切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (04) : 236 -242. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2026.04.006

股骨头

超选择血管介入联合髓芯减压植骨术治疗股骨头缺血性坏死的疗效及对术后并发症的影响
李鹏†(), 冯文博, 王延成, 张佩, 马红霞   
  1. 056001 邯郸市第二医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-22 出版日期:2026-08-05
  • 通信作者: 李鹏
  • 基金资助:
    邯郸市科学技术研究与发展计划项目(23422083063ZC)

Efficacy of supervascular intervention combined with core decompression and bone grafting for avascular necrosis of femoral head and its effect on postoperative complications

Peng Li†(), Wenbo Feng, Yancheng Wang, Pei Zhang, Hongxia Ma   

  1. Department of Orthopedics, Handan Second Hospital, Handan 056001, China
  • Received:2025-05-22 Published:2026-08-05
  • Corresponding author: Peng Li
引用本文:

李鹏, 冯文博, 王延成, 张佩, 马红霞. 超选择血管介入联合髓芯减压植骨术治疗股骨头缺血性坏死的疗效及对术后并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2026, 12(04): 236-242.

Peng Li, Wenbo Feng, Yancheng Wang, Pei Zhang, Hongxia Ma. Efficacy of supervascular intervention combined with core decompression and bone grafting for avascular necrosis of femoral head and its effect on postoperative complications[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2026, 12(04): 236-242.

目的

分析超选择血管介入联合髓芯减压植骨术对股骨头缺血性坏死患者疗效及并发症的影响。

方法

简单随机抽样选邯郸市第二医院2020年1月至2023年1月收入的92例股骨头缺血性坏死患者行前瞻性研究,将患者随机数字表法分为研究组46例与对照组46例,其中研究组中男性25例、女性21例,年龄40~70岁,平均(56.59±6.21)岁;对照组中男性26例、女性20例,年龄42~70岁,平均(57.85±6.15)岁,对照组予以髓芯减压植骨术治疗,研究组予以超选择血管介入联合髓芯减压植骨术治疗,比较两组手术效果、Harris髋关节评分、并发症发生情况与生活质量(SF-36量表)的差异。

结果

等级资料秩和检验结果显示,两组手术效果比较差异存在统计学意义(Z=12.699,P<0.05),且研究组优良率高于对照组(84.78% VS 50.00%)(χ2=12.662,P<0.05)。重复测量方差分析结果显示,术后2年,与对照组相比[(36.71±3.98)分、(34.28±4.54)分、(3.30±0.96)分、(3.33±0.90)分、(77.63±8.75)分],研究组功能、疼痛、活动度、畸形、Harris髋关节评分[(40.74±3.82)分、(38.46±3.86)分、(3.89±0.97)分、(3.89±0.97)分、(86.98±8.16)分]明显更高(F=4.947、4.746、2.910、2.901、5.298,P<0.05)。两组术后并发症发生情况与总并发症发生率(4.35% VS 13.04%)比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.190,P>0.05)。两组术后2年SF-36量表各因子得分与术前比较均升高(t=10.748/8.895、9.078/6.221、7.860/4.977、6.165/4.224、5.918/4.519、11.746/10.577、5.820/3.773,P<0.05);且研究组术后2年SF-36量表各因子得分[(61.09±7.26)分、(58.24±6.25)分、(68.06±7.21)分、(67.24±7.32)分、(64.17±8.21)分、(65.22±7.22)分、(65.13±6.14)分]均高于对照组[(55.45±7.12)分、(52.45±6.25)分、(61.25±6.21)分、(62.45±6.54)分、(60.12±7.22)分、(60.45±7.25)分、(61.24±6.12)分](t=3.762、4.443、4.854、3.307、2.515、3.162、3.043,P<0.05)。

结论

对股骨头缺血性坏死患者而言,超选择血管介入联合髓芯减压植骨术可获得较好手术效果,改善髋关节功能与生活质量。

Objective

To analyze the effect and complications of superselective vascular intervention combined with core decompression bone grafting in patients with avascular necrosis of femoral head.

Methods

A prospective study of 92 patients with ischemic necrosis of the femoral head from January 2020 to January 2023 in the Second Hospital of Handan City was selected by simple random sampling, and the patients were divided into 46 cases in the study group and 46 cases in the control group by random number table method, in which 25 males and 21 females were in the study group, with ages ranging from 40 to 70 years, with a mean of (56.59±6.21) years, and 26 males and 20 females were in the control group, with ages ranging from 42 to 70 years, with a mean of (57.85±6.15) years. The control group was treated with core decompression and bone grafting, and the study group was treated with super-selective vascular intervention combined with core decompression and bone grafting. The results, Harris hip score, complications and quality of life (SF-36 scale) were compared2 years after surgery between the two groups.

Results

The results of rank sum test for hierarchical data showed that the difference in surgical outcomes between the two groups was statistically significant (Z=12.699, P<0.05), and the excellent rate in the study group was higher than that in the control group (84.78% VS 50.00%) (χ2=12.662, P<0.05). The results of repeated measures ANOVA showed that at 2 years postoperatively, compared with the control group [(36.71±3.98) points, (34.28±4.54) points, (3.30±0.96) points, (3.33±0.90) points, and (77.63±8.75) points], the study group's functionality, pain, mobility, deformity, and Harris Hip Score [(40.74± 3.82), (38.46±3.86), (3.89±0.97), (3.89±0.97), (86.98±8.16)] were significantly higher in the study group (t=4.947, 4.746, 2.910, 2.901, 5.298, P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of postoperative complications and total complication rate (4.35% vs 13.04%) between the two groups (χ2=2.190, P>0.05). The SF-36 scale scores of each factor were higher in both groups at 2 years after surgery compared with the preoperative period (t=10.748/8.895, 9.078/6.221, 7.860/4.977, 6.165/4.224, 5.918/4.519, 11.746/10.577, and 5.820/3.773, P<0.05); and the study group had an increase in SF-36 scale scores at 2 years after surgery compared with the preoperative period. 2-year SF-36 scale scores for each factor [(61.09±7.26), (58.24±6.25), (68.06±7.21), (67.24±7.32), (64.17±8.21), (65.22±7.22), (65.13±6.14)] were higher than those of the control group [(55.45±7.12)points,, (65.13±6.14)]) points, (52.45±6.25) points, (61.25±6.21) points, (62.45±6.54) points, (60.12±7.22) points, (60.45±7.25) points, and (61.24±6.12) points] (t=3.762, 4.443, 4.854, 3.307, 2.515, 3.162, 3.043, P<0.05).

Conclusion

For patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head, superselective vascular intervention combined with core decompression and bone grafting can achieve better results, improve hip function and quality of life.

表1 两组股骨头缺血性坏死患者一般资料比较
图1~2 患者刘某,男性,57岁,右侧股骨头缺血性坏死超选择血管介入联合髓芯减压植骨术。图1 术前血管造影;图2 术后血管造影
表2 两组股骨头缺血性坏死患者手术效果比较[例(%)]
表3 两组股骨头缺血性坏死患者Harris髋关节评分比较(分,±s)
表4 两组股骨头缺血性坏死患者术后并发症比较[例(%)]
表5 两组股骨头缺血性坏死患者生活质量(SF-36)得分比较(分,±s)
1
袁浩,陈基长,何振辉,等.多条血管束植入治疗成人股骨头缺血性坏死(附56例58髋分析) [J].中华骨科杂志, 1992, 12(5): 357-360.
2
智林锋,吴清君.培元通滞法治疗股骨头缺血性坏死思路探讨[J].中华中医药杂志, 2022, 37(6): 3315-3318.
3
庄至坤,魏秋实,张颖,等.基于"态靶结合"理论探讨围塌陷期股骨头坏死精准保髋[J].中华中医药学刊, 2022, 40(11): I0022.
4
许翔宇,周方,田耘,等.股骨颈动力交叉钉系统与动力髋螺钉固定治疗股骨颈骨折的早期疗效比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志, 2021, 23(9): 754-760.
5
Gasparin GB, Frasson VB, Fritsch CG, et al. Are the harris hip score and the hip outcome score valid patient-reported outcome measures for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome? [J]. Braz J Phys Ther, 2022, 26(4): 100422.
6
Hossain MJ, Islam MW, Munni UR, et al. Health-related quality of Life among thalassemia patients in Bangladesh using the SF-36 questionnaire [J]. Sci Rep, 2023, 13(1): 7734.
7
孙庆增,沈阳,戚玉东,等.经内侧与前侧入路切开复位治疗发育性髋关节脱位临床疗效分析[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2021, 35(3): 251-254.
8
陈嘉楠,方志勋,柯烯,等.数字化术前设计辅助微型钢板联合重建接骨板内固定治疗粉碎性髋臼后壁骨折的疗效[J].中华创伤杂志, 2022, 38(10): 897-903.
9
Konarski W, Poboży T, Śliwczyński A, et al. Avascular necrosis of femoral head-overview and current state of the art [J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022, 19(12): 7348.
10
Olansen J, Dyke JP, Aaron RK. Is osteoarthritis a vascular disease? [J]. Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark, 2024, 29(3): 113.
11
周方.股骨颈骨折治疗的热点与创新[J].中华创伤骨科杂志, 2021, 23(9): 742-747.
12
张长青,张伟.股骨颈骨折内固定治疗的挑战与应对[J].中华创伤骨科杂志, 2021, 23(6): 467-469.
13
孙源,唐明杰,孙玉强. 50岁以上髋臼后壁骨折患者的手术疗效观察[J].中华创伤骨科杂志, 2024, 26(3): 202-208.
14
王得胜,侯毅,刘腾,等.超选择血管介入联合髓芯减压植骨术治疗早中期股骨头缺血性坏死的效果观察[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2019, 33(1): 35-36.
15
田智勇,陈洪强,戴科晶,等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉骨水泥增强固定治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的疗效分析[J].中华创伤骨科杂志, 2021, 23(6): 539-542.
16
远东涛,张绍安,吴广良,等.富血小板血浆联合中空螺钉内固定治疗股骨颈骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志, 2020, 22(3): 263-267.
17
Mazzai L, Anglani M, Giraudo C, et al. Imaging features of rhinocerebral mucormycosis:from onset to vascular complications [J]. Acta radiol, 2022, 63(2): 232-244.
18
王娟,陈伟,李会杰,等.应用自体股骨髁骨软骨整体移植微创治疗ARCOⅢ期股骨头缺血坏死[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 8(4): 193-196.
19
邱晓,黄钢勇,吴建国,等. ERAS结合SuperPATH入路人工股骨头置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2021, 7(5): 264-270.
20
刘以俊.芦浩,张殿英.不同OTA/AO分型股骨颈骨折内固定术后并发症特点及原因分析[J].中华创伤杂志, 2021, 37(4): 333-338.
[1] 于世元, 邓嘉诚, 王磊, 孙旭, 李朦, 李响, 张熠, 史若彤, 吕铮. 3种细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂在激素受体阳性/HER-2阴性乳腺癌中的疗效和安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 219-227.
[2] 李友, 唐林峰, 杜伟伟, 刘海亮, 巨积辉, 王东林. 双骨隧道重建止点治疗手指近指间关节掌板撕脱性损伤的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2026, 21(04): 266-270.
[3] 孙浩, 郑政, 叶少炜, 钟思权, 雒洪志, 冯春在, 陈宏, 周仕海. 优化共同开口关闭技术在3D腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术Overlap吻合中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 252-256.
[4] 杨敏, 杜峻峰, 辛林璞. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术后常见并发症防治与管理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 352-355.
[5] 石兵强, 支永发, 牛闻宇, 张义, 马明杰, 任孝德. 胃癌术后并发症对患者术后生命质量影响研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 271-274.
[6] 贾亚南, 尚迎晓, 甄江涛. 乳腺术后皮下高引流量淋巴漏1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 303-304.
[7] 黄伟, 林湘杰, 吴俊文, 胡浩, 杨雪菲. 部分可吸收补片在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中有效性和安全性的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 461-470.
[8] 李文芳, 董孟炜, 杨万彭, 巴特, 南楠, 刘杨, 郝慧琴. 关节腔注射脂肪间充质干细胞对碘乙酸钠诱导大鼠急性软骨损伤的抗炎及组织学修复作用[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(05): 266-277.
[9] 成津, 郭建明. 间充质干细胞治疗糖尿病足溃疡的研究现状与进展[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(05): 278-284.
[10] 汪韬, 潘炳权, 郁林海. 经脐入路三通道腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全性与疗效分析:附10 000例报告[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 791-797.
[11] 李海波, 李洋, 曾涛, 冯程, 李华. 基于3期RCT中国人群数据的肝细胞癌一线治疗方案网状Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 558-567.
[12] 韩晓钊, 杨能红, 韩民, 李永宁, 冉勋, 张宏, 何志伟, 罗加农, 喻超. 机器人与腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术安全性及疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 568-574.
[13] 杜修琪, 侍新宇, 胡优, 王索, 孙金兵, 钟润泽, 柯子昂, 王梦婷, 穆丽茜, 张丽娟, 周晓俊, 何宋兵. 机器人单切口加一孔与腹腔镜多孔全结肠切除术治疗慢传输型便秘的短期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 340-348.
[14] 宋宏伟, 张宇, 张珊珊. 四逆散联合西医治疗老年难治性胃食管反流病肝胃不和证患者的疗效及对细胞因子的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(05): 452-456.
[15] 吴立刚, 曾汉强, 张志成, 陈泉. 锁骨下静脉与颈内静脉入路完全植入式输液港在肿瘤患者中的应用及导管异位相关因素分析[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2026, 14(03): 299-306.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?