Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (05): 277-283. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2021.05.005

• Hip Fracture • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparative study of PFNA and DHS for the treatment of Seinsheimer V-type of femoral subtrochanteric fracture with sarcopenia

Chuanyong Hou1, Xinhui Liu1, Jian Yin1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211100, China
  • Received:2021-01-13 Online:2021-10-05 Published:2021-12-06
  • Contact: Jian Yin

Abstract:

Objective

Comparison of the efficacy of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) in the treatment of seinsheimer v-type of subtrochanteric fracture with sarcopenia.

Methods

From January 2016 to December 2018, 52 patients with seinsheimer V-type subtrochanteric fracture complicated with sarcopenia were retrospectively analyzed. Sarcopenia was diagnosed by grip strength and skeletal muscle index (SMI). They were divided into PFNA group (28 cases) and DHS group (24 cases). The age, gender, injury to operation time, SMI value, incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy times, perioperative blood transfusion, lower limb full weight-bearing time, visual analogue scale (VAS) and Harris score at 3 months and the last follow-up were compared between the two groups, as well as the complications.

Results

All patients were followed up. There was no significant difference in age, gender, injury to operation time and SMI between the two groups (t=0.054, P=0.957, χ2=0.018, P=0.894, t=0.044, P=0.965, t=-1.298, P=0.200). The incision length, blood loss and blood transfusion in PFNA group were less than those in DHS group, and the number of fluoroscopy in operation was more than that in DHS group (t=-13.016, P=0.000, t=-5.305, P=0.000, t=-2.505, P=0.016, t=9.293, P=0.000). There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups (t=0.432, P=0.668). In PFNA group, the time of complete weight-bearing was earlier, the VAS score was lower 3 months after operation, but the Harris score was higher, the difference was statistically significant (t=-3.874, P=0.000; z=-2.009, P=0.045; t=7.139, P=0.000), but there was no significant difference in VAS score and Harris score between the two groups at the last follow-up (z=-1.166, P=0.243; t=0.733, P=0.468). In PFNA group, 1 case had internal fixation loosening, and the incidence of complications was 3.57%. In DHS group, 2 cases had wound infection, and 5 cases had internal fixation loosening, and the incidence of complications was 29.17%. The difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.686, P=0.030).

Conclusions

PFNA and DHS are both effective methods in the treatment of seinsheimer V type subtrochanteric fracture with sarcopenia, but PFNA has shorter incision, less blood loss, faster recovery and lower incidence of complications, which can be preferred.

Key words: Hip fractures, Sarcopenia, PFNA, DHS

京ICP备07035254号-18
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 0311-88603818 E-mail: zhlngkykf@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd