切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (02) : 99 -104. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.02.007

所属专题: 文献

膝关节

膝关节骨关节炎患者膝关节内翻畸形与胫骨旋转角关系的临床研究
胡鸿鹏1, 高勇岗1, 刘泽明1, 马文辉1, 李振中1, 李向科1, 秦迪1, 李会杰1, 韩永台1,()   
  1. 1. 050051 石家庄,河北医科大学第三医院骨病科
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-25 出版日期:2019-04-05
  • 通信作者: 韩永台

Clinical study on the relationship between knee deformity and tibial rotation in knee osteoarthritis patients

Hongpeng Hu1, Yonggang Gao1, Zeming Liu1, Wenhui Ma1, Zhenzhong Li1, Xiangke Li1, Di Qi1, Huijie Li1, Yongtai Han1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Bone Disease, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050051, China
  • Received:2018-09-25 Published:2019-04-05
  • Corresponding author: Yongtai Han
引用本文:

胡鸿鹏, 高勇岗, 刘泽明, 马文辉, 李振中, 李向科, 秦迪, 李会杰, 韩永台. 膝关节骨关节炎患者膝关节内翻畸形与胫骨旋转角关系的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2019, 05(02): 99-104.

Hongpeng Hu, Yonggang Gao, Zeming Liu, Wenhui Ma, Zhenzhong Li, Xiangke Li, Di Qi, Huijie Li, Yongtai Han. Clinical study on the relationship between knee deformity and tibial rotation in knee osteoarthritis patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2019, 05(02): 99-104.

目的

探讨膝关节骨性关节炎患者膝关节内翻畸形与胫骨旋转角的关系。

方法

随机选取80例(107膝)罹患膝关节炎内翻患者和50例(100膝)膝关节正常者,分为KOA组和对照组。测量胫股角(FTA)和胫骨旋转角(TTA),对比两组间胫股角和胫骨旋转角的差异及相关性。

结果

KOA组FTA为(182.6±2.5)°,对照组FTA为(174.8±2.9)°,KOA组的FTA大于对照组(t=41.598,P<0.01);KOA组TTA为(20±8)°,对照组TTA为(25±8)°,KOA组的TTA小于对照组(t=6.360,P<0.01),对照组和KOA组男性[(174.3±2.2)° vs(181.9±2.2)°,t=24.319,P<0.01],女性[(175.0±2.4)° vs(184.8±3.3)°,t=17.490,P<0.01],40~59岁组[(173.1±2.0)° vs(177.0±2.2)°,t=63.808,P<0.01],60~69岁组[(174.7±2.0)° vs(179.2±2.2)°,t=76.181,P<0.01],>70岁组[(176.7±2.6)° vs(188.5±3.1)°,t=49.259,P<0.01],左侧[(175.3±2.2)° vs(183.9±3.3)°,t=29.871,P<0.01],右侧[(175.0±3.2)° vs(182.3±2.8)°,t=28.658,P<0.01]亚组间FTA差异有统计学意义;对照组和KOA组男性[(25±8)° vs(21±8)°,t=3.198,P<0.01],女性[(26±7)° vs(20±10)°,t=4.719,P<0.01],>70岁组[(23±10)° vs(18±8)°,t=6.651,P<0.01],左侧[(25±9)° vs(20±8)°,t=4.512,P<0.01],右侧[(25±9)° vs(21±8)°,t=2.973,P<0.01]亚组间TTA差异有统计学意义。KOA组40~59岁组(r=-0.317,P<0.05),60~69岁组(r=-0.429,P<0.05),>70岁组(r=-0.810,P<0.01),K-L分级Ⅱ级(r=-0.387,P<0.05),Ⅲ级(r=-0.442,P<0.05),Ⅳ级(r=-0.834,P<0.01)各亚组内胫股角和胫骨旋转角有相关性。

结论

KOA患者膝关节内翻畸形与胫骨旋转角呈负相关,其相关程度受年龄和K-L分级的影响,KOA患者年龄越大,胫骨旋转角越小;K-L分级越高,胫骨旋转角越小。

Objective

To explore the relationship between knee varus deformity and the rotation Angle of the tibia in patients with osteoarthritis of knee joint.

Methods

80 patients with knee osteoarthritis and 50 normal people were randomly selected and divided into KOA group and control group. The difference and correlation of femorotibial angle (FTA) and tibial rotation angle (TTA) between the two groups were compared.

Results

In the KOA group, the FTA is (182.6±2.5)°, the FTA in the control group is (174.8±2.9)°, FTA of the KOA group is bigger than the control group (t=41.598, P<0.01); and TTA of the KOA group is (20±8)°, the control group is (25±8)°, which is smaller than the control group (t=6.360, P<0.01). The FTA differences between the control group and the KOA group were statistically significant among males [(174.3±2.2)° vs (181.9±2.2)°, t=24.319, P<0.01], females [(175.0±2.4)° vs (184.8±3.3)°, t=17.490, P<0.01], 40-59 year [(173.1±2.0)° vs (177.0±2.2)°, t=63.808, P<0.01], 60-69 year [(174.7±2.0)° vs (179.2±2.2)°, t=76.181, P<0.01], >70 year [(176.7±2.6)° vs (188.5±3.1)°, t=49.259, P<0.01], left side [(175.3±2.2)° vs (183.9±3.3)°, t=29.871, P<0.01] and right side [(175.0±3.2)° vs (182.3±2.8)°, t=28.658, P<0.01] subgroups. The TTA difference of male [(25±8)° vs (21±8)°, t=3.198, P<0.01], female [(26±7)° vs (20±10)°, t=4.719, P<0.01], >70 year group [(23±10)° vs (18±8)°, t=6.651, P<0.01], the left side [(25±9)° vs (20±8)°, t=4.512, P<0.01], the right side [(25±9)° vs (21±8)°, t=2.973, P<0.01] between control group and KOA group were statistically significant. In KOA group, FTA in 40-59 year group (r=-0.317, P<0.05), 60-69 year group (r=-0.429, P<0.05), >70 year group (r=-0.810, P<0.01), K-L class Ⅱ (r=-0.387, P<0.05), Ⅲ (r=-0.442, P<0.05), Ⅳ(r=-0.834, P<0.01) were all correlated with TTA.

Conclusion

The knee joint deformity of knee osteoarthritis was negatively correlated with the rotation angle of tibia, and its correlation was influenced by age and K-L classification.

表1 膝关节炎内翻患者与膝关节正常者一般资料比较
图3 a为胫骨后髁轴,b为股骨后髁轴的层面投射,a和b所成夹角为β,即胫骨旋转角
表2 膝关节炎内翻患者与膝关节正常者FTA测量结果比较(°,±s
表3 膝关节炎内翻患者与膝关节正常者TTA测量结果比较(°,±s
表4 FTA与TTA的相关性分析
4
朱正亚,郑欣,赵凤朝,等.膝骨性关节炎与骨质疏松相关性研究概述[J].中国骨质疏松杂志, 2017, 23(10):1372-1375.
5
董政权,陈崇伟,卫小春,等.骨关节炎常用治疗药物的研究现状及展望[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2018, 4(4):252-256.
6
唐小英.膝关节承重的生物力学模型研究[J].四川生理科学杂志, 2017 (3):114-116.
7
李涛,史占军.膝关节骨关节炎的非置换手术[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2016, 2(1):1-6.
8
孙铁铮,吕厚山,倪磊,等.膝关节骨关节炎患者胫骨扭转角度的异常及临床意义[J].中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2007, 1(4):242-246.
9
Bramer JA, Maas M, Dallinga RJ, et al. Increased external tibial torsion and osteochondritis dissecans of the knee [J]. Clin OrthopRelat Res, 2004, 422(422):175-179.
10
邱贵兴.骨关节炎诊治指南[C]//2011全国骨关节创伤学术研讨会论文集,福建漳州, 2011: 1-2.
11
Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis [J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 1957, 16(4):494-502.
12
Zhang ZF, Wang D, Min JK. Correlation of medial compartmental joint line elevation with femorotibial angle correction and clinical function after unicompartmental arthroplasty [J]. Zhongguo Gu Shang, 2017, 30(4):309-312.
13
张承启,张志刚.胫骨扭转角的测量及其相关研究进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志, 2009 (15):1161-1163.
14
鲁洋,郑占乐,张英泽,等.膝内翻患者股骨形态的影像学测量及临床意义的初步研究[J].河北医科大学学报, 2018, 39(4):466-468.
15
郑艮强,吴斗,赵恩哲,等.膝关节周围截骨术对膝关节骨关节炎伴内翻畸形的治疗策略[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2016, 2(1):44-49.
16
张瑞鹏,李石伦,张英泽,等.腓骨截骨+胫骨高位截骨四点支撑钢板撑开固定治疗重度骨性膝关节炎[J].河北医科大学学报, 2018, 39(10):1224-1226.
17
张世峰,金群华.胫骨高位截骨术治疗膝内侧单间室骨关节炎的研究进展[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2018, 4(5):312-316.
18
臧越,吴舰,孙铁铮.膝关节骨性关节炎患者下肢扭转角度CT评价的临床价值[J].影像诊断与介入放射学, 2012, 21(4):268-273.
19
Mullaji AB, Shetty GM. Surgical technique: computer-assisted sliding medial condylar osteotomy to achieve gap balance in varus knees during TKA [J]. Clin OrthopRelat Res, 2013, 471(5):1484-1491.
20
O'reilly SC, Jones A, Muir KR, et al. Quadriceps weakness in knee osteoarthritis: the effect on pain and disability [J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 1998, 57(10):588-594.
1
刘康妍,郑聪,胡海澜.骨关节炎流行病学研究[J].中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(3):320-323.
2
Tang X, Wang S, Zhan S, et al. The prevalence of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in China results from the China health and retirement longitudinal study [J]. Arthritis Rheumatol, 2016, 68(3):648-653.
3
王坤正.膝关节骨关节炎的创新疗法-腓骨近端截骨术[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2018, 4(3):129-131.
21
Eriksson E. Dislocation of the knee [J]. Knee Surg Sports TraumatolArthrosc, 2004, 12(1):1-2.
22
Breeman S, Campbell M, Dakin H, et al. Patellar resurfacing in total knee replacement: Five-Year clinical and economic results of a large randomized controlled trial [J]. JBoneJointSurgAm, 2011, 93(16):1473-1481.
23
张可,杨桂姣. CT观察膝骨性关节炎患者股骨远端旋转解剖标志的研究[J].中国现代医生, 2015 (17):17-19, 161.
24
Liu B, Chen W, Zhang Q, et al. Proximal fibular osteotomy to treat medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: Preoperational factors for short-term prognosis [J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(5):1-9.
25
王波,罗建成,王平,等.膝关节表面置换术治疗膝关节骨性关节炎合并内翻及屈曲挛缩畸形的疗效分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2017, 32(6):589-591.
26
Yang ZY, Chen W, Li CX, et al. Medial compartment decompression by fibular osteotomy to treat medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: a pilot study [J]. Orthopedics, 2015, 38(12):e1110-e1114.
27
Misra D, Guermazi A, Sieren JP, et al. CT imaging for evaluation of calcium crystal deposition in the knee: initial experience from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis (MOST) study [J]. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2015, 23(2):244-248.
28
Buckley R, Mohanty K, Malish D. Lower limb malrotation following MIPO technique of distal femoral and proximal tibial fractures [J]. Injury, 2011, 42(2):194-199.
[1] 任俊筱, 浦路桥, 王志豪, 施洪鑫, 刘爱峰, 齐保闯, 徐永清, 李川. 机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的临床疗效对照研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 469-476.
[2] 李志文, 李远志, 李华, 方志远. 糖皮质激素治疗膝骨关节炎疗效的网状Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 484-496.
[3] 许亚龙, 巩栋, 陈晓涛. 超前镇痛在全膝关节置换术中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 517-523.
[4] 庄若语, 杭明辉, 李文华, 张霆, 侯炜. 膝骨关节炎半定量磁共振评分研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 545-552.
[5] 丁莹莹, 宋恺, 金姬延, 田华. 机器人辅助膝髋关节置换术后精细化临床护理[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 553-557.
[6] 王冰, 孙海宁, 于秀淳, 周珂, 翟凯, 苗族康. 膝骨关节炎的活动衬垫型单髁置换疗效与假体生存率[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 337-345.
[7] 张江礼, 刘金辉, 潘西庆, 刘光源, 范虓. 全膝关节置换应用智能辅助手术导航系统治疗膝骨关节炎[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 346-351.
[8] 杨士慷, 曹光磊. 膝骨关节炎三种术式患者满意度的术前影响因素[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 390-397.
[9] 王啸, 李一凡, 沈素红, 曹国瑞, 史小涛, 袁彦浩, 谭红略. 全膝关节置换术后早期下肢深静脉血栓形成的时空规律[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 414-420.
[10] 卢芳连, 汤莉, 何河北, 李建云, 欧栓机, 陈燕, 陈娇妹. 责任护士主导的疼痛管理在膝关节置换术后的应用[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 285-289.
[11] 中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组, 解放军总医院第四医学中心骨科医学部, 国家骨科与运动康复临床医学研究中心. 中国膝骨关节炎非手术治疗专家共识(2023年版)[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 151-159.
[12] 刘浩, 郑清源, 程龙, 辛鹏, 吴博, 任鹏, 张国强. 全膝关节置换术中选择窄版股骨假体的影响因素[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 193-200.
[13] 郝鑫, 贾健, 任雨昊, 成凯, 王小虎. 膝关节骨关节炎的运动学疗法[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 264-270.
[14] 李益军, 梁兴森, 方细霞, 肖文良, 李湘, 高彦平, 李嘉, 李玲. 温针灸治疗早中期寒湿痹阻型膝骨关节炎的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 7-12.
[15] 薛伟, 康少英, 郭洪生, 高庆亮, 张英民, 高彦平. 电针联合富血小板血浆治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 13-17.
阅读次数
全文


摘要