Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (05): 304-312. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2022.05.009

• Meta Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical efficacy of arthroscopic internal drainage with or without cystectomy in the treatment of popliteal cyst: a Meta-analysis

Xueding Wang1, Wenjie Song1, Wenjie Niu1, Haoran Liang1, Zhiyuan Ren1, Yang Liu1, Yongsheng Ma1, Wangpin Duan2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Osteoarthritis, the Second Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
    2. the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Key Laboratory of Bone and Soft Tissue Injury Repair of Shanxi Province, Taiyuan 030001, China
  • Received:2022-03-23 Online:2022-10-05 Published:2022-11-02
  • Contact: Wangpin Duan

Abstract:

Objective

Meta analysis was used to compare the clinical efficacy of arthroscopic internal drainage with or without cystectomy in the treatment of popliteal cyst.

Methods

The databases searched by computer include PubMed, EMBASE, The CochraneLibrary, Wanfang database, and China knowledge Network from August 2016 to August 2021. The search content is a clinical control study of arthroscopic internal drainage with or without cystectomy in the treatment of popliteal cysts. The literature was screened according to the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, and then the quality was evaluated for the included literature by NewcastleOttawaScale (NOS) literature quality evaluation scale and Cochrane manual bias evaluation criteria. After extracting the data, the data were analyzed by ReviewManager5.4 software to compare the clinical efficacy of arthroscopic internal drainage with or without cystectomy in the treatment of popliteal cyst.

Results

Finally, A total of 9 studies with 494 patients were included, including 256 cases of arthroscopic internal drainage group and 248 cases of arthroscopic internal drainage combined with cystectomy group. Meta-analysis showed that there was no difference in postoperative Lysholm score [MD=-0.49, (95%CI: -2.09,1.11), P=0.55], postoperative Rauschning and Lindgren grade [OR=0.54, (95%CI: 0.28,1.04), P=0.06] and hospitalization time [MD=-0.29, (95%CI: -0.73,0.14), P=0.19] between arthroscopic internal drainage group and arthroscopic internal drainage combined with cystectomy group. The incidence of postoperative complications in the internal drainage group was lower than that in the cyst wall resection group [OR=0.26, (95%CI: 0.10,0.65), P=0.004], the operation time [MD=-11.72, (95%CI: -13.69,-9.76), P<0.01] and incision length [MD=-5.94, (95%CI: -11.05,-0.83), P=0.02] in the internal drainage group were shorter than those in the cyst wall resection group, the postoperative recurrence rate [OR=3.32, (95%CI: 1.82, 6.06), P<0.01] in the cyst wall resection group was lower than that in the internal drainage group,and the difference in results between the two groups was statistically significant.

Conclusion

The clinical results of arthroscopic internal drainage combined with or without cyst wall resection in the treatment of popliteal cysts are satisfactory, but compared with arthroscopic internal drainage alone, the recurrence rate after arthroscopic internal drainage combined with cystectomy is relatively low, but the incidence of postoperative complications is relatively high and the operation time is relatively long.

Key words: Popliteal Cyst, Arthroscopy, Cyst Wall, Treatment Outcome, Meta-Analysis

京ICP备07035254号-18
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 0311-88603818 E-mail: zhlngkykf@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd