切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (06) : 312 -316. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.06.002

所属专题: 文献

关节

功率自行车对老年髋关节置换患者术后早期功能恢复的疗效分析
高磊1, 瞿玉兴1,(), 高益1, 沈鹏飞1, 王斌1, 郑冲1, 徐建达1, 谢子康1   
  1. 1. 213000 南京中医药大学附属常州市中医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-20 出版日期:2019-12-05
  • 通信作者: 瞿玉兴
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省中医药局科技项目(LZ11137)

Efficacy analysis of postoperative cycle ergometer program for elderly total hip arthroplasty patients

Lei Gao1, Yuxing Qu1,(), Yi Gao1, Pengfei Shen1, Bin Wang1, Chong Zheng1, Jianda Xu1, Zikang Xie1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing university of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changzhou 21300, China
  • Received:2018-11-20 Published:2019-12-05
  • Corresponding author: Yuxing Qu
引用本文:

高磊, 瞿玉兴, 高益, 沈鹏飞, 王斌, 郑冲, 徐建达, 谢子康. 功率自行车对老年髋关节置换患者术后早期功能恢复的疗效分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2019, 05(06): 312-316.

Lei Gao, Yuxing Qu, Yi Gao, Pengfei Shen, Bin Wang, Chong Zheng, Jianda Xu, Zikang Xie. Efficacy analysis of postoperative cycle ergometer program for elderly total hip arthroplasty patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2019, 05(06): 312-316.

目的

探讨早期下肢功率自行车应用对老年髋关节置换患者功能恢复的影响。

方法

前瞻性收集南京中医药大学附属常州市中医院骨科150例行髋关节置换术后两周的患者,根据纳入标准,纳入87例患者,随机分为常规组及常规+自行车训练组。常规训练组患者在康复治疗师指导下进行常规康复训练,常规+自行车训练组患者在常规康复训练基础上进行下肢功率自行车训练。两组患者都于术后8 w、4个月分别采用Harris评分及WOMAC量表对髋关节及全身健康状况进行评定。

结果

两组患者在治疗过程中均未出现严重并发症。WOMAC评分:术后8 w常规+自行车训练组患者髋关节僵硬程度[(26±20)分]较对照组[(26±23)分]改善明显,差异有统计学意义(t=9.765,P<0.05),功能及疼痛评分差异均无统计学意义。术后4个月WOMAC各项评分提示,常规+自行车训练组患者功能[(22±18)分]优于常规训练组[(25±19)分],差异具有统计学意义(t=5.434,P<0.05)。Harris评分:术后8 w及4个月常规+自行车训练组[(82±6)分、(88±12)分]高于同期常规康复训练组[(86±6)分、(82±6)分],差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

老年髋关节置换患者术后早期进行常规康复训练及功率自行车训练,能显著改善患者疼痛及促进患者术后髋关节功能恢复。

Objective

To evaluate the effect of cycle ergometer program for elderly total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients.

Methods

Prospective collected 150 patients underwent hip arthroplasty in the Department of Orthopaedics, Changzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine. Eighty-seven older patients who had received primary hip replacement were included in the study. Patients were divided into 2 treatment groups randomly. Conventional group performed only conventional exercises, and experimental group performed cycle ergometer and conventionalexercises. Patients were evaluated by Hip function and health-related quality of life were evaluated by Harris Hip Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at 8 weeks and 4months after surgery.

Results

There were no serious complications in the treatment of the two groups. WOMAC score: The degree of hip stiffness was (26±20) in experimental group at postoperative 8 weeks, which was significantly improved than that in the regulartraining group (26±23), results was statistically significant (t=9.765, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in functional and pain scores. The WOMAC scores at 4months postoperatively showed that the recovery degree of the experimental group (22±18) was significantly improved compared with the regular training group (25±19), and the difference was statistically significant(t=5.434, P<0.05). Harris score at 8 weeks and 4 months of the experimental group (82±6, 88±12) was higher than the regular training group (86±6, 82±6), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The rehabilitation including cycle ergometer can improve elderly patients' pain and function after the THA.

图1 全膝关节置换术患者采用下肢功率自行车训练
表1 全膝关节置换术前一般基线资料比较
表2 两组全膝关节置换术患者术后8 w及4个月WOMAC及Harris评分比较(分,±s
1
Bagarié I, Sarac H, Borovac JA, et al. Primary total hip arthroplasty: health related quality of life outcomes [J]. Int Orthop, 2014, 38(3): 495-501.
2
Rampazo MK, D’Elboux MJ. The influence of sociodemographic, clinical and functional variables on the quality of life of elderly people with total hip arthroplasty [J]. Rev Bras Fisioter, 2010, 14(3): 244-251.
3
Wood GC, Mclauchlan GJ. Outcome assessment in the elderly after total hip arthroplasty [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2006, 21(3): 398-404.
4
Ritterman S, Rubin LE. Rehabilitation for total joint arthroplasty [J]. R I Med J, 2013, 96(5): 19-22.
5
Brown GA. AAOS clinical practice guideline of osteoarthritis of the knee: evidence-based guideline, 2nd edition [J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2013, 21(9): 577-579.
6
Schwachmeyer V, Damm P, Bender A, et al. In vivo hip joint loading during post-operative physiotherapeutic exercises [J]. 2013, 8(10): e77807.
7
Soderman P. On the validity of the results from the Swedish national total hip arthroplasty register [J]. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl, 2000, 71(296): 1-33.
8
Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fracture: treatment by mold arthroplasty, an end-result study using a new method of result evaluation [J]. J Bone Joint Surg, 1969, 51(4): 737-755.
9
Peter WF, Nelissen RG, Vliet Vlieland TP. Guideline recommendations for post-acute postoperative physiotherapy in total hip and knee arthroplasty: are they used in daily clinical practice [J]. Musculoskeletal Care, 2014, 12(3): 125-131.
10
Geissler A, Scheller-Kreinsen D, Quentin W, et al. Do diagnosis-related groups appropriately explain variations in costs and length of stay of hip replacement [J]. Health Econ, 2012, 21 Suppl2: 103-115.
11
陈晟,戴闽,帅浪,等.早期运动治疗对全髋关节置换术后髋关节功能的影响[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2009, 31(6): 411-413.
12
Judd DL, Dennis DA, Thomas AC, et al. Muscle strength and functional recovery during the first year after THA [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014, 472(2): 654-664.
13
Di Monaco M, Vallero F, Tappero R, et al. Rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of controlled trials on physical exercise programs [J]. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 2009, 45(3): 303-317.
14
毕胜,燕铁斌,王宁华,等.运动控制原理与实践[M].第3版.北京:人民卫生出版社, 2009: 4-16.
15
周开颜,王莉,喻宏.人工全髋关节置换围手术期的教育康复[J].中国康复, 2003, 18(1): 63.
[1] 熊倩, 罗凤. 乳腺癌患者术后康复现状与对策的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 372-374.
[2] 孟繁宇, 周新社, 赵志, 裴立家, 刘犇. 侧位直接前方入路髋关节置换治疗偏瘫肢体股骨颈骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 865-870.
[3] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[4] 董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[5] 豆艺璇, 黄怀, 钱绮雯, 邢然然, 林丽, 白建芳. 低强度吸气肌训练对机械通气患者肺康复的影响[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 370-375.
[6] 吴建永. 单中心2 000例心脏死亡器官捐献肾移植发展与创新[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 0-.
[7] 李雪, 刘文婷, 窦丽婷, 刘叶红. 联合护理在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补中的应用效果分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 750-754.
[8] 郑华蓉, 刘俊, 郑艳, 陈玉莲, 廖子敏. 加速康复外科理念下的集束化护理模式在腹股沟疝修补术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 643-646.
[9] 代芬, 卞士柱. 无创机械通气联合肺康复在肺动脉高压呼吸衰竭治疗中的临床应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 560-562.
[10] 吕瑶, 张婵, 陈建华, 张鸣青. 压力控制容量保证通气模式在腹腔镜肝细胞癌切除术中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 528-533.
[11] 丁晨梦, 胡雪慧, 闫沛, 程乔. 髋部骨折术后患者居家康复体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 365-372.
[12] 中华医学会骨科分会关节学组. 中国髋、膝关节置换日间手术围手术期管理专家共识[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 321-332.
[13] 李美娜, 宋艳丽, 杨姗姗, 李聚彩, 罗慧利, 吕杰. 三联预康复策略在退行性脊柱侧弯患者围术期的应用效果[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 356-364.
[14] 李岩松, 李涛, 张元鸣飞, 李志鹏, 周谋望. 头戴式虚拟现实设备辅助全膝关节置换术后康复的初步研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 676-681.
[15] 赵守法, 王舒, Larissa Miare Vados, Alberto Cantidio Ferreira. 醒脑开窍针刺法结合康复疗法治疗缺血性中风病恢复期的疗效观察[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 151-155.
阅读次数
全文


摘要