切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (04) : 231 -237. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2021.04.006

护理园地

三种压力性损伤评估量表在老年髋部骨折围手术期患者中的应用研究
闫林平1, 崔怡2,(), 周红艳1, 周颖1, 周文琦1, 张亚辉3, 东潇妹4   
  1. 1. 050011 石家庄市第三医院护理部
    2. 050051 石家庄,河北医科大学第三医院护理部
    3. 050051 石家庄,河北医科大学第三医院日间手术部
    4. 050051 石家庄,河北医科大学第三医院老年骨科
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-16 出版日期:2021-08-05
  • 通信作者: 崔怡
  • 基金资助:
    石家庄市科技局研究课题(201461223)

Application of three stress injury assessment scales in elderly patients with hip fracture during perioperative period

Linping Yan1, Yi Cui2,(), Hongyan Zhou1, Ying Zhou1, Wen Qi Zhou1, Yahui Zhang3, Xiaomei Dong4   

  1. 1. Department of Nursing, Shijiazhuang Third Hospital, Shijiazhuang 050011, China
    2. Department of Nursing, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050051, China
    3. Department of Day operationthe, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050051, China
    4. Department of Geriatric Orthopedics, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050051, China
  • Received:2021-04-16 Published:2021-08-05
  • Corresponding author: Yi Cui
引用本文:

闫林平, 崔怡, 周红艳, 周颖, 周文琦, 张亚辉, 东潇妹. 三种压力性损伤评估量表在老年髋部骨折围手术期患者中的应用研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2021, 07(04): 231-237.

Linping Yan, Yi Cui, Hongyan Zhou, Ying Zhou, Wen Qi Zhou, Yahui Zhang, Xiaomei Dong. Application of three stress injury assessment scales in elderly patients with hip fracture during perioperative period[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2021, 07(04): 231-237.

目的

探讨Braden、Waterlow、汉化版Munro三种压力性损伤风险评估量表在老年髋部骨折患者围手术期中的应用效果。

方法

本研究采用方便抽样法前瞻性收集2019年8月至12月在某两所三级甲等医院老年髋部骨折围手术期患者作为研究对象,运用三种压力性损伤风险评估量表对180例患者进行术前、术中、术后风险评估与护理。采用SPSS17.0、中文版MedCalc19.5.2,统计软件进行数据分析。

结果

老年髋部骨折患者围手术期压力性损伤发生率为15%;Braden、Waterlow、汉化版Munro三种量表术前、术中、术后约登指数分别为0.1285、0.3878、0.1264;0.6471、0.5490、0.5599;0.3878、0.4989、0.4902,ROC曲线下面积分别为0.565、0.716、0.571;0.856、0.809、0.835;0.757、0.793、0.820。

结论

Waterlow风险评估量表综合预测能力优于Braden、汉化版Munro风险评估量表,更适用于老年髋部骨折患者围手术期压力性损伤风险筛查,可优先选择使用。

Objective

To explore the application effect of Braden, Waterlow and Munro pressure injury risk assessment scales in perioperative period of senile patients with brittle fracture of hip.

Methods

In this study, convenient sampling method was used to select the elderly patients with hip fracture during the perioperative period from August to December in 2019 and from October to November in 2019 in two Grade-A hospitals, and the risk assessment and nursing of 180 patients before, during and after operation were carried out using three risk assessment scales for pressure injury. SPSS17.0 and Chinese MedCalc19.5.2 statistical software were used for data analysis.

Results

The incidence of perioperative stress injury in senile patients with brittle fracture of hip was 15%. The indexes of Braden, Waterlow and Munro were 0.1285, 0.3878 and 0.1264 respectively before, during and after operation. 0.6471, 0.5490, 0.5599. The area under the ROC curve was 0.565, 0.716 and 0.571, respectively, 0.856, 0.809, 0.835; 0.757, 0.793, 0.820.

Conclusion

The comprehensive predictive ability of Waterlow risk assessment scale is superior to Braden and Munro risk assessment Scale, which is more suitable for the risk screening of pressure injury in the perioperative period of elderly patients with hip fracture, and can be preferred.

表1 三种压力性损伤RAS临界值及评价指标比较
表2 三种压力性损伤风险评估量表曲线下面积
图3 三种RAS术后评分ROC曲线
30
Delmore B, Kent M. An educational implementation process staff survey: lessons learned [J]. Adv Skin Wound Care, 2018, 31(5): 234-238.
31
Borghardt AT, Prado TN, Araújo TM, et al. Evaluation of the pressure ulcers risk scales with critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study [J]. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem, 2015, 23(1): 28-35.
32
Martinez-Garduno CM. The surgical patients'pressure injury incidence(SPPII)study:a cohort study of surgical patients and processes of care [J]. Wound Practice Research, 2019, 27(2): 120-128.
1
陈孝平,汪建平,赵继宗,等.外科学[M].第9版.北京:人民卫生出版社, 2018.
2
张英泽.成人髋部骨折指南解读[J].中华外科杂志, 2015, 53(1): 57-62.
3
Cooper C, Cole ZA, Holroyd CR, et al. Secular trends in the incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures [J]. Osteoporos Int, 2011, 22(5): 1277-1288.
4
刘澍雨,朱伟民,刘雨微,等.快速康复外科理念在老年髋部骨折中的术前应用[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2021, 7(1): 60-64.
5
Forni C, D'alessandro F, Genco R, et al. Prospective prognostic cohort study of pressure injuries in older adult patients with hip fractures [J]. Adv Skin Wound Care, 2018, 31(5): 218-224.
6
Rich SE, Shardell M, Hawkes WG, et al. Pressure-redistributing support surface use and pressure ulcer incidence in elderly hip fracture patients [J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2011, 59(6): 1052-1059.

URL    
7
Chen J, Wang X, Qian H, et al. Correlation between common postoperative complications of prolonged bed rest and quality of Life in hospitalized elderly hip fracture patients [J]. Ann Palliat Med, 2020, 9(3): 1125-1133.
8
Chen HL, Zhu B, Wei R, et al. A retrospective analysis to evaluate seasonal pressure injury incidence differences among hip fracture patients in a tertiary hospital in East China [J]. Ostomy Wound Manage, 2018, 64(2): 40-44.
9
De Almeida MA, Da Conceição DM, De Sá TJ, et al. Predictors of pressure ulcer risk in adult intensive care patients: A retrospective case-control study [J]. Intensive Crit Care Nurs, 2018, 45: 6-10.
10
Engels D, Austin M, Mcnichol L, et al. Pressure ulcers: factors contributing to their development in the OR [J]. AORN J, 2016, 103(3): 271-281.
11
Anrys C, Van Tiggelen H, Verhaeghe S, et al. Independent risk factors for pressure ulcer development in a high-risk nursing home population receiving evidence-based pressure ulcer prevention:Results from a study in 26 nursing homes in Belgium [J]. Int Wound J, 2019, 16(2): 325-333.
12
Cs A, Jcd A, Nca B. Evaluating the development and validation of empirically-derived prognostic models for pressure ulcer risk assessment: A systematic review - ScienceDirect [J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2019, 89:88-103.
13
Waterlow J. The Waterlow card for the prevention and management of pressure sores: Towards a pocket policy [J]. Care Sci Pract, 1998, 6: 8-12.
14
Engl T, Gül A, Yavuz HZ. Assessment of the risk of pressure ulcer during the perioperative period: Adaptation of the Munro scale to Turkish [J]. J Tissue Viability, 2021, 6: 009.
15
Magny E, Vallet H, Cohen-Bittan J, et al. Pressure ulcers are associated with 6-month mortality in elderly patients with hip fracture managed in orthogeriatric care pathway [J]. Arch Osteoporos, 2017, 12(1): 77.
16
Park KH, Park J. The efficacy of a viscoelastic foam overlay on prevention of pressure injury in acutely ill patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial [J]. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 2017, 44(5): 440-444.
17
Mathias JM. Fine-tuning the Munro Scale for pressure ulcers [J]. OR Manager, 2015, 31(6): 4-5.
18
李晓松.卫生统计学[M].第8版.北京:人民卫生出版社, 2018: 287-289.
19
李立明,黄悦勤.临床流行病学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社, 2016: 92.
20
Liu L, Wang C, Yin L, et al. Study on influence factors of pressure injury risk in the elderly inpatients with kidney disease based on LASSO regression [J]. Open J Prev Med, 2020, 10(6): 95-107.
21
姚孟轩,霍佳,魏聪聪,等.髋关节置换围手术期的多模式疼痛管理[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2020, 6(6): 370-375.
22
鲁攀攀[1,2,3,4,5],马彬彬[1,2,3,4,5],李荥娟[2,6,等.老年髋部骨折患者术前营养不良的危险因素分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2018, 4(3): P.145-P.150.
23
Yap TL, Kennerly S, Horn SD, et al. Influence of nutrition and nonnutrition factors on pressure injury outcomes among At-Risk Asian nursing home residents [J]. Adv Skin Wound Care, 2019, 32(10): 463-469.
24
Haleem S, Heinert G, Parker MJ. Pressure sores in 4654 hip fracture patients. The role of patient fracture types, surgical and anaesthetia factors [J]. Orthop Proc, 2018, 91-B(SII).
25
Wright KM, Van Netten Y, Dorrington CA, et al. Pressure injury can occur in patients undergoing prolonged head and neck surgery [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2014, 72(10): 2060-2065.
26
Luo M, Long XH, Wu JL, et al. Incidence and risk factors of pressure injuries in surgical spinal patients: a retrospective study [J]. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 2019, 46(5): 397-400.
27
Garcez Pedro Miguel Sardo. Pressure ulcer incidence and Braden subscales:Retrospective cohort analysis in general wards of a Portuguese hospital [J]. J Tissue Viability, 2018, 27(2): 95-100.
28
He W, Liu P, Chen HL. The braden scale cannot be used alone for assessing pressure ulcer risk in surgical patients: a meta-analysis [J]. Ostomy Wound Manage, 2012, 58(2): 34-40.

URL    
29
Phd MW, Phd OL. Predictive and concurrent validity of the B raden scale in long-term care:A meta-analysis [J]. Wound Repair Regen, 2015, 23(1): 44-56.
[1] 中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组, 广东省医学会骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病分会, 广东省佛山市顺德区第三人民医院. 中国髋部脆性骨折术后抗骨质疏松药物临床干预指南(2023年版)[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 751-764.
[2] 董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[3] 付佳, 肖海敏, 武曦, 冯涛, 师帅. 年龄校正查尔森合并症指数对腹腔镜结直肠癌围手术期并发症的预测价值[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 336-341.
[4] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[5] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[6] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[7] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[8] 朱青青, 卫贞祺. 腹股沟疝患者围手术期自我能效管理探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-777.
[9] 刘琪, 王殿琛, 符洋. 复杂腹壁疝诊疗问题与要点[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 504-508.
[10] 朱迪, 欧阳钒, 杨丹, 华敏, 吴倩. 双轨护理在老年腹股沟疝无张力修补术围手术期的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 630-634.
[11] 张汪, 徐淑英, 张爱华, 夏芬荣, 汪露. 手术室体温护理结合细节护理干预在老年腹股沟疝围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 635-638.
[12] 董玉花, 魏红花, 孔荷香, 周莉, 孙小花. 主动性个性化心理干预在成人腹股沟疝围手术期患者护理中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 652-656.
[13] 蓝冰, 王怀明, 王辉, 马波. 局部晚期结肠癌膀胱浸润的研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 505-511.
[14] 中华医学会骨科分会关节学组. 中国髋、膝关节置换日间手术围手术期管理专家共识[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 321-332.
[15] 苏鹏, 吕会来, 温士旺, 黄超, 张缜, 田子强. 全腔镜下食管癌根治术围手术期呼吸系统并发症发生的危险因素分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 294-298.
阅读次数
全文


摘要