Arthroscopic single row and double row suture bridge repair in the treatment of elderly rotator cuff injuries

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.06.007

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective

To explore the clinical effect of double-row and single-row suture bridge repair for rotator cuff injury in elderly patients.

Methods

118 patients with rotator cuff injury were randomly divided into control group (single row anchor fixation under arthroscopy) and observation group (double row suture bridge repair under arthroscopy). The ASES score, Constant-Murley score and CLA score before and after operation were compared between the two groups. The incidence of re-tear after surgery between two groups were compared.

Results

There was no significant difference in the Constant-Murley, UCLA and ASES scores of the four tear degrees before treatment (P>0.05), there was no significant difference in the three scores of mild tear between the two groups after treatment (P>0.05), but there were significant differences in the three scores of large, severe and moderate tear between the two groups (P<0.05). It is better than the control group. The rate of re-tearing in the control group (17 cases) (28.81%) was significantly higher than that in the observation group (6/59) (10.17%) (χ²=6.535, P=0.011).

Conclusion

Both double-row and single-row suture bridges are feasible for rotator cuff injury in the elderly, but double-row suture bridges are widely used and can be used to treat huge, severe and moderate tears.

Key words: Aged, Rotator cuff injury, Suture bridge technique, Shoulder, Arthroscopy

hui Zhang, Wanqiang Zhuang, Yonggang Luo, Hai Lei, Qinghua Wei, Xu Tang, Yi Tang. Arthroscopic single row and double row suture bridge repair in the treatment of elderly rotator cuff injuries[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2019, 05(06): 337-341.

/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://zhlngkykfdzzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.06.007

https://zhlngkykfdzzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/Y2019/V05/I06/337

Figures/Tables 3

References 15

1	姚晓滨.老年性肩袖损伤肩关节镜下修复术的临床研究[J].中国老年学杂志, 2015, 35(21): 6204-6205.
2	任江涛，徐丛.关节镜下缝线桥技术修复肩袖撕裂的缝合及固定方式研究进展[J].中华骨科杂志, 2016, 36(7): 443-448.
3	朱雪坤，徐斌，徐洪港,等.肩关节镜下单排缝合技术治疗不同程度肩袖损伤的效果评估[J].现代生物医学进展, 2016, 16(7): 1309-1313.
4	李进选，张磊，刘劲松,等.关节镜下线桥技术治疗中老年人肩袖损伤[J].中国骨伤, 2015, 28(10): 951-954.
5	黄成龙，潘界恩，蔡震海,等.关节镜下缝线桥技术治疗老年创伤性肩关节脱位合并肩袖损伤的疗效评价[J].中国内镜杂志, 2016, 22(6): 35-39.
6	傅仰攀，黄长明，尹宗生.全肩关节镜与关节镜辅助治疗肩袖损伤的比较[J].中国矫形外科杂志, 2016, 24(20): 1839-1843.
7	刘少华，李宏，孙亚英,等.关节镜下单排与缝线桥技术修复中型肩袖撕裂——临床与核磁共振评价[J].中国运动医学杂志, 2017, 36(2): 97-100, 105.
8	郑鸿，赵甲军，谭宏昌,等.关节镜下缝线桥与传统双排技术修复全层肩袖撕裂的比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志, 2017, 19(9): 806-809.
9	邓威，谌业帅，郑欣,等.关节镜下双排缝合桥固定技术修复大型肩袖撕裂的临床观察[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2017, 10(1): 48-51.
10	张华，杨俊兴，李杰.肩关节镜下单排缝合与双排缝合治疗肩袖损伤的比较研究[J].世界中医药, 2017 (a01): 453-453.
11	田谦.关节镜下缝线桥与双排锚钉修复肩袖撕裂的疗效观察[J].现代仪器与医疗, 2017, 23(2): 113-115.
12	胡培兴，李瑾.关节镜下缝线桥技术治疗老年肩袖损伤合并创伤性肩关节脱位的疗效分析[J].浙江创伤外科, 2017, 22(2): 327-329.
13	潘界恩，黄成龙，蔡震海,等.关节镜下改良压配式双排缝合技术治疗肩袖大型撕裂早期疗效分析[J].中国内镜杂志, 2017, 23(2): 49-52.
14	熊湘彦.关节镜缝合桥技术结合肱骨大结节钻孔治疗老年退变性肩袖损伤[J].临床合理用药杂志, 2018 (5): 166-167.
15	赵泽旭.关节镜下线桥缝合术治疗老年肩袖损伤的疗效研究[J].基层医学论坛, 2018 (5): 614-615.

组别	例数	例数		平均年龄（岁，±s）	撕裂部位		撕裂程度
组别	例数	男性	女性	平均年龄（岁，±s）	左肩	右肩	轻度撕裂	中度撕裂	重度撕裂	巨大撕裂
对照组	59	31	28	69±3	25	34	11	26	14	9
观察组	59	32	27	69±3	26	33	12	25	12	10
统计值		χ²=0.034		t=0.480	χ²=0.035		χ²=0.261
P值		0.854		0.632	0.853		0.967

组别	例数	例数		平均年龄（岁，±s）	撕裂部位		撕裂程度
组别	例数	男性	女性	平均年龄（岁，±s）	左肩	右肩	轻度撕裂	中度撕裂	重度撕裂	巨大撕裂
对照组	59	31	28	69±3	25	34	11	26	14	9
观察组	59	32	27	69±3	26	33	12	25	12	10
统计值		χ²=0.034		t=0.480	χ²=0.035		χ²=0.261
P值		0.854		0.632	0.853		0.967

组别		例数	UCLA		ASES		Contant-Murley
组别		例数	术前	术后2个月	术前	术后2个月	术前	术后2个月
轻度撕裂
	对照组	11	28.4±2.8	33.2±1.0*	75.6±3.8	94.7±2.7*	60.5±3.4	93.1±3.6*
	观察组	12	28.2±3.0	33.7±1.0*	76.2±4.1	95.0±2.6*	60.8±3.2	94.2±3.7*
	t值		0.221	1.334	0.296	0.287	0.209	0.732
	P值		0.827	0.197	0.771	0.777	0.836	0.472
中度撕裂
	对照组	26	21.8±2.2	29.8±0.5*	67.3±3.5	81.7±5.9*	57.9±2.9	80.5±5.3*
	观察组	25	21.6±2.3	32.1±0.8*	67.5±3.0	87.9±4.6*	58.1±3.0	88.8±5.4*
	t值		0.202	7.912	0.133	4.168	0.266	5.577
	P值		0.842	<0.01	0.895	<0.01	0.791	<0.01
重度撕裂
	对照组	14	16.4±2.2	26.6±3.1*	62.3±3.4	73.7±4.4*	51.3±3.1	65.3±3.2*
	观察组	12	16.6±2.2	30.3±4.0*	63.2±3.3	80.2±4.2*	51.6±3.2	75.0±3.5*
	t值		0.255	2.464	0.643	3.567	0.193	7.380
	P值		0.802	0.022	0.527	0.002	0.849	<0.01
巨大撕裂
	对照组	9	12.7±1.9	22.1±1.8*	58.8±2.6	70.7±3.3*	47.3±2.8	61.4±3.1*
	观察组	10	12.1±1.2	26.8±2.2*	58.8±2.8	76.0±4.5*	47.2±2.8	70.3±3.2*
	t值		0.921	5.470	0.009	3.202	0.146	6.108
	P值		0.367	<0.01	0.993	0.004	0.885	<0.01

组别		例数	UCLA		ASES		Contant-Murley
组别		例数	术前	术后2个月	术前	术后2个月	术前	术后2个月
轻度撕裂
	对照组	11	28.4±2.8	33.2±1.0*	75.6±3.8	94.7±2.7*	60.5±3.4	93.1±3.6*
	观察组	12	28.2±3.0	33.7±1.0*	76.2±4.1	95.0±2.6*	60.8±3.2	94.2±3.7*
	t值		0.221	1.334	0.296	0.287	0.209	0.732
	P值		0.827	0.197	0.771	0.777	0.836	0.472
中度撕裂
	对照组	26	21.8±2.2	29.8±0.5*	67.3±3.5	81.7±5.9*	57.9±2.9	80.5±5.3*
	观察组	25	21.6±2.3	32.1±0.8*	67.5±3.0	87.9±4.6*	58.1±3.0	88.8±5.4*
	t值		0.202	7.912	0.133	4.168	0.266	5.577
	P值		0.842	<0.01	0.895	<0.01	0.791	<0.01
重度撕裂
	对照组	14	16.4±2.2	26.6±3.1*	62.3±3.4	73.7±4.4*	51.3±3.1	65.3±3.2*
	观察组	12	16.6±2.2	30.3±4.0*	63.2±3.3	80.2±4.2*	51.6±3.2	75.0±3.5*
	t值		0.255	2.464	0.643	3.567	0.193	7.380
	P值		0.802	0.022	0.527	0.002	0.849	<0.01
巨大撕裂
	对照组	9	12.7±1.9	22.1±1.8*	58.8±2.6	70.7±3.3*	47.3±2.8	61.4±3.1*
	观察组	10	12.1±1.2	26.8±2.2*	58.8±2.8	76.0±4.5*	47.2±2.8	70.3±3.2*
	t值		0.921	5.470	0.009	3.202	0.146	6.108
	P值		0.367	<0.01	0.993	0.004	0.885	<0.01

[1]	Xiaomeng Ji, Fan Liu, Xiaobo Tang, Weiwei Bian, Peilong Dong, Zhenlu Liu. Two surgical methods in treatment of rotator cuff tear with adhesive shoulder capsitis [J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 561-567.
[2]	Xiaoling Chen, Yonglie Zhong, Qiaoli Liu, Na Li, Zhiqi Zhang, Weiming Liao, Guiwu Huang. Risk prediction of delirium and cardiovascular complications after hip and knee surgeries in elderly patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 575-584.
[3]	Cuiping Chen, Peijun Li, Jingrong Du, Qingmei Xie, Yining Xu, Shuyu Zhuo, Xiaofang Li. Application effect of internet plus home nursing service in elderly patients after total hip replacement [J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 676-681.
[4]	Jing Zeng, Dongdong Wu, Ming Shao, Zhenbo Fan, Zhiguo Wang, Peiyi Liu, Haifeng Lan. Perioperative effect of different surgical timing in elderly patients with hip fracture [J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(04): 445-449.
[5]	Zhijing Yuan, Jie Huang, Guoan He, Huiqiang Fang. Application of local block anesthesia with ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic tension-free inguinal hernia repair [J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 557-561.
[6]	Yue Zhao, Kun Tian, Zongming Zhang, Zhentian Guo, Limin Liu, Chong Zhang, Zhuo Liu. Predictive value of procalcitonin for incidence of acute severe cholecystitis in elderly patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 13(06): 801-806.
[7]	Anli Hu, Jian Huang, Jianping Wang, Xiaopei Wang, Hongliang Chen, Hongyu Chen. The effect of phased application of fumigation and washing on the generation of granulation tissue on the wound of patients after anal fistula surgery [J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2024, 13(05): 402-410.
[8]	Yafei Feng, Shitian Tang, Fukuan Tang, Liang Zhou. Curative effect and prognosis analysis of arthroscopic mLSRS technique and double-row suture bridge technique in the treatment of large rotator cufftear [J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2024, 12(04): 295-301.
[9]	Youjian Wang, Ran Tao, Yue Lu, Hongdong Ma. Clinical effect comparison of the medium- and small-sized degenerative rotator cuff tears [J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2024, 12(04): 302-308.
[10]	Na Xie, Dongxu Ji, Chen Liu, Feng Xu. The role of scapulohumeral distance in diagnosis and treatment decisions in patients with shoulder pain：a retrospective case-control study [J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2024, 12(04): 326-331.
[11]	Tianxin Chen, Shengping Yang, Yuqi Zhu, Yun Gao, Shuai Zhang. Network Meta-analysis of surgical approaches for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss [J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2024, 12(04): 344-352.
[12]	Yixuan Zhang, Bing Han, Chao Liu, Sichen Li, Xuefeng Sun. Young internal environment alleviated renal interstitial fibrosis induced by kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury in elderly mice [J]. Chinese Journal of Kidney Disease Investigation(Electronic Edition), 2024, 13(03): 129-133.
[13]	Qian Zhang, Wei Tang, Lili Liu. Effect of dexmedetomidine combined with oxycodone on postoperative cognitive function and analgesic effect in elderly patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy [J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2024, 10(04): 209-214.
[14]	Ning Lu, Liyou Wei, Liang Li, Yulong Zhang. Analysis of factors associated with early recovery of wrist function after small splint treatment of distal radius fractures in the elderly [J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2024, 10(04): 222-228.
[15]	Jian Cui, Qing Xia, Yun Lin, Guangling Li, Xinna Li, Wei Wang. Effects of platelet to lymphocyte ratio, immunoglobulin, myocardial enzyme spectrum and electrocardiogram parameters on the condition and prognosis of middle-aged and elderly patients with cirrhosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2024, 14(05): 400-406.

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export