切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (02) : 111 -116. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2024.02.007

手外

尺神经原位松解术与松解皮下前移术治疗中度肘管综合征的前瞻性对比研究
常文利1, 刘亚芳2, 宿晓雷1, 陈广先1, 张学磊1, 赵建勇1,()   
  1. 1. 061000 河北省沧州中西医结合医院手显微外一科
    2. 061000 河北省沧州中西医结合医院超声一科
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-11 出版日期:2024-04-05
  • 通信作者: 赵建勇
  • 基金资助:
    无重大疑难疾病中西医临床协作试点项目"肘关节退变性骨关节炎伴尺神经卡压综合征"

Comparative study of simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous transposition in the treatment of moderate cubital tunnel syndrome

Wenli Chang1, Yafang Liu2, Xiaolei Su1, Guangxian Chen1, Xuelei Zhang1, Jianyong Zhao1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hand Microsurgery, Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated TCM-WM Hebei, Cangzhou 061000, China
    2. Department of Ultrasound, Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated TCM-WM Hebei, Cangzhou 061000, China
  • Received:2023-03-11 Published:2024-04-05
  • Corresponding author: Jianyong Zhao
引用本文:

常文利, 刘亚芳, 宿晓雷, 陈广先, 张学磊, 赵建勇. 尺神经原位松解术与松解皮下前移术治疗中度肘管综合征的前瞻性对比研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 111-116.

Wenli Chang, Yafang Liu, Xiaolei Su, Guangxian Chen, Xuelei Zhang, Jianyong Zhao. Comparative study of simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous transposition in the treatment of moderate cubital tunnel syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2024, 10(02): 111-116.

目的

本研究旨在比较尺神经原位松解术与松解皮下前移术在治疗中度肘管综合征中的临床效果。

方法

将2018年7月至2019年7月于河北省沧州中西医结合医院收治的中度肘管综合征患者随机分为治疗组(尺神经原位松解术)和对照组(尺神经松解皮下前移术)。记录性别、年龄、症状持续时间等一般资料。将小指单丝触觉,小指两点辨别觉作为评价患者感觉恢复的指标,将握力,拇示指侧方捏力,运动神经传导速度作为评价患者运动的指标,并记录两组的术后并发症(肘关节疼痛,尺神经半脱位,切口感染)。对两组患者均进行为期不少于12个月的随访,并进行横向组间比较及纵向组内比较(治疗前,治疗后12月)。

结果

本研究共纳入50例患者,治疗组25例,对照组25例。两组患者性别(χ2=0.081,P=0.777),年龄(t=0.117,P=0.907),症状持续时间(t=-1.364,P=0.179),随访时间(Z=-0.865,P=0.387)一般资料未见统计学差异,具有可比性。两组小指单丝触觉(Z=-0.990,P=0.322),小指两点辨别觉(Z=-0.447,P=0.655),握力(t=0.711,P=0.481),拇示指侧方捏力(Z=-0.233,P=0.816),运动神经传导速度(Z=-1.438,P=0.150)均未见统计学差异。治疗组小指单丝触觉(Z=-4.391,P=0.000),小指两点辨别觉(Z=-4.506,P=0.000),握力(t=-41.297,P=0.000),拇示指侧方捏力(Z=-4.422,P=0.000),运动神经传导速度(Z=-4.418,P=0.000)均较治疗前有明显改善。对照组小指单丝触觉(Z=-4.430,P=0.000),小指两点辨别觉(Z=-4.526,P=0.000),握力(t=-33.597,P=0.000),拇示指侧方捏力(Z=-4.353,P=0.000),运动神经传导速度(Z=-4.449,P=0.000)均较治疗前有明显改善两组均未出现肘关节疼痛,尺神经半脱位,切口感染等术后并发症。

结论

尺神经原位松解术与松解皮下前移术是安全有效的两种术式,均能明显改善中度肘管综合征患者的运动及感觉,尺神经松解皮下前移术术中及术后出血更多。

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous transposition in the treatment of moderate cubital tunnel syndrome.

Methods

Patients with moderate cubital tunnel syndrome admitted to Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated TCM-WM of Hebei from July 2018 to July 2019 were divided into treatment group (simple decompression group) and control group (anterior subcutaneous transposition group). General information such as gender, age, and duration of symptoms. The Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament of the little finger and two-point discrimination of the little finger were used as the indicators to evaluate the sensory recovery of the patients, and grip strength, pinch strength of the thumb and index, and motor nerve conduction velocity were used as the indicators to evaluate the motor of the patients. The postoperative complications of the two groups were recorded (elbow joint pain, ulnar nerve supracrustal dislocation, and incision infection). Patients in both groups were followed up for at least 12 months, and cross-group and intra-group comparisons were performed (preoperative, 12-month follow up).

Results

A total of 50 patients were included in this study, including 25 patients in the treatment group and 25 patients in the control group. There were no statistically significant differences in gender (χ2=0.081, P=0.777), age (t=0.117, P=0.907), symptom duration (t=-1.364, P=0.179) and follow-up time (Z=-0.865, P=0.387) between the two groups, indicating comparability. Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament of the little finger (Z=-0.990, P=0.322), two-point discrimination of the little finger (Z=-0.447, P=0.655) grip strength (t=0.711, P=0.481), pinch strength of the thumb and index (Z=-0.233, P=0.816), and motor nerve conduction velocity (Z=-1.438, P=0.150) in treatment group were significantly improved compared with those before treatment. Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament of the little finger (Z=-4.430, P=0.000), two-point discrimination of the little finger (Z=-4.526, P=0.000), grip strength (t=-33.597, P=0.000), pinch strength of the thumb and index (Z=-4.353, P=0.000), and motor nerve conduction velocity (Z=-4.449, P=0.000) in control group were significantly improved compared with those before treatment postoperative complications such as elbow pain, ulnar nerve subluxation, and incision infection were not found in both groups.

Conclusions

Simple decompression and Anterior subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve are safe and effective procedures, both of which can significantly improve motor and sensation in patients with moderate cubital tunnel syndrome. Anterior subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve resulted in more intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage.

图1 纳入患者流程图
图2 术中小切口,切口长度约4 cm  图3 术中彻底切开内侧肌间隔,Struthers腱弓,肱骨内上髁,肘管及屈肌及旋前肌腱膜  图4 术中切除约2 cm内侧肌间隔,远端劈开部分尺侧腕屈肌起始段  图5 术中肘前切取皮下软组织筋膜瓣,约2.5 cm*2.5 cm大小
表1 两组中度肘管综合征患者一般资料比较
表2 两组中度肘管综合征患者观察指标对比
表3 两组中度肘管综合征患者出血量对比
1
FEINDEL W, STRATFORD J. Cubital tunnel compression in tardy ulnar palsy [J]. Can Med Assoc J, 1958, 78(5): 351-353.
2
Bednar MS, Blair SJ, Light TR. Complications of the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome [J]. Hand Clin, 1994, 10(1): 83-92.
3
Lima S, Correia JF, Martins RM, et al. SUBCUTANEOUS ANTERIOR TRANSPOSITION FOR TREATMENT OF CUBITAL TUNNEL SYNDROME: IS THIS METHOD SAFE AND EFFECTIVE? [J]. Rev Bras Ortop, 2012, 47(6): 748-753.
4
袁宇,彭志恒,徐林.肘管综合征的诊断及治疗进展[J].实用手外科杂志, 2021, 35(1): 91-96.
5
Thakker A, Gupta VK, Gupta KK. The anatomy, presentation and management options of cubital tunnel syndrome [J]. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol, 2020, 25(4): 393-401.
6
顾玉东.腕管综合征与肘管综合征的临床分型现状与建议[J].中华骨科杂志, 2011, 31(7): 818-819.
7
Dellon AL, Hament W, Gittelshon A. Nonoperative management of cubital tunnel syndrome: an 8-year prospective study [J]. Neurology, 1993, 43(9): 1673-1677.
8
Chan RC, Paine KW, Varughese G. Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: comparison of simple decompression and anterior transposition [J]. Neurosurgery, 1980, 7(6): 545-550.
9
Asami A, Morisawa K, Tsuruta T. Functional outcome of anterior transposition of the vascularized ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome [J]. J Hand Surg Br, 1998, 23(5): 613-616.
10
Caputo AE, Watson HK. Subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve for failed decompression of cubital tunnel syndrome [J]. J Hand Surg Am, 2000, 25(3): 544-551.
11
Osterman AL, Spiess AM. Medial epicondylectomy [J]. Hand Clin, 2007, 23(3): 329-337, vi.
12
Schnabl SM, Kisslinger F, Schramm A, et al. Objective outcome of partial medial epicondylectomy in cubital tunnel syndrome [J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2010, 130(12): 1549-1556.
13
Boone SA, Gelberman RH, Calfee RP. The management of cubital tunnel syndrome [J]. J Hand Surg Am, 2015, 40(9): 1897-1904; quiz 1904.
14
Caliandro P, La Torre G, Padua R, et al. Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2016, 11(11): CD006839.
15
Zlowodzki M, Chan S, Bhandari M, et al. Anterior transposition compared with simple decompression for treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome [J]. Journal of Bone&Joint Surgery American Volume,2007, 89 (12): 2591-2598.
16
Cirpar M, Turker M, Ozuak CS. Distal medial epicondylectomy. A modification of partial medial epicondylectomy for cubital tunnel syndrome: preliminary results [J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2012, 132(11): 1569-1575.
17
Bartels RHMA, Verhagen WIM, van der Wilt GJ, et al. Prospective randomized controlled study comparing simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous transposition for idiopathic neuropathy of the ulnar nerve at the elbow: Part 1 [J]. Neurosurgery, 2005, 56(3): 522-530; discussion 522-30.
18
彭凯,张博闻,高剑,等.尺神经筋膜下前置术与原位减压术治疗中度肘管综合征的临床疗效[J].宁夏医学杂志, 2021, 43(9): 789-791.
19
Iba K, Wada T, Aoki M, et al. Intraoperative measurement of pressure adjacent to the ulnar nerve in patients with cubital tunnel syndrome [J]. J Hand Surg Am, 2006, 31(4): 553-558.
20
Hutchinson DT, Sullivan R, Sinclair MK. Long-term Reoperation Rate for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome:Subcutaneous Transposition Versus In Situ Decompression [J]. Hand (N Y), 2019, 16(4): 447-452.
21
Krogue JD, Aleem AW, Osei DA, et al. Predictors of surgical revision after in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve [J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2015, 24(4): 634-639.
22
Macadam SA, Gandhi R, Bezuhly M, et al. Simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous and submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis [J]. J Hand Surg Am, 2008, 33(8): 1314.e1-1314.12.
23
马将,李红,史万英,等.任务导向性训练对上肢周围神经损伤患者肌电图及手功能的影响[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2020, 6(3): 159-164.
24
杨占宇,王旼娴,龙青燕,等.手法淋巴引流结合肌内效贴治疗中早期手碾压伤患者肿胀的临床研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2021, 7(3): 164-169.
25
Huang W, Zhang PX, Peng Z, et al. Anterior subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve improves neurological function in patients with cubital tunnel syndrome [J]. Neural Regen Res, 2015, 10(10): 1690-1695.
26
Liu XH, Gong MQ, Wang Y, et al. Anterior subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve affects elbow range of motion: a mean 13.5 years of follow-up [J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2018, 131(3): 282-288.
27
Dunn JC, Goddard R, Eckhoff MD, et al. Retrospective, nonrandomized analysis of subcutaneous anterior transposition versus in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve of military service members [J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2019, 28(4): 751-756.
28
Altay T, Yamak K, Koyuncu Ş, et al. Comparison of simple decompression and anterior subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome [J]. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil, 2018, 20(6): 475-481.
[1] 李杨, 宁雅婵, 郭连瑞, 佟铸, 李立强, 孟良, 谷涌泉. 腘动脉松解术治疗腘动脉陷迫综合征一例并文献复习[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(03): 273-275.
[2] 汪学伦, 丁俊涛, 方荣新. 开腹手术、高频电刀与超声刀治疗粘连性肠梗阻疗效分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2011, 05(05): 395-398.
[3] 《造口旁疝专家微共识:腹膜外Sugarbaker修补技术》编审委员会, 《中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)》编辑委员会, 全国卫生产业企业管理协会疝和腹壁外科产业及临床研究分会造口旁疝专家组. 造口旁疝专家微共识:腹膜外Sugarbaker修补技术[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 243-246.
[4] 王平, 黄永刚, 叶静, 高国栋, 张方捷, 吴浩. 腹横肌松解术在腹壁巨大切口疝修补中的临床应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(03): 194-198.
[5] 刘颂, 张喜成, 孙元, 黄献琛, 卢杏生. 腹腔镜治疗中弓韧带压迫综合征[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(06): 370-375.
[6] 白志钢, 新苏雅拉图, 谢迎光, 奥其. 肘关节僵硬手术松解治疗的研究进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 175-180.
[7] 新苏雅拉图, 刘峰, 高雨, 高晓宇, 谢迎光. 关节镜松解术治疗肘关节僵硬的疗效观察[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 239-243.
[8] 王伟, 李世英, 郭晓平, 张桐桐, 高星, 孟玉凤, 贾芳莹. 坚骨胶囊联合关节镜和尺神经松解术治疗肘关节骨关节炎伴尺神经卡压综合征的临床研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(02): 141-147.
[9] 熊晨, 张堃, 何晓, 杨佳瑞, 何昌军, 黄伟, 朱养均, 衡立松. 张力性支具结合开放松解术治疗肘关节僵硬的初步疗效分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(03): 257-262.
[10] 李先锋, 熊燕, 唐新, 李箭. 局部使用氨甲环酸在关节镜下肘关节松解中的临床效果[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2020, 08(04): 347-351.
[11] 李鹭鹭, 张永进, 何崇儒, 鞠泽亚, 周至游, 刘洋, 汪滋民. O’Driscoll四步法关节镜下肘关节松解术治疗肘关节僵硬的疗效分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2019, 07(03): 231-237.
[12] 谢芳, 潘世琴, 孙丽娟, 孙晓林, 潘信然, 张爽. ICU患者双上肢握力及髋关节屈曲拉力水平及其影响因素[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2021, 07(03): 228-232.
[13] 苏小平, 潘世琴, 蒋明霞, 孙丽娟, 孙晓林. ICU患者住院期间肢体握力及拉力的变化趋势[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2021, 07(02): 149-152.
[14] 王思达, 周松, 谢春成. 慢性偏头痛的外科治疗体会[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(01): 38-40.
阅读次数
全文


摘要