比较[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志201833(5):463-465.
18
Lee JK, Jang JW, Kim TW, et al. Percutaneous short-segment pedicle screw placement without fusion in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: is it effective?: comparative study with open short-segment pedicle screw fixation with posterolateral fusion[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2013, 155(12): 2305-2312; discussion 2312.
19
Mcanany SJ, Overley SC, Kim JS, et al. Open versus minimally invasive fixation techniques for thoracolumbar trauma: a Meta-Analysis[J]. Global Spine J, 2016, 6(2): 186-194.
20
Phan K, Rao PJ, Mobbs RJ. Percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation for treatment of thoracolumbar fractures: Systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies[J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2015, 135: 85-92.
21
陈贞庚,郑晓晖,涂致远,等. 经伤椎椎弓根螺钉固定技术在79例胸腰椎骨折中的应用初步经验[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志201321(14):1450-1453.
22
肖斌,李健,林绍仪,等. 单侧伤椎置钉结合打压植骨治疗胸腰椎爆裂骨折[J]. 实用骨科杂志201723(1):42-44.
23
Aono H, Tobimatsu H, Ariga K, et al. Surgical outcomes of temporary short-segment instrumentation without augmentation for thoracolumbar burst fractures[J]. Injury, 2016, 47(6): 1337-1344.
24
Wang H, Li C, Liu T, et al. Biomechanical efficacy of monoaxial or polyaxial pedicle screw and additional screw insertion at the level of fracture, in lumbar burst fracture: An experimental study[J]. Indian J Orthop, 2012, 46(4): 395-401.
[1] 齐伟亚, 方杰, 吴衡, 刘波. 掌侧小切口联合腕关节镜治疗AO-C型桡骨远端骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 577-582.
[2] 莫亮, 熊贤梅, 马超, 刘予豪, 陈镇秋, 何伟, 周驰. 股骨颈骨折内固定术后因素与股骨头坏死关系的分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 735-744.
[3] 唐小花, 孙建霞, 王君, 王美青. 预测老年股骨粗隆间骨折术后并发症的列线图模型构建[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 677-682.
[4] 周晓强, 孙超, 李志强, 徐人杰, 佘远时, 张向鑫, 陈广祥, 虞宵. 动力抗旋交叉钉治疗不稳定股骨颈骨折的早期疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 670-676.
[5] 毛文文, 陈昊, 李立, 朱友森, 张敏, 陈刚. Pilon骨折术后发生手术部位感染的危险因素分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 309-314.
[6] 李奇伟, 林涨源. 比较一期与分期手术治疗股骨转子间骨折合并椎体骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 528-532.
[7] 邓玖征, 袁野, 朱剑津, 何大炜, 赵喆, 赵锋, 孔德敬, 潘勇卫. 基于成人掌骨形态学数据设计的掌骨弹性髓内针治疗掌骨骨折的生物力学研究[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(04): 330-335.
[8] 张琳袁, 吴佳俊, 崔煦, 沈超, 付备刚, 崔崟, 王秀会, 蔡攀. 大结节解剖钢板与PHILOS内固定治疗伴肩关节脱位的Mutch I/II型肱骨大结节骨折的疗效差异[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 139-145.
[9] 薛亮, 魏梁锋, 郑兆聪, 陈业煌, 黎连杰, 王守森. 经伤椎置钉及显微减压技术治疗胸腰椎骨折并神经损伤的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(04): 203-206.
[10] 金宇杰, 虞宵, 周晓强, 李志强, 徐人杰, 张向鑫, 陈广祥. 动力交叉钉系统治疗股骨颈骨折其内固定位置与临床疗效的相关性研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 193-200.
[11] 沙西卡·那孜尔汗, 张树文, 郭瑞, 孙治国, 王浩. 长节段皮质骨轨迹螺钉固定胸腰椎结核临床疗效分析:2年随访比较[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 81-87.
[12] 顾晨希, 虞宵, 黄安全, 王烨峰, 蔡小强, 沈军, 邹天明. 不同穿刺入路行椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松椎体压缩骨折的研究进展[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(02): 117-122.
[13] 李忠辉, 于涛, 张晓艳. 椎弓根螺钉固定联合椎体成形术治疗老年胸腰段骨折的初步疗效观察[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2021, 07(01): 27-33.
[14] 丰瑞兵, 王华松, 庞炯宇, 姜壮, 蔡贤华. 锁定钢板加克氏针埋头技术(Lost K-wire)治疗伴关节面塌陷的尺骨鹰嘴骨折的临床研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2020, 06(06): 334-339.
[15] 郭义城, 谢志鹏, 刘万里, 赵阳, 车艳生, 赵敏. 胸12椎体骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折致心前区牵涉痛误诊为冠心病特征分析[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 136-139.
阅读次数
全文


摘要