切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (04) : 217 -222. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.04.007

所属专题: 文献

脊柱

经皮椎间孔入路内镜下治疗老年腰椎融合术后邻椎病
付松1, 吕仁花2, 邵诗泽1,(), 侯海涛1, 王龙强1, 王亚楠1, 刘海军1, 邹奇1, 王欢1, 黄相鹏1, 张翔1, 王振宇1, 宋钦鹏1   
  1. 1. 264400 威海,山东省文登整骨医院脊柱脊髓科
    2. 264400 威海,山东省威海市文登中心医院神经内科
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-11 出版日期:2019-08-05
  • 通信作者: 邵诗泽
  • 基金资助:
    威海市科技发展计划项目(2011-2-94-2)

Percutaneus endoscopic transforaminal approach decompression accurately for adjacent segmental disease after lumbar fusion

Song Fu1, Renhua Lyu2, Shize Shao1,(), Haitao Hou1, Longqiang Wang1, Yanan Wang1, Haijun Liu1, Qi Zou1, Huan Wang1, Xiangpeng Huang1, Xiang Zhang1, Zhenyu Wang1, Qinpeng Song1   

  1. 1. Department of Spinal Cord, Shandong Wendeng Orthopeadic Hospital, Weihai 264400, China
    2. Department of Neurology, the Affiliated Weihai Central Hospital, Weihai 264400, China
  • Received:2019-04-11 Published:2019-08-05
  • Corresponding author: Shize Shao
引用本文:

付松, 吕仁花, 邵诗泽, 侯海涛, 王龙强, 王亚楠, 刘海军, 邹奇, 王欢, 黄相鹏, 张翔, 王振宇, 宋钦鹏. 经皮椎间孔入路内镜下治疗老年腰椎融合术后邻椎病[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2019, 05(04): 217-222.

Song Fu, Renhua Lyu, Shize Shao, Haitao Hou, Longqiang Wang, Yanan Wang, Haijun Liu, Qi Zou, Huan Wang, Xiangpeng Huang, Xiang Zhang, Zhenyu Wang, Qinpeng Song. Percutaneus endoscopic transforaminal approach decompression accurately for adjacent segmental disease after lumbar fusion[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2019, 05(04): 217-222.

目的

讨论经皮椎间孔入路内镜下治疗老年腰椎融合术后邻椎病的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性收集2015年1月至2016年8月山东省文登整骨医院脊柱脊髓科收治的老年腰椎融合术后出现邻椎病的患者34例,男性25例,女性9例,年龄61~81岁,平均年龄(66±7)岁。全部患者采用经皮椎间孔入路内镜减压手术。记录手术时间及术中应注意的事项。在术前、术后1、6、12个月及末次随访时,按MacNab标准进行临床疗效的评价,进行腰部及下肢的疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)及Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI);在6个月随访时,行腰椎MRI检查评估神经根减压状况,并进行腰椎正侧位、动力位片评价本次手术节段的稳定性。

结果

34例患者均顺利完成手术,随访时间为24~44个月,平均(32±7)个月。手术时间54~142 min,平均(68±30)min。重复测量的方差分析显示,术后1、6、12个月、末次随访时,ODI较术前明显下降,差异具有统计学意义(F=2008.780,P<0.001);腰痛VAS评分较术前明显下降,差异具有统计学意义(F=599.821,P<0.001);下肢痛VAS评分较术前明显下降,差异具有统计学意义(F=601.751,P<0.001);6个月随访时,改良MacNab标准评估:优27例、良5例、可2例,优良率为94.12%。1例出现置管过程中导丝断裂;1例出现出口神经根外膜的撕裂;1例患者出现出口根刺激症状。末次随访时,3例椎间失稳。未发生神经根及硬膜囊的损伤,未发生手术节段错误。

结论

经皮椎间孔入路内镜治疗老年人腰椎融合术后邻椎病,创伤小,临床疗效好。

Objective

To discuss the effect of treatment and the matters needing attention during the operation Through percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery for Adjacent segmental disease after lumbar fusion.

Methods

From January 2015 to August 2016, 34 elderly patients (25 males and 9 females) with adjacent vertebral diseases occurred after lumbar fusion. The age ranged from 61 to 81 years, with an average of (66±7) years. All patients underwent percutaneous endoscopic decompression via transforaminal approach. Record the time of operation and the matters needing attention during the operation. In the preoperative and postoperative 1, 6, 12 months and the last follow-up, the clinical efficacy was evaluated according to the MacNab standard, the visual analogue score of the pain of the waist and lower limbs (VAS) and the Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI) were performed. During the follow-up of 6 months, lumbar MRI was performed to evaluate the status of nerve root decompression, and the stability of the operation was evaluated by anteroposterior and lateral lumbar radiographs and dynamic radiographs.

Results

The operation time was successfully completed in all 34 patients. The time of operation was 54-142 min, with an average of (68±30) min. The follow-up time was 24-44 months, with an average of (32±7) months. The scores of ODI at 1, 6, 12 months and final follow-up were significantly lower than those before operation (F=2008.780, P<0.001); The scores of Low back pain VAS at 1, 6, 12 months and final follow-up were significantly lower than those before operation (F=599.821, P<0.001); The scores of Lower limb pain VAS at 1, 6,12 months and final follow-up were significantly lower than those before operation (F=601.751, P<0.001). At the time of follow up in June, the modified MacNab criteria assessed excellent outcomes in 27 cases, good in 5 cases, and fair in 2 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 94.12%.One case had rupture of the guide wire, one case had tear of the epineurium of the outlet nerve root, and one case had irritation of the outlet root. At the last follow-up, 3 cases of intervertebral instability were found. No nerve root and dural sac injury occurred, no operative segment errors occurred.

Conclusion

Percutaneous intervertebral foramen endoscopic treatment of adjacent vertebral disease in elderly patients after lumbar fusion has less trauma and good clinical effect.

图1~10 男性,66岁,4年前因L3~4节段椎管狭窄症行腰椎后路椎管扩大减压顶棒系统+Cage椎间固定融合术,术后1年取出内固定;图1术前MRI;图2~3术后X线正侧位片;图4~7术后4年,L4~5节段出现邻椎病,进行椎间孔镜治疗;图8术中置管情况;图9~10术后MRI示椎管减压效果好
表1 34例患者术后随访各个时间点与术前ODI、腰痛及下肢痛VAS评分的比较(s,±s
表2 34例患者术后随访各个时间点与术前ODI、腰痛及下肢痛VAS评分两两比较的结果
1
Zeng ZY, Wu P, Sun DT, et al. Two different fixation methods combined with lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment oftwo-level lumbar vertebra diseases: a clinical comparisonstudy [J]. Zhongguo Gu Shang, 2015, 28(10): 903-909.
2
Harrop JS, YoussefJA, Maltenfort M, et al. Lumbar adjacent segmentdegeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2008, 33(15): 1701-1707.
3
Li G, Patil CG, Lad SP, et al. Effects of age and comorbidities on complication rates and adverse outcomes after lumbar laminectomy in elderly patients [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2008, 33(11): 1250-1255.
4
Komp M, Hahn P, Oezdemir S, et al. Bilateral spinal decompression of lumbar central stenosis with the full-endoscopic interlaminar versus microsurgical laminotomy technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study [J]. Pain Physician, 2015, 18(1): 61-70.
5
Djurasovic M, Glassman SD, Carreon LY, et al. Contemporary management of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis [J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2010, 41(2): 183-191.
6
Iguchi T, Kanemura A, Kasahara K, et al. Lumbar instability and clinical symptoms: which is the more critical factor for symptoms: sagittal translation or segment angulation? [J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2004, 17(4): 284-290.
7
Lee SE, Jahng TA, Kim HJ. Facet joint changes after application of lumbar nonfusion dynamic stabilization [J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2016,40(1): E6.
8
Kobayashi S. Pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of intermittent claudication in patients with lumbar canal stenosis[J]. World J Orthop, 2014,5(2):134-145.
9
钱宇,徐国健,金聪,等.腰椎管狭窄症致压因素与减压方式关系的研究[J].中华骨科杂志, 2016, 36(22): 1417-1425.
10
Jacobs WC, Rubinstein SM, Willems PC, et al. The evidence onsurgical interventions for low back disorders, an overview of systematic reviews [J]. Eur Spine J, 2013, 22(9): 1936-1949.
11
Chang F, Zhang T, Gao G, et al. Comparison of the minimally invasive and conventional open surgery approach in the treatment of lumbar stenosis: a systematic review and a Meta-Analysis [J]. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 2017, 46(4): 124-137.
12
Schubert M, Hoogland T. Endoscopic transforaminal nucleotomy with foraminoplasty for lumbar disk herniation [J]. Oper Orthop Traumatol, 2005, 17(6): 641-661.
13
Kim HS, Patel R, Paudel B, et al. Early Outcomes of EndoscopicContralateral Foraminal and Lateral Recess Decompression viaan Interlaminar Approach in Patients with Unilateral Radiculopathy from Unilateral Foraminal Stenosis[J]. World Neurosurg,2017, 108: 763-773.
14
Sairyo K, Matsuura T, Higashino K, et al. Surgery related complications in percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy under local anesthesia [J]. J Med Invest, 2014, 61(3/4): 264-269.
15
Jacquot F, Gastambide D. Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: is it worth it? [J]. Int Orthop, 2013, 37(8): 1507-1510.
16
Kambin P, Casey K, O'brien E, et al. Transforaminal arthroscopic decompression of lateral recess stenosis [J]. J Neurosurg, 1996, 84(3): 462-467.
[1] 李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[2] 袁成雪, 张宗霞, 许婷, 斯郎拉姆. 三种内镜手术治疗结肠息肉的效果及安全性观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 78-81.
[3] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[4] 李炳根, 龚独辉, 赖泽如, 聂向阳. 产后腹直肌分离全腔镜下肌后/腹膜外补片修补术的临床研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 724-727.
[5] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[6] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[7] 侯超, 潘美辰, 吴文明, 黄兴广, 李翔, 程凌雪, 朱玉轩, 李文波. 早期食管癌及上皮内瘤变内镜黏膜下剥离术后食管狭窄的危险因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 383-387.
[8] 单秋洁, 孙立柱, 徐宜全, 王之霞, 徐妍, 马浩, 刘田田. 中老年食管癌患者调强放射治疗期间放射性肺损伤风险模型构建及应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 388-393.
[9] 孙欣欣, 刘军, 陈超伍, 孙超. 超声内镜引导细针穿刺抽吸术在胰腺占位性病变中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 418-421.
[10] 高显奎, 赵太云, 陆兴俊, 张洪领, 房修罗, 闫碧春, 王胤, 王永翠, 刘苗苗, 冉若男. 内镜电凝止血与组织胶注射治疗上消化道溃疡伴出血的疗效观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 452-455.
[11] 张政赢, 鞠阳, 刘晓宁. 二甲双胍对2型糖尿病患者大肠腺瘤术后复发的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 485-488.
[12] 邱春华, 张志宏. 1108例小肠疾病的临床诊断及检查策略分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 948-954.
[13] 郭震天, 张宗明, 赵月, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 齐晖, 田坤. 机器学习算法预测老年急性胆囊炎术后住院时间探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 955-961.
[14] 王亚丹, 吴静, 黄博洋, 王苗苗, 郭春梅, 宿慧, 王沧海, 王静, 丁鹏鹏, 刘红. 白光内镜下结直肠肿瘤性质预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 655-661.
[15] 孟科, 李燕, 闫婧爽, 闫斌. 胶囊内镜胃通过时间的影响因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 671-675.
阅读次数
全文


摘要