切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (06) : 372 -378. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2025.06.008

综述

老年骨盆脆性骨折的治疗进展
曾凯, 樊仕才()   
  1. 510000 广州,南方医科大学第三附属医院
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-01 出版日期:2025-12-05
  • 通信作者: 樊仕才
  • 基金资助:
    广州地区临床高新和重大技术项目(2024PL-GX11)

Advancements in the management of fragility fractures of the pelvis in older adults

Kai Zeng, Shicai Fan()   

  1. The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guang Zhou 510000, China
  • Received:2025-07-01 Published:2025-12-05
  • Corresponding author: Shicai Fan
引用本文:

曾凯, 樊仕才. 老年骨盆脆性骨折的治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2025, 11(06): 372-378.

Kai Zeng, Shicai Fan. Advancements in the management of fragility fractures of the pelvis in older adults[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2025, 11(06): 372-378.

老年骨盆脆性骨折(FFP)是骨质疏松背景下由低能量损伤引发的特殊骨折类型,与高能量创伤所致骨盆骨折在病理机制、临床表现、影像学特征及治疗策略上存在显著差异。这类骨折因其隐匿性及易被忽视的特点,常导致迁延疼痛、功能障碍及生活质量下降,给老龄化社会带来沉重负担。随着我国逐渐进入人口老龄化社会,FFP逐渐成为多个学科交叉领域的核心,本文聚焦FFP的分型、诊断难点及策略、治疗进展等方面,旨在综述其诊疗现状与挑战。

Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) represent a distinct category of pelvic fractures occurring in the context of osteoporosis and resulting from low-energy trauma. They exhibit significant differences from high-energy traumatic pelvic fractures in terms of pathological mechanisms, clinical presentation, radiographic characteristics, and treatment strategies.Due to their often insidious nature and tendency to be overlooked, FFPs frequently lead to persistent pain, functional impairment, and reduced quality of life. This imposes a substantial burden on aging societies.As China progressively enters an era of population aging, FFPs have increasingly become a central topic within the multidisciplinary domain. This article focuses on the classification of FFPs, diagnostic challenges and strategies, and therapeutic advancements, among other aspects, aiming to review the current status and ongoing challenges in their diagnosis and management.

1
Rommens PM, Hofmann A, Kraemer S, et al. Operative treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis: a critical analysis of 140 patients [J]. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2022, 48(4): 2881-2896.
2
Heiman, E, Gencarelli P Jr, Tang A, et al. Fragility fractures of the pelvis and sacrum:current trends in literature [J]. Hip Pelvis, 2022, 34(2): 69-78.
3
Muschitz, C, Hummer M, Grillari J, et al. Epidemiology and economic burden of fragility fractures in Austria [J]. Osteoporos Int, 2022, 33(3): 637-647.
4
Chen Q, Li T, Ding H, et al. Age-period-cohort analysis of epidemiological trends in pelvic fracture in China from 1992 to 2021 and forecasts for 2046 [J].Front Public Health, 2024. 12: p. 1428068.
5
Matityahu, A, Elson J, Morshed S, et al., Survivorship and severe complications are worse for octogenarians and elderly patients with pelvis fractures as compared to adults: data from the national trauma data bank [J].J Osteoporos, 2012. 2012: p. 475739.
6
Filip, A, Veliceasa B, Puha B, et al. Pain Intensity and Degree of Disability after Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis [J].Medicina (Kaunas), 2022. 58(4).
7
Fleischhacker E, Gleich J, Hesse E, et al. [Individual aspects in eldery patients with fragility fractures] [J].Radiologe, 2021. 61(12): p. 1107-1114.
8
彭卫东,刘刚,葛宇峰,等.北京地区老年髋部脆性骨折患者术后抗骨质疏松症药物治疗现状及影响因素分析[J].中华解剖与临床杂志, 2023, 28(1): 1-6.
9
Hutchings L, Roffey DM, Lefaivre KA. Fragility fractures of the pelvis: current practices and future directions [J]. Curr Osteoporos Rep, 2022, 20(6): 469-477.
10
Rommens PM, Hofmann A. Comprehensive classification of fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: Recommendations for surgical treatment [J]. Injury, 2013, 44(12): 1733-1744.
11
Walz M, Burger C, Kabir K, et al. [Reliability of the FFP classification in pelvic fractures] [J]. Unfallchirurg, 2021. 124(7): p. 574-582.
12
Hotta K, Kobayashi T. Usefulness of Force-Controlled pelvic stress radiograph in the evaluation and treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis in geriatric patients: a pilot study [J]. Acta Med Okayama, 2023, 77(4): 407-414.
13
Na CW, Lee SH, Jung S, et al. Pelvic insufficiency fracture in severe osteoporosis patient [J]. Hip Pelvis, 2017, 29(2): 120-126.
14
Faber, F. [Osteoporotic fractures of the pelvic ring and their minimally invasive treatment options] [J]. Orthopade, 2021. 50(10): p. 871-882.
15
Rojas, C, Munjin A, Delgado G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for detection of occult instability of type I anterior to posterior pelvic injuries [J]. Injury, 2023. 54 Suppl 6: p. 110806.
16
Cabarrus C M, Ambekar A, Lu Y, et al. MRI and CT of insufficiency fractures of the pelvis and the proximal femur [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2008, 191(4): 995-1001.
17
Rommens M P, Boudissa M, Krämer S, et al. Operative treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis is connected with lower mortality.A single institution experience [J]. PLoS One, 2021, 16(7): e0253408.
18
Papakostidis KCG, Giannoudis PV. Evolution of treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvic ring. An update [J]. Injury, 2025, 56(2): 112145.
19
Hotta K, Kobayashi T. Functional treatment strategy for fragility fractures of the pelvis in geriatric patients [J]. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2021, 47(1): 21-27.
20
Rommens PM, Hopf JC, Arand C, et al. Prospective assessment of key factors influencing treatment strategy and outcome of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) [J]. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2022, 48(4): 3243-3256.
21
李涛,詹潇锐,郑秋宝,等.经腹直肌外侧入路治疗老年骨盆脆性骨折[J].中华骨科杂志, 2021, 41(19): 1396-1403.
22
Yang KW, Xiang FF, Ye JW, et al. A retrospective analysis of minimally invasive internal fixation versus nonoperative conservative management of pelvic ring fragility fractures and the elderly [J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2023, 18(1): 108.
23
Gericke, L, Fritz A, Osterhoff G, et al. Percutaneous operative treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis May not increase the general rate of complications compared to non-operative treatment [J]. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2022, 48(5): 3729-3735.
24
周述清,陆慧,张孝华,等.经皮钉棒系统联合骶髂螺钉内固定与非手术治疗Ⅱ~Ⅳ型骨盆脆性骨折的疗效比较[J].中华创伤杂志, 2023, 39(1): 47-54.
25
王浩,何红英,吕东东,等.微创手术治疗老年人脆性骨盆骨折[J].中华老年医学杂志, 2022, 41(10): 1178-1182.
26
Alnajjar, G A, Ezzelden A, Elgendy M, et al. Successful management of an acetabular fracture associated with comorbidities in an 80-Year-Old patient: a case report [J]. Cureus, 2024, 16(8): e67656.
27
姚林林,张明磊,朱彤彤,等.机器人辅助治疗老年骨盆骨折的疗效分析[J].中华骨科杂志, 2023, 43(19): 1277-1284.
28
《中国老年骨质疏松症诊疗指南(2023)》工作组,中国老年学和老年医学学会骨质疏松分会,中国医疗保健国际交流促进会骨质疏松病学分会,等.中国老年骨质疏松症诊疗指南(2023) [J].中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2023, 16(10): 865-885.
29
Hartz M C, Johannessen F B, Harsløf T, et al. The Effectiveness and Safety of Romosozumab and Teriparatide in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis [J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2024.
30
Gewiess, J, Albers C E, Keel M J B, et al. Chronic pelvic insufficiency fractures and their treatment [J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2024, 145(1): 76.
31
Zong, Y, Li J, Li Z, et al. Minimally invasive surgery and conservative treatment achieve similar clinical outcomes in patients with type II fragility fractures of the pelvis [J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2025, 20(1): 210.
32
Lodde M F, Klimek M, Herbst E, et al. Bilateral Iliosacral and Transsacral Screws Are Biomechanically Favorable and Reduce the Risk for Fracture Progression in Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis-A Finite Element Analysis [J]. Bioengineering (Basel), 2025. 12(1).
33
Lodde M F, Raschke M J, and Riesenbeck O, FFP: Indication for minimally invasive navigation technique [J]. Trauma Case Rep, 2023. 45: p. 100829.
34
Link, C B, Haveman R A, Van de Wall B J M, et al. Percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation with a 3D robot-assisted image-guided navigation system:Technical solutions [J]. Oper Orthop Traumatol, 2025, 37(1): 3-13.
35
Linhart C, Mehrens D, Gellert L M, et al. Gluteal Muscle Fatty Atrophy: An Independent Risk Factor for Surgical Treatment in Elderly Patients Diagnosed with Type-III Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis [J]. J Clin Med, 2023. 12(22).
36
Omichi T, Takegami Y, Tokutake K, et al. Mortality and functional outcomes of fragility fractures of the pelvis by fracture type with conservative treatment: a retrospective, multicenter TRON study [J]. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2022, 48(4): 2897-2904.
37
Nakayama Y, Suzuki T, Kurozumi T, et al. Progression to Rommens type IIIa fragility fracture of the pelvis managed by delayed open reduction and interdigitating screw fixation: A case report [J]. Trauma Case Rep, 2023. 43: p. 100773.
38
Yanagisawa Y, Watanabe Y, Matsumoto Y, et al. Closed reduction and minimally invasive surgical treatment of type IIIa fragility fractures of the pelvis associated with ipsilateral periprosthetic femur fracture: A case report [J]. Trauma Case Rep, 2020. 30: p. 100374.
39
Okazaki S, Shirahama M, Hashida R, et al. Iliac intramedullary stabilization for Type IIIA fragility fractures of the pelvis [J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 20380.
40
Nakayama YH, Suzuki T, Honda A, et al. Interdigitating percutaneous screw fixation for Rommens type IIIa fragility fractures of the pelvis: technical notes and preliminary clinical results [J]. Int Orthop, 2020, 44(11): 2431-2436.
41
Liu S, Liu S, Xiao K, et al. Fragility fracture of the pelvis treated with robot-assisted surgery under local anesthesia:a case report [J]. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open, 2024, 9(1): e001254.
42
Deng JQ, Zhu ZH, Li T, et al. A new technique for percutaneous screw fixation for treating FFP IIIa and IIIb fragility fractures of the pelvis [J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1): 17681.
43
樊仕才,廖奕岚,麦奇光,等.智能可视化系统辅助复位及固定治疗高龄骨盆脆性骨折[J].中华骨科杂志, 2023, 43(19): 1300-1307.
44
Riesner H J, Palm H G, Friemert B, et al. [Triangular minimally invasive spinopelvic stabilization for type C pelvic fractures according to AO/OTA and type IV according to FFP] [J]. Unfallchirurg, 2021. 124(11): p. 923-930.
45
Gewiess J, Albers C E, Bigdon S F, et al., Effective treatment of highest instability in a subacute fragility fracture of the pelvis (FFP IV) using a cement augmented transsacral screw only [J]. Trauma Case Rep, 2023. 43: p. 100771.
46
Schmerwitz U I, Jungebluth P, Lehmann W. Minimally invasive posterior locked compression plate osteosynthesis shows excellent results in elderly patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis [J]. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2021, 47(1): 37-45.
47
Gamada H, Yanagisawa Y, Teruya S, et al., Clinical Outcome of Sacroiliac Rod Fixation for Fragility Fracture of the Pelvis Rommens and Hoffman Classification Type IVb: Case Series [J]. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil, 2022. 13: p. 21514593221141358.
48
Hoppler S, Notov D, Zeidler S, et al. Which screw corridors can be used for bilateral fragility fractures of the pelvis with a transverse fracture component (FFP IVb)? [J]. Injury, 2025, 56(2): 112171.
49
Spalteholz M, Gulow J. Percutaneous triangular stabilization of type 3 and type 4 fragility fractures of the pelvis usually leads to fracture healing despite high revision rates [J]. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW, 2020, 9: Doc05.
50
Tian W, Jia F S, Zheng J M, et al. Treatment of type IV fragility fractures of pelvis with Robotic-Assisted minimally invasive triangular fixation [J]. Orthop Surg, 2025, 17(3): 848-857.
51
Franck A, Piltz S. The surgical treatment of unstable osteoporotic pelvic ring fractures with bilateral vertebropelvic stabilization using a less invasive technique [J]. Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research, 2022, 108(2): 103190.
[1] 葛建岭, 杨勇, 王坤, 徐成, 李晓明, 王伟. 超声引导下星状神经节阻滞联合右美托咪定对老年腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者炎性因子及快速康复的影响[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 390-395.
[2] 黄东航. 针式拉钩经皮穿刺悬吊与二氧化碳低压充气混合建腔单孔+1经锁骨下入路腔镜甲状腺手术[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 375-375.
[3] 刘立民, 张宗明, 张翀, 刘卓, 赵月, 齐晖. 改良腹腔镜经胆囊管胆总管探查术治疗胆总管结石的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 320-324.
[4] 向涵, 母德安, 王强, 黄英杰, 张伟. 3D荧光反染超微创单孔腹腔镜Ⅵ段、Ⅴ段背侧段解剖性肝切除[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 610-610.
[5] 蒲茜, 文曰, 卢春燕, 赵锐. 经肛门内镜微创手术治疗直肠肿瘤应用研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 698-700.
[6] 高加勒, 张忠涛. 结直肠癌外科领域最新进展与热点[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 595-599.
[7] 杜晓辉, 谢天宇, 晏阳. 我国腹腔镜结直肠癌外科治疗现状、问题与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 600-604.
[8] 程必盛, 吴芃. 2025EAU年会要点:微创、远程与精准泌尿外科的发展趋势[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 693-699.
[9] 朱玮, 曾国华. 输尿管软镜新技术与发展趋势[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 700-704.
[10] 宋小飞, 巫嘉文, 孙阳. 后腹腔镜上尿路手术中良性大体积标本体内分块取出技术的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 720-726.
[11] 孟维妮, 管旌旌, 刘敏, 王晓雪, 王海凤. 机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺根治性切除术后合并多种并发症的护理体会[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 765-771.
[12] 许梓锋, 黄展森, 狄金明. 胡桃夹综合征诊治进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 784-791.
[13] 延珍妮, 张修礼. 消化内镜机器人研究现状及发展展望[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 565-569.
[14] 石伯生, 黄涌, 王展. 锁骨下静脉最大直径和塌陷指数与老年胃肠道手术患者麻醉诱导后低血压的关系[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 649-654.
[15] 温欢, 苏博, 刘金波, 王宏宇. 甘油三酯葡萄糖指数与老年社区人群内皮功能障碍的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(08): 559-566.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?