切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) : 123 -128. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2026.02.009

综述

颈椎融合术后邻近节段疾病的诊疗进展
张利鹏, 刘阳, 王显, 郑银福, 杨薇, 杨政伟()   
  1. 402360 重庆市大足区中医院骨伤科
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-22 出版日期:2026-04-05
  • 通信作者: 杨政伟
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市自然科学基金项目(2023NSCQ-MSX4601)

Progress in diagnosis and treatment of adjacent segment diseases after cervical fusion

Lipeng Zhang, Yang Liu, Xian Wang, Yinfu Zheng, Wei Yang, Zhengwei Yang()   

  1. Dazu District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chongqing 402360, China
  • Received:2025-06-22 Published:2026-04-05
  • Corresponding author: Zhengwei Yang
引用本文:

张利鹏, 刘阳, 王显, 郑银福, 杨薇, 杨政伟. 颈椎融合术后邻近节段疾病的诊疗进展[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2026, 12(02): 123-128.

Lipeng Zhang, Yang Liu, Xian Wang, Yinfu Zheng, Wei Yang, Zhengwei Yang. Progress in diagnosis and treatment of adjacent segment diseases after cervical fusion[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2026, 12(02): 123-128.

颈椎融合术后邻近节段退变(ASDeg)和邻近节段疾病(ASD)是影响远期疗效的核心问题,影像学发病率达16%~96%,有症状ASD发生率为1.8%~36%,约40%需二次手术。核心机制为融合导致邻近节段生物力学负荷异常增加(屈曲时近端间盘压力升高73.2%),加速退变。危险因素涵盖术前(高龄、椎管狭窄、多节段退变)、术中(多节段融合、钢板位置不当)及术后(颈椎曲度丢失)等多维度。ASD诊断需结合病史、神经受压症状(颈痛、肢体麻木无力)及影像学表现(椎间隙狭窄、骨赘、椎管受压)。治疗需个体化:轻症非手术治疗无效或神经压迫明显者考虑手术。颈椎前路椎间盘切除减压融合术(ACDF)翻修仍是主流,但二次手术并发症风险高;零切迹融合器可显著降低吞咽困难发生率(0% vs5.2%);后路椎板成形术适用于多节段脊髓受压;颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)保留活动度,可能延缓邻节段退变。后路脊柱内镜技术(椎间盘切除/椎管减压/神经根管减压)因规避前路瘢痕风险,具有微创、恢复快、对稳定性影响小等优势,是新兴治疗方向,但需更多研究验证其长期疗效。未来需加强循证指南制定及技术创新以优化防治策略。

Adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) and adjacent segment disease (ASD) after cervical fusion are the core issues affecting long-term outcomes. The imaging incidence is 16% to 96%, and the incidence of symptomatic ASD is 1.8% to 36%. About 40% require secondary surgery. The core mechanism is that fusion causes an abnormal increase in biomechanical load on adjacent segments (a 73.2% increase in proximal disc pressure during flexion) and accelerates degeneration. Risk factors include multiple dimensions such as preoperative (advanced age, spinal stenosis, multi-level degeneration), intraoperative (multi-level fusion, improper plate positioning) and postoperative (loss of cervical curvature). The diagnosis of ASD requires combining medical history, nerve compression symptoms (neck pain, limb numbness and weakness) and imaging findings (intervertebral space stenosis, osteophytes, spinal canal compression). Treatment needs to be individualized: For mild cases, surgery should be considered for those who fail to respond to non-surgical treatment or have obvious nerve compression. Revision of anterior cervical discectomy and decompression fusion (ACDF) is still the mainstream, but the risk of secondary surgical complications is high; zero-profile fusion cages can significantly reduce the incidence of dysphagia (0% versus 5.2%); posterior laminoplasty is suitable for multi-level spinal cord compression; cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) preserves range of motion and may delay adjacent segment degeneration. Posterior spinal endoscopic technology (discectomy/spinal canal decompression/nerve root canal decompression) is an emerging treatment direction because it avoids the risk of anterior scarring, has the advantages of minimally invasive, rapid recovery, and little impact on stability. However, more research is needed to verify its long-term efficacy. In the future, it is necessary to strengthen the formulation of evidence-based guidelines and technological innovation to optimize prevention and control strategies.

1
Zhu Q, Li N, Ding Y, et al. Incidence of Adjacent Segment Degeneration and Its Associated Risk Factors Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Meta-Analysis [J]. World Neurosurg, 2024, 183: e153-e172.
2
Singh M, Balmaceno-Criss M, Anderson G, et al. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty: an epidemiological review of 433,660 surgical patients from 2011 to 2021 [J]. Spine J, 2024, 24(8): 1342-1351.
3
Hashimoto K, Aizawa T, Kanno H, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration after fusion spinal surgery-a systematic review [J]. Int Orthop, 2019, 43(4): 987-993.
4
Epstein NE, Agulnick MA. Short Review/Perspective on Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD) Following Cervical Fusion Versus Arthroplasty [J]. Surg Neurol Int, 2022, 13:313.
5
Toci GR, Canseco JA, Patel PD, et al. The Incidence of Adjacent Segment Pathology After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Compared with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials [J]. World Neurosurg, 2022, 160: e537-e548.
6
Wei Z, Yang S, Zhang Y, et al. Prevalence and Risk Factors for Cervical Adjacent Segment Disease and Analysis of the Clinical Effect of Revision Surgery: A Minimum of 5 Years' Follow-Up [J]. Global Spine J, 2025, 15(2): 314-320.
7
Shahzad H, Alvarez PM, Pallumeera M, et al. Exploring the incidence and risk factors of reoperation for symptomatic adjacent segment disease following cervical decompression and fusion [J]. N Am Spine Soc J, 2023, 17: 100305.
8
Shen YW, Yang Y, Liu H, et al. Biomechanical Evaluation of Intervertebral Fusion Process After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Finite Element Study. Front Bioeng Biotechnol [J]. 2022, 10: 842382.
9
Cheng CH, Chiu PY, Chen HB, et al. The influence of over-distraction on biomechanical response of cervical spine post anterior interbody fusion: a comprehensive finite element study [J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2023, 11: 1217274.
10
Lindenmann S, Tsagkaris C, Farshad M, et al. Kinematics of the Cervical Spine Under Healthy and Degenerative Conditions: A Systematic Review [J]. Ann Biomed Eng, 2022, 50(12): 1705-1733.
11
Kwok WCH, Wong CYY, Law JHW, et al. Risk Factors for Adjacent Segment Disease Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Plate Fixation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2022, 104(21): 1915-1945.
12
Zhang Y, Shao Y, Liu H, et al. Association between sagittal balance and adjacent segment degeneration in anterior cervical surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2019, 20(1): 430.
13
Gordon AM, Elali FR, Saleh A. Revision Rates After Single-Level Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: An Observational Study With 5-Year Minimum Follow-Up [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2025, 50(1): 19-25.
14
Mesregah MK, Baker M, Yoon C, et al. Radiographic Risk Factors for Adjacent Segment Disease Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J]. Global Spine J, 2024, 14(7): 2183-2200.
15
Broida SE, Murakami K, Abedi A, et al. Clinical risk factors associated with the development of adjacent segment disease in patients undergoing ACDF: A systematic review [J]. Spine J, 2023, 23(1): 146-156.
16
Kong CG, Park JB. Reoperation Strategy for Failure of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty at Index and Adjacent Levels [J]. J Clin Med, 2025, 14(6): 2038.
17
Schuermans VNE, Smeets AYJM, Wijsen NPMH, et al. Clinical adjacent segment pathology after anterior cervical discectomy, with and without fusion, for cervical degenerative disc disease: A single center retrospective cohort study with long-term follow-up [J]. Brain Spine, 2022, 2: 100869.
18
中国颈椎退行性病变诊疗指南制订专家组,中国老年保健协会疼痛病学分会,《中华疼痛学杂志》编辑委员会.中国颈椎退行性病变诊疗指南(2025版) [J].中华疼痛学杂志, 2025, 21(4): 484-499.
19
Thompson K, Travers H, Ngan A, Reed T, et al. Updates in current concepts in degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review [J]. J Spine Surg, 2024, 10(2): 313-326.
20
Zhang JY, Xuan AW, Ruan DK. Research progress of risk factors of adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion [J]. Zhongguo Gu Shang, 2022, 35(11): 1104-8.
21
Bonano J, Cummins DD, Burch S, et al. Economic Impact of Revision Operations for Adjacent Segment Disease of the Subaxial Cervical Spine [J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev, 2022, 6(4): e22.00058.
22
Huang X, Cai Y, Chen K, et al. Risk factors and treatment strategies for adjacent segment disease following spinal fusion (Review). Mol Med Rep. 2025;31(2):33. doi:10.3892/mmr.2024.13398
23
Turcotte JJ, Brennan JC, Johnson AH, et al. Midterm outcomes of revision anterior fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty in patients with prior single-level anterior cervical fusion [J]. Spine J, 2025, 25(11): 2422-2429.
24
Liang W, Yang Y, Han B, et al.iomechanical Analysis of Hybrid Artificial Discs or Zero-Profile Devices for Treating 1-Level Adjacent Segment Degeneration in ACDF Revision Surgery [J]. Neurospine, 2024, 21(2): 606-619.
25
Loidolt T, Kurra S, Riew KD, et al. Comparison of adverse events between cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a 10-year follow-up [J]. Spine J, 2021, 21(2): 253-264.
26
Liu Z, Lou YL, Fei H, Quan RF. Application of Solis fusion device in adjacent segment degeneration revision after anterior cervical discectomy bone grafting fusion [J]. Zhongguo Gu Shang, 2024, 37(11): 1056-61.
27
Huang K, Liu H, Wang B, et al. Cervical disc arthroplasty combined with two-level ACDF for the treatment of contiguous three-level cervical degenerative disc disease: A comparative study [J]. J Orthop Res, 2023, 41(5): 1105-1114.
28
Aldahamsheh O, Alhammoud A, Halayqeh S, et al. Stand-Alone Anchored Spacer vs Anterior Plate Construct in the Management of Adjacent Segment Disease after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies [J]. Global Spine J, 2024, 14(3): 1038-1051.
29
唐冲,周非非,李危石.颈椎椎板成形术对脊柱矢状位平衡的影响[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(11): 1066-1069.
30
He W, He D, Wang QL, et al. Longitudinal Spinous-Splitting Laminoplasty with Coral Bone for the Treatment of Cervical Adjacent Segment Degenerative Disease: A 5-Year Follow-up Study [J]. Orthop Surg, 2022, 14(2): 435-442.
31
Jin H, Luo J, Jiang Y, et al. Osteophyte formation causes neurological symptoms after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF): A case report [J]. Front Surg, 2023, 9: 1029743.
32
Zhang Q, Xue Y, Ma R, et al. Laminectomy and laminoplasty hybrid decompression versus laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a propensity score-matched study [J]. Int Orthop, 2025, 49(10): 2567-2574.
33
Divi SN, Plantz MA, Tegethoff J, et al. Current and Expanded Indications for Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: Beyond the FDA IDE Studies [J]. Clin Spine Surg, 2023, 36(9): 375-385.
34
Satin AM, Shenker T, Guyer RD, et al. Cervical Disc Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Adjacent Segment Disease After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2025, 50(4): 243-251.
35
Epstein NE, Agulnick MA. Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA)/total disc replacement (TDR) vs. anterior cervical diskectomy/fusion (ACDF): A review [J]. Surg Neurol Int, 2022, 13: 565.
36
Mumtaz M, Zafarparandeh I, Erbulut DU. Investigation into Cervical Spine Biomechanics Following Single, Multilevel and Hybrid Disc Replacement Surgery with Dynamic Cervical Implant and Fusion: A Finite Element Study [J]. Bioengineering (Basel), 2022, 9(1): 16.
37
Matgé G, Berthold C, Gunness VR, et al. Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression [J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2015, 22(3): 237-245.
38
Wang X, Li T, Li Y, et al. Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy for Single-Segment Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy: A Retrospective Study with Minimum 3-Year Follow-Up [J]. J Pain Res, 2025, 18: 2879-2888.
39
Ran B, Yang J, Wei J, et al. CT-Guided Posterolateral Full-Endoscopic Ventral Decompression for Single-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy [J]. Pain Physician, 2021, 24(2): E203-E210.
40
Huang CC, Fitts J, Huie D, et al. Evolution of Cervical Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Current Progress and Future Directions-A Narrative Review [J]. J Clin Med, 2024, 13(7): 2122.
41
Ahn Y, Lee S. Uniportal versus biportal endoscopic spine surgery: a comprehensive review [J]. Expert Rev Med Devices, 2023, 20(7): 549-556.
42
Lv J, Mei J, Feng X, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of posterior minimally invasive surgery in cervical spondylosis: a systematic review [J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2022, 17(1): 389.
43
祝斌,杨雍.脊柱内镜手术命名和适应证拓展的思考[J].国际外科学杂志, 2023, 50(7): 433-436.
44
Wang D, Xu J, Zhu C, et al. Comparison of Outcomes between Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic and Percutaneous Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Keyhole Surgeries [J]. Medicina (Kaunas), 2023, 59(3): 437.
45
Cheng W, Zhang YJ, Shao RX, et al. Unilateral biportal endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy for cervical radiculopathy [J]. Zhongguo Gu Shang, 2024, 37(11): 1046-50.
46
Wang XW, Min X, Wu XY, et al. [Clinical efficacy of posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy for single level cervical spondylopathy with intraspinal ossification] [J]. Zhongguo Gu Shang, 2021, 34(1): 20-5. Chinese.
47
孙宇.从颈椎管扩大椎板成形术的发展与创新看微创理念在颈椎外科中的应用[J].中华外科杂志, 2023, 61(8): 645-649.
48
Kim J, Heo DH, Lee DC, et al. Biportal endoscopic unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy [J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2021, 163(9): 2537-2543.
49
杨枭雄,夏天,陈欣,等.显微镜下颈后路经肌间隙入路单开门椎管扩大成形术的临床疗效[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2025, 18(2): 101-107.
50
Chien KT, Chen YC, Chang TK, et al. Novel Cervical Endoscopic Unilateral Laminoforaminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in Cervical Spondylosis Myeloradiculopathy: A Technical Note and Clinical Results [J]. J Clin Med, 2024, 13(7): 1910.
51
Zhang C, Fu S, Yan X, et al. Cervical microendoscopic laminoplasty-induced clinical resolution of disc herniation in patients with single- to three-level myelopathy [J]. Sci Rep, 2022, 12(1): 18854.
52
Tang R, Tan L, Lai G, et al. Research progress of unilateral biportal endoscopy technology in cervical degenerative disease [J]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2025, 39(4): 495-503.
53
Zhang Y, Dai J, Dai G, et al. Comparison of clinical efficacy of posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy versus unilateral biportal endoscopy key-hole techniques for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: a retrospective study with 2 years [J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2025, 20(1): 200.
54
Heo DH, Ha JS, Jang JW. Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Adjacent 2-Level Foraminal Lesions Using a Single Approach (Sliding Technique) [J]. Neurospine, 2023, 20(1): 92-98.
55
Dou H, Yu R, Zheng Y, et al. Modified Key-Hole Procedure for Treating Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy: Cannula Rotary Cutting Method Combined with Long and Short Tongue Cannulas [J]. World Neurosurg, 2025, 196: 123782.
[1] 江鸿宇, 梁家洛, 马琳, 邓永强, 李星瀚. 口腔和口咽鳞状细胞癌免疫治疗相关生物标志物研究现状[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 136-148.
[2] 阿依宝塔·沙那别克, 赵煜. 计算机辅助设计与制作一体化纤维桩核的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 149-156.
[3] 刘建勇, 江艺. 免疫检查点抑制剂新辅助治疗在肝细胞癌肝移植中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 127-132.
[4] 李广鑫, 权慧娟, 高志娟, 李良, 王肖君, 曹玉庆. 腹腔镜急诊切除与支架置入限期切除治疗梗阻性结直肠癌的临床效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 142-145.
[5] 李坚, 张伟, 曾少杰, 母德安. 经皮穿刺消融治疗与腹腔镜肝脏切除术治疗早期肝内胆管癌的临床效果对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 187-190.
[6] 李俊杰, 董培, 姚成, 刘泽, 李勇. 前列腺癌免疫治疗的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 209-215.
[7] 周明宽, 罗程, 庄锦涛, 涂响安. 广东省医学会泌尿外科疑难病例多学科会诊(第28期)——阴茎癌并双侧腹股沟、髂外动脉旁淋巴结转移[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 231-236.
[8] 谢伟, 张小峰, 沈锋. 肿瘤免疫治疗相关不良事件的流行病学特征、发生机制和防治策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 146-151.
[9] 崔梦玲, 孙文梅, 赵睿敏, 王家平. 合并微血管侵犯肝癌术后TACE联合治疗的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 160-166.
[10] 王琛, 徐芳, 周芳, 刘锦, 盛芳. 脂肪性肝病对晚期ICC系统治疗疗效及生存预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 226-233.
[11] 赵景, 何丹玲, 洪生杰, 张广权, 何函樨. 肝癌靶向与免疫治疗相关皮肤并发症的防治研究[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 266-270.
[12] 陈柏源, 林其圣, 林青霞, 杨渊婷, 倪兆慧, 周磊. 耗竭肾组织自然杀伤细胞改善叶酸诱导的小鼠急性肾损伤[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 69-75.
[13] 钱涛. 融合与重塑:神经调控康复一体化范式的构建与展望[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(02): 65-70.
[14] 常莉娜, 刘囡囡. DWI联合DCE-MRI定量参数对局部进展期直肠癌新辅助治疗后病理完全缓解的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(02): 125-129.
[15] 王明辉, 李文波, 李群, 马增翼, 吴文明, 王静, 孙奎林, 张保娟, 刘晓峰. 早期内镜止血治疗在胃底静脉曲张组织胶注射后排胶溃疡出血中的应用[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(02): 151-155.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?