切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (03) : 132 -136. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.002

所属专题: 文献

髋关节

个体化围手术期方案在高龄股骨转子间骨折治疗中的应用
张晟1, 余斌1,()   
  1. 1. 510515 广州,南方医科大学南方医院创伤骨科
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-15 出版日期:2018-06-05
  • 通信作者: 余斌
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目资助(81401777); 广东省自然科学基金资助(2015A030310396)

The clinical experience of the perioperative management of intertrochanteric fracture with elderly highrisk patients

Sheng Zhang1, Bin Yu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedic & Trauma, Nan Fang Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical Unversity, Guangzhou 510515, China
  • Received:2017-08-15 Published:2018-06-05
  • Corresponding author: Bin Yu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yu Bin, Email:
引用本文:

张晟, 余斌. 个体化围手术期方案在高龄股骨转子间骨折治疗中的应用[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2018, 04(03): 132-136.

Sheng Zhang, Bin Yu. The clinical experience of the perioperative management of intertrochanteric fracture with elderly highrisk patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2018, 04(03): 132-136.

目的

分析个体化围手术期治疗方案在高龄转子间骨折治疗中的应用效果。

方法

回顾性分析南方医科大学南方医院2008年7月至2016年1月收治的87例复杂高龄(80岁以上)股骨转子间骨折患者的资料,入院后评估患者心肺及认知能力、术前活动能力、骨折类型、个体化制定手术放案(髓内钉,髓外固定或外固定架)及麻醉方案(腰麻或筋膜阻滞),如无法手术则行保守治疗,记录患者入院至手术时间、术中出血量、手术时间、并发症发生率、30 d内死亡率、1年内死亡率、术后Harris评分及SF-36评分等来总结个体化治疗高龄患者的应用效果。

结果

78例患者接受手术治疗,平均受伤至手术时间为(35±8)h(12~78 h),平均手术时间为(63±14)min(15~98 min),平均术中失血量为(263±121)ml(47~795 ml)。随访1年,8例患者伤后30 d内死亡,30 d死亡率为9.2%,另15例患者伤后12个月内死亡,1年内死亡率为26.4%,15例患者死于肺部感染,5例心功能衰竭,2例泌尿系感染,1例肺栓塞;2例患者发生手术相关并发症从而导致内固定失效,无医源性骨折发生;术后1年平均Harris评分为(73±4)分(66~87分),SF-36评分较术前显著改善。

结论

高龄转子间骨折患者通过个体化术前合并症评估,制定个体化麻醉及手术方案,并尽可能伤后48 h内手术,有望降低死亡率并提高患者生存质量。

Objective

To conclude clinical experience of the perioperative management of intertrochanteric fracture with advanced patients.

Methods

Data of 87 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture (over 80 years old) admitted from July 2008 to January 2016 in Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University were analyzed. Cardiopulmonary and cognitive abilities, preoperative activities, fracture type were carefully recorded, individualized surgical release (intramedullary nail, extramedullary fixation or external fixator) and anesthesia program (spinal anesthesia or fascia block) were designed accordingly. If surgery was not applicable conservative treatment would be used. The duration from to operation, blood loss, intro-operative time, mortality rate, complication rate, 30 d motality, 1 year motality, Harris score and SF-36 score were recorded for analysis.

Results

Seventy-eight cases were treated operatively, the average time from injury to surgery is (35±8) h (12-78 h). The average intro-operative time is (63±14) min (15-98 min), blood lose is (263±121) ml (47-795 ml). Patients were followed up for 1 year, 8 patients died within 30 days after injury, the mortality rate was 9.2% after 30 days. The other 15 patients died within 12 months after injury, the mortality rate within 1 year was 26.4%. Fifteen patients died of lung disease and 5 cases of heart failure, 2 cases out of urinary tract infection and 1 case of pulmonary embolism. 2 patients had operation-related complications resulting in internal fixation failure and no iatrogenic fracture. The Harris score at 1 year after operation was 66-87 points with an average of (73±4) points, SF-36 score was significantly improved compared with the preoperative.

Conclusion

Individualized preoperative comorbidities evaluation, individualized anesthesia and surgical protocols and ensure surgery performing within 48 hours for elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures is possible to reduce mortality and improve patient quality of life.

表1 64例高龄转子间骨折患者危险度评分
表2 64例高龄转子间骨折患者术前与术后1年SF-36评分比较(分,±s
1
Desjardins AL, Roy A, Paiement G, et al. Unstable intertrochanteric fracture of the femur. A prospective randomised study comparing anatomical reduction and medial displacement osteotomy [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1993, 75(3): 445-447.
2
Nicholas JA. Preoperative optimization and risk assessment [J]. Clin Geriatr Med, 2014, 30(2): 207-218.
3
Marsland D, Colvin PL, Mears SC, et al. How to optimize patients for geriatric fracture surgery [J]. Osteoporos Int, 2010, 21(Suppl 4): 535-546.
4
Cenzer IS, Tang V, Boscardin WJ, et al. One-Year mortality after hip fracture: development and validation of a prognostic index [J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2016, 64(9): 1863-1868.
5
Liema IS, Kammerlander C, Suhm N, et al. Identifying a standard set of outcome parameters for the evaluation of orthogeriatric co-management for hip fractures [J]. Injury, 2013, 44(11): 1403-1412.
6
Liem IS, Kammerlander C, Suhm N, Kates SL, Blauth M. Literature review of outcome parameters used in studies of geriatric fracture centers [J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2014, 134(2): 181-187.
7
Kates SL, Mendelson DA, Friedman SM. The value of an organized fracture program for the elderly: early results [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2011, 25(4): 233-237.
8
Theodoros TH, Sheikh H, Stone MH, et al. Pain relief management following proximal femora fractures: Options, issues and controversies [J]. Injury, 2015, 46 Suppl: 52-58.
[1] 中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组, 广东省医学会骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病分会, 广东省佛山市顺德区第三人民医院. 中国髋部脆性骨折术后抗骨质疏松药物临床干预指南(2023年版)[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 751-764.
[2] 董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[3] 刘丹丹, 宋鸣, 李霞, 徐夏君. 老年髋部骨折术后便秘的影响因素及其列线图预测模型[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 607-612.
[4] 付佳, 肖海敏, 武曦, 冯涛, 师帅. 年龄校正查尔森合并症指数对腹腔镜结直肠癌围手术期并发症的预测价值[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 336-341.
[5] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[6] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[7] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[8] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[9] 朱青青, 卫贞祺. 腹股沟疝患者围手术期自我能效管理探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-777.
[10] 刘琪, 王殿琛, 符洋. 复杂腹壁疝诊疗问题与要点[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 504-508.
[11] 朱迪, 欧阳钒, 杨丹, 华敏, 吴倩. 双轨护理在老年腹股沟疝无张力修补术围手术期的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 630-634.
[12] 张汪, 徐淑英, 张爱华, 夏芬荣, 汪露. 手术室体温护理结合细节护理干预在老年腹股沟疝围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 635-638.
[13] 蓝冰, 王怀明, 王辉, 马波. 局部晚期结肠癌膀胱浸润的研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 505-511.
[14] 中华医学会骨科分会关节学组. 中国髋、膝关节置换日间手术围手术期管理专家共识[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 321-332.
[15] 苏鹏, 吕会来, 温士旺, 黄超, 张缜, 田子强. 全腔镜下食管癌根治术围手术期呼吸系统并发症发生的危险因素分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 294-298.
阅读次数
全文


摘要