切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (04) : 217 -222. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.04.007

所属专题: 文献

脊柱

经皮椎间孔入路内镜下治疗老年腰椎融合术后邻椎病
付松1, 吕仁花2, 邵诗泽1,(), 侯海涛1, 王龙强1, 王亚楠1, 刘海军1, 邹奇1, 王欢1, 黄相鹏1, 张翔1, 王振宇1, 宋钦鹏1   
  1. 1. 264400 威海,山东省文登整骨医院脊柱脊髓科
    2. 264400 威海,山东省威海市文登中心医院神经内科
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-11 出版日期:2019-08-05
  • 通信作者: 邵诗泽
  • 基金资助:
    威海市科技发展计划项目(2011-2-94-2)

Percutaneus endoscopic transforaminal approach decompression accurately for adjacent segmental disease after lumbar fusion

Song Fu1, Renhua Lyu2, Shize Shao1,(), Haitao Hou1, Longqiang Wang1, Yanan Wang1, Haijun Liu1, Qi Zou1, Huan Wang1, Xiangpeng Huang1, Xiang Zhang1, Zhenyu Wang1, Qinpeng Song1   

  1. 1. Department of Spinal Cord, Shandong Wendeng Orthopeadic Hospital, Weihai 264400, China
    2. Department of Neurology, the Affiliated Weihai Central Hospital, Weihai 264400, China
  • Received:2019-04-11 Published:2019-08-05
  • Corresponding author: Shize Shao
引用本文:

付松, 吕仁花, 邵诗泽, 侯海涛, 王龙强, 王亚楠, 刘海军, 邹奇, 王欢, 黄相鹏, 张翔, 王振宇, 宋钦鹏. 经皮椎间孔入路内镜下治疗老年腰椎融合术后邻椎病[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2019, 05(04): 217-222.

Song Fu, Renhua Lyu, Shize Shao, Haitao Hou, Longqiang Wang, Yanan Wang, Haijun Liu, Qi Zou, Huan Wang, Xiangpeng Huang, Xiang Zhang, Zhenyu Wang, Qinpeng Song. Percutaneus endoscopic transforaminal approach decompression accurately for adjacent segmental disease after lumbar fusion[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2019, 05(04): 217-222.

目的

讨论经皮椎间孔入路内镜下治疗老年腰椎融合术后邻椎病的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性收集2015年1月至2016年8月山东省文登整骨医院脊柱脊髓科收治的老年腰椎融合术后出现邻椎病的患者34例,男性25例,女性9例,年龄61~81岁,平均年龄(66±7)岁。全部患者采用经皮椎间孔入路内镜减压手术。记录手术时间及术中应注意的事项。在术前、术后1、6、12个月及末次随访时,按MacNab标准进行临床疗效的评价,进行腰部及下肢的疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)及Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI);在6个月随访时,行腰椎MRI检查评估神经根减压状况,并进行腰椎正侧位、动力位片评价本次手术节段的稳定性。

结果

34例患者均顺利完成手术,随访时间为24~44个月,平均(32±7)个月。手术时间54~142 min,平均(68±30)min。重复测量的方差分析显示,术后1、6、12个月、末次随访时,ODI较术前明显下降,差异具有统计学意义(F=2008.780,P<0.001);腰痛VAS评分较术前明显下降,差异具有统计学意义(F=599.821,P<0.001);下肢痛VAS评分较术前明显下降,差异具有统计学意义(F=601.751,P<0.001);6个月随访时,改良MacNab标准评估:优27例、良5例、可2例,优良率为94.12%。1例出现置管过程中导丝断裂;1例出现出口神经根外膜的撕裂;1例患者出现出口根刺激症状。末次随访时,3例椎间失稳。未发生神经根及硬膜囊的损伤,未发生手术节段错误。

结论

经皮椎间孔入路内镜治疗老年人腰椎融合术后邻椎病,创伤小,临床疗效好。

Objective

To discuss the effect of treatment and the matters needing attention during the operation Through percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery for Adjacent segmental disease after lumbar fusion.

Methods

From January 2015 to August 2016, 34 elderly patients (25 males and 9 females) with adjacent vertebral diseases occurred after lumbar fusion. The age ranged from 61 to 81 years, with an average of (66±7) years. All patients underwent percutaneous endoscopic decompression via transforaminal approach. Record the time of operation and the matters needing attention during the operation. In the preoperative and postoperative 1, 6, 12 months and the last follow-up, the clinical efficacy was evaluated according to the MacNab standard, the visual analogue score of the pain of the waist and lower limbs (VAS) and the Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI) were performed. During the follow-up of 6 months, lumbar MRI was performed to evaluate the status of nerve root decompression, and the stability of the operation was evaluated by anteroposterior and lateral lumbar radiographs and dynamic radiographs.

Results

The operation time was successfully completed in all 34 patients. The time of operation was 54-142 min, with an average of (68±30) min. The follow-up time was 24-44 months, with an average of (32±7) months. The scores of ODI at 1, 6, 12 months and final follow-up were significantly lower than those before operation (F=2008.780, P<0.001); The scores of Low back pain VAS at 1, 6, 12 months and final follow-up were significantly lower than those before operation (F=599.821, P<0.001); The scores of Lower limb pain VAS at 1, 6,12 months and final follow-up were significantly lower than those before operation (F=601.751, P<0.001). At the time of follow up in June, the modified MacNab criteria assessed excellent outcomes in 27 cases, good in 5 cases, and fair in 2 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 94.12%.One case had rupture of the guide wire, one case had tear of the epineurium of the outlet nerve root, and one case had irritation of the outlet root. At the last follow-up, 3 cases of intervertebral instability were found. No nerve root and dural sac injury occurred, no operative segment errors occurred.

Conclusion

Percutaneous intervertebral foramen endoscopic treatment of adjacent vertebral disease in elderly patients after lumbar fusion has less trauma and good clinical effect.

图1~10 男性,66岁,4年前因L3~4节段椎管狭窄症行腰椎后路椎管扩大减压顶棒系统+Cage椎间固定融合术,术后1年取出内固定;图1术前MRI;图2~3术后X线正侧位片;图4~7术后4年,L4~5节段出现邻椎病,进行椎间孔镜治疗;图8术中置管情况;图9~10术后MRI示椎管减压效果好
表1 34例患者术后随访各个时间点与术前ODI、腰痛及下肢痛VAS评分的比较(s,±s
表2 34例患者术后随访各个时间点与术前ODI、腰痛及下肢痛VAS评分两两比较的结果
1
Zeng ZY, Wu P, Sun DT, et al. Two different fixation methods combined with lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment oftwo-level lumbar vertebra diseases: a clinical comparisonstudy [J]. Zhongguo Gu Shang, 2015, 28(10): 903-909.
2
Harrop JS, YoussefJA, Maltenfort M, et al. Lumbar adjacent segmentdegeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2008, 33(15): 1701-1707.
3
Li G, Patil CG, Lad SP, et al. Effects of age and comorbidities on complication rates and adverse outcomes after lumbar laminectomy in elderly patients [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2008, 33(11): 1250-1255.
4
Komp M, Hahn P, Oezdemir S, et al. Bilateral spinal decompression of lumbar central stenosis with the full-endoscopic interlaminar versus microsurgical laminotomy technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study [J]. Pain Physician, 2015, 18(1): 61-70.
5
Djurasovic M, Glassman SD, Carreon LY, et al. Contemporary management of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis [J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2010, 41(2): 183-191.
6
Iguchi T, Kanemura A, Kasahara K, et al. Lumbar instability and clinical symptoms: which is the more critical factor for symptoms: sagittal translation or segment angulation? [J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2004, 17(4): 284-290.
7
Lee SE, Jahng TA, Kim HJ. Facet joint changes after application of lumbar nonfusion dynamic stabilization [J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2016,40(1): E6.
8
Kobayashi S. Pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of intermittent claudication in patients with lumbar canal stenosis[J]. World J Orthop, 2014,5(2):134-145.
9
钱宇,徐国健,金聪,等.腰椎管狭窄症致压因素与减压方式关系的研究[J].中华骨科杂志, 2016, 36(22): 1417-1425.
10
Jacobs WC, Rubinstein SM, Willems PC, et al. The evidence onsurgical interventions for low back disorders, an overview of systematic reviews [J]. Eur Spine J, 2013, 22(9): 1936-1949.
11
Chang F, Zhang T, Gao G, et al. Comparison of the minimally invasive and conventional open surgery approach in the treatment of lumbar stenosis: a systematic review and a Meta-Analysis [J]. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 2017, 46(4): 124-137.
12
Schubert M, Hoogland T. Endoscopic transforaminal nucleotomy with foraminoplasty for lumbar disk herniation [J]. Oper Orthop Traumatol, 2005, 17(6): 641-661.
13
Kim HS, Patel R, Paudel B, et al. Early Outcomes of EndoscopicContralateral Foraminal and Lateral Recess Decompression viaan Interlaminar Approach in Patients with Unilateral Radiculopathy from Unilateral Foraminal Stenosis[J]. World Neurosurg,2017, 108: 763-773.
14
Sairyo K, Matsuura T, Higashino K, et al. Surgery related complications in percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy under local anesthesia [J]. J Med Invest, 2014, 61(3/4): 264-269.
15
Jacquot F, Gastambide D. Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: is it worth it? [J]. Int Orthop, 2013, 37(8): 1507-1510.
16
Kambin P, Casey K, O'brien E, et al. Transforaminal arthroscopic decompression of lateral recess stenosis [J]. J Neurosurg, 1996, 84(3): 462-467.
[1] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[2] 杨建波, 马欢, 黄小梅, 刘华柱. 结肠镜辅助下EMR、CSP和RFA术治疗直径<1cm结直肠息肉的疗效和安全性比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 76-79.
[3] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[4] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[5] 袁志静, 黄杰, 何国安, 方辉强. 罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定局部阻滞麻醉在老年腹腔镜下无张力疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 557-561.
[6] 方开萱, 翟亚奇, 张贯军, 陈升鑫, 陈德鑫, 刘文静, 梁雅文, 李明阳. 内镜逆行胰胆管造影术治疗胰腺分裂症的安全性与远期疗效[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 284-289.
[7] 张露平, 黄春玉, 张生澎, 李晶华, 冯力民. 阴道内镜在妊娠期宫颈息肉治疗中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 301-305.
[8] 张宗明, 董家鸿, 何小东, 王秋生, 徐智, 刘立民, 张翀. 老年胆道外科热点问题的争议与思考[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 754-762.
[9] 王贝贝, 崔振义, 王静, 王晗妍, 吕红芝, 李秀婷. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后贫血预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 355-362.
[10] 吴天宇, 刘子璇, 杨浦鑫, 贾思明, 丁凯, 程晓东, 李泳龙, 陈伟, 吕红芝, 张奇. 腰椎间盘突出症保守治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 379-384.
[11] 李新宇, 梁建锋. 3D打印导板辅助颅内血肿穿刺引流手术[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 382-384.
[12] 吴广迎, 张延娟, 秦鹏, 卢艳丽. 经颈静脉肝内门体静脉分流术预防上消化道出血的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 545-548.
[13] 梁艳娉, 陈燕柔, 梁运啸, 白飞虎, 吴斌, 王省. 华南地区门静脉高压食管胃静脉曲张出血内镜治疗现状调研分析[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 390-395.
[14] 崔健, 夏青, 林云, 李光玲, 李心娜, 王位. 血小板与淋巴细胞比值、免疫球蛋白、心肌酶谱及心电图对中老年肝硬化患者病情及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 400-406.
[15] 商倩, 罗静, 卓振山, 苗园园, 吴静, 廖振林. 通腑泻浊法联合生长抑素对内镜逆行胰胆管造影治疗的急性胆源性胰腺炎患者预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 437-441.
阅读次数
全文


摘要