切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (03) : 132 -136. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.002

所属专题: 文献

髋关节

个体化围手术期方案在高龄股骨转子间骨折治疗中的应用
张晟1, 余斌1,()   
  1. 1. 510515 广州,南方医科大学南方医院创伤骨科
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-15 出版日期:2018-06-05
  • 通信作者: 余斌
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目资助(81401777); 广东省自然科学基金资助(2015A030310396)

The clinical experience of the perioperative management of intertrochanteric fracture with elderly highrisk patients

Sheng Zhang1, Bin Yu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedic & Trauma, Nan Fang Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical Unversity, Guangzhou 510515, China
  • Received:2017-08-15 Published:2018-06-05
  • Corresponding author: Bin Yu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yu Bin, Email:
引用本文:

张晟, 余斌. 个体化围手术期方案在高龄股骨转子间骨折治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2018, 04(03): 132-136.

Sheng Zhang, Bin Yu. The clinical experience of the perioperative management of intertrochanteric fracture with elderly highrisk patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2018, 04(03): 132-136.

目的

分析个体化围手术期治疗方案在高龄转子间骨折治疗中的应用效果。

方法

回顾性分析南方医科大学南方医院2008年7月至2016年1月收治的87例复杂高龄(80岁以上)股骨转子间骨折患者的资料,入院后评估患者心肺及认知能力、术前活动能力、骨折类型、个体化制定手术放案(髓内钉,髓外固定或外固定架)及麻醉方案(腰麻或筋膜阻滞),如无法手术则行保守治疗,记录患者入院至手术时间、术中出血量、手术时间、并发症发生率、30 d内死亡率、1年内死亡率、术后Harris评分及SF-36评分等来总结个体化治疗高龄患者的应用效果。

结果

78例患者接受手术治疗,平均受伤至手术时间为(35±8)h(12~78 h),平均手术时间为(63±14)min(15~98 min),平均术中失血量为(263±121)ml(47~795 ml)。随访1年,8例患者伤后30 d内死亡,30 d死亡率为9.2%,另15例患者伤后12个月内死亡,1年内死亡率为26.4%,15例患者死于肺部感染,5例心功能衰竭,2例泌尿系感染,1例肺栓塞;2例患者发生手术相关并发症从而导致内固定失效,无医源性骨折发生;术后1年平均Harris评分为(73±4)分(66~87分),SF-36评分较术前显著改善。

结论

高龄转子间骨折患者通过个体化术前合并症评估,制定个体化麻醉及手术方案,并尽可能伤后48 h内手术,有望降低死亡率并提高患者生存质量。

Objective

To conclude clinical experience of the perioperative management of intertrochanteric fracture with advanced patients.

Methods

Data of 87 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture (over 80 years old) admitted from July 2008 to January 2016 in Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University were analyzed. Cardiopulmonary and cognitive abilities, preoperative activities, fracture type were carefully recorded, individualized surgical release (intramedullary nail, extramedullary fixation or external fixator) and anesthesia program (spinal anesthesia or fascia block) were designed accordingly. If surgery was not applicable conservative treatment would be used. The duration from to operation, blood loss, intro-operative time, mortality rate, complication rate, 30 d motality, 1 year motality, Harris score and SF-36 score were recorded for analysis.

Results

Seventy-eight cases were treated operatively, the average time from injury to surgery is (35±8) h (12-78 h). The average intro-operative time is (63±14) min (15-98 min), blood lose is (263±121) ml (47-795 ml). Patients were followed up for 1 year, 8 patients died within 30 days after injury, the mortality rate was 9.2% after 30 days. The other 15 patients died within 12 months after injury, the mortality rate within 1 year was 26.4%. Fifteen patients died of lung disease and 5 cases of heart failure, 2 cases out of urinary tract infection and 1 case of pulmonary embolism. 2 patients had operation-related complications resulting in internal fixation failure and no iatrogenic fracture. The Harris score at 1 year after operation was 66-87 points with an average of (73±4) points, SF-36 score was significantly improved compared with the preoperative.

Conclusion

Individualized preoperative comorbidities evaluation, individualized anesthesia and surgical protocols and ensure surgery performing within 48 hours for elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures is possible to reduce mortality and improve patient quality of life.

表1 64例高龄转子间骨折患者危险度评分
表2 64例高龄转子间骨折患者术前与术后1年SF-36评分比较(分,±s
1
Desjardins AL, Roy A, Paiement G, et al. Unstable intertrochanteric fracture of the femur. A prospective randomised study comparing anatomical reduction and medial displacement osteotomy [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1993, 75(3): 445-447.
2
Nicholas JA. Preoperative optimization and risk assessment [J]. Clin Geriatr Med, 2014, 30(2): 207-218.
3
Marsland D, Colvin PL, Mears SC, et al. How to optimize patients for geriatric fracture surgery [J]. Osteoporos Int, 2010, 21(Suppl 4): 535-546.
4
Cenzer IS, Tang V, Boscardin WJ, et al. One-Year mortality after hip fracture: development and validation of a prognostic index [J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2016, 64(9): 1863-1868.
5
Liema IS, Kammerlander C, Suhm N, et al. Identifying a standard set of outcome parameters for the evaluation of orthogeriatric co-management for hip fractures [J]. Injury, 2013, 44(11): 1403-1412.
6
Liem IS, Kammerlander C, Suhm N, Kates SL, Blauth M. Literature review of outcome parameters used in studies of geriatric fracture centers [J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2014, 134(2): 181-187.
7
Kates SL, Mendelson DA, Friedman SM. The value of an organized fracture program for the elderly: early results [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2011, 25(4): 233-237.
8
Theodoros TH, Sheikh H, Stone MH, et al. Pain relief management following proximal femora fractures: Options, issues and controversies [J]. Injury, 2015, 46 Suppl: 52-58.
[1] 曾敬, 吴冬冬, 邵明, 范震波, 王治国, 刘培谊, 兰海峰. 高龄髋部骨折患者不同手术时机的围手术期疗效评估[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 445-449.
[2] 沈建成, 阮安民, 刘壮. 两种关节评分联用评价两种手术治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 329-336.
[3] 杜雪清, 冯周莲, 钟佩珍, 潘杏玲. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者应用护士主导的共管模式[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 421-426.
[4] 欧梁, 齐麒, 胡伟伟, 卢敏, 黄彦昌, 黄维琛, 匡建军. 股骨颈动力交叉钉系统与其它内固定治疗股骨颈骨折对比[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 92-105.
[5] 宋玟焱, 杜美君, 陈佳丽, 石冰, 黄汉尧. 唇腭裂手术围手术期疼痛管理的研究进展及基于生物材料治疗新方法的展望[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 397-405.
[6] 王淑贤, 张良灏, 王利君, 张慧, 郭源, 许传屾, 李志强, 蔡金贞, 解曼, 饶伟. 成人肝移植围手术期严重心血管事件危险因素分析及预测模型研究[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 222-229.
[7] 吴小山, 任桂灵, 朱杰东, 史天陆, 马葵芬. 肾移植受者围手术期霉酚酸暴露量及不良反应分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 17-21.
[8] 张斌, 孙代宇, 胡昕, 韩菲, 李久明, 李功雨, 吴伟力, 冯宝富, 彭国辉. 评分系统预测不同经验手术者输尿管软镜术后结石清除率准确性的比较研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 353-360.
[9] 成紫琳, 戴明, 李建华, 马靓. 加速康复外科理念在儿童腹股沟疝围手术期的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 331-335.
[10] 师帅, 马文星, 陈昕, 单良, 王泽正, 段降龙, 吴云桦. 腹壁切口疝围手术期并发症发生危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 83-88.
[11] 吕欣谕, 李雯, 王娟侠, 邹维, 王艳, 雷杰. 围手术期肺康复训练在胸腔镜肺叶切除术中疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 256-259.
[12] 朱垒, 汪斌, 张爱民, 陈晓燕, 张艳冰, 齐浩龙. 小剂量地塞米松在腹腔镜下经胆囊管胆道探查围手术期中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 339-343.
[13] 沈海锋, 吕方伊, 顾海华, 常志博, 陈盈, 王苹莉, 吴祖群, 邱福铭, 姚杰, 范军强. 局部进展期肺癌新辅助治疗后胸腔镜袖式肺叶切除术——浙江大学医学院附属第二医院2014—2023年56例回顾性分析[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 158-166.
[14] 王可涵, 许涛, 周全红. 围术期谵妄与应激的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 45-49.
[15] 张顺, 杨希孟, 陆军, 王海峰, 张东. 是否留置术区引流管对颈动脉内膜切除术围手术期安全性的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 210-214.
阅读次数
全文


摘要