切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (06) : 351 -356. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2020.06.007

所属专题: 文献

骨质疏松

阿仑磷酸钠对糖尿病骨质疏松症患者骨代谢的影响
杨利1, 李强1, 阚志芸1, 侯海生1,()   
  1. 1. 066000 秦皇岛,河北省秦皇岛军工医院急诊科
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-12 出版日期:2020-12-05
  • 通信作者: 侯海生
  • 基金资助:
    秦皇岛市2019年重点研发计划科技支撑项目(20191365)

Effects on bone metabolism in patients with diabetic osteoporosis using alendronate

Li Yang1, Qiang Li1, Zhiyun Kan1, Haisheng Hou1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Emergency, Hebei Qinhuangdao Military Hospital, Qinhuangdao 066000, China
  • Received:2019-12-12 Published:2020-12-05
  • Corresponding author: Haisheng Hou
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Hou Haisheng, Email:
引用本文:

杨利, 李强, 阚志芸, 侯海生. 阿仑磷酸钠对糖尿病骨质疏松症患者骨代谢的影响[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2020, 06(06): 351-356.

Li Yang, Qiang Li, Zhiyun Kan, Haisheng Hou. Effects on bone metabolism in patients with diabetic osteoporosis using alendronate[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2020, 06(06): 351-356.

目的

探究阿仑磷酸钠对糖尿病骨质疏松症(DOP)患者骨代谢的影响。

方法

前瞻性收集2017年12月至2018年12月秦皇岛军工医院收治的108例DOP患者,随机分为对照组(54例)和阿仑磷酸钠组(54例),所有患者均给予常规对症及降糖治疗,阿仑磷酸钠组在此基础上给予阿仑膦酸钠片。治疗2个月后,观察并比较两组患者的骨代谢指标、骨密度(BMD)、血生化指标和临床疗效。

结果

治疗后,对照组的血清骨代谢指标骨特异型碱性磷酸酶(BAP)、骨钙素(BGP)、人抗酒石酸酸性磷酸酶5b(TRAP-5b)水平分别为(7.52±3.20)μg/L、(6.24±2.22)U/L、(3.30±1.13)ng/ml,阿仑磷酸钠组分别为(9.41±3.32)μg/L、(7.73±2.34)U/L、(2.45±1.18)ng/ml;治疗后,两组BAP和BGP水平较治疗前升高(t=4.670,t=6.120,P<0.05),组间比较,阿仑磷酸钠组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=3.010,t=3.390,P<0.01);两组TRAP-5b(t=4.780,t=5.620,P<0.05)水平较治疗前下降,组间比较,阿仑磷酸钠组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=3.820,P<0.01)。治疗后,对照组的腰椎和股骨颈的BMD分别为(0.82±0.06)g/cm2、(0.74±0.05)g/cm2,阿仑磷酸钠组分别为(0.91±0.04)g/cm2、(0.83±0.08)g/cm2,两组腰椎和股骨颈BMD(t=3.840,t=3.760,P<0.05)水平较治疗前均升高,组间比较,阿仑磷酸钠组高于对照组(t分别=9.170和7.010,P<0.05)。治疗后,对照组空腹血糖(FBG)、餐后2 h血糖(2 hBG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平分别为(7.06±0.29)mmol/L、(8.02±3.17)mmol/L、(6.21±0.46)%,对照组FBG、2 hBG、HbA1c水平分别为(8.12±0.33)mmol/L、(9.98±0.54)mmol/L、(7.56±0.67)%,两组比较,阿仑磷酸钠组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=17.730,4.480,12.210,P<0.01)。阿仑磷酸钠组总有效率(90.74%)高于对照组(79.63%,P<0.05)。

结论

阿仑磷酸钠治疗DOP患者疗效显著,可有效改善其骨代谢,促进BMD水平增加,值得临床加以推广与应用。

Objective

To explore the effect on bone metabolism in patients with diabetic osteoporosis (DOP) using alendronate.

Methods

108 patients with DOP hospitalized in our hospital from December 2017 to December 2018 were randomly divided into the control group (54 cases) and the alendronate group (54 cases). All patients were treated with routine treatment and alendronate group was given alendronate tablets on this basis. After 2 months treatment, the bone metabolism index, bone mineral density (BMD), blood biochemical index and clinical efficacy were observed and compared between the two groups.

Results

After treatment, the serum bone metabolism indexes bone specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP), osteocalcin (BGP) and human tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAP-5b) in the control group were (7.52±3.20) μg/L, (6.24±2.22) U/L, (3.30±1.13) ng/ml, respectively, and the alendronate group was (9.41±3.32) μg/L, (7.73±2.34) U/L, (2.45±1.18) ng/ml, respectively. After treatment, the levels of BAP (t=4.670, P<0.05) and BGP (t=6.120, P<0.05) in the two groups were higher than those before treatment. Compared with the control group, the levels of sodium alendronate group were significantly higher than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (t=3.010 and 3.390, P<0.01, respectively). Trap-5b (t= 4.780 and 5.620, P<0.05, respectively) level of the two groups decreased compared with that before treatment. Compared with the control group, sodium alendronate group was significantly lower than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=3.820, P<0.01). There was no significant difference in bone metabolism before and after treatment in the control group (P>0.05). After treatment, the BMD of lumbar spine and femoral neck in the control group were (0.82±0.06) g/cm2 and (0.74±0.05) g/cm2, respectively, and those in the alenphosphate group were (0.91±0.04) g/cm2 and (0.83±0.08) g/cm2, respectively. BMD levels in lumbar spine and femoral neck (t=3.840 and 3.760, P<0.05, respectively) were higher in both groups than before treatment, and the alendronate group was higher than the control group (t=9.170 and 7.010, P<0.05, respectively). After treatment, fasting blood glucose (FBG), postprandial blood glucose (2 hBG), glycadified hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in the control group were (7.06±0.29) mmol/L, (8.02±3.17) mmol/L, (6.21±0.46)%, respectively. The FBG, 2 hBG, and HbA1c levels in the control group were (8.12±0.33) mmol/L, (9.98±0.54) mmol/L, and (7.56±0.67)%, respectively. The comparison between the two groups showed that the alenophosphate group was significantly lower than the control group, with statistically significant differences (t=17.730, 4.480, 12.210, P<0.01). The total effective rate was 90.74% significantly higher than 79.63% in the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Alendronate combined with control was effective in the treatment of patients with DOP, and it can improve bone metabolism and increase the level of BMD, which was worthy of clinical promotion and application.

表1 两组糖尿病骨质疏松症患者一般资料
表2 两组糖尿病骨质疏松症患者治疗前后骨代谢相关指标的比较(±s
表3 两组DOP患者治疗前后相关部位BMD值的比较(g/cm2±s
表4 两组DOP患者治疗后2个月血生化指标比较(±s
表5 两组DOP患者临床疗效比较[例(%)]
1
Yoo TK, Kim SH, Kwak J, et al. Association between osteoporosis and Age-Related macular degeneration: the Korea National health and nutrition examination survey [J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2018, 59(4): AMD132-AMD142.
2
Lei C, Xueming H, Ruihang D. MLN64 deletion suppresses RANKL-induced osteoclastic differentiation and attenuates diabetic osteoporosis in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced mice [J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2018, 505(4): 1228-1235.
3
刘丹丹,常虹,谈敏.男性2型糖尿病患者25羟维生素D3及骨代谢指标的变化分析[J].安徽医药,2015,19(2): 288-291.
4
蔡德,林志绣,黄志华,等.阿仑磷酸钠联合金天格胶囊治疗绝经后骨质疏松临床观察[J].中国药师,2015,18(8): 1352-1354.
5
姚新苗,史晓林,王健,等.浙江省中医药防治原发性骨质疏松症分级诊疗专家共识(2017)[J].浙江中医杂志,2018,53(4): 237-241.
6
廖涌.中国糖尿病的流行病学现状及展望[J].重庆医科大学学报,2015,40(7): 1042-1045.
7
郑博,蒋涛,黄佳涌,等.我国中老年脆性髋部骨折及桡骨远端骨折骨质疏松诊断标准与WHO诊断标准的比较分析[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2018,24(10): 1299-1304.
8
赵彦杰,何兰杰.2型糖尿病骨质疏松、胰岛素抵抗与维生素D水平的相关性[J].宁夏医学杂志,2015,37(3): 256-258.
9
刘爽,杨梅.糖尿病骨质疏松症发病机制探讨[J].实用糖尿病杂志,2014,10(6): 59-60.
10
王芳,任汉强,沈晓波.胰岛素联合阿仑膦酸钠对老年糖尿病骨质疏松症患者骨密度及血清BAP、TRAP-5b、BGP水平影响[J].海南医学院学报,2016,22(13): 1387-1389+1393.
11
陈华.阿仑膦酸钠联合碳酸钙D_3片治疗2型糖尿病性骨质疏松症疗效观察[J].药物流行病学杂志,2015,24(8): 451-453+459.
12
王玉容,方向明,叶文春,等.唑来膦酸注射液治疗糖尿病骨质疏松患者的疗效研究[J].四川医学,2015,36(1): 69-71.
13
陈玉凤,郭献山,赵建林,等.老年2型糖尿病中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比率与骨质疏松症的关系[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2015,21(7): 824-826.
14
Fuglsang-Nielsen R, Starup-Linde J, Gregersen S, et al. The effect of meals on bone turnover - a systematic review with focus on diabetic bone disease [J]. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab, 2018, 13(5):233-249.
15
丛宝华,赵方,宋飞,等.胰岛素联合阿仑膦酸钠对2型糖尿病骨质疏松症患者骨代谢的影响[J].现代生物医学进展,2017,17(3): 516-519.
16
屈强,蔺改雯,金晶.阿仑磷酸钠与阿法骨化醇胶丸联合用药治疗绝经后骨质疏松症疗效观察[J].陕西医学杂志,2015,44(7): 906-908.
17
朱超,刘伟,王华,等.阿仑磷酸钠联合阿法骨化醇治疗老年肱骨近端骨折的效果[J].中国医药导报,2016,13(24): 85-88+104.
18
张志梅,张倩辉,李彩英,等.利拉鲁肽联合胰岛素治疗2型糖尿病骨质疏松的疗效[J].西北药学杂志,2018,33(6): 830-833.
19
王兵,杨勋能.2型糖尿病合并骨质疏松患者DEXA骨密度测量结果与血清细胞因子、胰岛素抵抗的关系[J].海南医学院学报,2017,23(2): 277-280.
20
刘君英,阎德文,邓建新,等.围绝经期2型糖尿病骨质疏松症治疗中胰岛素与阿仑膦酸钠的联合应用效果观察[J].山东医药,2017,57(19): 69-71.
21
周庆胜.骨化三醇联合阿仑磷酸钠治疗绝经后骨质疏松症的疗效研究[J].实用妇科内分泌杂志:电子版,2017,4(20): 109+111.
22
赵春芝,娄方勇.胰岛素、阿仑膦酸钠治疗新诊断老年糖尿病骨质疏松症患者骨密度及骨转换指标的研究[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2014,20(4): 392-395,438.
[1] 何金梅, 尹立雪, 谭静, 张文军, 王锐, 任梅, 廖明娇. 超声心肌做功技术对2型糖尿病患者潜在左心室心肌收缩功能损伤的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1029-1035.
[2] 王珏, 陈赛君, 贲志飞, 詹锦勇, 徐开颖. 剪切波弹性成像联合极速脉搏波技术评估颈动脉弹性对糖尿病性视网膜病变的预测价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 636-641.
[3] 王洁, 丁泊文, 尹健. 糖尿病性乳腺病52例临床分析[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 285-289.
[4] 陈絮, 詹玉茹, 王纯华. 孕妇ABO血型联合甲状腺功能检测对预测妊娠期糖尿病的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[5] 张健, 刘小龙, 查天建, 姚俊杰, 王傑. 富含血小板血浆联合异种脱细胞真皮基质修复糖尿病足缺血性创面的临床效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 503-506.
[6] 陆宜仙, 张震涛, 夏德萌, 王家林. 巨噬细胞极化在骨质疏松中调控作用及机制的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 538-541.
[7] 赵雅玫, 谢斌, 陈艳, 吴健. 抗生素骨水泥联合负压封闭引流对糖尿病足溃疡临床疗效的荟萃分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 427-433.
[8] 叶弘, 吕婧喆, 钟良军. 白藜芦醇治疗牙周炎和糖尿病的新进展[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 376-380.
[9] 李琛, 张惟佳, 潘亚萍. 牙周炎与系统性疾病之间关系的应用思考:2022年EFP和WONCA欧洲分部联合研讨会共识报告的解读及启示[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 322-327.
[10] 黄岩, 刘晓巍, 杨春玲, 兰烨. 急性胰腺炎合并糖尿病患者的临床特征及血糖代谢与病情严重度的相关性[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 439-442.
[11] 张政赢, 鞠阳, 刘晓宁. 二甲双胍对2型糖尿病患者大肠腺瘤术后复发的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 485-488.
[12] 薛念余, 张盛敏, 吴凌恒, 沙蕾, 童揽月, 沈崔琴, 李朝军, 杜联芳. 研究血清胆红素对2型糖尿病患者心脏结构发生改变前心肌功能的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1004-1009.
[13] 田明达, 吴珺, 王会娟, 张欣, 沙玉英, 陈琳, 赵宾洋. 6297名0~3岁婴幼儿超声骨密度检测结果分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[14] 周加军, 余永武, 周涵, 刘勇, 张凌. 甲状旁腺切除对继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进患者骨密度及骨代谢的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
[15] 谢国晓, 赵凌霞, 薛雪花. 慢性病管理模式在糖尿病社区管理中的应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 587-590.
阅读次数
全文


摘要