超声波联合悬吊治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效对比分析

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2020.05.008

目的

比较超声波治疗、悬吊治疗以及超声波联合悬吊治疗对缓解腰椎间盘突出症患者疼痛及功能障碍的疗效对比分析。

方法

前瞻性收集2019年1月至2019年6月在河北医科大学第三医院康复科门诊及住院收治的30例患者，年龄28~45岁，男性与女性患者各15例。均符合腰椎间盘突出症的诊断标准。将30例患者按照随机数字表法随机分为3组，每组各10人。分别为超声波治疗组、悬吊治疗组、超声波联合悬吊治疗组。每组每天治疗一次，连续治疗2 w，治疗前后进行疼痛VAS评分、ODI指数评分来评价患者疼痛及功能的改善情况。

结果

30例患者获得随访，随访时间为治疗后4~8 w。三组治疗后VAS评分均较治疗前明显降低，差异有统计学意义（F=20.582，P<0.001）。三组治疗后VAS评分均较治疗前降低，差异有统计学意义（F=3.069，P=0.043）。三组治疗后VAS评分，超声波组联合悬吊组降低最明显（t=12.676，P<0.001）。三组治疗后ODI指数评分均较治疗前降低，差异有统计学意义（F=399.67，P<0.001）。三组治疗后ODI指数评分，超声波组联合悬吊组最低（t=12.737，P<0.001）。

结论

超声波及悬吊治疗均可以减轻腰椎间盘突出症患者的疼痛及改善功能障碍。超声波联合悬吊治疗能更有效的减轻腰椎间盘突出症患者的疼痛及改善功能障碍。

关键词: 椎间盘退变, 腰椎, 超声波治疗, 悬吊

Objective

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency of sling exercise, therapeuticultrasound, therapeuticultrasound and sling exercise in patients to alleviate pain and improve lumbar function with lumbar disc herniation.

Methods

Individuals were selected from a list of patients being followed at the department of Rehabilitation in the third hospital of Hebei Medical University. 30 patients who were diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation were collected, the diagnoses were established upon medical history, physical examination, and results of imaging studies. The patients were randomly divided into three groups: therapeuticultrasound group received 14 sessions of ultrasonic therapy to the lumbar region, Sling exercise group received 14 sessions of sling exercise, and therapeuticultrasound and sling exercise group received therapeuticultrasound and sling exercise therapy 14 sessions of therapeuticultrasound to the lumbar region,7 sessions per week, 2 weeks. The VAS and ODI were compared with the assessment of the patients before and at the end of the therapy.

Results

At the end of treatment, three groups VAS scores (F=3.069, P=0.043) and ODI scores (t=12.676, P<0.001) was lower than that at the beginning of treatment (P<0.05), at the end of treatment the VAS scores (F=59.400, P<0.001) and of the ODI scores (t=12.737, P<0.001) of ultrasonic and sling exercise therapy group was lower than the other group, the difference is significantly.

Conclusion

All three groups could reduce pain and improve lumbar function, and the ultrasonic and sling exercise therapy was most effective for lumbar disc herniation treatment in the three groups.

Key words: Intervertebral disc degeneration, Lumbar vertebrae, Ultrasonic therapy, Suspension

表1 30例腰椎间盘突出症患者一般资料比较

组别	例数	年龄（岁， ±s）	性别（例，男/女）	病程（月， ±s）	VAS（分， ±s）	ODI（分， ±s）
悬吊治疗组	10	38±5	6/4	6.4±2.5	6.3±1，1	73±2
超声波治疗组	10	40±10	5/5	5.7±1.9	6.1±1.2	73±2
超声波联合悬吊组	10	41±8	4/6	5.2±2.3	6.1±1.2	75±3
统计值	?	F=0.469	χ²=0.800	F=0.732	F=0.095	F=1.094
P值	?	0.631	0.670	0.490	0.910	0.349

表1 30例腰椎间盘突出症患者一般资料比较

组别	例数	年龄（岁， ±s）	性别（例，男/女）	病程（月， ±s）	VAS（分， ±s）	ODI（分， ±s）
悬吊治疗组	10	38±5	6/4	6.4±2.5	6.3±1，1	73±2
超声波治疗组	10	40±10	5/5	5.7±1.9	6.1±1.2	73±2
超声波联合悬吊组	10	41±8	4/6	5.2±2.3	6.1±1.2	75±3
统计值	?	F=0.469	χ²=0.800	F=0.732	F=0.095	F=1.094
P值	?	0.631	0.670	0.490	0.910	0.349

图3 仰卧悬吊训练

表2 三组腰椎间盘突出症患者VAS评分比较（分，±s）

组别	例数	治疗前	治疗结束时	t值	P值
超声波治疗组	10	6.3±1.1	4.5±0.8	9.000	<0.001
悬吊治疗组	10	6.1±1.2	4.6±1.0	9.000	<0.001
超声波联合悬吊组	10	6.1±1.2	2.8±0.6	12.676	<0.001
F值	?	0.095	3.069	?	?
P值	?	0.910	0.043	?	?

表2 三组腰椎间盘突出症患者VAS评分比较（分，±s）

组别	例数	治疗前	治疗结束时	t值	P值
超声波治疗组	10	6.3±1.1	4.5±0.8	9.000	<0.001
悬吊治疗组	10	6.1±1.2	4.6±1.0	9.000	<0.001
超声波联合悬吊组	10	6.1±1.2	2.8±0.6	12.676	<0.001
F值	?	0.095	3.069	?	?
P值	?	0.910	0.043	?	?

表3 三组腰椎间盘突出症患者ODI指数评分比较（%，±s）

组别	例数	治疗前	治疗结束时	t值	P值
超声波治疗组	10	73.2±2.5	65.6±2.5	13.077	<0.001
悬吊治疗组	10	73.4±2.3	64.8±1.7	10.167	<0.001
超声波联合悬吊组	10	74.8±3.0	60.0±1.6	12.737	<0.001
F值	?	1.094	4.255	?	?
P值	?	0.349	<0.001	?	?

表3 三组腰椎间盘突出症患者ODI指数评分比较（%，±s）

组别	例数	治疗前	治疗结束时	t值	P值
超声波治疗组	10	73.2±2.5	65.6±2.5	13.077	<0.001
悬吊治疗组	10	73.4±2.3	64.8±1.7	10.167	<0.001
超声波联合悬吊组	10	74.8±3.0	60.0±1.6	12.737	<0.001
F值	?	1.094	4.255	?	?
P值	?	0.349	<0.001	?	?

1	Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015 [J]. Lancet (London, England), 2016, 388(10053): 1545-1602.
2	Bishop FL, Dima AL, Ngui J, et al. "lovely pie in the Sky plans": a qualitative study of clinicians' perspectives on guidelines for managing low back pain in primary care in England [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2015, 40(23): 1842-1850.
3	Chait J, Aurshina A, Marks N, et al. Comparison of Ultrasound-Accelerated Versus Multi-Hole Infusion Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for the Treatment of Acute Limb Ischemia [J]. Vasc Endovascular Surg, 2019, 53(7): 558-562.
4	Wang SQ, Chen M, Wei X, et al. Clinical research on lumbar oblique-pulling manipulation in combination with sling exercise therapy for patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain [J]. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992), 2019, 65(6): 886-892.
5	Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain [J]. Lancet (London, England), 1974, 2(7889): 1127-1131.
6	Al Nezari NH, Schneiders AG, Hendrick PA. Neurological examination of the peripheral nervous system to diagnose lumbar spinal disc herniation with suspected radiculopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Spine J, 2013, 13(6): 657-674.
7	Demchak TJ, Straub SJ, Johns LD. Ultrasound heating is curvilinear in Nature and varies between transducers from the same manufacturer [J]. J Sport Rehabil, 2007, 16(2): 122-130.
8	Chan AK, Myrer JW, Gj M, et al. Temperature changes in human patellar tendon in response to therapeutic ultrasound [J]. J Athl Train, 1998, 33(2): 130-135.
9	Morrisette DC, Brown D, Saladin ME. Temperature change in lumbar periarticular tissue with continuous ultrasound [J]. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2004, 34(12): 754-760.
10	Frühwald T, Gärtner U, Stöckmann N, et al. In vitro examination of the thrombolytic efficacy of tenecteplase and therapeutic ultrasound compared to rt-PA [J]. BMC Neurology, 2019, 19(1): 181-181.
11	Hampton T. Noninvasive ultrasound May help treat inflammation and other conditions [J]. JAMA, 2019, 321(21): 2064-2065.
12	Roh HS, Cho WJ, Ryu WJ, et al. The change of pain and lumbosacral sagittal alignment after sling exercise therapy for patients with chronic low back pain [J]. J Phys Ther Sci, 2016, 28(10): 2789-2792.
13	Lee JS, Lee HG. Effects of sling exercise therapy on trunk muscle activation and balance in chronic hemiplegic patients [J]. J Phys Ther Sci, 2014, 26(5): 655-659.
14	Lee SB, Cho WJ. The effect of sling exercise on sagittal lumbosacral angle and intervertebral disc area of chronic low back pain patients [J]. J Exerc Rehabil, 2016, 12(5): 471-475.
15	Yoon JL, Joon-Shik S, Jinho L, et al. Survey of integrative lumbar spinal stenosis treatment in Korean medicine doctors: preliminary data for clinical practice guidelines [J]. BMC Complement Altern Med, 2017, 17(1): 017-1942.
16	Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljärvi L, et al. Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1993, 18(5): 575-581.
17	Susan A Saliba, Ted Croy, Rebecca Guthrie, et al. Differences in transverse abdominis activation with stable and unstable bridging exercises in individuals with low back pain [J]. N Am J Sports Phys Ther, 2010, 5(2): 63-73.
18	Demoulin C, Distrée V, Tomasella M, J-M Crielaard, et al. Lumbar functional instability: a critical appraisal of the literature [J]. Ann Readapt Med Phys, 2007, 50(8): 677-684.
19	Chang WD, Huang WS, Lee CL, et al. Effects of open and closed kinetic chains of sling exercise therapy on the muscle activity of the vastus medialis oblique and vastus lateralis [J]. J Phys Ther Sci, 2014, 26(9): 1363-1366.
20	Luciana Gazzi Macedo 1, Geoff P Bostick, Christopher G Maher. Exercise for Prevention of Recurrences of Nonspecific Low Back Pain [J]. Phys Ther, 2013, 93(12): 1587-1591.

[1]	童芷芹, 刘艳, 潘亚娟. 后路腰椎椎间融合术后手术部位感染风险预测模型的构建[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 149-155.
[2]	李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[3]	田淞宇, 张明月, 张宇博. 圆韧带悬吊联合腹腔镜子宫全切术对患者术后阴道膨出的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 433-436.
[4]	唐虹, 周奇, 欧阳晓玲, 王永峰, 华宇, 郝小白, 李林霞. 腹膜外无张力吊带子宫悬吊术治疗盆腔脏器脱垂的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 315-319.
[5]	王泽钦, 洪军, 王雅平, 王健, 蒿汉坤. W型肝脏悬吊技术在全腹腔镜下全胃切除术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 218-221.
[6]	赵晓秋, 李锋, 赵传东, 刘元钦, 林彦达, 辛涛. 3D数字外视显微镜下微通道手术治疗腰椎间盘突出的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 243-247.
[7]	吴天宇, 刘子璇, 杨浦鑫, 贾思明, 丁凯, 程晓东, 李泳龙, 陈伟, 吕红芝, 张奇. 腰椎间盘突出症保守治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 379-384.
[8]	邵佳申, 张志武, 孟海, 杨雍, 费琦. 单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效和学习曲线研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 202-208.
[9]	张苡齐, 海涌, 关立, 潘爱星, 张扬璞, 丁红涛, 李越, 刘玉增. 伴骨质疏松的单节段腰椎退行性变后路皮质骨轨迹螺钉固定治疗术后螺钉松动的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 153-158.
[10]	张青菊, 许建林, 南永刚, 施常备, 牛锦云. ^99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT定量骨显像测定腰椎标准化摄取值的分析及应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 238-244.
[11]	李婛, 凌国源, 江山, 陈晓菊, 郭晓云. 非小细胞肺癌软脑膜转移通过Ommaya囊注射与腰椎穿刺术给药方式疗效的比较[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 128-132.
[12]	易端, 黄鑫, 罗启鹏, 李水清, 贾东林. 3D打印技术在腰椎微创介入手术教学中的应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 190-194.
[13]	冯建宇, 郝珂楠, 陈小晶, 何晓峰, 赵玮. 集束化护理在腰椎间盘突出臭氧消融术治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 397-400.
[14]	欧阳川, 朱巧珍, 欧阳林. 腰椎间盘退变的生物代谢特征及评价技术研究进展[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 206-211.
[15]	孙伟, 徐东升. 减重与代谢外科肝脏悬吊方式研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 261-268.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

The effect of combining therapeutic ultrasound and sling exercise for lumbar disc herniation

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

The effect of combining therapeutic ultrasound and sling exercise for lumbar disc herniation