切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (02) : 73 -80. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2023.02.002

关节置换

SuperPATH微创全髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的学习曲线研究与临床应用价值分析
刘璇, 胡正霞, 王晓东, 兰海, 李开南()   
  1. 610081 成都大学附属医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-27 出版日期:2023-04-05
  • 通信作者: 李开南
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2019YFB1311403); 四川省科技计划项目(2016FZ0066)

Learning curve and clinical application value of SuperPATH minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in the elderly

Xuan Liu, Zhengxia Hu, Xiaodong Wang, Hai Lan, Kainan Li()   

  1. Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital&Clinical Medical Collage of Chengdu University, Chengdu 610081, China
  • Received:2022-06-27 Published:2023-04-05
  • Corresponding author: Kainan Li
引用本文:

刘璇, 胡正霞, 王晓东, 兰海, 李开南. SuperPATH微创全髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的学习曲线研究与临床应用价值分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 73-80.

Xuan Liu, Zhengxia Hu, Xiaodong Wang, Hai Lan, Kainan Li. Learning curve and clinical application value of SuperPATH minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in the elderly[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2023, 09(02): 73-80.

目的

探讨"SuperPATH"微创全髋关节置换术的学习曲线并分析其临床应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析2014年8月至2018年12月本院采用"SuperPATH"微创全髋关节置换术连续治疗的85例老年股骨颈骨折伴重度骨质疏松患者资料,其中男性24例,女性61例;年龄57~70岁,平均(62,3.3)岁。手术均同一医疗组完成。按接受手术的先后顺序分为4组(N=85,n=21,21,21,22)。比较各组手术时间、手术切口长度、术中出血量、围手术期并发症、髋臼假体前倾角以及术后6周Harris髋关节评分,采用对数曲线回归分析方法反映手术时间随手术例数变化的趋势[y=aln(x)+bx为手术例数,y为手术时间]。

结果

85例患者均获得完整随访,随访率100%,随访时间5~12个月,中位随访时间8个月。四组患者年龄、性别、分型、受伤至手术时间等一般情况差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性。四组均未发生坐骨神经损伤(n=0),组A有1例围手术期髋关节假体脱位,组A、B各有1例术后切口感染,各组围手术期并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后6周Harris髋关节评分组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。四组手术时间:(122.05±6.13)min,(115.43±9.22)min,(106.71±7.23)min,(98.64±4.46)min,四组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),组A、B分别与组C、D比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),C组,D组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),In对数曲线回归分析结果显示,随着手术例数的增加,总手术时间(y=8.778ln(x)+141.11,r2=0.5158,P<0.01)减少,在C组、D组相对稳定。四组间术中出血量、手术切口长度、术后髋臼假体前倾角比较有统计学意义(P<0.01)。

结论

"SuperPATH"微创全髋关节置换术疗效稳定确切但存在学习曲线。总手术时间、手术切口长度、术中出血量随手术例数增加而减小,髋臼假体前倾角随手术例数增加而接近理想前倾角20°,学习曲线可较快达到平稳,适合临床推广。

Objective

To explore the learning curve of SuperPATH minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty and evaluate its clinical application value.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted of consecutive 85 osteoporotic femoral neck fracture patients who had been treated with SuperPATH minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty from August 2014 to December 2018 at Department of Orthopedic, Affiliated Hospital/Clinical Medical Collage of Chengdu University. There were 24 males and 61 females, with an average age of (62±3.3) years (57-70 years). All operations were completed by the same medical group.The patients were divided into 4 groups (n=85) according to the date of operations: group A (n=21), group B (n=21), group C (n=21) and group D (n=22). The operative time, incision length, intraoperative hemorrhage, perioperative complications, anteversion of acetabular prosthesis and Harris hip score at 6 weeks were statistically analyzed and compared between 4 groups. The Log curve regression analysis was used to reflect the change trend of operation time with the number of operation cases. [y=aln(x)+b, x indicating the number of surgical cases, y operation time].

Results

85 patients were fully followed up, with a follow-up rate of 100%. The follow-up time was 5 to 12 months, with a median follow-up time of 8 months. The 4 groups were comparable due to insignificant difference in age, gender, fracture type, time from injury to operation. There was no sciatic nerve injury in the four groups (n=0) but one hip prosthesis dislocation in group A and one incision infection in group B showing no significant difference in each group (9.5%, 4.7%, 0%, 0%) (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in Harris hip score between 4 groups at six weeks after operation. The operation time for the 4 groups respectively (122.05±6.13)min,(115.43±9.22)min, (106.71±7.23)min, (98.64±4.46) min showing significant differences between 4 groups (P<0.01) and significant differences between group A and B versus group C and D (P<0.01) but no significant differences between group C and D (P>0.05). The Log curve regression analysis showed that the operation time [y=8.778ln(x)+141.11, r2=0.5158, P<0.01] decreased significantly with the increase of operation number but stable in group C and D. There were significant differences among the four groups in the intraoperative hemorrhage (ML), incision length (CM) and the anteversion of acetabular prosthesis (P<0.01).

Conclusions

The perioperative complications rate and postoperative hip Harris score of SuperPATH minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty does not change with the number of cases increased but the operation time, incision length and intraoperative hemorrhage decreased significantly with the increase of the number of cases.The anteversion angle of acetabulum prosthesis was close to the ideal anteversion angle of 20° with the increase of the number of cases. The SuperPATH minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty has learning curve but becomes stable very fast, indicating the technique is easy to learn.

表1 四组接受SuperPATH手术患者年龄、性别、骨折类型、受伤至手术天数的比较
图2~9 SuperPATH手术技术,男性,68岁,跌伤致左股骨颈骨折。图2 术前X线;图3 标记大转子的顶点和股骨干的中轴;图4 从臀小肌和梨状肌之间的间隙显露髋后上关节囊;图5 从小到大插入SuperPATH专用髓腔锉;图6 将两枚Schanz钉插入股骨头,以便取出股骨头;图7 建立经皮工作套管研磨髋臼;图8 在取出组件后,将最终的头部和颈部插入并重新复位;图9 术后复查
图10 手术时间与病例数拟合关系图,y=-8.778ln(x)+141.11,r2=0.5158,其中x为手术例数,y为手术时间
表2 四组接受SuperPATH手术患者手术时间、术中出血量、手术切口长度、术后髋臼假体前倾角以及术后6周Harris髋关节评分的比较(±s
表3 老年股骨颈骨折伴重度骨质疏松患者平台期前后相关指标的比较(±s
图11 术后髋臼假体前倾角=arcsina/ba为髋臼假体杯出口椭圆短轴长度,b为髋臼假体杯出口椭圆长轴,平台期后假体前倾角可以达到理想的20度左右注:图中所示SuperPATH微创入路采用的假体为组配式假体,优势在于避免切口过小导致的头颈部假体置入困难
1
Hedbeck, Carl, Johan, et al. Comparison of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty with Total Hip Arthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2011.
2
Dorr LD, Maheshwari AV, Long WT, et al. Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty. A prospetive randomized,blinded study [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2007, 89(6): 1153.
3
Paillard P. Hip replacement by a minimal anterior approach [J]. Int Orthop, 2007, 31(Suppl 1): S13-S15.
4
Bal BS, Haltom D, Aleto T, et al. Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with a two-incision minimally invasive technique [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2005, 87(11): 2432-2438.
5
Speranza A, Iorio R, Ferretti M, et al. A lateral minimal incision technique in total hip replacement: a prospective,randomized,controlled trial [J]. Hip International, 2007, 17(1): 4-8.
6
Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Meneghini RM, et al. Slower recovery after two incision than mini posterior incision total hip arthroplasty [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2008, 90(5): 1000-1006.
7
Fink B, Mittelstaedt A, Schulz MS, et al. Comparison of a minimally invasive posterior approach and the standard posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty A prospective and comparative study [J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2010, 5(1): 46.
8
Procyk S. Initial results with a mini-posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty [J]. Int Orthop, 2007, 31(Suppl 1): S17-S20.
9
Chow J, Penenberg B, Murphy S. Modified micro-superior percutaneously-assisted total hip: early experiences & case reports [J]. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med, 2011, 4(3): 146-150.
10
Chow JC, Torre PKD, Fitch DA. SuperPATH and Micro superior Total Hip Arthroplasty [M]// Minimally Invasive Surgery in Orthopedics. Springer International Publishing, 2016.
11
Amanatullah DF, Masini MA, Roger DJ, et al. Greater inadvertent muscle damage in direct anterior approach when compared with the direct superior approach for total hip arthroplasty [J]. Bone Joint J, 2016, 98-B(8): 1036-1042.
12
贾建波,禹宝庆,吴良浩.微创SuperPath入路人工股骨头置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的近期疗效[J].中华创伤骨科杂志, 2016, 18(11):938-944.
13
张涵,员晋,兰海. Super PATH微创髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志, 2018, 20(5): 400-406.
14
Penenberg Brad L, Bolling W Seth, Riley Michelle, et al. Percutaneously assisted total hip arthroplasty (PATH): A preliminary report[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2008, 90 (6): 209.
15
Gofton W, Chow J, Olsen KD, et al. Thirty-day readmission rate and discharge status following total hip arthroplasty using the supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip surgical technique [J]. Int Orthop, 2015, 39(5): 847-851.
16
Glassou, EN, Hansen, et al. Association between hospital procedure volume and risk of revision after total hip arthroplasty: a population based study within the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association database [J]. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 24(3): 419-426.
17
Glassou Eva N, Pedersen Alma B, Hansen Torben B. Risk of readmission, reoperation, and mortality within 90 days of total hip and knee arthroplasty in fast track departments in Denmark from 2005 to 2011 [J]. Acta Orthopaedica, 2014, 85(5): 493-500.
18
Rasuli Kevin J, Gofton Wade. Percutaneously assisted total hip (PATH) and Supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip (SuperPATH) arthroplasty: Learning curves and early outcomes [J]. Ann Transl Med, 2015, 3(13): 179.
19
Hamilton WG, Parks NL, McDonald JF, et al. A Prospective, Randomized Study of Surgical Positioning Software Shows Improved Cup Placement in Total Hip Arthroplasty [J]. Orthop, 2019, 42(1): 42-47.
20
Chow J, Fitch DA. In-hospital costs for total hip replacement performed using the supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip replacement surgical technique [J]. Int Orthop, 2017, 41(6): 1119-1123.
21
Bodrogi AW, Sciortino R, Fitch DA, et al. Use of the supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip approach for femoral neck fractures: surgical technique and case series [J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2016, 11(1): 113.
22
Della Torre Paul K, Fitch David A, Chow James C. Supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip arthroplasty: Radiographic outcomes and surgical technique [J]. Ann Transl Med, 2015, 3(13): 180.
23
孙茂淋,何锐,张颖,等. SuperPATH入路微创全髋关节置换术与加速康复[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2019, 12(4): 316-320.
24
邱晓,黄钢勇,吴建国,等. ERAS结合SuperPATH入路人工股骨头置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2021, 07(05): 264-270.

URL    
25
Avshalumov S, Frane N, Stapleton E J, et al. SuperPATH Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Technical Review and Early Experience [J]. JBJS, 2021, 9(4): e21.00015
[1] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[2] 邓华梅, 袁札根, 曾德荣, 潘珊珊, 张葆青, 欧爱华, 曹学伟. 全膝关节置换术中气压止血带应用效果与影响因素分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 788-794.
[3] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[4] 李培杰, 乔永杰, 张浩强, 曾健康, 谭飞, 李嘉欢, 王静, 周胜虎. 细菌培养阴性的假体周围感染诊治的最新进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 827-833.
[5] 林文, 王雨萱, 许嘉悦, 王矜群, 王睿娜, 何董源, 樊沛. 人工关节置换登记系统的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 834-841.
[6] 闫文, 谢兴文, 顾玉彪, 雷宁波, 马成, 于文霞, 高亚雄, 张磊. 微小RNA与全膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 842-846.
[7] 贺敬龙, 尚宏喜, 郝敏, 谢伟, 高明宏, 孙炜, 刘安庆. 重度类风湿关节炎患者行多关节置换术的临床手术疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 860-864.
[8] 孟繁宇, 周新社, 赵志, 裴立家, 刘犇. 侧位直接前方入路髋关节置换治疗偏瘫肢体股骨颈骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 865-870.
[9] 王宏宇. 固定与活动平台假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 871-876.
[10] 李善武, 叶永杰, 王兵, 王子呓, 银毅, 孙官军, 张大刚. 胫骨高位截骨与单髁置换的早期疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 882-888.
[11] 李辉, 吴奇, 张子琦, 张晗, 王仿, 许鹏. 日间全膝关节置换术早期疗效及标准化流程探索[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 889-892.
[12] 王竟楠, 赵吉宏. 从微创到功能:牙槽外科的必由之路[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 381-385.
[13] 李炳根, 龚独辉, 赖泽如, 聂向阳. 产后腹直肌分离全腔镜下肌后/腹膜外补片修补术的临床研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 724-727.
[14] 邱朋, 邓正栋, 王剑明. 肝内胆管结石微创治疗策略[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 591-596.
[15] 李岩松, 李涛, 张元鸣飞, 李志鹏, 周谋望. 头戴式虚拟现实设备辅助全膝关节置换术后康复的初步研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 676-681.
阅读次数
全文


摘要