切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) : 106 -113. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2026.02.007

膝关节

关节外肌腱固定术对前交叉韧带损伤合并重度轴移现象患者术后关节功能恢复的疗效研究
冯倩倩, 毛俊超, 缪祎, 赵海珠, 袁慧颖, 杨伟欣()   
  1. 063000 唐山市第二医院关节一科
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-22 出版日期:2026-04-05
  • 通信作者: 杨伟欣
  • 基金资助:
    河北省2025年度医学科学研究课题计划(20251183)

Clinical effect of extra-articular tendon fixation on postoperative joint function and stability in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury complicated with severe pivot shift phenomenon

Qianqian Feng, Junchao Mao, Yi Miao, Haizhu Zhao, Huiying Yuan, Weixin Yang()   

  1. Department of Joint Surgery, Second Hospital of Tangshan, Tangshan 063000, China
  • Received:2025-07-22 Published:2026-04-05
  • Corresponding author: Weixin Yang
引用本文:

冯倩倩, 毛俊超, 缪祎, 赵海珠, 袁慧颖, 杨伟欣. 关节外肌腱固定术对前交叉韧带损伤合并重度轴移现象患者术后关节功能恢复的疗效研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2026, 12(02): 106-113.

Qianqian Feng, Junchao Mao, Yi Miao, Haizhu Zhao, Huiying Yuan, Weixin Yang. Clinical effect of extra-articular tendon fixation on postoperative joint function and stability in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury complicated with severe pivot shift phenomenon[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2026, 12(02): 106-113.

目的

探讨关节外肌腱固定术对前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤合并重度轴移现象患者术后关节功能及稳定性的临床效果。

方法

回顾性选取2020年1月至2023年6月唐山市第二医院关节一科收治的164例ACL损伤合并重度轴移现象(轴移试验Ⅲ级)患者,其中男104例、女60例,年龄20~45岁,平均(28.8±5.1)岁,病程1~8周,平均(4.0±1.4)周,损伤左侧86例、右侧78例,合并半月板损伤67例。根据手术方式分为联合组(82例,行关节外肌腱固定术联合ACL重建术)和单纯组(82例,行单纯ACL重建术)。

结果

最终162例患者获得满意随访,随访率98.78%,随访时间22.5~25.5个月,平均(24.0±1.5)个月;其中联合组实际随访81例,随访时间22.5~25.3个月,平均(23.9±1.6)个月,单纯组实际随访81例,随访时间22.6~25.5个月,平均(24.1±1.4)个月。术后6个月、1年,联合组轴移试验及Lachman试验阴性率、Lysholm评分、IKDC评分均显著高于单纯组,术后2年联合组移植物优良率显著高于单纯组(P<0.05),具体数值为:术后6个月联合组轴移试验阴性率93.8%(76/81)、Lachman试验阴性率96.3%(78/81),Lysholm评分(78.5±6.3)分、IKDC评分(76.8±5.7)分,单纯组则分别为72.8%(59/81)、76.5%(62/81),(70.2±5.9)分、(68.3±6.2)分;术后1年联合组轴移试验阴性率98.8%(80/81)、Lachman试验阴性率100.0%(81/81),Lysholm评分(85.7±4.8)分、IKDC评分(84.2±4.5)分,单纯组则分别为80.2%(65/81)、83.9%(68/81),(76.3±5.5)分、(73.5±5.9)分;术后2年联合组移植物优良率(0~Ⅰ级)97.5%(79/81),显著高于单纯组的81.5%(66/81)(P<0.05)。

结论

关节外肌腱固定术对ACL重建术可有效提升ACL损伤合并重度轴移现象患者的术后关节稳定性与功能,保护移植物,且安全性良好。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of extra-articular tendon fixation in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury combined with severe axial shift on postoperative joint function and stability.

Methods

Retrospectively, 164 patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury complicated with severe pivot shift phenomenon (Grade Ⅲ pivot shift test) admitted to the First Department of Joint Surgery, Tangshan Second Hospital from January 2020 to June 2023 were enrolled in the study, including 104 males and 60 females, aged 20 to 45 years with a mean age of (28.8±5.1) years, having a disease course of 1 to 8 weeks with an average of (4.0±1.4) weeks. Among them, 86 cases suffered from left knee injury and 78 cases from right knee injury, with 67 cases complicated with meniscus injury. The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical method adopted: the combined group (82 cases) treated with extra-articular tendon fixation combined with ACL reconstruction, and the control group (82 cases) treated with ACL reconstruction alone.

Results

A total of 162 patients were successfully followed up at last, with a follow-up rate of 98.78%. The follow-up period ranged from 22.5 to 25.5 months, with a mean of (24.0±1.5) months. Specifically, 81 patients in the combined group were actually followed up, with a follow-up period of 22.5 to 25.3 months and a mean of (23.9±1.6) months; 81 patients in the simple group were actually followed up, with a follow-up period of 22.6 to 25.5 months and a mean of (24.1±1.4) months. At 6 months and 1 year postoperatively, the negative rates of pivot shift test and Lachman test, Lysholm scores and IKDC scores in the combined group were significantly higher than those in the simple group; at 2 years postoperatively, the excellent and good rate of grafts in the combined group was significantly higher than that in the simple group (P<0.05). The specific values were as follows: at 6 months postoperatively, the negative rate of pivot shift test and Lachman test in the combined group was 93.8% (76/81) and 96.3% (78/81) respectively, with the Lysholm score of (78.5±6.3) points and IKDC score of (76.8±5.7) points; while the corresponding indicators in the simple group were 72.8% (59/81), 76.5% (62/81), (70.2±5.9) points and (68.3±6.2) points respectively. At 1 year postoperatively, the negative rate of pivot shift test and Lachman test in the combined group was 98.8% (80/81) and 100.0% (81/81) respectively, with the Lysholm score of (85.7±4.8) points and IKDC score of (84.2±4.5) points; the corresponding indicators in the simple group were 80.2% (65/81), 83.9% (68/81), (76.3±5.5) points and (73.5±5.9) points respectively. At 2 years postoperatively, the excellent and good rate of grafts (Grade 0-Ⅰ) in the combined group was 97.5% (79/81), which was significantly higher than 81.5% (66/81) in the simple group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Extra-articular tendon fixation combined with ACL reconstruction can effectively improve postoperative joint stability and function in patients with ACL injury and severe axial displacement, protect the graft, and demonstrate good safety.

图1 ACL损伤合并重度轴移现象患者病例筛选流程图
表1 两组ACL损伤合并重度轴移现象患者基线资料比较
表2 两组前交叉韧带损伤患者术后不同时间点关节稳定性及关节功能评分比较(各组n=81)
图2~4 对照组患者男,44岁,图2为前交叉韧带断裂与前外侧结构损伤术前MRI片,显示ACL断裂 图3 手术后为肌腱固定术联合前交叉韧带术后CT重建 图4 术后MRI为重建术后恢复良好  图5~6 联合组患者男,32岁,图5为前交叉韧带断裂与前外侧结构损伤术前MRI片 图6 手术后为肌腱固定术联合前交叉韧带治疗后
1
VajaPey SP, Alvarez PM, Greco NJ, et al. Medial Osteoarthritis in an ACL DeFicient Knee: A Critical Analysis Review [J]. JBJS Rev, 2021, 9(3): P0197.
2
Marois B, Tan XW, Pauyo T, et al. Can a knee brace prevent ACL reinjury: A systematic review [J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18 (14): 7611.
3
Ashigbi EYK, Banzer W, Niederer D. Return to sports tests' prognostic value for reinjury risk after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review [J]. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2020, 52 (6): 1263-1271.
4
唐肇祥,倪乾坤,吕晶同,等.关节外肌腱固定术对合并高度轴移现象的前交叉韧带损伤患者术后膝关节稳定性的影响[J].中华创伤骨科杂志, 2025, 27(5): 395-402.
5
Marom N, Ouanezar H, Jahandar H, et al. Lateral extra-articular tenodesis reduces anterior cruciate ligament graft force and anterior tibial translation in response to applied pivoting and anterior drawer loads [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2020, 48 (13): 3183-3193.
6
Jette C, Gutierrez D, Sastre S, et al. Biomechanical comparison of anterolateral ligament anatomical reconstruction with a semi-anatomical lateral extra-articular tenodesis: A cadaveric study [J]. Knee, 2019, 26 (5): 1003-1009.
7
Jeslette EL, Mikula JD, Schon JM, et al. Biomechanical results of lateral extra-articular tenodesis procedures of the knee: A systematic review [J]. Arthroscopy, 2016, 32 (12): 2592-2611.
8
Lee HJ, Park YB, Kim SH. Diagnostic value of stress radiography and arthrometer measurement for anterior instability in anterior cruciate ligament injured knees at different knee flexion positions [J]. Arthroscopy, 2019, 35 (6): 1721-1732.
9
Hefti F, Müller W, Jakob RP, et al. Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form [J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 1993, 1 (3-4): 226-234.
10
Howell SM, Berns GS, Farley TE. Unimpinged and impinged anterior cruciate ligament grafts: MR signal intensity measurements [J]. Radiology, 1991, 179 (3): 639-643.
11
冯仕明,薛越,薛冲,等.全内关节镜下克氏针联合Suture-Bridge技术与单纯克氏针固定治疗陈旧性外踝撕脱骨折的疗效比较[J].中华创伤杂志2024, 40 (8): 699-706.
12
Frobell RB, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, et al. Extra-articular tenodesis reduces failure of hamstring tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 2-year outcomes from the STABILITY study randomized clinical trial [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2020, 48 (2): 285-297.
13
Gibbs CM, Hughes JD, Popchak AJ, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with lateral extra-articular tenodesis better restores native knee kinematics in combined ACL and meniscal injury [J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2022, 30 (1): 131-138.
14
Chiba D, Gale T, Nishida K, et al. Lateral extra-articular tenodesis contributes little to change in vivo kinematics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized controlled trial [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2021, 49 (7): 1803-1812.
15
Zhu M, Han Lee DY, Williams A. Safe femoral fixation depth and orientation for lateral extra-articular tenodesis in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [J]. Orthop J Sports Med, 2021, 9 (1): 2325967120976591.
16
陈敏芸,罗溪,刘秀芬,等.体能训练中膝关节前交叉韧带损伤的列线图风险预测模型构建[J].中华航海医学与高气压医学杂志, 2026, 33(02): 148-152.
17
刘哲,郭静,李昊鑫,等.关节镜下缝线桥技术与领带结技术治疗前交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折的短期疗效比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志, 2025, 27(08): 650-657.
18
王红.膝关节前交叉韧带重建术股骨足印区重建及胫骨隧道调整技术的生物力学及临床研究[D].兰州大学, 2024, 05.
19
贾梦阳,陈维伊,杨莹,等.前十字韧带重建术中移植物股骨端固定方式的研究进展[J].中华骨科杂志, 2025, 45(06): 380-386.
20
季佳庆,张鑫,钱继魁,等.背尺侧骨块累及月骨窝关节面1/8至1/3的AO分型C型桡骨远端骨折的内固定治疗[J].中华骨科杂志, 2024, 44(02): 87-95.
[1] 李政, 李雳, 欧传双, 杨琼, 李长树. 对比分析单束不同方式保残重建治疗前交叉韧带断裂[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 162-171.
[2] 于威, 王艺凯, 杨文博, 孟春庆, 王洪, 黄玮. 陈旧性前交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折的诊疗进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 532-537.
[3] 李强, 韩琼, 吴茂厚, 李旷达, 张楠心. 原位缝合联合单束重建治疗前交叉韧带损伤[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 160-166.
[4] 李静, 周凯, 李鹏程, 刘莉, 李沭, 李箭. 医护技一体化加速康复模式促进前交叉韧带重建术后早期功能康复[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(04): 501-507.
[5] 闫文貌, 李有国, 许峻, 钟志强, 邢颖, 闫鸣, 白日星. 胃旁路术对2型糖尿病患者的长期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 152-157.
[6] 邱红生, 林树体, 梁朝莹, 劳世高, 何荷. 模拟现实步态训练对膝关节前交叉韧带损伤的功能恢复及对跌倒恐惧的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 343-350.
[7] 劳子胤, 张炳耀, 冯青. 前交叉韧带损伤形式与胫骨平台后侧骨损伤的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2021, 07(02): 73-78.
[8] 牛晓卫, 刘同亭, 田廷斌, 吕佳敏. 托伐普坦治疗肝硬化难治性腹水的长期疗效[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2018, 08(01): 33-38.
[9] 杨溯, 李杭隆, 郑来, 韩鹏飞. 前交叉韧带损伤后老年创伤性骨关节炎的诊治进展[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2021, 08(04): 5-9.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?