1 |
Beytemür O, Barış A, Albay C, et al. Comparison of intramedullary nailing and minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis in the treatment of simple intra-articular fractures of the distal tibia(AO-OTA type 43 C1-C2)[J]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc, 2017, 51(1): 12-16.
|
2 |
Freeman AL, Craig R, Schmidt AH. Biomechanical comparison of tibial nail stability in a proximal third fracture:do screw quantity and locked,interlocking screws make a difference? [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2011, 25(6): 333-339.
|
3 |
Beaino ME, Morris RP, Lindsey RW, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of dual plate configurations for femoral shaft fracture fixation [J]. BioMed Res Int, 2019, 2019: 1-7.
|
4 |
Cheng T, Xia RG, Dong SK, et al. Interlocking intramedullary nailing versus locked dual-plating fixation for femoral shaft fractures in patients with multiple injuries:A retrospective comparative study [J]. J Invest Surg, 2019, 32(3): 245-254.
|
5 |
Juriaan V, Monteban P, Roobroeck M, et al. Functional outcome and general health status after treatment of AO type 43 distal tibial fractures [J]. Injury, 2016, 47(7): 1519-1524.
|
6 |
Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, et al. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot,midfoot,hallux,and lesser toes [J]. Foot Ankle Int, 1994, 15(7): 349-353.
|
7 |
Wennergren, D. Epidemiology and incidence of tibia fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register [J]. Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured, 2018, 49(11): 2068-2074.
|
8 |
Joveniaux P, Ohl X, Harisboure A, et al. Distal tibia fractures: management and complications of 101 cases [J]. Int Orthop, 2010, 34(4): 583-588.
|
9 |
Newman, S DS. Distal metadiaphyseal tibial fractures [J]. Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured, 2011, 42(10): 975-984.
|
10 |
Hansen M, Attal RE, Blum J, et al. Intramedullary nailing of the tibia with the expert tibia nail [J]. Oper Orthop Traumatol, 2009, 21(6): 620-635.
|
11 |
Barcak E, Collinge CA. Metaphyseal distal tibia fractures:A cohort, single-surgeon study comparing outcomes of patients treated with minimally invasive plating versus intramedullary nailing [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2016, 30(5): e169-e174.
|
12 |
Märdian S, Schaser KD, Duda GN, et al. Working length of locking plates determines interfragmentary movement in distal femur fractures under physiological loading [J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2015, 30(4): 391-396.
|
13 |
Heyland M, Duda GN, Haas, NP, et al. Semi-rigid screws provide an auxiliary option to plate working length to control interfragmentary movement in locking plate fixation at the distal femur [J]. Injury, 2015, 46:S24-S32.
|
14 |
Wennergren D, Bergdahl C, Selse A, et al. Treatment and re-operation rates in one thousand and three hundred tibial fractures from the Swedish Fracture Register [J]. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2021, 31(1): 143-154.
|
15 |
Phisitkul P, Mckinley TO, Nepola JV, et al. Complications of locking plate fixation in complex proximal tibia injuries [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2007, 21(2): 83-91.
|
16 |
Kim JW, Kim HU, Oh CW, et al. A prospective randomized study on operative treatment for simple distal tibial fractures-minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis versus minimal open reduction and internal fixation [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2018, 32(1): e19-e24.
|
17 |
Paluvadi SV, Lal H, Mittal D, et al. Management of fractures of the distal third tibia by minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis-A prospective series of 50 patients [J]. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 2014, 5(3): 129-136.
|
18 |
Bingol I, Yalcin N, Bicici V, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis does not increase complication rates in extra-articular distal tibial fractures [J]. Open Orthop J, 2015, 9:73-77.
|
19 |
Jiang R, Luo CF, Zeng BF. Biomechanical evaluation of different fixation methods for fracture dislocation involving the proximal tibia [J]. Clinical Biomechanics, 2008, 23(8): 1059-1064.
|
20 |
Wagner M. General principles for the clinical use of the LCP [J]. Injury, 2003, 34(supp/S2): B31-B42.
|