切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (05) : 266 -270. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.05.003

所属专题: 文献

创新技术

双反牵引装置治疗Schatzker分型Ⅴ、Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折的优势
鲍飞龙1, 刘涛1,(), 亢世杰1, 黄东生1, 江涛1, 胡义明1   
  1. 1. 266035 青岛,山东大学齐鲁医院(青岛)创伤骨科
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-04 出版日期:2018-10-05
  • 通信作者: 刘涛
  • 基金资助:
    青岛市医疗卫生重点学科建设项目(QDZDXK-A-2017005)

The advantage of homeopathic double reverse traction device treating tibial plateau fractures of typing Schatzker Ⅴ and Ⅵ

Feilong Bao1, Tao Liu1,(), Shijie Kang1, Dongsheng Huang1, Tao Jiang1, Yiming Hu1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (Qingdao), Qingdao 266035, China
  • Received:2017-12-04 Published:2018-10-05
  • Corresponding author: Tao Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Tao, Email:
引用本文:

鲍飞龙, 刘涛, 亢世杰, 黄东生, 江涛, 胡义明. 双反牵引装置治疗Schatzker分型Ⅴ、Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折的优势[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2018, 04(05): 266-270.

Feilong Bao, Tao Liu, Shijie Kang, Dongsheng Huang, Tao Jiang, Yiming Hu. The advantage of homeopathic double reverse traction device treating tibial plateau fractures of typing Schatzker Ⅴ and Ⅵ[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2018, 04(05): 266-270.

目的

探讨双反牵引装置结合钢针撬拨闭合复位,骨膜外置入双钢板固定治疗Schatzker Ⅴ、Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折的优势。

方法

回顾性分析2015年10月至2017年6月在山东大学齐鲁医院(青岛)创伤骨科应用双反牵引、微创内固定手术治疗Schatzker分型为Ⅴ型、Ⅵ型的胫骨平台骨折23例,术中应用双反牵引装置,在膝关节周围韧带及关节囊的自身张力牵引下,结合钢针撬拨闭合复位,骨膜外置入双钢板固定,术后根据Rasmussen影像学评价标准进行评分,测量膝关节活动度和美国特种外科医院膝关节评分(HSS)对膝关节功能进行评分。

结果

所有患者均获得随访,随访时间平均为(9±5)个月。末次随访时膝关节屈曲平均(125±9)°,伸直平均(2.7±2.1)°。所有患肢均恢复正常力线,患膝稳定。Rasmussen影像学评分优18例,良5例,优良率100%;HSS评分平均为(86±8)分,其中优19例,良3例,可1例,优良率为95.7%。

结论

双反牵引装置可以提供有效牵引力,并能维持断端,给术者提供了良好的操作环境,临床疗效满意。

Objective

To explore the advantage of homeopathic double reverse traction device combined with closed reduction and percutaneous insertion of dual plate in the treatment of Schatzker Ⅴ and Ⅵ tibial plateau fractures.

Methods

From October 2015 to June 2017, 23 Schatzker Ⅴ and Ⅵ tibial plateau fractures admitted to the trauma center of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (Qingdao) were included into this retrospectively study. All the patients were treated using homeopathic double reverse traction device, by means of ligamentotaxis and tension of capsule surrounding the knee, combined with percutaneous joystick and plate fixation. The reduction was evaluated according to Rasmussen radiological system, and the functional recovery of the knee was evaluated by the rang of motion and HSS score.

Results

All patients were followed up for (9±5) months. At the final follow up, the mean flexion angle was (125±9)°and the mean extension angle was (2.7±2.1)°. All patients obtained a stable, normal mechanical axis of knee. Rasmussen radiological scoring system was excellent in 18 cases, good in 5 cases, excellent rate was 100%; HSS knee score was (86±8) points, among which 19 cases were excellent, 3 cases were good, 1 case was fair, and the excellent and good rate was 95.7%.

Conclusion

Homeopathic double reverse traction device can provide effective traction and stable the broken ends, providing the surgeon a good operating environment and the clinical outcome is satisfied.

图4 双方牵引后,胫骨平台关节面恢复
图5~16 男性,43岁,左胫骨平台SchatzkerⅥ型骨折。图5~6术前X线片;图7~8术前CT;图9术前大体像;图10术中切口;图11~12术后X线片见胫骨力线恢复良好,关节面匹配良好;图13~14 CT见塌陷关节面基本恢复,骨折复位满意;图15~16术后14个月患者膝关节伸直正常,屈曲约135°,功能恢复良好
[1]
Schatzker J, McBroom R, Bnlce D. The tibial plateau fracture. The Toronto experience 1968-1975 [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1979, 138: 94-104.
[2]
郑占乐,张飞,何泽阳,等.双向牵引闭合复位微创治疗胫骨平台骨折的初步临床应用[J].河北医科大学学报, 2015, 0(4): 491-492.
[3]
张世民.骨折分类与功能评定[M].北京:人民军医出版社, 2008: 210.
[4]
Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, et al. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1976, 58(6): 754-765.
[5]
Koval KJ, Sanders R, Borrelli J, et al. Indirect reduction and percutaneous screw fixation of displaced tibial plateau fractures [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 1992, 6(3): 340-346.
[6]
庞桂根,王宏川,忻大明,等.闭合复位有限固定治疗胫骨平台骨折[J].中华骨科杂志, 2003, 23(12): 22-26.
[7]
Watson JT, Coufal C. Treatment of complex lateral plateau fractures using Ilizarov techniques [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1998 (353): 97-106.
[8]
Lansiger O, Bergman B, Korner L, et al. Tibial condylar fractures. A twenty-year follow-up [J]. J Bone Join Surg Am, 1986, 68(1): 13-19.
[9]
Scheerlinck T, Ng CS, Handelberg F, et al. Mediun-term results of percutaneous, arthroscopically-assisted osteosynthesis of fractures of the tibial plateau [J]. J Bone Join Surg Br, 1998, 80(6): 959-964.
[10]
张英泽.临床创伤骨折流行病学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社, 2014: 290.
[11]
汤旭日,王秋根,张秋林,等.胫骨平台骨折术后高度丢失的原因及对策[J].中华创伤骨科杂志, 2004, 6(03): 24-27.
[1] 刘瀚忠, 黄生辉, 万俊明, 李家春, 舒涛. 髌上入路和髌旁外侧入路髓内钉治疗胫骨骨折疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 795-801.
[2] 夏效泳, 王立超, 朱治国, 丛云海, 史宗新. 深度塌陷性胫骨平台骨折的形态特点和治疗策略[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 625-632.
[3] 齐伟亚, 方杰, 吴衡, 刘波. 掌侧小切口联合腕关节镜治疗AO-C型桡骨远端骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 577-582.
[4] 莫亮, 熊贤梅, 马超, 刘予豪, 陈镇秋, 何伟, 周驰. 股骨颈骨折内固定术后因素与股骨头坏死关系的分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 735-744.
[5] 唐小花, 孙建霞, 王君, 王美青. 预测老年股骨粗隆间骨折术后并发症的列线图模型构建[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 677-682.
[6] 周晓强, 孙超, 李志强, 徐人杰, 佘远时, 张向鑫, 陈广祥, 虞宵. 动力抗旋交叉钉治疗不稳定股骨颈骨折的早期疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 670-676.
[7] 毛文文, 陈昊, 李立, 朱友森, 张敏, 陈刚. Pilon骨折术后发生手术部位感染的危险因素分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 309-314.
[8] 吴萍, 刘永林, 陈能彬, 季明军, 万晓波. 应用皮瓣联合负压封闭引流及灌洗引流治疗胫骨骨折术后钢板外露的临床效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(04): 317-320.
[9] 邓玖征, 袁野, 朱剑津, 何大炜, 赵喆, 赵锋, 孔德敬, 潘勇卫. 基于成人掌骨形态学数据设计的掌骨弹性髓内针治疗掌骨骨折的生物力学研究[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(04): 330-335.
[10] 张琳袁, 吴佳俊, 崔煦, 沈超, 付备刚, 崔崟, 王秀会, 蔡攀. 大结节解剖钢板与PHILOS内固定治疗伴肩关节脱位的Mutch I/II型肱骨大结节骨折的疗效差异[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 139-145.
[11] 金宇杰, 虞宵, 周晓强, 李志强, 徐人杰, 张向鑫, 陈广祥. 动力交叉钉系统治疗股骨颈骨折其内固定位置与临床疗效的相关性研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 193-200.
[12] 高岩, 张泽, 张进, 张登峰, 刘杰, 刘沛东, 包勤济, 张永红. 主辅钢板内固定治疗胫骨中下1/3骨折的初步临床研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 39-44.
[13] 曹发奇, 谢旭东, 胡益强, 周武, 刘梦非, 米博斌, 刘国辉. 双反牵引器微创复位在老年不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的应用研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(06): 325-329.
[14] 赵阔, 王忠正, 王宇钏, 张浚哲, 郭家良, 郑占乐, 陈伟, 张英泽. 双反牵引复位器联合MIPO技术治疗肱骨近端骨折的初步应用[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2021, 07(06): 321-325.
[15] 高金伟. 经皮伤椎置钉与否对胸腰椎骨折疗效的影响[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2021, 07(05): 291-297.
阅读次数
全文


摘要