切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (01) : 39 -44. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2023.01.008

下肢

主辅钢板内固定治疗胫骨中下1/3骨折的初步临床研究
高岩, 张泽, 张进, 张登峰, 刘杰, 刘沛东, 包勤济, 张永红()   
  1. 030001 太原,山西医科大学第二医院骨科
    030001 太原,山西医科大学
    030600 晋中市第一人民医院骨科
    044500 永济市人民医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-19 出版日期:2023-02-05
  • 通信作者: 张永红
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82172439)

Preliminary clinical study of main and auxiliary plates internal fixation in the treatment of middle and lower 1/3 tibial fractures

Yan Gao, Ze Zhang, Jin Zhang, Dengfeng Zhang, Jie Liu, Peidong Liu, Qinji Bao, Yonghong Zhang()   

  1. Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
    Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001,China
    Department of Orthopedics, The first people`s Hospital of jinzhong City, Jinzhong 030600, China
    Department of Orthopedics, People's Hospital of yongji City, Yongji 044500, China
  • Received:2022-05-19 Published:2023-02-05
  • Corresponding author: Yonghong Zhang
引用本文:

高岩, 张泽, 张进, 张登峰, 刘杰, 刘沛东, 包勤济, 张永红. 主辅钢板内固定治疗胫骨中下1/3骨折的初步临床研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 39-44.

Yan Gao, Ze Zhang, Jin Zhang, Dengfeng Zhang, Jie Liu, Peidong Liu, Qinji Bao, Yonghong Zhang. Preliminary clinical study of main and auxiliary plates internal fixation in the treatment of middle and lower 1/3 tibial fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2023, 09(01): 39-44.

目的

探究主辅钢板内固定技术能否为胫骨中下1/3骨折提供一个可选择的治疗方案。

方法

回顾性收集山西医科大学第二医院骨科单一团队于2015年6月至2021年7月期间收治的胫骨中下1/3骨折患者40例,AO分型为42A(11例)、42B(5例)、42C(24例)。男性33例,女性7例;左侧21例,右侧19例;年龄18~67岁,平均年龄为(43.4±14.3)岁。所有患者经由同一团队以同一方法完成主辅钢板手术治疗,术后指导患者康复锻炼,出院后定期门诊复查,观察并记录骨折对位、对线和骨折愈合情况,记录患者并发症以及不良反应,评价踝关节功能情况,随访患者直至骨折完全愈合。

结果

35例患者得到随访,失随访患者5例,失访率12.5%。随访时间为4~33月。骨折愈合时间为12~20周,中位数为16(14,18)周。踝-后足AOFAS评分显示该方法治疗胫骨中下1/3骨折优良率为97.1%。其中1例患者外踝部皮肤出现轻度感染破溃,经过换药和抗炎治疗后伤口愈合。1例Gustilo I型的患者胫前皮肤出现破溃,螺钉尾帽外露,经过换药缝合后伤口愈合。1例患者出现胫骨轻度外翻畸形(外翻角度约为8°),末次随访时,步态正常,X线片显示骨折愈合,患者可无痛行走。

结论

在胫骨中下1/3骨折的治疗中,主辅钢板技术提供了坚实的内固定,有效防止了骨折断端术后移位,患者能更早的进行康复锻炼,减少了踝关节僵硬等并发症;降低了骨折延迟愈合、不愈合的发生率;取得了良好的临床效果。

Objective

To explore whether the treatment with main and auxiliary plates can provide an alternative treatment for the middle and lower 1/3 tibial fractures.

Methods

Forty patients with mid-lower 1/3 tibial fractures admitted to the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University Orthopedics single team between June 2015 and July 2021 were retrospectively collected, with AO classification of 42A (11 cases), 42B (5 cases) and 42C (24 cases). There were 33 males and 7 females; 21 left-sided cases and 19 right-sided cases; ages ranged from 18 to 67 years, with a mean age of (43.4±14.3) years. All patients were treated with main and auxiliary plates in the same way by the same team. Post-operative rehabilitation exercises were given to the patients and regular follow-ups were carried out after discharge. The fracture alignment and fracture healing were observed and recorded, complications and adverse effects were recorded. The ankle joint function was analyzed with the AOFAS score of the ankle. Patients were followed up until the fracture healed completely.

Results

Thirty-five patients were followed up and 5 patients were lost. The follow-up period was 4 to 33 months. The fracture healing time was 12 to 20 weeks, the median was 16 (14, 18) weeks. The AOFAS score of ankle-hindfoot showed an excellent rate of 97.1% for the treatment of mid-lower 1/3 tibial fractures. One patient had a mildly infected skin ulceration of the lateral malleolus and the wound healed after dressing changes and anti-inflammatory treatment. One patient with Gustilo type I tibial fracture accompanied with ulceration of anterior tibial skin and exposed internalfixation, wound healed after dressing changes and sutures. One patient got tibial valgus deformity (valgus angle approximately 8°) which has no serious effect on walking. Importantly, in their last follow-ups, the fracture position was good, and the X-ray showed that the fracture healed, and the patients could walk without pain and support.

Conclusions

In the treatment of the middle and lower 1/3 tibial fractures, the main and auxiliary plates technique provides a solid internal fixation, effectively preventing the displacement of the fracture end so the patients can carry out rehabilitation exercises earlier and complications such as ankle stiffness are reduced. Meanwhile, it reduces the incidence of delayed fracture healing and nonunion. It has achieved good clinical results.

表1 40例胫骨中下1/3骨折患者的一般资料
患者编号 性别 年龄(岁) 诊断 致伤原因 骨折类型 评分 手术时间(min) 出血量(ml) 骨折愈和时间(周) 患肢负重时间(周)
1 25 右胫腓骨骨折 摔伤 42C 330 250 14 10
2 47 左胫骨骨折 摔伤 42B 169 130 12 8
3 47 左胫腓骨骨折 砸伤 42C 232 200 18 12
4 63 右胫腓骨骨折 车祸伤 42B 249 200 18 8
5 26 右胫腓骨骨折 砸伤 42B 99 120 14 4
6 18 左胫骨骨折 摔伤 42A 96 110 16 8
7 47 左胫腓骨骨折 摔伤 42C 405 600 20 12
8 45 右胫腓骨粉碎骨折 摔伤 42C 128 170 16 8
9 43 右胫腓骨远端骨折 坠落伤 42C 118 150 20 10
10 29 左侧胫腓骨骨折 车祸 42C 209 500 15 8
11 56 右胫腓骨骨折 碾压伤 42C 120 50 19 12
12 67 左胫腓骨开放骨折 车祸 42C 106 100 16 9
13 46 左胫腓骨粉碎性骨折 摔伤 42C 180 200 19 12
14 56 左胫腓骨骨折 摔伤 42C 245 180 18 10
15 51 左胫腓骨骨折 坠落伤 42C 122 130 14 7
16 29 左胫骨骨折 摔伤 42A 112 140 15 6
17 64 左胫腓骨骨折 摔伤 42C 115 150 16 8
18 34 右胫骨下段骨折 摔伤 42A 158 120 15 8
19 19 左胫腓骨骨折 摔伤 42C 103 110 12 4
20 23 右胫腓骨开放骨折 摔伤 42A 95 100 16 8
21 66 右胫骨骨折 坠落伤 42C 180 400 13 4
22 60 右胫骨粉碎骨折 摔伤 42A 180 100 14 6
23 36 左胫骨远端骨折 砸伤 42B 105 110 16 7
24 45 左胫腓骨骨折 车祸 42B 112 120 16 8
25 37 右胫腓骨远端骨折 水泥块撞伤 42C 235 160 20 10
26 44 左胫骨下端骨折 摔伤 42C 240 150 19 11
27 42 右胫腓骨骨折 车祸 42C 116 130 20 12
28 26 右胫骨下段骨折 摔伤 42A 98 100 14 4
29 38 右胫腓骨骨折 摔伤 42A 100 110 16 6
30 27 右胫骨骨折 摔伤 42A 104 120 14 4
31 50 左胫骨骨折 砸伤 42A 91 90 18 8
32 18 左胫腓骨开放性骨折 车祸 42A 150 120 12 4
33 49 左胫腓骨远端骨折 摔伤 42C 170 300 17 11
34 57 右胫腓骨骨折 碾伤 42C 128 150 16 8
35 33 左胫腓骨骨折 车祸 42C 134 170 14 5
36(失随访) 63 右胫腓骨骨折 砸伤 42C          
37(失随访) 61 右胫腓骨骨折 车祸 42C          
38(失随访) 54 左胫腓骨骨折 坠落伤 42C          
39(失随访) 53 左胫骨骨折 车祸 42C          
40(失随访) 41 右胫腓骨粉碎性骨折 坠落伤 42A          
图7~8 术后2月余患者复查X光片及大体照
1
Beytemür O, Barış A, Albay C, et al. Comparison of intramedullary nailing and minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis in the treatment of simple intra-articular fractures of the distal tibia(AO-OTA type 43 C1-C2)[J]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc, 2017, 51(1): 12-16.
2
Freeman AL, Craig R, Schmidt AH. Biomechanical comparison of tibial nail stability in a proximal third fracture:do screw quantity and locked,interlocking screws make a difference? [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2011, 25(6): 333-339.
3
Beaino ME, Morris RP, Lindsey RW, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of dual plate configurations for femoral shaft fracture fixation [J]. BioMed Res Int, 2019, 2019: 1-7.
4
Cheng T, Xia RG, Dong SK, et al. Interlocking intramedullary nailing versus locked dual-plating fixation for femoral shaft fractures in patients with multiple injuries:A retrospective comparative study [J]. J Invest Surg, 2019, 32(3): 245-254.
5
Juriaan V, Monteban P, Roobroeck M, et al. Functional outcome and general health status after treatment of AO type 43 distal tibial fractures [J]. Injury, 2016, 47(7): 1519-1524.
6
Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, et al. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot,midfoot,hallux,and lesser toes [J]. Foot Ankle Int, 1994, 15(7): 349-353.
7
Wennergren, D. Epidemiology and incidence of tibia fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register [J]. Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured, 2018, 49(11): 2068-2074.
8
Joveniaux P, Ohl X, Harisboure A, et al. Distal tibia fractures: management and complications of 101 cases [J]. Int Orthop, 2010, 34(4): 583-588.
9
Newman, S DS. Distal metadiaphyseal tibial fractures [J]. Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured, 2011, 42(10): 975-984.
10
Hansen M, Attal RE, Blum J, et al. Intramedullary nailing of the tibia with the expert tibia nail [J]. Oper Orthop Traumatol, 2009, 21(6): 620-635.
11
Barcak E, Collinge CA. Metaphyseal distal tibia fractures:A cohort, single-surgeon study comparing outcomes of patients treated with minimally invasive plating versus intramedullary nailing [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2016, 30(5): e169-e174.
12
Märdian S, Schaser KD, Duda GN, et al. Working length of locking plates determines interfragmentary movement in distal femur fractures under physiological loading [J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2015, 30(4): 391-396.
13
Heyland M, Duda GN, Haas, NP, et al. Semi-rigid screws provide an auxiliary option to plate working length to control interfragmentary movement in locking plate fixation at the distal femur [J]. Injury, 2015, 46:S24-S32.
14
Wennergren D, Bergdahl C, Selse A, et al. Treatment and re-operation rates in one thousand and three hundred tibial fractures from the Swedish Fracture Register [J]. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2021, 31(1): 143-154.
15
Phisitkul P, Mckinley TO, Nepola JV, et al. Complications of locking plate fixation in complex proximal tibia injuries [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2007, 21(2): 83-91.
16
Kim JW, Kim HU, Oh CW, et al. A prospective randomized study on operative treatment for simple distal tibial fractures-minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis versus minimal open reduction and internal fixation [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2018, 32(1): e19-e24.
17
Paluvadi SV, Lal H, Mittal D, et al. Management of fractures of the distal third tibia by minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis-A prospective series of 50 patients [J]. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 2014, 5(3): 129-136.
18
Bingol I, Yalcin N, Bicici V, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis does not increase complication rates in extra-articular distal tibial fractures [J]. Open Orthop J, 2015, 9:73-77.
19
Jiang R, Luo CF, Zeng BF. Biomechanical evaluation of different fixation methods for fracture dislocation involving the proximal tibia [J]. Clinical Biomechanics, 2008, 23(8): 1059-1064.
20
Wagner M. General principles for the clinical use of the LCP [J]. Injury, 2003, 34(supp/S2): B31-B42.
[1] 刘瀚忠, 黄生辉, 万俊明, 李家春, 舒涛. 髌上入路和髌旁外侧入路髓内钉治疗胫骨骨折疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 795-801.
[2] 夏效泳, 王立超, 朱治国, 丛云海, 史宗新. 深度塌陷性胫骨平台骨折的形态特点和治疗策略[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 625-632.
[3] 谢文伟, 吴利洲, 冯庆裕, 张家勋, 叶龙城, 姚沛全, 王志坤, 李再学, 余颖锋. 双瓣钢板内固定系统治疗前交叉韧带止点骨折的研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 697-704.
[4] 周晓强, 孙超, 李志强, 徐人杰, 佘远时, 张向鑫, 陈广祥, 虞宵. 动力抗旋交叉钉治疗不稳定股骨颈骨折的早期疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 670-676.
[5] 伊喆, 王志新, 陈伟, 齐伟亚, 方杰, 石海飞, 赵夏, 赵喆, 竺枫, 盛伟, 陈焱, 张宇昊, 朱瑾, 殷耀斌, 杨勇, 陈山林, 刘波. 机器人辅助无移位急性舟骨骨折经皮内固定的诊疗与手术操作规范[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 464-468.
[6] 吴萍, 刘永林, 陈能彬, 季明军, 万晓波. 应用皮瓣联合负压封闭引流及灌洗引流治疗胫骨骨折术后钢板外露的临床效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(04): 317-320.
[7] 左楠, 刘岩, 孙大辉, 刘哲闻, 杨光. 胸大肌三角肌入路与经三角肌外侧入路治疗肱骨近端骨折的疗效分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 252-257.
[8] 李立, 王红莉, 常红, 张艳. 肱骨近端骨折术后功能康复策略现状及新理念下的研究进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 284-287.
[9] 马小刚, 秦桂兰, 缪嘉吉. 西藏地区复杂肩胛骨骨折手术治疗疗效分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 117-121.
[10] 刘泽民, 张经, 王栋, 李岩, 常诗语, 张永红. 解剖锁定板是否联合带线锚钉重建喙锁韧带治疗不稳定性锁骨远端骨折疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 53-62.
[11] 王云鹭, 李锡勇, 刘伦, 张鹏, 韩鹏飞, 李晓东. TTIE中桡骨头骨折切开复位内固定与桡骨头置换疗效对比的Meta分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 240-246.
[12] 江凯乐, 杨异. 肋骨骨折的手术治疗进展及存在问题[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(03): 149-152.
[13] 杨杨, 刘永志, 刘军峰, 周雪涛, 张东升. 回顾性分析完全胸腔镜下肋骨骨折内固定术治疗肋骨骨折患者的临床效果[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(03): 137-142.
[14] 张强, 李博闻, 刘振振. 胸骨骨折的外科治疗[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 80-85.
[15] 周志明, 姜威, 王泽学, 曲博, 梁磊, 张敏. 肋弓骨折手术内固定治疗[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 63-69.
阅读次数
全文


摘要