切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (02) : 93 -98. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.02.006

所属专题: 文献

膝关节

旋转平台与固定平台假体全膝人工关节置换术的早期疗效比较
王琦1, 王国栋1, 马龙飞1, 谢士成1, 赵晓伟1, 张元民1,()   
  1. 1. 272029 济宁医学院附属医院骨关节科
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-23 出版日期:2019-04-05
  • 通信作者: 张元民
  • 基金资助:
    山东省重点研发计划(公益类专项)(2017GSF218065); 山东省自然科学基金(ZR201702140118); 济宁市科技发展计划(济科字[2015]57号-67)

Comparison of early clinical outcomes between rotating platform and fixed platform prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty: a short-term result

Qi Wang1, Guodong Wang1, Longfei Ma1, Shicheng Xie1, Xiaowei Zhao1, Yuanmin Zhang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Bone and Joint Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining 272029, China
  • Received:2018-08-23 Published:2019-04-05
  • Corresponding author: Yuanmin Zhang
引用本文:

王琦, 王国栋, 马龙飞, 谢士成, 赵晓伟, 张元民. 旋转平台与固定平台假体全膝人工关节置换术的早期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2019, 05(02): 93-98.

Qi Wang, Guodong Wang, Longfei Ma, Shicheng Xie, Xiaowei Zhao, Yuanmin Zhang. Comparison of early clinical outcomes between rotating platform and fixed platform prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty: a short-term result[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2019, 05(02): 93-98.

目的

比较全膝人工关节置换术应用强生旋转平台与固定平台两种假体术后早期临床疗效。

方法

回顾性收集2017年1月至2018年01月济宁医学院附属医院收治的79例86侧膝关节骨性关节炎患者进行回顾性研究,其中43例46膝应用强生旋转平台,其中男性18例(18膝,39.13%),女性25例(28膝,60.87%);左侧25膝(54.35%),右膝21膝(45.65%),年龄为55~77岁,平均(68±8)岁。36例(40膝)应用强生固定平台,其中男性16例(17膝,42.50%),女性20例(23膝,57.50%);左侧22膝(55.00%),右膝18膝(45.00%)。年龄为54~80岁,平均(67±8)岁。所有患者均由同一位医师行固定平台假体或旋转平台假体初次TKA术。分别于手术前后评估膝关节HSS评分、膝关节活动度。

结果

固定平台组或旋转平台组患者的术前活动度与末次随访活动度相比,差异均具有统计学意义(t=26.801,t=21.470,P<0.05);固定平台组或旋转平台组患者的术前HSS评分与末次随访HSS评分相比,差异均具有统计学意义(t=35.180,t=35.053,P<0.05)。固定平台组与旋转平台组患者比较,术前及末次随访活动度差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05),固定平台组与旋转平台组患者比较,术前及末次随访HSS评分差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。

结论

旋转平台假体与固定平台假体TKA术后早期临床总体疗效相似。两种假体均能明显改善膝关节活动度及膝关节功能。无论使用哪种假体,短期随访时间内都不会影响到效果。

Objective

To compare the early postoperative clinical outcomes of rotating platform and fixed platform prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed on 79 patients (86 cases) with diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis from January 2017 to January 2018, including 43 patients with 46 knees using a rotating platform, thereinto 18 males with 18 knees (39.13%), 25 females with 28 knees (60.87%). 25 left knee (54.35%), 21 right knee (45.65%), age range was 55 to 77 years old, and the average was (68±8) years old. 36 patients (40 knee) using a fixed platform, including 16 males with 17 knees (42.50%), 20 females with 23 knees (57.50%), 22 left knee (55.00%), 18 right knee (45.00%), age range was 54 to 80 years old and the average was (67±8) years old. All patients underwent primary TKA with a fixed platform prosthesis or a rotating platform prosthesis. The knee joint HSS score and range of motion of knee were evaluated before and after surgery.

Results

The preoperative range of motion of knee in the fixed platform group or the rotating platform group was statistically different with the last follow-up range of motion of knee (t=26.801, t=21.470, P<0.05).The preoperative HSS scores of the patients in the fixed platform group or the rotating platform group were statistically different compared with the last follow-up HSS score (t=35.180, t=35.053, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in range of motion of knee between the fixed platform group and the rotating platform group at preoperative and the last follow-up. There was no significant difference in the HSS between the fixed platform group and the rotating platform group at preoperative and the last follow-up.

Conclusions

The overall clinical efficacy of the rotating platform prosthesis and the fixed platform prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty was similar. Both prostheses significantly improved mobility and function of knee compared to preoperative. No matter which type of prosthesis was used, it will not affect the clinical effect during short-term follow-up.

表1 两组膝骨关节炎患者术前一般资料的比较
表2 两组膝骨关节炎患者术前及末次随访时的膝关节活动度比较(°,±s
表3 两组膝骨关节炎患者术前及末次随访时的HSS评分比较(分,±s
图9~10 两种假体的术野照片。图9 旋转平台假体;图10 固定平台假体
1
杨兆先.不同分期膝关节骨性关节炎治疗方案探讨[J].中国骨科临床与基础研究杂志, 2015, 7(1):48-52.
2
何志勇,吴海山,吴宇黎,等.关节镜下有限与广泛清理术治疗膝骨性关节炎的临床比较[J].中国矫形外科杂志, 2004, 12(15):1130-1132.
3
王坤正.浅谈中国关节置换外科的现状与未来[J].中华关节外科杂志:电子版, 2015, 9(6):703-706.
4
Bhattacharya R, Scott CE, Morris HE, et al. Survivorship and patient satisfaction of a fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty incorporating an all-polyethylene tibial component [J]. Knee, 2012, 19(4):348-351.
5
Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS. Clinical Results of Fixed-Bearing and Rotating-Platform Total Knee Prostheses [J]. Orthopedics, 2018, 41(2):88-94.
6
Goldstein WM, Gordon AC, Youderian A, et al. Mid-term survivorship results for a rotating-platform knee prosthesis [J]. Orthopedics, 2011, 34(1):16.
7
Huang CH, Liau JJ, Cheng CK. Fixed or mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty [J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2007, 5(2):1.
8
Silvestre Munoz A, Almeida Herrero F, Lopez Lozano R, et al. Comparison of mobile- and fixed-bearing cemented total knee arthroplasty [J]. Acta Orthop Belg, 2008, 74(6):801-808.
9
陈廖斌,王华,王欣,等.旋转平台与固定平台全膝关节置换术的对比研究及髌骨置换与否对疗效的影响[J].中华关节外科杂志:电子版, 2010, 4(6):742-747.
10
Ranawat AS, Rossi R, Loreti I, et al. Comparison of the PFC sigma fixed-bearing and rotating-platform total knee arthroplastyin the same patient [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2004, 19(1):35-39.
11
Ranawat CS, Flynn WF, Saddler S, et al. Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty. A 15-year survivorship study [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1993, (286):94-102.
12
柴伟,任鹏,陈继营,等.旋转平台后交叉韧带保留型与替代型人工膝关节置换术短期疗效比较[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2015, 8(4):327-331.
13
Ranawat CS, Komistek RD, Rodriguez JA, et al. In vivo kinematics for fixed and mobile-bearing posterior stabilized knee prostheses [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004 (418):184-190.
14
Rees JL, Beard DJ, Price AJ, et al. Real in vivo kinematic differences between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasties [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2005 (432):204-209.
15
Rönn K, Reischl N, Gautier E, et al. Current surgical treatment of knee osteoarthritis [J]. Arthritis, 2011, 2011:454873.
16
孙启彬,王玉.膝关节镜下有限清理与广泛清理术治疗膝关节骨关节炎的疗效对比[J].中国老年学杂志, 2014, 34(2):367-369.
17
Carothers JT, Kim RH, Dennis DA, et al. Mobile-Bearing total knee arthroplasty a meta-analysis [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2011, 26(4):537-542.
18
李金龙,李为,樊大钊,等.后方稳定型全膝人工关节置换术30例分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志, 2007, 15(21):1656-1658.
19
丘立标,彭伟秋,李富明,等.中年膝骨性关节炎全膝关节置换中应用旋转高屈曲型假体的特点[J].中国组织工程研究, 2016, 20(17):2467-2473.
20
Woolson ST, Epstein NJ, Huddleston JI. Long-Term comparison of Mobile-Bearing vs Fixed-Bearing total knee arthroplasty [J]. Journal of Arthroplasty, 2011, 26(8):1219-1223.
21
Oh KJ, Pandher DS, Lee SH, et al. Meta-analysis comparing outcomes of Fixed-Bearing and Mobile-Bearing prostheses in total knee arthroplasty [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2009, 24(6):873-884.
22
Hasegawa M, Sudo A, Uchida A. Staged bilateral mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty in the same patients: a prospective comparison of a posterior-stabilized prosthesis [J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2009, 17(3):237-243.
23
Breugem SJ, Sierevelt IN, Schafroth MU, et al. Less anterior knee pain with a mobile-bearing prosthesis compared with a fixedbearing prosthesis [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2008, 466(8):1959-1965.
24
Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, et al. A multicenter analysis of axial femorotibial rotation after total kneearthroplasty [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004, (428):180-189.
25
Kim YH, Yoon SH, Kim JS. The long-term results of simultaneous fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee replacements performed in the same patient [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2007, 89(10):1317-1323.
[1] 龚艺燃, 李雯婷, 方雅滨, 杨楷熠, 何聚馨, 陈树强. 超声评估远端指间关节指伸肌腱附着点炎对炎性关节病的临床诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(04): 408-413.
[2] 任俊筱, 浦路桥, 王志豪, 施洪鑫, 刘爱峰, 齐保闯, 徐永清, 李川. 机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的临床疗效对照研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 469-476.
[3] 高小康, 张净宇, 刘金伟, 田东牧, 胡永成, 徐卫国. 连接型人工膝关节假体运动和负重模式的演变和进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 505-516.
[4] 许亚龙, 巩栋, 陈晓涛. 超前镇痛在全膝关节置换术中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 517-523.
[5] 丁莹莹, 宋恺, 金姬延, 田华. 机器人辅助膝髋关节置换术后精细化临床护理[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 553-557.
[6] 王冰, 孙海宁, 于秀淳, 周珂, 翟凯, 苗族康. 膝骨关节炎的活动衬垫型单髁置换疗效与假体生存率[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 337-345.
[7] 张江礼, 刘金辉, 潘西庆, 刘光源, 范虓. 全膝关节置换应用智能辅助手术导航系统治疗膝骨关节炎[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 346-351.
[8] 杨士慷, 曹光磊. 膝骨关节炎三种术式患者满意度的术前影响因素[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 390-397.
[9] 王啸, 李一凡, 沈素红, 曹国瑞, 史小涛, 袁彦浩, 谭红略. 全膝关节置换术后早期下肢深静脉血栓形成的时空规律[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 414-420.
[10] 刘浩, 郑清源, 程龙, 辛鹏, 吴博, 任鹏, 张国强. 全膝关节置换术中选择窄版股骨假体的影响因素[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 193-200.
[11] 卢芳连, 汤莉, 何河北, 李建云, 欧栓机, 陈燕, 陈娇妹. 责任护士主导的疼痛管理在膝关节置换术后的应用[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 285-289.
[12] 赵锦伟, 李晓军, 刘桂宇, 荣晓玲, 黄明利, 宋文静, 高广凌, 鞠昌军. 固定平台假体膝关节单髁置换术中止血带应用策略研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 39-47.
[13] 郑占乐, 王宇钏, 蔚佳昊, 宋庆成, 张凯旋, 纳静, 王天瑞, 宋九宏, 张英泽, 王娟. 保膝须“开膝”——“开膝”在膝骨关节炎中的临床应用价值[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 325-330.
[14] 王浩汀, 尚运涛, 曹光, 张延祠, 李军勇. 胫骨高位截骨联合关节镜与单髁置换治疗单间室膝关节骨性关节炎的临床疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 229-236.
[15] 于晓光, 秦永辉, 李佳, 贾国兴, 李军, 赵振栓, 刘国彬. 人工单髁置换术治疗膝关节内侧间室骨关节炎合并前交叉韧带功能不良的近期疗效[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 337-342.
阅读次数
全文


摘要