切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (05) : 290 -295. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2022.05.007

髋部骨折

多学科协作构建老年髋部骨折"绿色通道"
李宁1, 杨明辉1, 朱仕文1, 张萍2, 吴新宝1, 蒋协远1,()   
  1. 1. 100035 北京积水潭医院创伤骨科
    2. 100035 北京积水潭医院老年医学科
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-28 出版日期:2022-10-05
  • 通信作者: 蒋协远
  • 基金资助:
    北京市医院管理中心"青苗"计划(QML20190402); 北京积水潭医院"学科骨干"培养计划(XKGG201808)

"Green Pathway" with a multidisciplinary approach in geriatric hip fractures

Ning Li1, Minghui Yang1, Shiwen Zhu1, Ping Zhang2, Xinbao Wu1, Xieyuan Jiang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China
    2. Department of Geriatrics, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China
  • Received:2022-04-28 Published:2022-10-05
  • Corresponding author: Xieyuan Jiang
引用本文:

李宁, 杨明辉, 朱仕文, 张萍, 吴新宝, 蒋协远. 多学科协作构建老年髋部骨折"绿色通道"[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 290-295.

Ning Li, Minghui Yang, Shiwen Zhu, Ping Zhang, Xinbao Wu, Xieyuan Jiang. "Green Pathway" with a multidisciplinary approach in geriatric hip fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2022, 08(05): 290-295.

目的

评价新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情前后多学科协作模式治疗老年髋部骨折的效果,探索常态化疫情防控形势下进一步完善临床诊疗路径的突破点。

方法

回顾性收集自2019年1月至2020年12月间北京积水潭医院老年创伤骨科以多学科协作模式治疗的老年髋部骨折患者的相关信息进行分析比较,包括年龄、性别、骨折类型、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分、手术治疗率、受伤至急诊时间、急诊至入院时间、入院至手术时间、入院48 h内手术率、住院时间、围手术期并发症发生率及院内死亡率等。

结果

本研究共纳入老年髋部骨折患者2 275例,平均年龄79.7岁(65~105岁);男性663例(29.1%),女性1 612例(70.9%);股骨颈骨折1 219例(53.6%),股骨粗隆间骨折1 016例(44.7%),股骨粗隆下骨折40例(1.8%);ASA评分高分级占比49.6%;手术治疗率为97.7%;院内死亡率为0.2%(4例)。相较于2019年,2020年所收治患者受伤至急诊平均时间明显延长(1.7 d VS. 3.4 d,P=0.000),急诊至入院平均时间无明显变化(23.4 h VS. 24.0 h,P=0.109),入院至手术平均时间略有增长(30.7 h VS. 38.3 h,P=0.000),入院48 h内手术率有所下降(82.1% VS. 72.4%,P=0.000),平均住院时间略有延长(4.1 d VS. 4.3 d,P=0.005);围手术期并发症发生率明显增加(16.9% VS. 22.5%,P=0.001),主要体现在压疮、肺部感染及泌尿系感染的发生率明显上升。

结论

基于多学科协作的老年髋部骨折"绿色通道"诊疗模式院内死亡率极低;有效地缩短术前等待时间,可能降低围手术期并发症发生率。

Objective

This research aims to evaluate the efficacy of multidisciplinary care model in the management of geriatric hip fractures before and after COVID-19 pandemic and explore the breakthrough of the clinical pathway optimization in the situation of routine epidemic prevention and control.

Methods

The elderly patients with hip fracture treated with a multidisciplinary approach in the Department of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Traumatology of Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from January 2019 to December 2020 were included. The clinical data including age, gender, fracture type, ASA score, surgical treatment rate, time from injury to emergency, time from emergency to admission, time from admission to operation, operation rate within 48 hours of admission, length of stay, incidence of perioperative complications and in-hospital mortality were collected retrospectively and analyzed.

Results

A total of 2275 elderly patients with hip fracture were enrolled, in which 663 males (29.1%) and 1612 females (70.9%). The average age was 79.7 y (65-105 y). There were 1219 cases of femoral neck fracture (53.6%), 1016 cases of trochanteric fracture (44.7%), and 40 cases of subtrochanteric fracture (1.8%). High ASA score accounted for 49.6%. The surgical treatment rate was 97.7%. The in-hospital mortality rate was 0.2% (4 cases). Compared with 2019, in 2020, the average time from injury to emergency was significantly longer (1.7 d VS. 3.4 d, P=0.000); the average time from emergency to admission was unchanged (23.4 h VS. 24.0 h, P=0.109); the average time from admission to operation increased slightly (30.7 h VS. 38.3 h, P=0.000); the operation rate within 48 hours of admission decreased (82.1% VS. 72.4%, P=0.000); the average length of stay was slightly longer (4.1 d VS. 4.3 d, P=0.005); the incidence of perioperative complications increased significantly (16.9% VS. 22.5%, P=0.001), mainly reflected in the increased incidence of bedsore, pneumonia and urinary tract infection.

Conclusions

"Green Pathway" with a multidisciplinary approach is efficient in the management of geriatric hip fractures with an extremely low in-hospital mortality. Effective shortening the waiting time before operation might reduce the incidence of perioperative complications.

表1 2019年与2020年老年髋部骨折患者基本资料比较
表2 2019年与2020年老年髋部骨折临床路径关键指标比较(±s
表3 2019年与2020年老年髋部骨折患者围手术期并发症发生率及院内死亡率比较(%)
1
国家统计局,第七次全国人口普查公报[Z]. 2021.
2
Kammerlander C, Gosch M, Kammerlander-Knauer U, et al. Long-term functional outcome in geriatric hip fracture patients [J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2011, 131(10): 1435-1444.
3
Guzon-Illescas O, Perez Fernandez E, Crespí VN, et al. Mortality after osteoporotic hip fracture: incidence, trends, and associated factors [J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2019, 14(1): 203.
4
吴新宝,杨明辉,张萍,等.老年病科和骨科共管模式缩短老年髋部骨折患者术前等待时间和住院时间[J].骨科临床与研究杂志, 2017, 2(2): 96-100.
5
Roberts KC, Brox WT. AAOS clinical practice guideline:management of hip fractures in the elderly [J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2015, 23(2): 138-140.
6
中国老年医学学会骨与关节分会创伤骨科学术工作委员会.老年髋部骨折诊疗专家共识(2017) [J].中华创伤骨科杂志, 2017, 19(11): 1671-7600.
7
吴新宝,杨明辉.谈谈老年髋部骨折患者手术治疗的几个问题[J].中国骨与关节杂志, 2017, 6(3): 161-162.
8
Grigoryan KV, Javedan H, Rudolph JL. Orthogeriatric care models and outcomes in hip fracture patients:a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2014, 28(3): e49-e55.
9
Baroni M, Serra R, Boccardi V, et al. The orthogeriatric comanagement improves clinical outcomes of hip fracture in older adults [J]. Osteoporos Int, 2019, 30(4): 907-916.
10
李宁,杨明辉,李新萍,等.老年髋部骨折中"骨折联络服务"的初步临床效果[J].骨科临床与研究杂志, 2017, 2(5): 287-292.
11
杨明辉,王颢,李文菁,等.骨科和老年科共同管理模式治疗老年人髋部骨折的疗效分析[J].中华老年医学杂志, 2018, 37(12): 1312-1315.
12
Crozier-Shaw G, Hughes AJ, Conlon B, et al. Hip fracture care during Covid-19: a regional trauma centre’s experience [J]. Ir J Med Sci, 2021, 190(4): 1275-1280.
13
Bub CD, Larsen CG, Heimroth J, et al. Hip fracture trends and outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic [J]. Orthopedics, 2021, 44(5): 293-298.
14
Anusitviwat C, Vanitcharoenkul E, Chotiyarnwong P, et al. Surgical treatment for fragility hip fractures during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in lower short-term postoperative functional outcome and a higher complication rate compared to the pre-pandemic period [J]. Osteoporosis International, 2022, 33(10): 2217-2226.
15
Rowe KA, Kim K, Varady NH, et al. Comparative outcomes and surgical timing for operative fragility hip fracture patients during the COVID-19 pandemic:a retrospective cohort study [J]. Geriatrics (Basel), 2022, 7(4): 84.
16
Wang KC, Xiao R, Cheung ZB, et al. Early mortality after hip fracture surgery in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Orthop, 2020, 22: 584-591.
17
Simunovic N, Devereaux PJ, Sprague S, et al. Effect of early surgery after hip fracture on mortality and complications:systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. CMAJ, 2010, 182(15): 1609-1616.
18
Sasabuchi Y, Matsui H, Lefor AK, et al. Timing of surgery for hip fractures in the elderly:A retrospective cohort study [J]. Injury, 2018, 49(10): 1848-1854.
19
Elkbuli A, Eily A, Polcz V, et al. Isolated hip fracture in the elderly and time to surgery:is there an outcome difference? [J]. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open, 2018, 3(1): e000212.
20
Shin WC, Woo SH, Lee SJ, et al. Preoperative prevalence of and risk factors for venous thromboembolism in patients with a hip fracture:an indirect multidetector CT venography study [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2016, 98(24): 2089-2095.
21
Shin WC, Lee SM, Suh KT. Recent updates of the diagnosis and prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with a hip fracture [J]. Hip Pelvis, 2017, 29(3): 159-167.
22
王京,杨明辉,孙旭,等.老年髋部骨折患者术前下肢深静脉血栓形成的危险因素分析[J].医学综述, 2018, 24(23): 4581-4585.
23
National Clinical Guideline Centre (UK). The Management of Hip Fracture in Adults [Internet]. London: Royal College of Physicians (UK); 2011. PMID: 22420011.
24
Kelly-Pettersson P, Samuelsson B, Muren O, et al. Waiting time to surgery is correlated with an increased risk of serious adverse events during hospital stay in patients with hip-fracture: A cohort study [J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2017, 69: 91-97.
25
Chen X, Liao Z, Shen Y, et al. The relationship between Pre-Admission waiting time and the surgical outcomes after hip fracture operation in the elderly [J]. J Nutr Health Aging, 2021, 25(8): 951-955.
[1] 杜滨和, 徐楠, 杨云川, 崔培元. 5项改良衰弱指数预测胰十二指肠切除术近期预后的价值探讨[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 444-448.
[2] 李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[3] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[4] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[5] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[6] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[7] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[8] 曹智, 朱希望, 王尉, 张辉, 杨成林, 张小明. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术中不同肾盂内压力与围术期并发症相关性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 616-620.
[9] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[10] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[11] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[12] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[13] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[14] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
[15] 郭震天, 张宗明, 赵月, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 齐晖, 田坤. 机器学习算法预测老年急性胆囊炎术后住院时间探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 955-961.
阅读次数
全文


摘要